|
|
Post by sheepy on Jul 30, 2024 21:47:06 GMT
We just want our country back, from those who think they own it and its residents to do as they wish with. Me thinks the Establishment is suffering some kind of Mental breakdown, while they plough on regardless lying to themselves and everyone else.
|
|
|
|
Post by patman post on Jul 30, 2024 21:58:11 GMT
It’s got a bit rough out there in Southport now. Why’s EDL being blamed? I thought that had been disbanded and reformed as Patriotic Alternative.
Is it true that some stores have been looted — if so, what for, Union Jacks..?
|
|
|
|
Post by Bentley on Jul 30, 2024 22:59:56 GMT
It’s got a bit rough out there in Southport now. Why’s EDL being blamed? I thought that had been disbanded and reformed as Patriotic Alternative. Is it true that some stores have been looted — if so, what for, Union Jacks..? How do you know it’s the white people looting ? |
|
|
|
Post by Orac on Jul 31, 2024 6:52:59 GMT
Tommy Robinson is one end of a spectrum of hate - at the opposite end are Islamic extremists But MOST white, British people do not support Tommy Robinson, and MOST British Muslims do not support Islamic extremists. This is not a binary issue, there is no "one side or the other", in my book if you do not accept British values, those of Tolerance, Freedom of Religion, Democracy, Equality and Free Speech within the parameters of incitement of hatred or civil unrest .... then piss off and live in Russia or Iran. What is the Tommy Robinson equivalent of killing Apostates , suppression of women , Sharia law and throwing homosexuals off high buildings ? This is the important question. Witchfinder suggested there was a moral equivalence between the two movements which , of course, there isn't. One is pretty well as extreme as it gets and the other is just liberalism and defense of civilisation |
|
|
|
Post by Fairsociety on Jul 31, 2024 8:37:38 GMT
I take it Robinson will get blamed for the riots in Southport, it couldn't just be that ordinary law abiding non-EDL far-right wing members have had enough, ordinary decent people have breaking points, they don't have to be members of so called far-right groups, they are just pissed off the state of this country.
|
|
|
|
Post by piglet on Jul 31, 2024 8:54:25 GMT
Indeed fair society, that the reaction too the Southport deaths and maiming is entirely normal and appropriate, society would be sick if it was just accepted. The whole business is amazing, that the ordinary brit is a second class citizen in their own country.
It is thee governance thatr is wrong, criminal, the reaction to it is HEALTHY.
Indeed to object, like the Southport riots, that those in charge will label it wrong, racist, a minority, agitators etc. Objecting to the murders of young girls is correct. And indeed it can only get worse, god knows what comes over the channel.
|
|
|
|
Post by Fairsociety on Jul 31, 2024 9:02:25 GMT
Indeed fair society, that the reaction too the Southport deaths and maiming is entirely normal and appropriate, society would be sick if it was just accepted. The whole business is amazing, that the ordinary brit is a second class citizen in their own country. It is thee governance thatr is wrong, criminal, the reaction to it is HEALTHY. Indeed to object, like the Southport riots, that those in charge will label it wrong, racist, a minority, agitators etc. Objecting to the murders of young girls is correct. And indeed it can only get worse, god knows what comes over the channel. I agree, instead of Starmer and the rest of them condemning the violence, they should be addressing it, people don't riot for nothing, people have a right to be outraged at such a atrocity, and when Starmer condemns the rioters it's like he's supporting the person who committed the offense, Starmer needs to reassure the public that their children are going to be safe and protected from such crimes, until he does something about it the riots will continue and HE is to blame for them, Southport have now put 'Bouncers' on all places children will be during the summer ...... Bounces not Police. |
|
|
|
Post by ProVeritas on Jul 31, 2024 9:16:05 GMT
Tommy "Two Names" and "Too Sacred" Robinson.
What country does he want back?
The one he has just fled to to avoid a court case?
He's a con man, and racist con man at that.
All The Best
|
|
|
|
Post by ProVeritas on Jul 31, 2024 9:17:46 GMT
I take it Robinson will get blamed for the riots in Southport, it couldn't just be that ordinary law abiding non-EDL far-right wing members have had enough, ordinary decent people have breaking points, they don't have to be members of so called far-right groups, they are just pissed off the state of this country. How can they be law abiding if they start a riot? I know education standards have slipped recently, but surely that is self evident. All The Best |
|
|
|
Post by Fairsociety on Jul 31, 2024 9:19:10 GMT
I take it Robinson will get blamed for the riots in Southport, it couldn't just be that ordinary law abiding non-EDL far-right wing members have had enough, ordinary decent people have breaking points, they don't have to be members of so called far-right groups, they are just pissed off the state of this country. How can they be law abiding if they start a riot? I know education standards have slipped recently, but surely that is self evident. All The Best People are 'law abiding' until they snap, and when three children have been murdered and many still critical law abiding people snap, can't you read? |
|
|
|
Post by andrewbrown on Jul 31, 2024 9:24:56 GMT
I take it Robinson will get blamed for the riots in Southport, it couldn't just be that ordinary law abiding non-EDL far-right wing members have had enough, ordinary decent people have breaking points, they don't have to be members of so called far-right groups, they are just pissed off the state of this country. Not really sure that rioting is "law abiding", even in the FairSociety definition. |
|
|
|
Post by ProVeritas on Jul 31, 2024 9:25:25 GMT
How can they be law abiding if they start a riot? I know education standards have slipped recently, but surely that is self evident. All The Best People are 'law abiding' until they snap, and when three children have been murdered and many still critical law abiding people snap, can't you read? So, the moment they start rioting they are NOT law abiding. So I was correct. Being able to read is clearly not enough, you also need to be able to understand what you read - and that seems to be missing in this case. I am willing to bet not one of those "law abiding rioters" even knew any of the victims. I am willing to bet the ONLY reason they know their name is they read it somewhere. I am willing to bet that they were looking for any excuse to "snap" and this just happened to be it. They don't care about the victims, or the victims' families. They don't even care about the root cause of the problem. They only care about having a good old riot - because they are, every last one of then, scum. Surely rioting scum should be put face-down on the ground and have their heads stamped on - that was OK in Manchester after all. All The Best |
|
|
|
Post by Fairsociety on Jul 31, 2024 9:28:04 GMT
I take it Robinson will get blamed for the riots in Southport, it couldn't just be that ordinary law abiding non-EDL far-right wing members have had enough, ordinary decent people have breaking points, they don't have to be members of so called far-right groups, they are just pissed off the state of this country. Not really sure that rioting is "law abiding", even in the FairSociety definition. Well let me know how you feel if one of your children get knifed by a racist, get back to me then andrea. |
|
|
|
Post by andrewbrown on Jul 31, 2024 9:28:45 GMT
People are 'law abiding' until they snap, and when three children have been murdered and many still critical law abiding people snap, can't you read? So, the moment they start rioting they are NOT law abiding. So I was correct. Being able to read is clearly not enough, you also need to be able to understand what you read - and that seems to be missing in this case. I am willing to bet not one of those "law abiding rioters" even knew any of the victims. I am willing to bet the ONLY reason they know their name is they read it somewhere. I am willing to bet that they were looking for any excuse to "snap" and this just happened to be it. They don't care about the victims, or the victims' families. They don't even care about the root cause of the problem. They only care about having a good old riot - because they are, every last one of then, scum. Surely rioting scum should be put face-down on the ground and have their heads stamped on - that was OK in Manchester after all. All The Best I also bet that not one of these numbskull knuckledraggers was from Southport, but travelled into the area specifically to cause trouble, far from the "snapped" excuse that FairSociety is trying to make. |
|
|
|
Post by andrewbrown on Jul 31, 2024 9:29:52 GMT
Not really sure that rioting is "law abiding", even in the FairSociety definition. Well let me know how you feel if one of your children get knifed by a racist, get back to me then andrea. It's a very simple question. Are they law abiding or not. I say not, what bout you? None of these idiots was stopping people getting stabbed, were they? |
|
