|
Post by Bentley on Mar 24, 2024 13:26:17 GMT
There is a huge interest in the Royal family around the world . We could see that through the popularity of The Crown TV series . A fictional TV series about a fiction Monarchy. So the UK equivalent of Hollywood - is Hollywood taxpayer funded? All The Best Nice strawman . Or was it two?
|
|
|
Post by ProVeritas on Mar 24, 2024 13:28:59 GMT
Imagine choosing a time like this to hate her. What vile people these lot really are. It's no wonder they have to troll forums desperately telling everyone how they're superior. Pathetic. Indeed. There is always an elite in any society and there will always be people who envy and/ or hate them. And most people have much less issue with that, if that Elite is a meritocracy. What we have is an elite based on whose grandfather fucked whose second-cousin. Totally different. All The Best
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 24, 2024 13:32:05 GMT
Imagine choosing a time like this to hate her. What vile people these lot really are. It's no wonder they have to troll forums desperately telling everyone how they're superior. Pathetic. Indeed. There is always an elite in any society and there will always be people who envy and/ or hate them. Agreed, but watching yet another drone pretending to be outraged over something so insignificant as a photo is quite revolting. The Islamists moving in like vultures, because they want a load of hairy authoritarian bigots in control, is very repulsive.
|
|
|
Post by Bentley on Mar 24, 2024 13:32:09 GMT
Indeed. There is always an elite in any society and there will always be people who envy and/ or hate them. And most people have much less issue with that, if that Elite is a meritocracy. What we have is an elite based on whose grandfather fucked whose second-cousin. Totally different. All The Best Elites are never part of a meritocracy and never have been. You live in a fantasy world if you think they ever have been or ever will. Personally I would rather have Kate part of our elite than most .
|
|
|
Post by Montegriffo on Mar 24, 2024 13:41:47 GMT
So they made a statement they didn't know to be true? They claimed she didn't have cancer before knowing the result of their investigations into cancer? A bit misleading don't you think? Never mind releasing doctored images. Any resulting speculation is of the Palace's making. Some heads of PR need to roll.Yeah, the Palace is clearly still playing the 20thC PR Game, and the world has moved on and they are totally out of touch. The photo was disastrous from a PR point of view - it was always going to be once it had been digitally altered, and the Palace PR machine can't pretend to be ignorant of K Notices. The "Hey, I have cancer but jumped the NHS queues even though the Taxpayer pays for my healthcare" footage was almost as damning; could have slipped it through IMO had the photo fuster-cluck not already happened. All The Best Yes, I think the numquam queri, numquam explicare motto should have expired with Her late Majesty RIP.
|
|
|
Post by jonksy on Mar 24, 2024 14:07:16 GMT
1} Pure Vitriol 2} could have fooled me along with many others
3} Bullshit many of the royals are patron saints of charites. Do MP's work 24/7 or do they get time to themselves?
4} Oh is that from the survey where a pile of fucking rocks are a greater attraction than the Grand Canyon? 5} Don't you mean disgusting?
1) Oh, you used Google Dictionary, how quaint. 2) Doesn't take much to fool you though, does it? 3) They are PAID TAXPAYER MONEY to do so. 4) That is an evidence led survey from the global tourist industry - I mean I know you don't like fact that show you to be an idiot, but they are still facts. 5) No, but once again, try using Google Dictionary to learn the correct tense and participles of words' it'll help with you alleged dyslexia. Oh, wait... ...you were trying to be funny... ...something else you fail at, well done. All The Best Well it seems you are easily fooled oh rabid one...And You would be the last person I would turn too for help...You evem make rasputin look good...
|
|
|
Post by ProVeritas on Mar 24, 2024 14:07:44 GMT
And most people have much less issue with that, if that Elite is a meritocracy. What we have is an elite based on whose grandfather fucked whose second-cousin. Totally different. All The Best Elites are never part of a meritocracy and never have been. You live in a fantasy world if you think they ever have been or ever will. Personally I would rather have Kate part of our elite than most . I have no issue with Kate as a person. I wish her a speedy recovery, and hope her and her family are given the time and space they need for that. That does not mean I have to fawn over her very existence and be comfortable with the a publicly funded millionaire seeking to deceive the very public that funds her. I can find something wrong in the actions of a person without hating the person themselves. This is what normal rationale people do every single day. It is only extremist absolutists like B-4 that think disapproving of an action by X means hating X. All The Best
|
|
|
Post by Bentley on Mar 24, 2024 14:55:12 GMT
Elites are never part of a meritocracy and never have been. You live in a fantasy world if you think they ever have been or ever will. Personally I would rather have Kate part of our elite than most . I have no issue with Kate as a person. I wish her a speedy recovery, and hope her and her family are given the time and space they need for that. That does not mean I have to fawn over her very existence and be comfortable with the a publicly funded millionaire seeking to deceive the very public that funds her. I can find something wrong in the actions of a person without hating the person themselves. This is what normal rationale people do every single day. It is only extremist absolutists like B-4 that think disapproving of an action by X means hating X. All The Best I honestly don’t believe there is any mechanism in this country that makes you ‘ have’ to fawn over the RF. I don’t believe she deceived the public in any meaningful sense .
|
|
|
Post by Fairsociety on Mar 24, 2024 15:03:20 GMT
Elites are never part of a meritocracy and never have been. You live in a fantasy world if you think they ever have been or ever will. Personally I would rather have Kate part of our elite than most . I have no issue with Kate as a person. I wish her a speedy recovery, and hope her and her family are given the time and space they need for that. That does not mean I have to fawn over her very existence and be comfortable with the a publicly funded millionaire seeking to deceive the very public that funds her. I can find something wrong in the actions of a person without hating the person themselves. This is what normal rationale people do every single day. It is only extremist absolutists like B-4 that think disapproving of an action by X means hating X. All The Best The royal family aren't attention seekers, they don't need to pull publicity stunts, unlike the toxic twosome in America, any chance for a photo opportunity, tipping off the press everywhere they go ... look at us ... everyone look at us ..... it's all about us.
Kate and the rest of the proper royal family don't need to do any of that, Kate hasn't asked for all the media frenzy, she realises it comes with the territory, so you thinking you are 'forced' in to some sort of compulsory Kate conspiracy frenzy is just utter nonsense, I am sure Kate wishes people would get on with their own lives, and LEAVE her and her family ALONE.
|
|
|
Post by ProVeritas on Mar 24, 2024 15:11:22 GMT
I have no issue with Kate as a person. I wish her a speedy recovery, and hope her and her family are given the time and space they need for that. That does not mean I have to fawn over her very existence and be comfortable with the a publicly funded millionaire seeking to deceive the very public that funds her. I can find something wrong in the actions of a person without hating the person themselves. This is what normal rationale people do every single day. It is only extremist absolutists like B-4 that think disapproving of an action by X means hating X. All The Best The royal family aren't attention seekers, they don't need to pull publicity stunts, unlike the toxic twosome in America, any chance for a photo opportunity, tipping off the press everywhere they go ... look at us ... everyone look at us ..... it's all about us.
Kate and the rest of the proper royal family don't need to do any of that, Kate hasn't asked for all the media frenzy, she realises it comes with the territory, so you thinking you are 'forced' in to some sort of compulsory Kate conspiracy frenzy is just utter nonsense, I am sure Kate wishes people would get on with their own lives, and LEAVE her and her family ALONE.
I am not sure what Whataboutery involving "The Ginger & The Whinger" has to do with this. I don't judge Kate's or anyone else's actions based on the actions of others, I judge them on their own merit. It was, and Kate and William and their PR Team knew it was, wrong to send a Photoshopped image to the world's press, knowing it would be subject to a K Notice when the inept alterations were finally noticed. It was inevitable that doing so would lead to a media and social-media frenzy. People will get on with their own lives and leave Kate and her family to get on with theirs when they stop being Taxpayer Funded Millionaires. As long as they remain such the public has a right to focus a little more attention on them. All The Best
|
|
|
Post by wapentake on Mar 24, 2024 15:14:15 GMT
I have no issue with Kate as a person. I wish her a speedy recovery, and hope her and her family are given the time and space they need for that. That does not mean I have to fawn over her very existence and be comfortable with the a publicly funded millionaire seeking to deceive the very public that funds her. I can find something wrong in the actions of a person without hating the person themselves. This is what normal rationale people do every single day. It is only extremist absolutists like B-4 that think disapproving of an action by X means hating X. All The Best The royal family aren't attention seekers, they don't need to pull publicity stunts, unlike the toxic twosome in America, any chance for a photo opportunity, tipping off the press everywhere they go ... look at us ... everyone look at us ..... it's all about us.
Kate and the rest of the proper royal family don't need to do any of that, Kate hasn't asked for all the media frenzy, she realises it comes with the territory, so you thinking you are 'forced' in to some sort of compulsory Kate conspiracy frenzy is just utter nonsense, I am sure Kate wishes people would get on with their own lives, and LEAVE her and her family ALONE.
I wouldn't say toxic,I feel sorry for Harry who despite what is called a privileged life lost his mother at an early age and he’s strong in his belief she was hounded by the press not least in the manner of her death. Also if you do a bit of research and look at the people who actually served with him in the army theres a good percentage who rated him.
|
|
|
Post by jonksy on Mar 24, 2024 15:15:55 GMT
I have no issue with Kate as a person. I wish her a speedy recovery, and hope her and her family are given the time and space they need for that. That does not mean I have to fawn over her very existence and be comfortable with the a publicly funded millionaire seeking to deceive the very public that funds her. I can find something wrong in the actions of a person without hating the person themselves. This is what normal rationale people do every single day. It is only extremist absolutists like B-4 that think disapproving of an action by X means hating X. All The Best The royal family aren't attention seekers, they don't need to pull publicity stunts, unlike the toxic twosome in America, any chance for a photo opportunity, tipping off the press everywhere they go ... look at us ... everyone look at us ..... it's all about us.
Kate and the rest of the proper royal family don't need to do any of that, Kate hasn't asked for all the media frenzy, she realises it comes with the territory, so you thinking you are 'forced' in to some sort of compulsory Kate conspiracy frenzy is just utter nonsense, I am sure Kate wishes people would get on with their own lives, and LEAVE her and her family ALONE.
Little chance of that mate. The trolls and flamers of envy will treat her with the utmost contempt...Lets hope they don't have to deal with such a sitiation in their miserable lives and then try and state it isn't a leveller..
|
|
|
Post by Fairsociety on Mar 24, 2024 15:18:06 GMT
The royal family aren't attention seekers, they don't need to pull publicity stunts, unlike the toxic twosome in America, any chance for a photo opportunity, tipping off the press everywhere they go ... look at us ... everyone look at us ..... it's all about us.
Kate and the rest of the proper royal family don't need to do any of that, Kate hasn't asked for all the media frenzy, she realises it comes with the territory, so you thinking you are 'forced' in to some sort of compulsory Kate conspiracy frenzy is just utter nonsense, I am sure Kate wishes people would get on with their own lives, and LEAVE her and her family ALONE.
I am not sure what Whataboutery involving "The Ginger & The Whinger" has to do with this. I don't judge Kate's or anyone else's actions based on the actions of others, I judge them on their own merit. It was, and Kate and William and their PR Team knew it was, wrong to send a Photoshopped image to the world's press, knowing it would be subject to a K Notice when the inept alterations were finally noticed. It was inevitable that doing so would lead to a media and social-media frenzy. People will get on with their own lives and leave Kate and her family to get on with theirs when they stop being Taxpayer Funded Millionaires. As long as they remain such the public has a right to focus a little more attention on them. All The Best Why should the 'entitled' public demand the royals should give them any private photos of themselves, even if it is photoshopped, they graciously allow the public in to their private lives, something that would piss me right off, how would you feel if the media and public were 'demanding' pictures of your family, I am sure you would have something to say about it ........ We do not own the royal family, they are entitled to a private life, they generate on average over a £Billion a year in tourist revenue, and all the hotels, shops, hospitality industries would suffer financially if it weren't royal tourists.
The royals owe us nothing, personally if I was Kate and William I'd tell the press and the entitled public to kiss my fuck arse, but of course they are far too polite and tolerant to do that.
|
|
|
Post by Fairsociety on Mar 24, 2024 15:23:33 GMT
The royal family aren't attention seekers, they don't need to pull publicity stunts, unlike the toxic twosome in America, any chance for a photo opportunity, tipping off the press everywhere they go ... look at us ... everyone look at us ..... it's all about us.
Kate and the rest of the proper royal family don't need to do any of that, Kate hasn't asked for all the media frenzy, she realises it comes with the territory, so you thinking you are 'forced' in to some sort of compulsory Kate conspiracy frenzy is just utter nonsense, I am sure Kate wishes people would get on with their own lives, and LEAVE her and her family ALONE.
I wouldn't say toxic,I feel sorry for Harry who despite what is called a privileged life lost his mother at an early age and he’s strong in his belief she was hounded by the press not least in the manner of her death. Also if you do a bit of research and look at the people who actually served with him in the army theres a good percentage who rated him. We are fed up of him using and abusing his mothers death, many children lose parents, he's no different, and as for serving in the army, he got as close to the front line in Afghanistan as I did, plus he cause a big headache because he had to have personal security protecting him, he's always been a spoilt little brat who is use to getting all his own way, a nasty piece of work.
|
|
|
Post by ProVeritas on Mar 24, 2024 15:27:18 GMT
I am not sure what Whataboutery involving "The Ginger & The Whinger" has to do with this. I don't judge Kate's or anyone else's actions based on the actions of others, I judge them on their own merit. It was, and Kate and William and their PR Team knew it was, wrong to send a Photoshopped image to the world's press, knowing it would be subject to a K Notice when the inept alterations were finally noticed. It was inevitable that doing so would lead to a media and social-media frenzy. People will get on with their own lives and leave Kate and her family to get on with theirs when they stop being Taxpayer Funded Millionaires. As long as they remain such the public has a right to focus a little more attention on them. All The Best Why should the 'entitled' public demand the royals should give them any private photos of themselves, even if it is photoshopped, they graciously allow the public in to their private lives, something that would piss me right off, how would you feel if the media and public were 'demanding' pictures of your family, I am sure you would have something to say about it ........ We do not own the royal family, they are entitled to a private life, they generate on average over a £Billion a year in tourist revenue, and all the hotels, shops, hospitality industries would suffer financially if it weren't royal tourists.
The royals owe us nothing, personally if I was Kate and William I'd tell the press and the entitled public to kiss my fuck arse, but of course they are far too polite and tolerant to do that.
They owe us EVERYTHING. They exist because we fund them. They hoard wealth because we allow to ignore rules on tax and Inheritance. They are not even a real Monarchy, just a pretend one, nothing more than a Disneyland with pomp and tax breaks. Net recurring value of Royal Family just £197 Million per year for the 2023/2024 Financial Year: brandfinance.com/press-releases/new-analysis-finds-the-uk-monarchy-produces-a-net-economic-benefit-for-the-ukAll The Best
|
|