|
|
Post by The Squeezed Middle on Jul 29, 2024 12:08:25 GMT
Fuck me, you're gullible Nulla. There's nothing independent about the IOPC. They've always had an anti-police agenda.Do you have demonstrable, evidence backed, proof of that claim. All The Best Yes. Probably sufficient to fill a book. |
|
|
|
Post by Dogburger on Jul 29, 2024 12:25:06 GMT
So that's what you think of council estate people?
I wouldn't say you were riff raff just thick as two short planks.
No thats what you think of council people i dont forget You forgot to reply to my post . What do you think would have happened if the police had not given the Pakistani thug a shoeing ? |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 29, 2024 14:14:28 GMT
Think you mean COARSE, but hey, I have a brain. All The Best Of course . Do you? Yes, of course he does. To prove it he writes "All The Best" with capitalisation of all the words on every single post. |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 29, 2024 14:20:02 GMT
And now the lawyer AkhmedYakoob steps aside claiming the media have sabotaged him  link
I wonder if he is still punting that claim on behalf of his ex-clients. |
|
|
|
Post by Totheleft on Jul 29, 2024 14:23:45 GMT
No thats what you think of council people i dont forget You forgot to reply to my post . What do you think would have happened if the police had not given the Pakistani thug a shoeing ? Dont thinks the race of the victims matter. |
|
|
|
Post by ProVeritas on Jul 29, 2024 14:40:14 GMT
Do you have demonstrable, evidence backed, proof of that claim. All The Best We had an earlier discussion about the role and structure of the IOPC and its anti-police agenda here:
Had a quick scan. Did not see any obvious link to demonstrable, evidence backed, proof that the IOPC is "anti-police". Perhaps if there any such links in that thread you could highlight them for me. All The Best |
|
|
|
Post by Fairsociety on Jul 29, 2024 15:10:53 GMT
And now the lawyer AkhmedYakoob steps aside claiming the media have sabotaged him link
I wonder if he is still punting that claim on behalf of his ex-clients. He should already be suspended for touting lies about it being a 'assassination' attempt, what lawyer makes outlandish totally uncorroborated statements like that, most trained qualified lawyers/solicitors never open their mouths until they are in possession of the FULL FACTS. I've never come such a incompetent phoney micky mouse lawyer ever. |
|
|
|
Post by sandypine on Jul 29, 2024 15:20:12 GMT
You forgot to reply to my post . What do you think would have happened if the police had not given the Pakistani thug a shoeing ? Dont thinks the race of the victims matter. Probably not, but that is not what the police or the Pakistani community say so who are you to disagree. However it does not stop you attempting an answer. What would have happened if the policeman had stepped back and allowed the Pakistani thug to arise as he was obviously trying to do when he was kicked? |
|
|
|
Post by ratcliff on Jul 29, 2024 15:28:41 GMT
Dont thinks the race of the victims matter. Probably not, but that is not what the police or the Pakistani community say so who are you to disagree. However it does not stop you attempting an answer. What would have happened if the policeman had stepped back and allowed the Pakistani thug to arise as he was obviously trying to do when he was kicked? Maybe as well as drug dogs and armed police it's an idea also to have police dogs ( the sharp tooth chasing sort) regularly available at airports? |
|
|
|
Post by Dan Dare on Jul 29, 2024 15:42:53 GMT
We had an earlier discussion about the role and structure of the IOPC and its anti-police agenda here:
Had a quick scan. Did not see any obvious link to demonstrable, evidence backed, proof that the IOPC is "anti-police". Perhaps if there any such links in that thread you could highlight them for me. All The Best
Rather than a 'quick scan' you need to read the IOPC report on the Williams-Dos Santos affair, paying particular attention to the manner in evidence from the 'victims' was simply read into the record as opposed to evidence from the police which was rigorously cross-examined.
A means of obtaining the report is included in the thread, but your quick scan obviously passed over it.
Come back with further questions when you've actually read it.
|
|
|
|
Post by wapentake on Jul 29, 2024 16:25:42 GMT
|
|
|
|
Post by bancroft on Jul 29, 2024 16:39:48 GMT
My grandfather K.O.d a policeman who grabbed his collar from behind without a warning in the 30's, obviously he did not hang about.
This is why we need to know what warnings were given and when?
|
|
|
|
Post by wapentake on Jul 29, 2024 17:23:29 GMT
My grandfather K.O.d a policeman who grabbed his collar from behind without a warning in the 30's, obviously he did not hang about. This is why we need to know what warnings were given and when? Oh blimey that’s nigh on 100 years ago and very different times |
|
|
|
Post by ProVeritas on Jul 29, 2024 17:29:46 GMT
Had a quick scan. Did not see any obvious link to demonstrable, evidence backed, proof that the IOPC is "anti-police". Perhaps if there any such links in that thread you could highlight them for me. All The Best
Rather than a 'quick scan' you need to read the IOPC report on the Williams-Dos Santos affair, paying particular attention to the manner in evidence from the 'victims' was simply read into the record as opposed to evidence from the police which was rigorously cross-examined.
A means of obtaining the report is included in the thread, but your quick scan obviously passed over it.
Come back with further questions when you've actually read it.
So that will show one case, right? Did the Police Officers involved lodge an appeal? Was that appeal successful and the charges against them overturned? Because without that there is no real evidence the IOPC is "anti police". Just that it delivered a result you didn't like. Is a single case proof that the IOPC "anti-police"? If so, surely the Manchester Airport incident is proof that all the police are out of control thugs? I don't happen to think that is the case; I think it far more likely that one Police Officer over-reacted in the heat of the moment, and rather than realising his error of judgement, he went on to repeat it. Now, let me go on record. I think the penalties for attacking the Police, and other Emergency Services as they go about their duties should be MUCH more severe. But that needs to happen through Due Process. Not though some out of control thug laying the boot into an an already subdued suspect. But I also think that the penalties for a Police Officer doing what was just done - if it is found to be GBH - need to be as harsh as the law permits as well. We need to seriously disincentivise both criminals and rogue Police. All The Best |
|
|
|
Post by johnofgwent on Jul 29, 2024 18:22:47 GMT
Understandably the colleagues of the officer suspended have now refused to carry weapons,police federations around the country are showing their support too and their anger at the idiots on social media bent on making them aunt sallys at every opportunity it is now up to the courts to start making assaulting them and other emergency workers a jailing issue. linkJust like they shot that guy Chris Kaba Though the windows . Talk about mob rule Oh yeah I remember him Chopsy black gangster who thought he could ram a firearms car forming part of a Roadblock. His relatives were a bunch of chopsy bastards who shut the fuck up once the body can footage became available. About time we had more of this |
|
