|
Post by Vinny on May 23, 2024 8:53:13 GMT
No idea what the yanks or the Israelis have to do with debunking your bollox....
Asking for evidence is being "programmed"? Blindly believing something without evidence is "being open to new ideas, or new science"?
Don't make me laugh Dub, do you know how silly that is as an argument against providing methodology?
Where A is anti gravity, and E is energy, and R is radiation and MT is total mass of vehicle, including MC (mass of cargo including food), MF (which is mass of fuel), and MG which is mass of power generator, kindly provide a method by which A can exceed MT without producing fatal radiation killing pilot.
And provide the means by which such a vessel could cross the galaxy, within a year, without killing the pilot.
|
|
|
Post by Dubdrifter on May 23, 2024 9:34:59 GMT
Funny how one of the best search engines(Duck Duck Go) that used to dig out all sorts of Conspiracy nuggets …. has now been completely ‘compromised’ … and taken over by the Deep State Internet Censorship Department. (Tap to expand) Even simplifying the Search …. draws a complete BLANK on this topic. Google on the other hand has loads of ready-filtered articles. ….. Meanwhile … here are some more hidden truths Vinny doesn’t want you to read about …. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_gravity_control_propulsion_research…. If you read this article before it disappears along with so much Internet material on this subject (The Cover-Up …. remember I mentioned it?) …. you will learn that many top establishments in the U.S. were doing research on reverse engineering projects … but all strangely stopped publishing articles in the early seventies … . Meanwhile Disclosure Project whistle-blowers state results showing success creating anti-gravity devices came to fruition 10 years later ( the early 1980’s) … around the time mainstream science was blocked from gaining access to the breakthrough. …. This ties in with a number of sightings …. including the one in Scotland in the 1990’s showing photos of an anti-gravity diamond grey craft being escorted by 2 Bae System’s Hawker-Siddeley jets during testing (stealth paint coatings?). (See article dropped in the other discussion).
|
|
|
Post by Vinny on May 23, 2024 9:42:14 GMT
Where A is the anti gravity output, V is velocity, and E is energy, and R is radiation and MT is total mass of vehicle, including MC (mass of cargo including food), MF (which is mass of fuel), and MG which is mass of power generator, kindly provide a method by which A can exceed MT without producing fatal radiation killing pilot.
Complete the equation with these factors and provide the means by which such a vessel could cross the galaxy, within a year, without killing the pilot.
|
|
|
Post by piglet on May 23, 2024 11:04:22 GMT
Your making the mistake of only taking into account current knowledge vinny. All is fluid, changing, new thinking will uncover new discoveries, new laws.
If you showed a man from 1356 a car, he would not grasp it.
|
|
|
Post by ProVeritas on May 23, 2024 11:27:33 GMT
Programmed people like you Vinny, are not open-minded to new ideas. … or new science. ….. more clues there is a cover-up going on …. and sections of the Internet are being “blanket blocked” and censorship/free speech under U.S. Deep State and Israel … is reaching intolerable levels. View Attachment(Tap to expand) Looks like only certain ‘controlled’ POV are only being permitted these days …. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anti-gravity…( for those interested in exploring and addressing the science in the title in the thread … rather than just attacking the writers here.) Well, that is clearly a, probably deliberately manufactured, property of your Browser or Browser Settings. I get no such censorship when I run a search for exact same search string. Looks like that is a PEBKAC issue. All The Best
|
|
|
Post by ProVeritas on May 23, 2024 11:30:46 GMT
Your making the mistake of only taking into account current knowledge vinny. Well, as we don't and can't know what we don't know it is the case that it is only possible to formulate good science on our "current knowledge" - that is called science fact. Basing it on stuff we don't know, but make up because we want that to be the case, is called Science-Fiction. All The Best
|
|
|
Post by Dubdrifter on May 25, 2024 5:26:08 GMT
Where A is the anti gravity output, V is velocity, and E is energy, and R is radiation and MT is total mass of vehicle, including MC (mass of cargo including food), MF (which is mass of fuel), and MG which is mass of power generator, kindly provide a method by which A can exceed MT without producing fatal radiation killing pilot. Complete the equation with these factors and provide the means by which such a vessel could cross the galaxy, within a year, without killing the pilot. I’ve told you once … within the skin of the anti-gravity principle … no EMF radiation penetrates. Can you not process text now? … I thought it was just audio failure that was your problem? It’s your scenario … you are going to have to tell us what the numbers are in your fantasy equation …?? … Which alien civilisation does it apply to? … what are the stats/efficiency of their gravity drives? …. So which MOTHER ship in this list are you applying this to? Where do you get the idea from I have these stats?? Most of these are scout craft for reconnaissance … small, cramped and not geared for wormhole travel. First learn about how they make anti-gravity devices work and how they make short cuts through the fabric of Space before trying to formulate stupid equations navigating across the Milky Way. As usual, you are a stupid human trying to run before you can walk … much like NASA trying to put a manned base on Mars … before it has even made manned travel and bases on the Moon a reality … and safe …. second nature. NASA/human scientists aren’t as bright as you imagine. If you are going to claim something is impossible because your primitive technology is barely capable of holding a rickety ISS in orbit around your own Planet … maybe you should step out of your arrogant mindset … thinking you know what all the Laws of the Universe are … whose out there … and what is possible?? … Humans are stupid wild animals … and many scientist are whores to evil genocidal tyrants … with no moral fibre …. programmed to destroy this Planet. “You think your so creative” … You largely haven’t a clue what you’re doing. … if truth be known … just stumbling in the dark.
|
|
|
Post by Dubdrifter on May 25, 2024 6:42:43 GMT
Let’s go back to basics here … OBSERVATION OF NATURE … Tap to expand this photo …. then use your mathematics to calculate the potential weight of water and ice, that might be held aloft by the wonders of Nature … in your average storm cloud. …. today’s ‘extreme weather’ …. has likely been exacerbated by secret military geo-weathering experiments - covertly spraying thousands of tons of toxic chemicals into our atmosphere since WW2 …. which have then been bombarded by microwave manipulations. 70 years of this hasn’t helped => extreme clouds are now holding literally TONS of water/ice aloft miraculously … (even fish and frogs on rare occasions? ) …. before a sudden trigger has it released by electrical storms of ferocity … torrential rain and HUGE hail stones (that take ages to form to that size) …. suddenly rain down on us in deluges. Time for the experts here to work out with their calculators the energy/force needed to keep these weights aloft for the time necessary to create the multi-layers in a giant 2 Ib / 8” diameter record sized hailstone… Crack the mechanism at work here … and maybe this will crack the simple Anti-Gravity Principle. …. You don’t need thousands of UFO’s dancing around trying to catch scientist’s attention … when there are giant ice-balls and tons of water held aloft … easily[b levitated[/b] for HOURS. …. Is this an anti-gravity effect at work? ….suddenly released by an electrical effect scientists have been programmed to ignore for thousands of years … and just brushed off as an updraft??
|
|
|
Post by Vinny on May 25, 2024 8:01:57 GMT
So you cannot provide scientific evidence for it. Got it. You're a cultist.
|
|
|
Post by ProVeritas on May 25, 2024 8:05:05 GMT
So you cannot provide scientific evidence for it. Got it. You're a cultist. He did, he linked to a Terminator 2 clip on youtube. All The Best
|
|
|
Post by Vinny on May 26, 2024 6:05:56 GMT
|
|
|
Post by Vinny on May 26, 2024 6:25:20 GMT
Not interested in YouTube rubbish, I'm interested in scientific facts. Anyone can post anything on YouTube. Something being on YouTube isn't enough.
Provide the equation for powering anti gravity. Provide the equation for powering rapid intergalactic travel.
Energy cannot be created or destroyed, only changed from state to state.
How much energy is required and how do you harness it? At what rate is it expended and at what point do you need to refuel?
|
|
|
Post by Dubdrifter on May 26, 2024 8:07:02 GMT
If you study the cross-section of a hailstone … you sometimes see many layers of build-up in the largest heaviest examples. … suggesting some force … explained as an updraft/downdraft combination (not a tornado funnel … let’s be clear what forces are at work here) … theorised to be continually keeping these hailstones rotating up and down in this electrically charged storm cloud for hours. We are aware tornadoes can suck up incredibly heavy weights … and the unpowered aircraft wing shape can generate lift in and around a storm system as hang-glider pilots are occasionally swept up rapidly and high into freezing storm clouds …. But it would be interesting to test if there is an anti-gravity/ionisation particle flow effect going on in most storm clouds that sustain lift … hail up to a maximum of 2Ibs/8” diameter going up and down in this updraft … building up these layers over hours seems a little unlikely?? 🤔 From the different types of hail sticking together before falling … maybe the updraft is only spinning the particles in cold and warm cycles to create the adhesion necessary to build spikey and layered examples?? … My suggestion here is that sustained lift comes from an anti-gravity/ionisation (positron?) effect many scientists could have overlooked?? Weak Gravitational Accretion => adhesion … will only normally occur once a body reaches a significant planetary size. Smaller particles can be persuaded to coalesce in ionisation chambers … (see the principles of powder coating painting techniques used in the automobile industry).
|
|
|
Post by Vinny on May 26, 2024 8:38:35 GMT
Oh for god's sake.
I asked for scientific evidence not cult dogma.
|
|
|
Post by dodgydave on May 27, 2024 0:19:26 GMT
Crossing the Atlantic was a fantasy, once. In a boat, with sails,no or little shelter. Its just a matter of time before we sail in the heavens, the only thing we need is the will to do it. Actually the more we learn, the less likely it is. You couldn't just point a telescope at a distant star and travel to it, what you are seeing is where the star was millions / billions of years ago. There are massive navigational problems because (1) everything in the Universe is moving (2) gravitational interactions (3) the Universe is expanding. We simply science and pretend even our own solar system has nice a regular, predictable pattern, however that is not true. The Universe is chaotic and very hard to predict. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Three-body_problem
|
|