|
|
Post by ProVeritas on Jul 31, 2024 9:30:32 GMT
Not really sure that rioting is "law abiding", even in the FairSociety definition. Well let me know how you feel if one of your children get knifed by a racist, get back to me then andrea. Is there any proof that any of the rioters had children killed by a racist? No, of course there isn't. You are just posting lies to try and cover up an indefensible position. All The Best |
|
|
|
Post by Fairsociety on Jul 31, 2024 9:33:06 GMT
Well let me know how you feel if one of your children get knifed by a racist, get back to me then andrea. It's a very simple question. Are they law abiding or not. I say not, what bout you? They are until they are pushed over the edge through lack of policing and security, I am a law abiding citizen but if a child of mine was stabbed to death by a racist I can assure you I would no longer be law abiding, and it would be justifiable in the circumstances, in fact there is a law in America called 'justifiable homicide' in such cases like this one if one of the parents murders the person who stabbed their child to death they will be tried under that law, and it will be reflected in the sentencing, obviously the UK don't have such laws they punish the victims of crime. |
|
|
|
Post by andrewbrown on Jul 31, 2024 9:33:35 GMT
What he means is when black people cause trouble, they are scum.
When white people cause trouble, it's black people's fault.
It's very easy to see straight through that.
|
|
|
|
Post by witchfinder on Jul 31, 2024 9:34:22 GMT
How can they be law abiding if they start a riot? I know education standards have slipped recently, but surely that is self evident. All The Best People are 'law abiding' until they snap, and when three children have been murdered and many still critical law abiding people snap, can't you read? Except that NONE of the EDL thugs which descended on Southport last night were local people, a fact which has been stated by local people, the local Police, the local Crime Commissioner and the local MP. I reckon that last nights incident will probably finish off the already discredited EDL, they well and truly showed themselves up for what they really are ... scum, taking advantage of a terrible tragedy to whip up division in a grieving community. Make no mistake, these were EDL supporters, and both directly and indirectly Tommy Robinson is responsible. |
|
|
|
Post by andrewbrown on Jul 31, 2024 9:35:18 GMT
It's a very simple question. Are they law abiding or not. I say not, what bout you? They are until they are pushed over the edge through lack of policing and security, I am a law abiding citizen but if a child of mine was stabbed to death by a racist I can assure you I would no longer be law abiding, and it would be justifiable in the circumstances, in fact there is a law in America called 'justifiable homicide' in such cases like this one if one of the parents murders the person who stabbed their child to death they will be tried under that law, and it will be reflected in the sentencing, obviously the UK don't have such laws they punish the victims of crime. You've worked out his motive already? Inspector Cleuseau. Glad you've backtracked on the "law abiding" bit though, that was a stretch even for you. |
|
|
|
Post by Fairsociety on Jul 31, 2024 9:37:28 GMT
They are until they are pushed over the edge through lack of policing and security, I am a law abiding citizen but if a child of mine was stabbed to death by a racist I can assure you I would no longer be law abiding, and it would be justifiable in the circumstances, in fact there is a law in America called 'justifiable homicide' in such cases like this one if one of the parents murders the person who stabbed their child to death they will be tried under that law, and it will be reflected in the sentencing, obviously the UK don't have such laws they punish the victims of crime. You've worked out his motive already? Inspector Cleuseau. Errrr well maybe they were rioting because McDonald's had closed down. ......... Duh. |
|
|
|
Post by ProVeritas on Jul 31, 2024 9:40:11 GMT
Here's the inbred, moronic logic of these rioters.
1) The attacker in the horrific Southport incident may have been Muslim.
2) That makes all Muslims responsible.
3) We can attack a Mosque just for the fun of it.
From that we get:
1) The rioters in Southport may have been Far-Right EDL Members.
2) That makes all Far-Right EDL Members responsible.
3) We can now attack Far-Right EDL Members just for the fun of it.
The EDL is clearly happy to use violence, intimidation, and law-breaking as a means to disseminate their political ideology.
That, de facto, makes the EDL a Terrorist Organisation.
The leaders of the EDL should face the same kinds of sanctions that Anjem Choudary has justifiably faced.
All The Best
|
|
|
|
Post by ProVeritas on Jul 31, 2024 9:42:53 GMT
Anyone willing to bet that the reason Tommy Two Names fled the country, missing a scheduled court appearance, on Monday was so he could notably be out of the country when this little EDL terrorist incident kicked off?
All The Best
|
|
|
|
Post by Orac on Jul 31, 2024 9:45:59 GMT
Just a few fires, so, using the media's modern standard, this protest was 'mostly peaceful'
|
|
|
|
Post by piglet on Jul 31, 2024 9:49:59 GMT
Regardless of the identity of the rioters, rioting in this instance is correct. How else, but by force, are we to eject a criminal government? . I know the reply, through the ballot box, thats not funny is it? By doing nothing more children will die.
Will Starmer, Sunak, on the lecturn in parliament take responsibility for the Southport deaths?, no.
Common decency, fairneess, democracy IS DEAD. Ask what the parents think. We need adults to take chgarge.
|
|
|
|
Post by Fairsociety on Jul 31, 2024 9:50:26 GMT
Anyone willing to bet that the reason Tommy Two Names fled the country, missing a scheduled court appearance, on Monday was so he could notably be out of the country when this little EDL terrorist incident kicked off? All The Best I'd say he had a strong Alibi. |
|
|
|
Post by The Squeezed Middle on Jul 31, 2024 9:53:26 GMT
Here's the inbred, moronic logic of these rioters. 1) The attacker in the horrific Southport incident may have been Muslim. 2) That makes all Muslims responsible. 3) We can attack a Mosque just for the fun of it. From that we get: 1) The rioters in Southport may have been Far-Right EDL Members. 2) That makes all Far-Right EDL Members responsible. 3) We can now attack Far-Right EDL Members just for the fun of it. The EDL is clearly happy to use violence, intimidation, and law-breaking as a means to disseminate their political ideology. That, de facto, makes the EDL a Terrorist Organisation. The leaders of the EDL should face the same kinds of sanctions that Anjem Choudary has justifiably faced. All The Best Remind us: What does "Far Right" mean again? |
|
|
|
Post by The Squeezed Middle on Jul 31, 2024 9:54:42 GMT
Just a few fires, so, using the media's modern standard, this protest was 'mostly peaceful' Yep, just a bit of high spirits. |
|
|
|
Post by buccaneer on Jul 31, 2024 9:55:53 GMT
Just a few fires, so, using the media's modern standard, this protest was 'mostly peaceful' lol |
|
|
|
Post by Orac on Jul 31, 2024 9:56:40 GMT
What he means is when black people cause trouble, they are scum. When white people cause trouble, it's black people's fault. It's very easy to see straight through that. Double standards tend to spread because when faced with an outrageous and persistent double standard, it is tempting to adopt one of your own. So, when the government (and its various faceless, unaccountable minions) adopt and enforce a double standard , it erodes the base values needed for social order. Where is this going? who knows |
|
