|
|
Post by ProVeritas on Aug 6, 2024 20:24:44 GMT
Well, it is effectively impossible to keep things peaceful when the real reason for it was to stir up racial hatred and have jolly old riot.. All The Best They might say that they rioted to highlight racial hatred against them . They would be lying if they did; because they were the ones expressing racial hatred, not their victims. All The Best |
|
|
|
Post by Bentley on Aug 6, 2024 20:39:53 GMT
Well it is . A stop and search rate success of more than one in 4 is a very high rate of success . Stop pretending otherwise . Stop and search search is an effectively targeted yet random method . If you threw the number required to win every fourth time you threw two dice it would be a high success . There is no way, using common usage of the English Language, that 4.9 million people is not a lot of people . A barely 1 in 4 success rate is NOT a "very high" success rate in any common use of the English Language. Well, 4.6 Million is not a lot in comparison to 67 Million - it just isn't, end of. How can something be both "effectively targeted" and "random"? It just can't. It would be like saying something is "effectively wet" and also "dry". All The Best It is in the context of finding success in more than one in 4 potential criminals . A one in four success rate at winning the jackpot in the lottery would be a ‘ very high’ success rate in any common use of any language in that context. It can be effectively targeted and random . You can target a particular group of people and randomly check those who are within those parameters . A google is an incredibly high number but not a high number compared with a google plex . A google is still a high number . 4.6million is a very high number . Only people that aren’t clever would think otherwise . |
|
|
|
Post by Bentley on Aug 6, 2024 20:41:36 GMT
They might say that they rioted to highlight racial hatred against them . They would be lying if they did; because they were the ones expressing racial hatred, not their victims. All The Best Maybe they are expressing their hatred of those who express racial hatred towards them . |
|
|
|
Post by Pacifico on Aug 6, 2024 21:45:34 GMT
Well it is . A stop and search rate success of more than one in 4 is a very high rate of success . Stop pretending otherwise . Stop and search search is an effectively targeted yet random method . If you threw the number required to win every fourth time you threw two dice it would be a high success . There is no way, using common usage of the English Language, that 4.9 million people is not a lot of people . A barely 1 in 4 success rate is NOT a "very high" success rate in any common use of the English Language. Well it's higher than nothing. And in fact 25% is a pretty good rate for discovering criminal evidence. |
|
|
|
Post by ProVeritas on Aug 7, 2024 0:49:49 GMT
They would be lying if they did; because they were the ones expressing racial hatred, not their victims. All The Best Maybe they are expressing their hatred of those who express racial hatred towards them . I am willing to bet my left bollock that no one at all who rioted at that Asylum Hotel had, in any way at all, been subject to racial abuse by anyone in the Asylum Hotel they tried to burn to the ground. I am also willing to bet you know I am right. All The Best |
|
|
|
Post by ProVeritas on Aug 7, 2024 0:52:34 GMT
A barely 1 in 4 success rate is NOT a "very high" success rate in any common use of the English Language. Well it's higher than nothing. And in fact 25% is a pretty good rate for discovering criminal evidence. Were you in charge of a business would you continue to use a system that had only a 25% success rate? I mean I know an awful lot of executive level officers in far too many UK companies are there not because they are competent to be there, but because of the old school tie network; but even most of them are not dumb enough to run with a system that FAILS 75% of the time. All The Best |
|
|
|
Post by wapentake on Aug 7, 2024 5:11:24 GMT
Oh blimey PV have you been on the sauce?
I bet you don’t know who St George was? Schoolboy stuff,is the pope a catholic?
It’s like a comedy sketch “You are all racists und your name vill go on ze list I’m reporting you to Der Fuhrer at Proboards”
I bet both your bollocks they’re your specialist subject.
It’s a political forum for gods sake and nobody that matters gives a stuff what people say here.
|
|
|
|
Post by johnofgwent on Aug 7, 2024 6:08:58 GMT
Now do the honest thing and give the figures by party supporter excluding the don't knows Farage said he was coming for Labour and with the police doing fuck all when blacks and browns rampage means he's fucking toast. |
|
|
|
Post by thomas on Aug 7, 2024 6:31:01 GMT
Open prisons tend to be non violent criminals, fraud, theft, embezzlement etc. The defining factor is the unknown countries of origin and the cultures thereof. We know many are from Muslim lands with the outlook on Non-Muslims especially women. We have evidence from France and Germany where some pretty horrendous crimes have been committed by asylum seekers on priests and on local residents. The Normandy church throat slitting of Priest Hamel in 2016 is the type of thing that tells the tale. The list is long and partly suppressed as the authorities do not want that information. These factors make the Open Prison much less of a risk. Not really. They are also used for violent criminals who are coming to the end of their custodial sentence. So the defining factor is RACE; you are admitting to being a Racist. Lets hope the Mods here do their legal duty and report you. All The Best im not sure im buying into your comparison between open prisons and migrant hostels. in Scotland , the open prison we have is two miles from the nearest small village in a rural area , with category d low supervision prisoners. while you are correct they may be in prison for a variety of crimes , they are not regarded as a danger to the public , and while the few locals may not like having the prison near them , we all agree they are a necessary part of the criminal justice system which we all buy into as part of policing society. contrast that with migrant hostels( hotels etc) , which appear to be in the main situated in large population areas ( according to the British government , most are in London , south east England and the midlands) foreign nationals who have no right or need to be here except for their own ends , and do not appear to be wanted by the majority , and have little or no value on average to society , except at best to provide low value taxation for high value costs of housing , schooling , health etc etc. The defining factor is not race but nationality. I think resorting to demanding the mods report another forum member to the authorities is really poor debating. If you cant hold your own on a debating forum without resorting to squealing about calling the polis it's a bad day. |
|
|
|
Post by thomas on Aug 7, 2024 6:32:15 GMT
and the majority think starmer is doing very badly dealing with these riots...  |
|
|
|
Post by thomas on Aug 7, 2024 6:34:09 GMT
4.6 million Brits SUPPORT the riots . 7.9 milllion Brits think the riots ARE justified . Thats a lot of support . In the same delusion way you think a 29% success rate is high? why laugh , when you think 33.7% is a majority mandate. ? I see labours Home Secretary comes out poorly at minus twenty with dealing with these riots. I must admit , whenever I see Cooper , she looks like a rabbit caught in headlights.  |
|
|
|
Post by Pacifico on Aug 7, 2024 6:40:38 GMT
Well it's higher than nothing. And in fact 25% is a pretty good rate for discovering criminal evidence. Were you in charge of a business would you continue to use a system that had only a 25% success rate? Depends - is there a system that works better?. Sometimes you have to use what is to hand - even if it is not perfect. |
|
|
|
Post by ProVeritas on Aug 7, 2024 8:55:54 GMT
Oh blimey PV have you been on the sauce? I bet you don’t know who St George was? Go on then. PROVE that anything I said was FACTUALLY wrong. You can't, you know you can't, I know you can't. So you'll attempt ridicule to deflect from your inadequacies. All The Best |
|
|
|
Post by ProVeritas on Aug 7, 2024 9:01:27 GMT
In the same delusion way you think a 29% success rate is high? why laugh , when you think 33.7% is a majority mandate. ? Ah another LIE about me. Is that all you can do LIE? I acknowledged that 33.7% was not a majority. I also acknowledged the FACT that in our Electoral System Total Voter Support is irrelevant - even though both you and I think it should be. I also acknowledged that in our Electoral System the ONLY thing that matters is Seats Won - and both you and I agree that should not be the case. I also pointed out the FACT, that you have yet to acknowledge, that no UK Government has come to power with a Votes Cast Majority since 1931. So, both in Law and in Common Practice for our Electoral System Labour's win is 100% completely valid, no matter that both you and I think it should not be. The difference between an Adult and a Child? They both have views of how they want the world to be, how they think it should be; the Adult also accepts the reality of how the world actually is. Stop being a LYING CHILD and grow up. All The Best |
|
|
|
Post by wapentake on Aug 7, 2024 9:05:21 GMT
Oh blimey PV have you been on the sauce? I bet you don’t know who St George was? Go on then. PROVE that anything I said was FACTUALLY wrong. You can't, you know you can't, I know you can't. So you'll attempt ridicule to deflect from your inadequacies. All The Best I’m inadequate? Grow up people on here are all expressing different theories as to why what is happening is happening that is why it’s a political forum and you are threatening to report them to the authorities. You have to ridicule it because it is literally ridiculous, |
|
