|
|
Post by Bentley on Mar 18, 2024 19:54:20 GMT
Shrieks, please quote where I've said anything racist on this thread.
Because there's nothing like repeating an untruth to really make you look like a proper bell-end.
I am happy to let others read this entire thread to determine for themselves who the real bell ends are. Your fellow racists will conclude it is people like me. Others of a more enlightened disposition might well conclude otherwise. Let what has thus far been said tell readers who the real bell ends are. Now this is interesting. MRAngry cries about being called a dimwit and then calls others bellends and racists . What was that about a mirror? Hester made an informal comment about the racist black MP Dianne Abbott where he said she made him want to hate black women but that he doesn’t . Hardly racist . He said she should be shot . Not because she was black . He didn’t call for her to be shot , he made a crude remark . Anyone but the most mollycoddled leftie has heard this kind of informal talk . They know that he never called for her to be murdered. Hester didn’t make a racist comment about the black racist . He made a very silly pub type comment that was wheeled out as a smoke screen for the growlers hypocrisy. |
|
|
|
Post by Bentley on Mar 18, 2024 19:56:15 GMT
Depends. If you call someone a dimwit, are they a victim of abuse? It is what they do when called out. I am guilty this evening of giving back more than they have given purely for my own entertainment. If some mod wants to come along and delete it all thats fine. But I did not start the trading of insults. One here in particular loves the word "dimwit" when he is himself too dim to formulate a more intelligent response. It generally signposts that he has lost the argument. But alas, guilty as charged in responding to them on the same level, albeit with more wit, largely for my own amusement. Its not big and its not clever I know, but I am still willing to respond intelligently to intelligent arguments. Basing any kind of argument on the supposed notion that I am a dimwit does not work well in terms of eliciting an intelligent response from me, unsurprisingly enough. But you haven’t dimwit. You have merely got more angrier and angrier every time your false claim was pointed out . Let me remind you again of your 3rd post “Something you and the other transparently obvious white racists around here will never understand because in your inner souls you believe racism is okay unless directed at white people. A double standard that leaves your true selves naked in the spotlight for all to see.”And you whine about lack of ‘ intelligent’ arguments Dimwit. |
|
|
|
Post by Bentley on Mar 18, 2024 19:57:23 GMT
Oh, I think we can both agree that you've admirably managed that.  Your lack of self awareness has proven worthy of a modest chuckle. Keep going. Are you and See2 related ?.😁 |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 18, 2024 20:01:39 GMT
A highly intelligent post which surely wins any debate, a post liked by those of equal intelligence clearly |
|
|
|
Post by The Squeezed Middle on Mar 18, 2024 20:01:59 GMT
I am happy to let others read this entire thread to determine for themselves who the real bell ends are. Your fellow racists will conclude it is people like me. Others of a more enlightened disposition might well conclude otherwise. Let what has thus far been said tell readers who the real bell ends are. Now this is interesting. MRAngry cries about being called a dimwit and then calls others bellends and racists . What was that about a mirror? Hester made an informal comment about the racist black MP Dianne Abbott where he said she made him want to hate black women but that he doesn’t . Hardly racist . He said she should be shot . Not because she was black . He didn’t call for her to be shot , he made a crude remark . Anyone but the most mollycoddled leftie has heard this kind of informal talk . They know that he never called for her to be murdered. Hester didn’t make a racist comment about the black racist . He made a very silly pub type comment that was wheeled out as a smoke screen for the growlers hypocrisy. Yes, but Shrieks and his fellow anti-Semites can't see it that way. Anyone who disagrees is a de-facto racist to them.
The irony is lost on them. |
|
|
|
Post by Bentley on Mar 18, 2024 20:04:08 GMT
A highly intelligent post which surely wins any debate, a post liked by those of equal intelligence clearly It puts you and people like you into perspective . There are plenty of others like you out there l |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 18, 2024 20:06:29 GMT
I am happy to let others read this entire thread to determine for themselves who the real bell ends are. Your fellow racists will conclude it is people like me. Others of a more enlightened disposition might well conclude otherwise. Let what has thus far been said tell readers who the real bell ends are. Now this is interesting. MRAngry cries about being called a dimwit and then calls others bellends and racists . What was that about a mirror? Hester made an informal comment about the racist black MP Dianne Abbott where he said she made him want to hate black women but that he doesn’t . Hardly racist . He said she should be shot . Not because she was black . He didn’t call for her to be shot , he made a crude remark . Anyone but the most mollycoddled leftie has heard this kind of informal talk . They know that he never called for her to be murdered. Hester didn’t make a racist comment about the black racist . He made a very silly pub type comment that was wheeled out as a smoke screen for the growlers hypocrisy. So Hester did nothing wrong. Abbott is the racist for complaining about it. Tis a pity then that the Tory leadership regard it as racist but are hanging on to his money anyway. One thing. You called me a dimwit which is obviously a deliberate insult. In response I called you a fuckwit which is also an insult. But I also said you are thick and a racist. And both of those things are clearly demonstrable facts. |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 18, 2024 20:09:40 GMT
Now this is interesting. MRAngry cries about being called a dimwit and then calls others bellends and racists . What was that about a mirror? Hester made an informal comment about the racist black MP Dianne Abbott where he said she made him want to hate black women but that he doesn’t . Hardly racist . He said she should be shot . Not because she was black . He didn’t call for her to be shot , he made a crude remark . Anyone but the most mollycoddled leftie has heard this kind of informal talk . They know that he never called for her to be murdered. Hester didn’t make a racist comment about the black racist . He made a very silly pub type comment that was wheeled out as a smoke screen for the growlers hypocrisy. Yes, but Shrieks and his fellow anti-Semites can't see it that way. Anyone who disagrees is a de-facto racist to them.
The irony is lost on them. On what basis do you call me an antisemite? I do not hate Jews. Where is your evidence? Or are you as ever posting throwaway slurs as a form of shit, hoping that some of it will stick? Starmer would probably give you a job if you tell him about this, |
|
|
|
Post by Bentley on Mar 18, 2024 20:10:34 GMT
Now this is interesting. MRAngry cries about being called a dimwit and then calls others bellends and racists . What was that about a mirror? Hester made an informal comment about the racist black MP Dianne Abbott where he said she made him want to hate black women but that he doesn’t . Hardly racist . He said she should be shot . Not because she was black . He didn’t call for her to be shot , he made a crude remark . Anyone but the most mollycoddled leftie has heard this kind of informal talk . They know that he never called for her to be murdered. Hester didn’t make a racist comment about the black racist . He made a very silly pub type comment that was wheeled out as a smoke screen for the growlers hypocrisy. Yes, but Shrieks and his fellow anti-Semites can't see it that way. Anyone who disagrees is a de-facto racist to them.
The irony is lost on them. Indeed and that’s why I liken them to religious cult followers. They are offended by anyone who takes another view than theirs . Any dissent is met with outrage . Any opposing view is the work of blasphemers and heretics . A racist is a racist because they say so . No mitigation , no explanation, no other view is worth considering. |
|
|
|
Post by Baron von Lotsov on Mar 18, 2024 20:12:29 GMT
You are just making a logical error. He is part of a set of rich people who donate to political parties. There is another set of people who are corrupt and cheat the system. We have examples where the two sets intersect, so we observe people who are a member of both sets. This does not imply every member of set A is a member of set B. It's simple set theory. I take that on board. It does not necessarily follow that just because someone is very wealthy it does not mean that he or she is automatically part of the corrupt ruling elite. Hester has definitely been using his wealth to buy political influence. Although not illegal, most people tend to regard a system that allows this as morally corrupt. But there is no evidence yet public of more than that. However, the fact is that some of the wealthy elites are part of the corruptocracy and it is not something ordinary joes are going to be part of. By definition, you are unlikely to be a major part of the corruption unless you are yourself getting rich or even richer out of it. So whilst not all rich people need be part of the corruption, almost all of those up to their necks in it will be amongst the rich or super rich. The fact that we are highly unlikely to ever be allowed to know who is or is not corruptly leeching off us does not change the fact of it quite obviously happening. And it is curious that a media mostly owned and controlled by the wealthy elites seeks so obviously to foment public anger at powerless groups easy to demonise, who in no way control anything of significance. The people who truly are ruining our lives are not the powerless scapegoat groups we are encouraged to hate who mostly have no power at all to hurt us. It is the ones in power who control everything who are ruining our lives. Until we wake up to that reality we wll keep hating migrants and welfare claimants whilst getting ever poorer as the wealthy elites keep taking the piss unchallenged Have a read of this link because it seems to give you a fair idea how he made his money. He got friendly with the Chinese and the Chinese look like they gave him a leg-up.
Perhaps it was because he was with Call me Dave, but this is what happens when you impress the Chinese and don't insult them. They like tech gurus.
|
|
|
|
Post by Bentley on Mar 18, 2024 20:19:12 GMT
Now this is interesting. MRAngry cries about being called a dimwit and then calls others bellends and racists . What was that about a mirror? Hester made an informal comment about the racist black MP Dianne Abbott where he said she made him want to hate black women but that he doesn’t . Hardly racist . He said she should be shot . Not because she was black . He didn’t call for her to be shot , he made a crude remark . Anyone but the most mollycoddled leftie has heard this kind of informal talk . They know that he never called for her to be murdered. Hester didn’t make a racist comment about the black racist . He made a very silly pub type comment that was wheeled out as a smoke screen for the growlers hypocrisy. So Hester did nothing wrong. Abbott is the racist for complaining about it. Tis a pity then that the Tory leadership regard it as racist but are hanging on to his money anyway. One thing. You called me a dimwit which is obviously a deliberate insult. In response I called you a fuckwit which is also an insult. But I also said you are thick and a racist. And both of those things are clearly demonstrable facts. No Hester did quite a lot wrong . He made a remark that he knew would leave him open to accusation of racism but trusted the people around him. His point was that Abbott ( the racist ) was so awful that it soured his view of women like her but he doesn’t hate them. Had he left it there then he might just might have got away with this diatribe against Abbott. But he said that she should be shot …stupid thing to say . I called you are a dimwit because you are .No other reason . I’m not thick because I pointed out your false claim . I’m not racist because I pointed out your false claim . Im not thick because I pointed out that you are a dimwit . I’m not offended by a dimwit calling me thick . |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 18, 2024 20:25:00 GMT
Yes, but Shrieks and his fellow anti-Semites can't see it that way. Anyone who disagrees is a de-facto racist to them.
The irony is lost on them. Indeed and that’s why I liken them to religious cult followers. They are offended by anyone who takes another view than theirs . Any dissent is met with outrage . Any opposing view is the work of blasphemers and heretics . A racist is a racist because they say so . No mitigation , no explanation, no other view is worth considering. We are offended by ageing racists who think their kneejerk racism is ok. But most of them will be dead in 20 years and the UK will move on without them. Their obvious desire to return to some mythical golden age of the 1950s is looking truly daft to most of us. Including me of an age not far removed from them, but in tune with my younger friends and relatives. I am aware of how my generation and yours have stolen their futures and think they are shit for not dealing with it whilst wishing to impose upon them your own negative values and bigotries. When you are gone they will despise your memory and legacy as they cope with the shit you left them. I hope to be remembered as one of the ones who was on their side. You lot just have malice for them and their future, whilst being happy to leech off them now |
|
|
|
Post by The Squeezed Middle on Mar 18, 2024 20:25:08 GMT
Yes, but Shrieks and his fellow anti-Semites can't see it that way. Anyone who disagrees is a de-facto racist to them.
The irony is lost on them. On what basis do you call me an antisemite? I do not hate Jews. Where is your evidence? Or are you as ever posting throwaway slurs as a form of shit, hoping that some of it will stick? Starmer would probably give you a job if you tell him about this, Well thing is, Shrieks... I call you "Shrieks" because you have a long history of shrieking "Racist" at anyone that disagrees with you, however minutely. Many on the left do. It's a lefty thing.
But at the same time, many on the left are actively anti-Semitic. Indeed, the Labour Party have had to repeatedly apologise for it.
So if it's acceptable for you to presume that anyone to your right is a de-facto "Racist" (because you say so), then it is equally valid for me to presume that anyone to the left of my politics is anti-Semitic (albeit with considerably more evidence).
Fair is, after all, fair.
And if you want evidence, well it's in the same place as your evidence that I'm a racist.
So suck it up, Buttercup.  |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 18, 2024 20:26:50 GMT
So Hester did nothing wrong. Abbott is the racist for complaining about it. Tis a pity then that the Tory leadership regard it as racist but are hanging on to his money anyway. One thing. You called me a dimwit which is obviously a deliberate insult. In response I called you a fuckwit which is also an insult. But I also said you are thick and a racist. And both of those things are clearly demonstrable facts. No Hester did quite a lot wrong . He made a remark that he knew would leave him open to accusation of racism but trusted the people around him. His point was that Abbott ( the racist ) was so awful that it soured his view of women like her but he doesn’t hate them. Had he left it there then he might just might have got away with this diatribe against Abbott. But he said that she should be shot …stupid thing to say . I called you are a dimwit because you are .No other reason . I’m not thick because I pointed out your false claim . I’m not racist because I pointed out your false claim . Im not thick because I pointed out that you are a dimwit . I’m not offended by a dimwit calling me thick . Your obvious inability to recognise obvious racism makes you - to coin your favourite insult - the dimwit. |
|
|
|
Post by Bentley on Mar 18, 2024 20:30:31 GMT
Indeed and that’s why I liken them to religious cult followers. They are offended by anyone who takes another view than theirs . Any dissent is met with outrage . Any opposing view is the work of blasphemers and heretics . A racist is a racist because they say so . No mitigation , no explanation, no other view is worth considering. We are offended by ageing racists who think their kneejerk racism is ok. But most of them will be dead in 20 years and the UK will move on without them. Their obvious desire to return to some mythical golden age of the 1950s is looking truly daft to most of us. Including me of an age not far removed from them, but in tune with my younger friends and relatives. I am aware of how my generation and yours have stolen their futures and think they are shit for not dealing with it whilst wishing to impose upon them your own negative values and bigotries. When you are gone they will despise your memory and legacy as they cope with the shit you left them. I hope to be remembered as one of the ones who was on their side. You lot just have malice for them and their future, whilst being happy to leech off them now Now..read your own post again. Nothing but a construct created by you for the express reason to hate a group of people . Same old tropes , same old bitterness , same old chip on the shoulder that you possess projected to others . You are the very thing you claim to hate . You have merely confirmed the post that you replied to. |
|
