Frank Hester/Diane Abbott.

Not so it is why it is inappropriate that is the issue. It is nasty but it is not racist.

It is not racist to say that a member of a group makes you want to hate all of that group but you will not. In fact it is the opposite of being racist. It is important to give the qualifying points. It seems the left just love missing bits out to paint a picture that is not there.
It would not be racist for Dianne Abbott to say Nick Griffin makes me want to hate all white men but I know that is wrong and I will not.

EDIT as an aside a man who made gun gestures at Nick Griffin and allegedly shouted white bastards at a group of BNP men was found not guilty of racial abuse and threatening behaviour so it seems that making intimation that someone will be shot is OK. 

People often reveal their true nature in private gatherings amongst their mates, which they hide from wider audiences. Things like racism and misogyny for example. Racism is n ot acceptable just because we were never supposed to know about it.

He then of course says that is wrong and he should not hate all black women because of Mz Abbott. Why do people keep on missing that bit out? 

Because what he said in an unguarded moment is obviously more likely to be representative of his true feelings than something he is saying publicly to try and get himself out  of the shit.

I saw an interview with her on social media a few hours back. She really isn't bothered about it an was smiling and saying I'm sure Kier will hand back the whip. Maybe she has some antisemitism proof on Starmer or something.  What I think our main problem here is, is the press are all kind of paid off so they go full blast to try and destroy someone or other at the request of their sponsors. It's deep corruption an it make the press look like clowns.

The press are simply doing their job. Any big donor saying shite like this would be all over the papers if they got wind of it. So there is no point of value at all in blaming the press for doing their job. The motives of whoever blew the whistle and why ought to be of more concern. But that in no way diminishes the enormity of Hester's own utterings.

If that someone is a major donor to a political party, especially if the sums involved are so large that they smell of undue influence of a kind most of us vaguely regard as a bit corrupt, then when that someone spouts racist and extremist opinions it matters.

Were he someone who uttered such opinions without donating large sums, no one would care nearly so much, just another racist of a kind that exists all over the place. It is the fact of someone with such obviously obnoxious views buying substantial influence in one of our main political parties that makes it the serious issue it is.