|
Post by steppenwolf on Aug 9, 2024 12:48:14 GMT
The facts are clear - far clearer than the facts in the "show trials" that are currently going on. The show trials involve working class people who "want their country back". They have no access to expensíve lawyers so they just plead guilty and get locked up. The reason why the muslims don't do the same is that their "community" will provide them with a crooked muslim lawyer (charged to the taxpayer) and the CPS don't want to waste their time in a long court case. That's what's going on here.
|
|
|
Post by Hutchyns on Aug 9, 2024 17:13:19 GMT
The facts are clear - far clearer than the facts in the "show trials" that are currently going on. The show trials involve working class people who "want their country back". They have no access to expensíve lawyers so they just plead guilty and get locked up. You don't have to convince me that Sharia Courts would be a big improvement on what we now witness, but the change won't arrive overnight. The current legal process is what we're stuck with for the moment, and it's enjoying getting it's claws into Far Right thuggery.
|
|
|
Post by steppenwolf on Aug 10, 2024 12:54:11 GMT
Your ignorance of sharia is not unexpected. I suggest that you spend a bit of time living in a muslim country before spouting crap.
|
|
|
Post by Hutchyns on Aug 10, 2024 15:52:17 GMT
I suggest that you spend a bit of time living in a muslim country before spouting crap. There's certainly no denying it worked for you. If ever living proof were needed
|
|
|
Post by Red Rackham on Aug 10, 2024 15:57:15 GMT
Red Rackham Far more about what happened is probably being revealed with clarity once the bodycam recordings have been examined etc. Hence the grounds for a further criminal investigation. What we've so far seen as regards what happened is proving to only be a selective part of the whole, as the need for this new criminal investigation indicates. There is absolutely no confusion over what happened, sadly for the minority appeasing authorities the CCTV footage is crystal clear. Two aggressive Pakistani muslims attacked two police officers and carried out a violent and sustained attack. Everyone on the planet knows damned well if the assailants were white English or non muslim, they would have been arrested charged fast tracked to court and banged up for five years. There's one reason the assailants are not in prison. They're muslims.
|
|
|
Post by Hutchyns on Aug 10, 2024 16:06:04 GMT
I'm sure you can be relied on to know the full facts RR , but I'll be even more content once the official. Investigation corroborates your judgement.
|
|
|
Post by Red Rackham on Aug 10, 2024 16:30:42 GMT
|
|
|
Post by ratcliff on Aug 10, 2024 17:46:44 GMT
So the legal blokes claims the Bodycam may have been switched off is cobblers If you've established that the Officer referred to in RR's post and the Officer referred to by the 'legal bloke' are one and the same, then quite possibly. Then again maybe that Officer's 'activities' were recorded on a fellow Officer's bodycam that was fully functioning. Obviously the evidence warranting a further criminal investigation has come from somewhere. Airports have CCTV everywhere - film , from a variety of angles will exist irrespective of bodycam film
|
|
|
Post by Pacifico on Sept 1, 2024 20:57:10 GMT
The two violent thugs who were filmed on CCTV brutally attacking armed police officers at Manchester Airport have still not been charged.
|
|
|
Post by steppenwolf on Sept 2, 2024 7:02:13 GMT
It's absolutely incredible. The facts are obvious. The police tried to arrest these two muslim thugs after an altercation in an airport coffee shop and they went berserk and attacked the police. They then called in the armed police.so there are two incidents which need to be handled separately. The first incident is clear and it was a violent assault on the police causing actual bodily harm. This should attract a custodial sentence (up to 10 years IIRC).
The second incident is a further attack on the police which should result in an additional sentence. There's also the matter of the police using "excessive force" which is more contentious. I can understand some delay in prosecuting this incident, but it's about 4 weeks now.
|
|
|
Post by wapentake on Oct 7, 2024 14:52:23 GMT
The reform party have said this Greater Manchester Police replied shortly after So it’s down to the cps,or reform if nowt happens
|
|
|
Post by Red Rackham on Oct 7, 2024 15:37:57 GMT
Reform UK plots prosecution for fight at Manchester AirportReform UK has said it will launch a private prosecution against the men suspected of being involved in a disturbance at Manchester Airport in July if they are not charged by the Crown Prosecution Service (CPS). Footage of a fracas at the airport went viral and appeared to show an officer kicking and stamping on the head of Fahir Amaaz, 19, as he and his brother Muhammed Amaad, 25, were restrained by officers. Further footage, obtained by the Manchester Evening News, emerged days later which showed the immediate lead-up to the incident on July 23, including when two female police officers were hit to the ground before Mr Amaaz was incapacitated with a Taser. An investigation by the Independent Office for Police Conduct (IOPC) is under way into the incident and nobody has been charged. A letter to Home Secretary Yvette Cooper signed by the party’s five MPs said: “We have genuine reason to be concerned that in fact, the CPS is awaiting for the IOPC to find some fault with the police officers, which will then give them a reason not to progress charges against the assailants. This is totally unacceptable.” www.theboltonnews.co.uk/news/24635075.reform-uk-plots-prosecution-fight-manchester-airport/Well done Nigel Farage and Reform UK. The police and politically correct establishment have obviously decided the Pakistani brothers who in broad daylight, in front many of witnesses and on CCTV violently beat up two police officers, have no case to answer. Thank god Farage has a moral compas.
|
|
|
Post by wapentake on Oct 8, 2024 15:50:55 GMT
The cps in reply have issued this statement This from the home office Make of all that what you will.
|
|
|
Post by jonksy on Oct 8, 2024 16:43:10 GMT
The cps in reply have issued this statement This from the home office Make of all that what you will.
|
|
|
Post by Handyman on Oct 12, 2024 15:08:42 GMT
What went on on the plane between the Mother and the Kuwaiti guy has no bearing on the attack carried out by the 2 kids - they were not on the flight. The Lawyer is trying to muddy the waters. Mitigation and probably successful. Mitigation is put forward to a Court by the defendants Defence Lawyers to try to reduce the severity of their clients sentence punishment if found guilty or pleads guilty basically a sob story.
|
|