|
|
Post by Baron von Lotsov on Mar 18, 2024 13:29:00 GMT
They are just like distraught children. No one benefits from such a pathetic display. Meanwhile the important news goes unpublished.
I bet you didn't hear that puberty blockers will be banned by April. That's chemical castration and immensely damaging, but it was allowed to go on for years.
I did hear about it actually but kind of thought it not worth starting a thread about since I have no issue with them being banned. But what has that got to do with the price of fish? We do not have a functioning democracy when every front page is taken up by tabloid inane gossip. It means the dictators can quietly get on and screw us. Have you noticed some of the poorest countries have the richest people in them? Mexico for example was where the richest man in the world operated from. That's how it is in the Third World. The poverty largely comes about via mass corruption. The papers play a part by talking about things like this. It keep the demos off the trail of what the real business is. Anyway, how to commit genocide without a single bullet: just prescribe puberty blockers and that's the British consigned to history. Remember they started by making them gay. Now today the Tories I hear are trying to crown Mordaunt, who is a keen advocate of the ones prescribing puberty blockers down at the Tavistock. I think what rocked them was someone went to their lawyers and proceeded to go for the kill. |
|
|
|
Post by Baron von Lotsov on Mar 18, 2024 15:36:57 GMT
Yes but she says it in a rather playful way, as an intellectual plays with ideas. It's not meant to insult but to stimulate an argument that defeats her argument. She might say something like well why should we not have a black prime minister - I think it is a great idea myself. It's to draw out the counter augments of your opponent. One pisser where she always has a grin on her face is the opponent is handicapped because some of the strongest reasons he might proffer in response would cause an uproar, and probably get him arrested, such as to point out how Africa is stupid and you can prove it by its history of non-development. That's a sound argument intellectually, but take those away by law and she is grinning. You get the idea. She finds it rather funny how the Brits have given people like her undue power. You can't blame her, can you. She didn't give herself power. When she was younger she was an object of celebration, as per Britain's first black MP or something. I don't think there is a thing playful about the lady whatsoever. Corbyn used her as a sex object to prove to his peers he had no problems fucking black women. She's like Paddington bear. They found her at Paddington station!
Apparently she originated from Jamaica. The thing is blacks come in various shades, and the Jamaicans are quite different from lets say a Somalian. Out of all the blacks I would say the Jamaicans were the most successful in getting on with the Brits and take a laid back attitude. They just want to do their thing and don't care too much for the police knocking on their door. They have the attitude, if the police don't fuck with them they wont bother the police. It was only a problem when the police had to follow their stupid rules and poke their noses in. So that is how it is with Jamaicans. They wont do those protest marches or anything, but they will get into putting on a carnival. I used to know a few from Manchester and they were pretty friendly. I see Abbott much in the same light. She's not in any way vicious, but it is more like she is thinking, wow this is a great life, look at all the great perks I'm getting. She is not at all pissed off. What has happened is our politically correct Brits have showered her with awards, like figurehead of their false religion. She's just going along for the ride. And this is why they did not let her give her own view on how she felt in the House of Commons debate. She stood up 47 times.
|
|
|
|
Post by ratcliff on Mar 18, 2024 16:26:41 GMT
I don't think there is a thing playful about the lady whatsoever. Corbyn used her as a sex object to prove to his peers he had no problems fucking black women. She's like Paddington bear. They found her at Paddington station!
Apparently she originated from Jamaica. The thing is blacks come in various shades, and the Jamaicans are quite different from lets say a Somalian. Out of all the blacks I would say the Jamaicans were the most successful in getting on with the Brits and take a laid back attitude. They just want to do their thing and don't care too much for the police knocking on their door. They have the attitude, if the police don't fuck with them they wont bother the police. It was only a problem when the police had to follow their stupid rules and poke their noses in. So that is how it is with Jamaicans. They wont do those protest marches or anything, but they will get into putting on a carnival. I used to know a few from Manchester and they were pretty friendly. I see Abbott much in the same light. She's not in any way vicious, but it is more like she is thinking, wow this is a great life, look at all the great perks I'm getting. She is not at all pissed off. What has happened is our politically correct Brits have showered her with awards, like figurehead of their false religion. She's just going along for the ride. And this is why they did not let her give her own view on how she felt in the House of Commons debate. She stood up 47 times.
She stood up 47 times? That's good exercise for mobility and helps towards weight loss Her diabetic nurse will be happy to see that |
|
|
|
Post by Fairsociety on Mar 18, 2024 16:29:12 GMT
She's like Paddington bear. They found her at Paddington station!
Apparently she originated from Jamaica. The thing is blacks come in various shades, and the Jamaicans are quite different from lets say a Somalian. Out of all the blacks I would say the Jamaicans were the most successful in getting on with the Brits and take a laid back attitude. They just want to do their thing and don't care too much for the police knocking on their door. They have the attitude, if the police don't fuck with them they wont bother the police. It was only a problem when the police had to follow their stupid rules and poke their noses in. So that is how it is with Jamaicans. They wont do those protest marches or anything, but they will get into putting on a carnival. I used to know a few from Manchester and they were pretty friendly. I see Abbott much in the same light. She's not in any way vicious, but it is more like she is thinking, wow this is a great life, look at all the great perks I'm getting. She is not at all pissed off. What has happened is our politically correct Brits have showered her with awards, like figurehead of their false religion. She's just going along for the ride. And this is why they did not let her give her own view on how she felt in the House of Commons debate. She stood up 47 times.
She stood up 47 times? That's good exercise for mobility and helps towards weight loss Her diabetic nurse will be happy to see that LOL... |
|
|
|
Post by Fairsociety on Mar 18, 2024 16:30:40 GMT
So she stood up 47 times, I bet that's the most work she's ever done as a MP
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 18, 2024 17:07:12 GMT
I do not believe she has called upon anyone she dislikes to be shot, certainly not another elected representative. Nor has she used dislike of a particular individual to state that it makes her hate entire ethnic groups. And her supposed dislike of white people is mostly tongue in cheek. In any case perpetrators can also be victims... I'm not sure that Abbot's comments are tongue-in-cheek but Hesters clearly were and he's getting no quarter, so she can stuff her hypocrisy. And as for perps being victims, it's a case of live by the sword: If you attract certain kinds of trouble then you tend to get it back. As Abbot does. So nice try, Shrieks. But no cigar. Your attempts to defend the indefensible are utterly risible as ever. Still, I suppose you and others around here have comedy value from time to time. |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 18, 2024 17:10:57 GMT
Whataboutery is no excuse for Hester's obviously racist opinions. Whoever first adopted the term whataboutery should be shot (see what I did there?) Whataboutery a dishonest ploy to shut down any counter argument and claim the higher ground which when used I’ve always found to be dishonest debate (nothing personal I’ve said this to others) Basically what you’re saying and I’ll use an outrageous example Public figure A who coerced another in to a sexual act and then for the sake of that argument is known to have paid out a large sum and required a NDA signed goes on to say any public figure convicted of rape should be barred from office for life when talking about public figure B. You point the inconsistency out and up pops someone and says you can’t say that it’s whataboutery. That’s really your line here,Hester said something in private but very stupid for someone in his position Abbot was equally stupid and public,you can claim all you like her comments were more subtle but it does amount to hypocrisy to try and justify that. Further I was amused that Harman cried and called for her return to the fold but whilst in her position of power and very apparent hatred for Boris she couldn’t wait to turn the knife on him. Yes Boris was stupid too but there’s a lot of hypocrisy and reason to say ”but what about “much of what goes on in Westminster. I am surprised that someone with your intelligence is joining the usual suspects in defence of the indefensible, in your case attempting to combine whataboutery with minimisation. But then again you did vote for Boris Johnson so I suppose I am expecting too much. |
|
|
|
Post by The Squeezed Middle on Mar 18, 2024 17:19:23 GMT
I'm not sure that Abbot's comments are tongue-in-cheek but Hesters clearly were and he's getting no quarter, so she can stuff her hypocrisy. And as for perps being victims, it's a case of live by the sword: If you attract certain kinds of trouble then you tend to get it back. As Abbot does. So nice try, Shrieks. But no cigar. Your attempts to defend the indefensible are utterly risible as ever. Still, I suppose you and others around here have comedy value from time to time. That was a particularly pointless post even by your standards, Shrieks.
Now, I know that to someone such as yourself, any shrill allegation of "Racism", no matter how stupid, is the worst thing ever.
But anyone with a sense of proportion it's clear that Abbot's a big fat racist and her attempts to demonstrate fauxtrage over a five year old non-incident carry absolutely zero weight.
So you carry on and whip up a nice case of fauxtrage, Shrieks. Just know that normal people don't give the remotest shit.  |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 18, 2024 17:20:13 GMT
I did hear about it actually but kind of thought it not worth starting a thread about since I have no issue with them being banned. But what has that got to do with the price of fish? We do not have a functioning democracy when every front page is taken up by tabloid inane gossip. It means the dictators can quietly get on and screw us. Have you noticed some of the poorest countries have the richest people in them? Mexico for example was where the richest man in the world operated from. That's how it is in the Third World. The poverty largely comes about via mass corruption. The papers play a part by talking about things like this. It keep the demos off the trail of what the real business is. Anyway, how to commit genocide without a single bullet: just prescribe puberty blockers and that's the British consigned to history. Remember they started by making them gay. Now today the Tories I hear are trying to crown Mordaunt, who is a keen advocate of the ones prescribing puberty blockers down at the Tavistock. I think what rocked them was someone went to their lawyers and proceeded to go for the kill. More usually they talk about immigrants and the poor, encouraging people to direct their malice at those even more poor and more powerless than themselves. And most of you - including you personally - buy into it lock stock and barrel rather than getting angry at all the ones really in charge. But because this is a racist Tory donor attacking a black left winger, suddenly it is all distraction tactics, because it is something you would all rather agree with than get angry about. Instead you play your part by getting angry at the ones getting angry, doing exactly as they want you to. As the money keeps disappearing into off shore accounts. The thing is, Hester is one of the ones benefitting from mass corruption and will no doubt end up in the Lords, so they are relying on all you useful idiots ranting on his behalf, without you having the first clue that you are the ones being played by the corrupt bastards |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 18, 2024 17:25:10 GMT
Your attempts to defend the indefensible are utterly risible as ever. Still, I suppose you and others around here have comedy value from time to time. That was a particularly pointless post even by your standards, Shrieks.
Now, I know that to someone such as yourself, any shrill allegation of "Racism", no matter how stupid, is the worst thing ever.
But anyone with a sense of proportion it's clear that Abbot's a big fat racist and her attempts to demonstrate fauxtrage over a five year old non-incident carry absolutely zero weight.
So you carry on and whip up a nice case of fauxtrage, Shrieks. Just know that normal people don't give the remotest shit. If by normal people you mean ageing right wing racists who regret the passing of golliwogs and the black and white minstrels, then yes they no doubt don't give a shit. The mistake you and others around here are making as usual though is in assuming that you are representative of majority opinion just because most of your mates think like you. When in fact you are an ageing and dying breed. |
|
|
|
Post by andrewbrown on Mar 18, 2024 17:26:51 GMT
The victims of racism are themselves racist for complaining so loudly about it? If you say so. Abbot's not a victim. She's a serial perpetrator. You can be both. They are not mutually exclusive. |
|
|
|
Post by The Squeezed Middle on Mar 18, 2024 17:31:15 GMT
That was a particularly pointless post even by your standards, Shrieks. Now, I know that to someone such as yourself, any shrill allegation of "Racism", no matter how stupid, is the worst thing ever. But anyone with a sense of proportion it's clear that Abbot's a big fat racist and her attempts to demonstrate fauxtrage over a five year old non-incident carry absolutely zero weight. So you carry on and whip up a nice case of fauxtrage, Shrieks. Just know that normal people don't give the remotest shit. If by normal people you mean ageing right wing racists who regret the passing of golliwogs and the black and white minstrels, then yes they no doubt don't give a shit. The mistake you and others around here are making as usual though is in assuming that you are representative of majority opinion just because most of your mates think like you. When in fact you are an ageing and dying breed. Except that not even her own party wanted to hear it, Shrieks. Sorry, but...  Well, except you and maybe three other lefties. |
|
|
|
Post by The Squeezed Middle on Mar 18, 2024 17:31:44 GMT
Abbot's not a victim. She's a serial perpetrator. You can be both. They are not mutually exclusive. See above where I already addressed this for Shrieky. |
|
|
|
Post by Bentley on Mar 18, 2024 17:32:23 GMT
Next time Tommy Robinson is insulted I expect the lefties to be very sympathetic to him.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 18, 2024 17:40:46 GMT
Next time Tommy Robinson is insulted I expect the lefties to be very sympathetic to him. He tends to be insulted for being a racist prick, not because of his skin colour. You are either too thick or too racist yourself to understand the difference. The fact that you leap to the defence of a well known racist hatemonger tells me all I need to know about where you are coming from. |
|
