Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on May 30, 2024 16:45:25 GMT
Why are you diverting attention toward Farage when he has nothing to do with this? Whether you trust him or not, Farage doesn't do identity politics. Now you're bigging up race-baiting Abbott and dissing Farage over something he doesn't do. I can only conclude that you're lying for her. I'm not lying about anything. It's a genuine mystery, and all the more so because in polling, Farage is rated as one of the most popular/the most popular on the list over hundreds.
I think the answer is that out of those who vote, they prefer extreme left-wing nutters. You see she is doing the same kind of act as Farage but pushing the opposite thing. It's the same act as Johnson as well. Give the proles a laugh and they will vote and support you in an emotional way. What the proles hate though is someone way smarter than they are. They assume that means they will be conned for sure. These two both fit that window. not too smart, but smart enough to get a laugh.
You're deflecting. The topic is Abbott and why she is whinging. She's desperately trying to be a victim, even though she's responsible for her own actions. Of course, somebody like that can never be responsible, it's always other people who are to blame. She wanted to bash Jews because Jews are an easy target. She wanted to bash whites because she wants to maintain a racist constituency to hold onto her income. She's a shameless opportunistic troll woman who gets rich from racial hatred. Even her own party told her to fuck off, because she's so deranged and ugly inside and out that she's a liability.
|
|
|
|
Post by patman post on May 30, 2024 16:46:55 GMT
Maybe you're just living in a fantasy world, Baron. She will get in as an independent. Watch and you will see. She might even return as Labour — the deputy leader of the Labour Party sees no reason she shouldn’t stand. Labour HQ should sack the incompetents who briefed The Times about the outcome of then confidential agreements that could have allowed Diane Abbott to retire in a civil manner and without negative fuss. Now Labour has a row that’s drowning out all its campaigning and a deputy leader who’s shown she’s prepared to give guidance to the leader. Surely, Starmer wouldn’t be wise to let this carry on over the weekend… |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on May 30, 2024 16:53:12 GMT
It'll pass. The media will move onto something else. There's only so much story and when people stop clicking she'll vanish into a puff of smoke.
|
|
|
|
Post by Baron von Lotsov on May 30, 2024 17:00:37 GMT
It'll pass. The media will move onto something else. There's only so much story and when people stop clicking she'll vanish into a puff of smoke. That is until someone finds out another bit of juicy information regarding Starmer and his crew in relation to this. In PR you don't release all the dirt at once, bearing in mind your point above. If Starmer is capable of one dodgy deal then you can imagine what else has gone on. I think she is smarter than he is. She's got friends. |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on May 30, 2024 17:08:07 GMT
It'll pass. The media will move onto something else. There's only so much story and when people stop clicking she'll vanish into a puff of smoke. That is until someone finds out another bit of juicy information regarding Starmer and his crew in relation to this. In PR you don't release all the dirt at once, bearing in mind your point above. If Starmer is capable of one dodgy deal then you can imagine what else has gone on. I think she is smarter than he is. She's got friends. Perhaps you should educate yourself on how the Labour party is run. |
|
|
|
Post by patman post on May 30, 2024 17:12:54 GMT
It'll pass. The media will move onto something else. There's only so much story and when people stop clicking she'll vanish into a puff of smoke. That is until someone finds out another bit of juicy information regarding Starmer and his crew in relation to this. In PR you don't release all the dirt at once, bearing in mind your point above. If Starmer is capable of one dodgy deal then you can imagine what else has gone on. I think she is smarter than he is. She's got friends. You’re correct. But Diane Abbott is past retirement age and not in good health. Had she been allowed back into the party when the decision on her suspension was made, she would likely have retired at the next (this) election. Incompetence and immaturity within Labour HQ has led to this current mess… |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on May 30, 2024 17:25:22 GMT
That is until someone finds out another bit of juicy information regarding Starmer and his crew in relation to this. In PR you don't release all the dirt at once, bearing in mind your point above. If Starmer is capable of one dodgy deal then you can imagine what else has gone on. I think she is smarter than he is. She's got friends. You’re correct. But Diane Abbott is past retirement age and not in good health. Had she been allowed back into the party when the decision on her suspension was made, she would likely have retired at the next (this) election. Incompetence and immaturity within Labour HQ has led to this current mess… Incorrect, she got the boot for undermining the party who was trying to clean up their appearence after her mate Corbyn was stoking up Jew hatred. I've seen similar things happen within other parties, where some things are just not tolerated. All you're doing is exactly what I said she does, which is to play the poor lil victim. |
|
|
|
Post by Baron von Lotsov on May 30, 2024 17:37:27 GMT
You’re correct. But Diane Abbott is past retirement age and not in good health. Had she been allowed back into the party when the decision on her suspension was made, she would likely have retired at the next (this) election. Incompetence and immaturity within Labour HQ has led to this current mess… Incorrect, she got the boot for undermining the party who was trying to clean up their appearence after her mate Corbyn was stoking up Jew hatred. I've seen similar things happen within other parties, where some things are just not tolerated. All you're doing is exactly what I said she does, which is to play the poor lil victim. More cheeky upstart in my opinion. She's always smiling while the others faff about like headless chickens. |
|
|
|
Post by Bentley on May 30, 2024 17:40:32 GMT
If Abbot doesn’t stand then the Labour candidate will win anyway .
I’d like to see her stand and win as an independent . That way she will have no filter 👍
|
|
|
|
Post by patman post on May 30, 2024 17:45:10 GMT
You’re correct. But Diane Abbott is past retirement age and not in good health. Had she been allowed back into the party when the decision on her suspension was made, she would likely have retired at the next (this) election. Incompetence and immaturity within Labour HQ has led to this current mess… Incorrect, she got the boot for undermining the party who was trying to clean up their appearence after her mate Corbyn was stoking up Jew hatred. I've seen similar things happen within other parties, where some things are just not tolerated. All you're doing is exactly what I said she does, which is to play the poor lil victim. Even in the unlikely case that your prejudiced assumptions were correct, had she been allowed to go quietly Labour would have been saved all this mess.
Anti-Semitism isn't exclusive to parts of the Labour Party. Although now it can mostly be blamed on the Muslim population, it wasn't too long ago that "Christian Hotels" and middle class golf clubs restricted entrants...
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on May 30, 2024 17:52:17 GMT
Incorrect, she got the boot for undermining the party who was trying to clean up their appearence after her mate Corbyn was stoking up Jew hatred. I've seen similar things happen within other parties, where some things are just not tolerated. All you're doing is exactly what I said she does, which is to play the poor lil victim. Even in the unlikely case that your prejudiced assumptions were correct, had she been allowed to go quietly Labour would have been saved all this mess.
Anti-Semitism isn't exclusive to parts of the Labour Party. Although now it can mostly be blamed on the Muslim population, it wasn't too long ago that "Christian Hotels" and middle class golf clubs restricted entrants...
There's nothing prejudiced about my post. It's fact.
I never said anything about Labour being exclusive to anything. Against, like Baron, you're deflecting.
Abbott is a race-baiting washed up lunatic and a liability who wanted to insult Jews during a time when her type thought it would increase their income.
|
|
|
|
Post by patman post on May 30, 2024 17:55:25 GMT
Even in the unlikely case that your prejudiced assumptions were correct, had she been allowed to go quietly Labour would have been saved all this mess.
Anti-Semitism isn't exclusive to parts of the Labour Party. Although now it can mostly be blamed on the Muslim population, it wasn't too long ago that "Christian Hotels" and middle class golf clubs restricted entrants...
There's nothing prejudiced about my post. It's fact.
I never said anything about Labour being exclusive to anything. Against, like Baron, you're deflecting.
Abbott is a race-baiting washed up lunatic and a liability who wanted to insult Jews during a time when her type thought it would increase their income.
So the back office idiots at Labour HQ were stupid to sabotage Diane Abbott's departure and cause Starmer the unneeded problems he's now having to deal with... |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on May 30, 2024 17:57:11 GMT
There's nothing prejudiced about my post. It's fact.
I never said anything about Labour being exclusive to anything. Against, like Baron, you're deflecting.
Abbott is a race-baiting washed up lunatic and a liability who wanted to insult Jews during a time when her type thought it would increase their income.
So the back office idiots at Labour HQ were stupid to sabotage Diane Abbott's departure and cause Starmer the unneeded problems he's now having to deal with... If she wants to hurt the party that supported her thoughout her life, a party that made her rich, and only turned on her when she disrespected the party's wishes to hold down on the Jew hated, then she can. All I'm saying is that she is a racist manipulative deranged lunatic supported by racist bigots who don't want to give up their victim status.
|
|
|
|
Post by Baron von Lotsov on May 30, 2024 18:00:32 GMT
Even in the unlikely case that your prejudiced assumptions were correct, had she been allowed to go quietly Labour would have been saved all this mess.
Anti-Semitism isn't exclusive to parts of the Labour Party. Although now it can mostly be blamed on the Muslim population, it wasn't too long ago that "Christian Hotels" and middle class golf clubs restricted entrants...
There's nothing prejudiced about my post. It's fact.
I never said anything about Labour being exclusive to anything. Against, like Baron, you're deflecting.
Abbott is a race-baiting washed up lunatic and a liability who wanted to insult Jews during a time when her type thought it would increase their income.
I'm with you on the real motive on this which is likely to be to do with party funding. I hear Labour are a bit short whilst the Tories have such strong funding that they have hit the legal limit, leaving Labour looking broke by comparison. It's not a pretty picture whichever way you look at things. The proles come last every time in the pecking order. |
|
|
|
Post by patman post on May 30, 2024 18:17:42 GMT
So the back office idiots at Labour HQ were stupid to sabotage Diane Abbott's departure and cause Starmer the unneeded problems he's now having to deal with... If she wants to hurt the party that supported her thoughout her life, a party that made her rich, and only turned on her when she disrespected the party's wishes to hold down on the Jew hated, then she can. All I'm saying is that she is a racist manipulative deranged lunatic supported by racist bigots who don't want to give up their victim status.
Why not do a bit of easy research? Diane Abbott has held her constituency since 1987. In includes Stamford Hill, which is known to have the largest Charedi (Hasidic) community in the world outside of Israel and New York.
Abbott's winning margin at the last election was 39,000, that is over 70% of the votes cast.
I doubt she or Labour would have held the seat had it been thought she was anti-Semitic, or displayed other racist tendencies in an area that's over 60% White...
|
|
