|
Post by happyhornet3 on Aug 6, 2024 14:25:43 GMT
|
|
|
Post by Bentley on Aug 6, 2024 14:47:46 GMT
4.6 million Brits SUPPORT the riots . 7.9 milllion Brits think the riots ARE justified . Thats a lot of support .
|
|
|
Post by ProVeritas on Aug 6, 2024 15:28:18 GMT
4.6 million Brits SUPPORT the riots . 7.9 milllion Brits think the riots ARE justified . Thats a lot of support . In the same delusion way you think a 29% success rate is high? 7% in inconsequential. 8% means nothing. 12% is the only own that merits any real consideration. Here's the full link: yougov.co.uk/politics/articles/50257-the-public-reaction-to-the-2024-riots23% of those polled think the rioters are actually Terrorists. 58%% think they are racist. By you logic - 7% equating to "a lot" - then 58% is an astronomical level of support for a position; the position that these thugs are Racist. All The Best
|
|
|
Post by Fairsociety on Aug 6, 2024 15:30:27 GMT
Best watch what we say or we'll be reported to ProBoards .... LOL
|
|
|
Post by Bentley on Aug 6, 2024 15:43:07 GMT
4.6 million Brits SUPPORT the riots . 7.9 milllion Brits think the riots ARE justified . Thats a lot of support . In the same delusion way you think a 29% success rate is high? 7% in inconsequential. 8% means nothing. 12% is the only own that merits any real consideration. Here's the full link: yougov.co.uk/politics/articles/50257-the-public-reaction-to-the-2024-riots23% of those polled think the rioters are actually Terrorists. 58%% think they are racist. By you logic - 7% equating to "a lot" - then 58% is an astronomical level of support for a position; the position that these thugs are Racist. All The Best ^ The same delusional way you think a success rate of 29% of stop and search isn’t high success rate and are in denial of an English phrase because it triggers you and your leftie mate. 4.9 million people is a huge number to support the rioters and 7.9 million people supporting the idea that the riots are JUSTIFIED is huge . Don’t try counting them , you will run out of fingers .
|
|
|
Post by Bentley on Aug 6, 2024 15:44:03 GMT
Best watch what we say or we'll be reported to ProBoards .... LOL They have narks on street corners in lrftie land . He’s setting himself up for the job .
|
|
|
Post by Fairsociety on Aug 6, 2024 15:46:14 GMT
Best watch what we say or we'll be reported to ProBoards .... LOL They have narks on street corners in lrftie land . He’s setting himself up for the job . If ProBoards scale through this forum there's more chance Pro veri posts will be reported.
|
|
|
Post by sandypine on Aug 6, 2024 19:01:03 GMT
Once again we are back to 'what is British Culture please define it'. No other culture is expected to face that challenge. Native American culture is instantly recognised and respected but no one can define what it is, Indian sub-continent culture is instantly recognised and respected yet no one can define what it is, Caribbean cultures are instantly recognised as what they are and instantly respected. It is what it is instantly recognised and maligned by far too many as a matter of policy it seems. If our culture is built upon 'being fair' why does that not apply to British people themselves and expect them to be long suffering and accepting of cultures that are antithetical to our own and suffer immense risks to their families and friends as we can see regularly demonstrated over the years from far too many of those from other cultures. We can start with Southport and progress backwards through Kent, Nottingham, Manchester Arena, Reading, London Bridge and many more I have missed. Bringing in people of whom far too many actually hate who you are is not a good policy to undertake and Starmer has clearly indicated he will carry on regardless. I partially defined what I think British Culture is. But surely, if you can't define it it means you don't actually know what it is. Like I said - standing up to thugs and bullies is to me part of British Culture, I've stood up to bullies my whole life, and taken more than one beating for it. You seem to think that rolling over for them is British Culture - I'd suggest Churchill and those who fought in WWII would laugh at you and think you are pathetic. I am not at all sure what you mean by this: How, EXACTLY, are British people being treated unfairly? Also what are these immense risks you talk of? In 2023 there were 29 Homicides in the UK. There were 4,907 drug deaths. 300 Drink Driving deaths. 74,600 deaths from smoking related cancer. Surely if this were really about mitigating risk to British Citizens you'd be campaigning to completely stamp out the illegal drug market, or outlaw alcohol, and definitely ban smoking? Oh, and you obviously do not think "respect for the rule of law" is part of British Culture - why not? All The Best Well define for me what Indian culture is and I shall use the same parameters to define British culture? Talk about tangential. I repeat we all live with a degree of risk in normal society and campaigns are under way for many things that present a risk to British people and their children. Many people have identified asylum centres in their neighbourhood as a much increased and unacceptable risk to themselves and theirs. Where have I said the rule of law should not be respected? We are back to the rule of law not being respected by poll tax rioters and they lauded their own success at getting the Tories to change their minds over new laws by violence and civil unrest.
|
|
|
Post by ProVeritas on Aug 6, 2024 19:41:26 GMT
In the same delusion way you think a 29% success rate is high? 7% in inconsequential. 8% means nothing. 12% is the only own that merits any real consideration. Here's the full link: yougov.co.uk/politics/articles/50257-the-public-reaction-to-the-2024-riots23% of those polled think the rioters are actually Terrorists. 58%% think they are racist. By you logic - 7% equating to "a lot" - then 58% is an astronomical level of support for a position; the position that these thugs are Racist. All The Best ^ The same delusional way you think a success rate of 29% of stop and search isn’t high success rate and are in denial of an English phrase because it triggers you and your leftie mate. 4.9 million people is a huge number to support the rioters and 7.9 million people supporting the idea that the riots are JUSTIFIED is huge . Don’t try counting them , you will run out of fingers . Well it isn't. It fails more than two times more often that it succeeds? There is no way, using common usage of the English Language, that is a "high success rate". 4.9 Million sounds a lot of people, to those people incapable of grasping the meaning of very high numbers. But in relation to the 66.9 Million people who live in this country it is negligible, if it got too much smaller it would be a "rounding error". All The Best
|
|
|
Post by sandypine on Aug 6, 2024 19:49:21 GMT
4.6 million Brits SUPPORT the riots . 7.9 milllion Brits think the riots ARE justified . Thats a lot of support . In the same delusion way you think a 29% success rate is high? 7% in inconsequential. 8% means nothing. 12% is the only own that merits any real consideration. Here's the full link: yougov.co.uk/politics/articles/50257-the-public-reaction-to-the-2024-riots23% of those polled think the rioters are actually Terrorists. 58%% think they are racist. By you logic - 7% equating to "a lot" - then 58% is an astronomical level of support for a position; the position that these thugs are Racist. All The Best Am I missing something. 58% support the peaceful protests which seems pretty significant. It is always difficult to keep a peaceful protest peaceful for a variety of reasons
|
|
|
Post by ProVeritas on Aug 6, 2024 19:53:02 GMT
In the same delusion way you think a 29% success rate is high? 7% in inconsequential. 8% means nothing. 12% is the only own that merits any real consideration. Here's the full link: yougov.co.uk/politics/articles/50257-the-public-reaction-to-the-2024-riots23% of those polled think the rioters are actually Terrorists. 58%% think they are racist. By you logic - 7% equating to "a lot" - then 58% is an astronomical level of support for a position; the position that these thugs are Racist. All The Best Am I missing something. 58% support the peaceful protests which seems pretty significant. It is always difficult to keep a peaceful protest peaceful for a variety of reasonsWell, it is effectively impossible to keep things peaceful when the real reason for it was to stir up racial hatred and have jolly old riot.. All The Best
|
|
|
Post by sandypine on Aug 6, 2024 20:00:58 GMT
Am I missing something. 58% support the peaceful protests which seems pretty significant. It is always difficult to keep a peaceful protest peaceful for a variety of reasonsWell, it is effectively impossible to keep things peaceful when the real reason for it was to stir up racial hatred and have jolly old riot.. All The Best Of course it is, which is what I said although I did allow for all factors not just the racial hatred aspect. You seem to know the real reason for the protests yet there has been no, or little, engagement with protestors. People keep trying to explain that there are many underlying reasons but you are back on race hatred. Just a thought why is it wrong to distrust or not like other races? It seems that there is much distrust of white people as an academic study but that seems OK and not attacked by the left. If it is a moral concept why does it not apply to all groups. I can never understand this perhaps you can help?
|
|
|
Post by Bentley on Aug 6, 2024 20:18:53 GMT
^ The same delusional way you think a success rate of 29% of stop and search isn’t high success rate and are in denial of an English phrase because it triggers you and your leftie mate. 4.9 million people is a huge number to support the rioters and 7.9 million people supporting the idea that the riots are JUSTIFIED is huge . Don’t try counting them , you will run out of fingers . Well it isn't. It fails more than two times more often that it succeeds. 4.9 Million sounds a lot of people, to those people incapable of grasping the meaning of very high numbers. But in relation to the 66.9 Million people who live in this country it is negligible, if it got too much smaller it would be a "rounding error". All The Best Well it is . A stop and search rate success of more than one in 4 is a very high rate of success for a random search . Stop pretending otherwise . If you threw the number required to win every fourth time you threw two dice it would be a high success in a casino . There is no way, using common usage of the English Language, that 4.9 million people is not a lot of people .
|
|
|
Post by Bentley on Aug 6, 2024 20:20:30 GMT
Am I missing something. 58% support the peaceful protests which seems pretty significant. It is always difficult to keep a peaceful protest peaceful for a variety of reasonsWell, it is effectively impossible to keep things peaceful when the real reason for it was to stir up racial hatred and have jolly old riot.. All The Best They might say that they rioted to highlight racial hatred against them .
|
|
|
Post by ProVeritas on Aug 6, 2024 20:23:45 GMT
Well it isn't. It fails more than two times more often that it succeeds. 4.9 Million sounds a lot of people, to those people incapable of grasping the meaning of very high numbers. But in relation to the 66.9 Million people who live in this country it is negligible, if it got too much smaller it would be a "rounding error". All The Best Well it is . A stop and search rate success of more than one in 4 is a very high rate of success . Stop pretending otherwise . Stop and search search is an effectively targeted yet random method . If you threw the number required to win every fourth time you threw two dice it would be a high success . There is no way, using common usage of the English Language, that 4.9 million people is not a lot of people . A barely 1 in 4 success rate is NOT a "very high" success rate in any common use of the English Language. Well, 4.6 Million is not a lot in comparison to 67 Million - it just isn't, end of. How can something be both "effectively targeted" and "random"? It just can't. It would be like saying something is "effectively wet" and also "dry". All The Best
|
|