|
|
Post by Red Rackham on May 25, 2024 19:30:00 GMT
Some kids may be aware of politics, have no understanding of, but they may be aware of politics. Many kids are more interested in important issues, Play station & X Box spring to mind. Human rights issues, yes indeed the little dears are indoctrinated with all that stuff by left wing teachers who will be thrilled at the thought of ballot boxes in schools. Which is what I said 😉 Fairy nuff, you've worn me down.  |
|
|
|
Post by Bentley on May 25, 2024 19:37:19 GMT
Fairy nuff, you've worn me down. No I haven’t…. 😁 |
|
LL
New Member
Posts: 42
|
Post by LL on May 25, 2024 19:41:54 GMT
I could say the same about people who continue to vote conservative after all they’ve done just change young to old Why do you think Starmer wants ballot boxes in schools?.. We already have them, I voted in a school at the local elections 😎 |
|
|
|
Post by Red Rackham on May 25, 2024 20:28:52 GMT
Why do you think Starmer wants ballot boxes in schools?.. We already have them, I voted in a school at the local elections 😎 Are you that 40 year old Abdul chap, who claims to be 16... |
|
LL
New Member
Posts: 42
|
Post by LL on May 25, 2024 20:33:08 GMT
We already have them, I voted in a school at the local elections 😎 Are you that 40 year old Abdul chap, who claims to be 16... Not the first time you’ve accused me of being a foreigner for saying something you disagree with… says more about you than anything |
|
|
|
Post by Red Rackham on May 25, 2024 20:34:08 GMT
I see Sir Ed [Of course a woman can have a cock] Davey is thrilled that Starmer will allow children to vote. On hearing this news he said...
..."The Liberal Democrats are way more in tune with young voters than any other party"
I have to say, on this point I agree with Sir Ed. Lets face it, only clueless kids (and possibly ex RAF) are stupid enough to vote LibDem.
|
|
|
|
Post by Red Rackham on May 25, 2024 20:42:12 GMT
Are you that 40 year old Abdul chap, who claims to be 16... Not the first time you’ve accused me of being a foreigner for saying something you disagree with… says more about you than anything Actually I was joking, I would of thought that was obvious. Perhaps not, hey ho. |
|
|
|
Post by Red Rackham on May 25, 2024 21:11:59 GMT
That's a point... kids leave school at 17 these days don't they? In fact... having just read up: It's compulsory for kids to stay in 'educational training' of some sort until the age of 18. Of course that doesn't mean they have to be in school until 18, but it does mean they have be in some sort of educational training until the age of 18. Therefore Starmer is talking bollox, as if we didn't know. 16 year olds, he said, work pay tax and fight for our country. The man is a liar. He is a charlatan.
|
|
|
|
Post by Bentley on May 25, 2024 21:18:12 GMT
He’s a political grifter.
|
|
|
|
Post by Red Rackham on May 25, 2024 21:30:01 GMT
He’s a political grifter. Ahh, I see the pooch avatar is back. Excellent. |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on May 26, 2024 9:13:57 GMT
Yes that’s the one haha. Liverpoollefty which is why I have used ll Ahh yes, bloody hell yes. Liverpoollefty, I was slow on the uptake there. Not like me, lol. I thought it was eleven, or two in Roman numerals. |
|
|
|
Post by Red Rackham on May 27, 2024 16:26:42 GMT
I just listened to Starmer being interviewed by Katherine Forster, GB News. She put it to him that the only reason he was giving 16 year olds the vote was because they will vote Labour. Naturally he denied this, he said, and this is so disingenuous it's ridiculous, I don't know how he kept a straight face, he said, and I quote...
..."16 year olds can have families and pay tax, therefor they should have a say"
This is fantastic, it's the first time in my life I have ever heard anyone let alone someone who wants to be our next prime minister, promoting 16 year old parents. The man is an absolute disgrace.
|
|
|
|
Post by Bentley on May 27, 2024 16:34:48 GMT
I just listened to Starmer being interviewed by Katherine Forster, GB News. She put it to him that the only reason he was giving 16 year olds the vote was because they will vote Labour. Naturally he denied this, he said, and this is so disingenuous it's ridiculous, I don't know how he kept a straight face, he said, and I quote... ..."16 year olds can have families and pay tax, therefor they should have a say" This is fantastic, it's the first time in my life I have ever heard anyone let alone someone who wants to be our next prime minister, promoting 16 year old parents. The man is an absolute disgrace. And this is before the lunatics are in power. |
|
|
|
Post by Red Rackham on May 27, 2024 16:42:25 GMT
I just listened to Starmer being interviewed by Katherine Forster, GB News. She put it to him that the only reason he was giving 16 year olds the vote was because they will vote Labour. Naturally he denied this, he said, and this is so disingenuous it's ridiculous, I don't know how he kept a straight face, he said, and I quote... ..."16 year olds can have families and pay tax, therefor they should have a say" This is fantastic, it's the first time in my life I have ever heard anyone let alone someone who wants to be our next prime minister, promoting 16 year old parents. The man is an absolute disgrace. And this is before the lunatics are in power. Indeed, have you ever heard anything like it in your life? "16 year olds should have the vote because they can have families"! Incredible. With this gaff it would seem he is struggling to come up with excuses for giving children the vote. |
|
|
|
Post by Baron von Lotsov on May 27, 2024 16:57:36 GMT
16 is about the age where you become aware of politics . M the kids would have been subject to the cult of wokeism for a while and be without enough life experience to realise how toxic and false it is . The Nazis knew this. So did the church. They never told you at school the Nazis were anti-woke. The famous book burning was the library of a woke professor who invented trans bollox. |
|
