|
|
Post by happyjack on May 19, 2024 0:32:04 GMT
I am not repeating what I thought I saw but what I saw - and that is what I describe above. The fact that you were and are unable to see it does not make it any less true. Why should I see what you thought you saw when I see what the core reasons for Brexit were ? You may or may not have seen ‘quasi racism , blah blah’ but that has nothing to do with the reasons why so many voted to leave the EU. Its obvious that you see a false reflection of Snat prejudice in the Brexit vote . No, I don’t see a reflection, false or otherwise, of SNat prejudice in the Brexit vote. What I see is what I describe above and there is nothing false or “ what you thought you saw” about it. |
|
|
|
Post by Bentley on May 19, 2024 19:44:33 GMT
Why should I see what you thought you saw when I see what the core reasons for Brexit were ? You may or may not have seen ‘quasi racism , blah blah’ but that has nothing to do with the reasons why so many voted to leave the EU. Its obvious that you see a false reflection of Snat prejudice in the Brexit vote . No, I don’t see a reflection, false or otherwise, of SNat prejudice in the Brexit vote. What I see is what I describe above and there is nothing false or “ what you thought you saw” about it. What you saw or what you thought you saw was not the core reading for Brexit . It wasn’t a driving force for Brexit . It wasn't a reflection of Brexit .it was a side show that would have been there with it without Brexit . Brexit had nothing in common with Scottish independence. There is some parallels though , for instance, some advocates claim that they can/ could leave without any negative consequences. |
|
|
|
Post by happyjack on May 19, 2024 20:55:45 GMT
There was no “what I thought I saw” about it. I saw what I describe above and what I describe above was crucial to the Brexit referendum outcome.
|
|
|
|
Post by Bentley on May 19, 2024 20:57:14 GMT
There was no “what I thought I saw” about it. I saw what I describe above and what I describe above was crucial to the Brexit referendum outcome. What you thought you saw was a side show . It wasn’t crucial to anything apart from giving remainers a way to insult leavers . |
|
|
|
Post by happyjack on May 19, 2024 23:38:13 GMT
There is no “what I thought I saw” about it. What I saw and describe above was crucial. The fact that you didn’t see it or refuse to acknowledge it is immaterial to that fact.
|
|
|
|
Post by Bentley on May 20, 2024 18:21:09 GMT
There is no “what I thought I saw” about it. What I saw and describe above was crucial. The fact that you didn’t see it or refuse to acknowledge it is immaterial to that fact. The fact is what you saw or thought you saw wasn't crucial regarding the Brexit vote . The fact that cant see it is your problem . . |
|
|
|
Post by happyjack on May 20, 2024 21:04:41 GMT
No. I don’t have a problem and there is no “what I thought I saw” about it. I saw what I describe above and what I saw above was crucial to the Brexit outcome. If there is or was a problem then that problem lies with you and your inability to see, or your unwillingness to acknowledge, what was going on around you (and, perhaps, with you?).
|
|
|
|
Post by Bentley on May 20, 2024 21:38:30 GMT
No. I don’t have a problem and there is no “what I thought I saw” about it. I saw what I describe above and what I saw above was crucial to the Brexit outcome. If there is or was a problem then that problem lies with you and your inability to see, or your unwillingness to acknowledge, what was going on around you (and, perhaps, with you?). It wasn’t crucial at all . What was crucial about the Brexit vote were the people who realised they gained nothing from EU membership and voted accordingly. What you thought you saw was around before the EU vote and is around now . Your unwillingness to acknowledge this lies with your inability to see what was and is going on around you and perhaps with with you …? See I can do that …. |
|
|
|
Post by wassock on May 20, 2024 21:54:08 GMT
SNAT's independence dreams ripped apart as migrant poll delivers blow to ‘Scexit'
Scotland's independence dreams have been left in tatters as new research puts a hole in claims they are letting in more migrants than other parts of the UK.
The nationalist party have based a number of their Scexit prospectuses on statements which indicate that Scotland is more welcoming to immigration than those south of the border.
The only sensible option for Scotland is the dissolution of their government. |
|
|
|
Post by happyjack on May 21, 2024 0:38:53 GMT
No. I don’t have a problem and there is no “what I thought I saw” about it. I saw what I describe above and what I saw above was crucial to the Brexit outcome. If there is or was a problem then that problem lies with you and your inability to see, or your unwillingness to acknowledge, what was going on around you (and, perhaps, with you?). It wasn’t crucial at all . What was crucial about the Brexit vote were the people who realised they gained nothing from EU membership and voted accordingly. What you thought you saw was around before the EU vote and is around now . Your unwillingness to acknowledge this lies with your inability to see what was and is going on around you and perhaps with with you …? See I can do that …. There was and is no “ what I thought I saw” about it. I saw what I describe above and what I describe above was crucial to the Brexit referendum outcome. Your inability to see it, or your unwillingness to acknowledge it, is immaterial. |
|
|
|
Post by Bentley on May 21, 2024 12:28:43 GMT
It wasn’t crucial at all . What was crucial about the Brexit vote were the people who realised they gained nothing from EU membership and voted accordingly. What you thought you saw was around before the EU vote and is around now . Your unwillingness to acknowledge this lies with your inability to see what was and is going on around you and perhaps with with you …? See I can do that …. There was and is no “ what I thought I saw” about it. I saw what I describe above and what I describe above was crucial to the Brexit referendum outcome. Your inability to see it, or your unwillingness to acknowledge it, is immaterial. What you thought you saw was not crucial to the Brexit referendum. Was WAS crucial were the thing I pointed out. Your inability to see it, or your unwillingness to acknowledge it, is immaterial. I think you see negative factors in the Scot Indy mindset and need to transpose them to the Brexit mindset . Either that or sheer ignorance on your part . |
|
|
|
Post by bancroft on May 22, 2024 20:13:28 GMT
Hollyrood has already pulled one stunt in giving 16yrs + the vote, this my not be the last stunt they pull to try and get their way.
|
|
|
|
Post by happyjack on May 27, 2024 15:26:31 GMT
There was and is no “ what I thought I saw” about it. I saw what I describe above and what I describe above was crucial to the Brexit referendum outcome. Your inability to see it, or your unwillingness to acknowledge it, is immaterial. What you thought you saw was not crucial to the Brexit referendum. Was WAS crucial were the thing I pointed out. Your inability to see it, or your unwillingness to acknowledge it, is immaterial. I think you see negative factors in the Scot Indy mindset and need to transpose them to the Brexit mindset . Either that or sheer ignorance on your part . There is no “what I thought I saw “ about it. What I saw is what I describe above and what I describe above was crucial to the Brexit outcome. The fact that you either failed to see it or ( for whatever reason) are unwilling to acknowledge it is immaterial. |
|
|
|
Post by Bentley on May 27, 2024 15:28:40 GMT
What you thought you saw was not crucial to the Brexit referendum. Was WAS crucial were the thing I pointed out. Your inability to see it, or your unwillingness to acknowledge it, is immaterial. I think you see negative factors in the Scot Indy mindset and need to transpose them to the Brexit mindset . Either that or sheer ignorance on your part . There is no “what I thought I saw “ about it. What I saw is what I describe above and what I describe above was crucial to the Brexit outcome. The fact that you either failed to see it or ( for whatever reason) are unwilling to acknowledge it is immaterial. |
|
|
|
Post by happyjack on May 27, 2024 15:31:33 GMT
There is no “what I thought I saw “ about it. What I saw is what I describe above and what I describe above was crucial to the Brexit outcome. The fact that you either failed to see it or ( for whatever reason) are unwilling to acknowledge it is immaterial.
|
|
