This is what to expect if labour win...

What to expect if Labour win?  ...  looks like more economic decline..




Labour is plotting to introduce new net zero laws that will force big companies and banks to limit their carbon footprint to comply with UN climate goals.

The new laws planned in the event of a Labour victory would legally oblige directors to publish their company’s carbon footprint every year. They would also have to show that their business’s policies were compliant with the UN Paris climate treaty signed in 2015, under which the world agreed to try to limit temperature rises.

The treaty was agreed between governments but Mr Miliband wants the obligations it enshrines to also apply to FTSE 100 businesses including energy producers like Shell and BP, significant energy consumers such as Easyjet and major supermarket chains Tesco and Sainsbury.

Perhaps more importantly, he also wants it to apply to the banks and financial institutions that lend to all businesses. It could potentially mean companies could only get loans if they were “climate compliant.”

A green taxonomy is a system for deciding if an investment is sustainable or not, using thresholds and targets to assess activities and assets to see if they meet objectives on greenhouse gas emissions and sustainability.

It implies Labour would want financial institutions to apply such criteria in all lending and other activities.

Dr Ian Hurst, an associate research director at the National Institute of Economic and Social Research, an independent research centre, said such policies would impact the UK economy, reducing GDP by around 0.6pc and productivity by 0.1pc and potentially creating stranded assets in the energy sector.

He said: “Most of this will be borne by the energy intensive companies unless they invest in carbon capture technologies. Studies have shown that climate measures need to be implemented globally to prevent disparate country impacts and have an actual impact on emissions.

“So this does have the risk of adversely constraining UK companies if the measures implemented far exceed competitors’ own measures.”

Well, at least they have publicly stated what they truly stand for, and that doesn't include caring for their local community, nor caring for the UK as a whole. This should be a boost to the tories.......They have no right to demand anything. They were elected by their communities to do what councillors do! It is not about religion or bowing to their demands!

The '18 DEMANDS' Muslim Vote group issued to Keel after dozens of pro-Gaza activists were elected to councils across UK - from cutting military ties with Israel to 'ensuring insurance quotes don't cost more for someone called Muhammad'

The Muslim Vote also called for Sir mossie bum licker to recognise a Palestinian state

www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-13386393/Muslim-vote-list-demands-Keir-Starmer-Labour-Gaza-Palestine.html

You need Conservative voters to turn out to vote which will happen if a conservative government (little c , centre left) listens to them and takes notice instead of dismissing members as irrelevancies

Sunak was talking the right talk last week about issuing vouchers to welfare scroungers and tightening down the criteria  all the allegedly mentally disabled who now get a free ride because opening the gas bill supposedly gives them the vapours or some such other rubbish.

But its just talk - action is needed now 

One comment made me think - I fully understand that disability handouts are there to fund the extra costs involved with the disability involved - apparently this is even paid to those who are too anxious/scared to leave the house - what possible extra costs does someone who does not go past their front door possibly incur? There are no special clothes /travel/food/social/laundry/entertainment/health  etc  costs involved with this so called 'disability'' so why the hell is there a handout paid? That should immediately be scrapped .

I agree , issuing a green paper now to tighten up on benefit spongers is a waste of time. It's far too late .
If it had been done years ago ,  by now benefit spongers would have been issued with restricted vouchers and those with so called ''anxiety'' on seeing a gas bill or being told they aren't owed a living,  told to pull their socks up and get a job.

Just laughing thinking if Labour win the GE and fuck up big time, how many years will they blame the Tories for their mess by the end of their term people will be on bended knees wishing for a Tory party.

Yeah. The fact that you think people on benefits are coining it in tells me all I need to know.

Basically it's a fiction. People believed it before, they're not so stupid now.

You honestly think that the economic woes of this country are because of people on benefits? 🤔🙄🙃

Did I post that?
No? Well why try (unsucessfully ) to pretend I did so?

I'm posting about the benefit spongers taking the p*ss who moan and contribute absolutely nothing

As you are so very pro spongers of all ilks please tell me exactly what extra expenses are there to do with their imagined ''disability'' someone who allegedly never leaves the house incurs that justifies them continuing to take the p*ss and sponging off the taxpayer?

Disability benefits are supposed to contribute towards those expenses involved in living with a ''disability'' - so what are these mystery ''extra'' costs if they never go out of the house ?