|
|
Post by happyhornet on Mar 4, 2024 11:56:23 GMT
So you're telling me what I think now? |
|
|
|
Post by Bentley on Mar 4, 2024 12:02:43 GMT
So you're telling me what I think now? I’m not sure that you know what you think . You dismiss the three possible readings out to you and allude to a widespread irrational hive mind in HR departments YOU ..”People act against their own best interests all the time, they smoke, they drink too much, eat unhealthy food, stay in unhealthy or abusive relationships, spend money they don't have on things they don't need etc.” You think HR departments deny people with certain names the chance of an interview bevause they are acting against their own interests? TBH I did cover that earlier . Perhaps you haven’t thought about it at all. |
|
|
|
Post by happyhornet on Mar 4, 2024 12:20:10 GMT
So you're telling me what I think now? I’m not sure that you know what you think . You dismiss the three possible readings out to you and allude to a widespread irrational hive mind in HR departments YOU ..”People act against their own best interests all the time, they smoke, they drink too much, eat unhealthy food, stay in unhealthy or abusive relationships, spend money they don't have on things they don't need etc.” You think HR departments deny people with certain names the chance of an interview bevause they are acting against their own interests? TBH I did cover that earlier . Perhaps you haven’t thought about it at all. Well if you bothered to ask, I'd have said that the most likely explanation for me is that the CV rejection is indicative of societal prejudice. |
|
|
|
Post by Bentley on Mar 4, 2024 12:27:53 GMT
I’m not sure that you know what you think . You dismiss the three possible readings out to you and allude to a widespread irrational hive mind in HR departments YOU ..”People act against their own best interests all the time, they smoke, they drink too much, eat unhealthy food, stay in unhealthy or abusive relationships, spend money they don't have on things they don't need etc.” You think HR departments deny people with certain names the chance of an interview bevause they are acting against their own interests? TBH I did cover that earlier . Perhaps you haven’t thought about it at all. Well if you bothered to ask, I'd have said that the most likely explanation for me is that the CV rejection is indicative of societal prejudice. Just another way of claiming that there is tacit conspiracy in HR department to deny people with certain names employment without actually saying it . |
|
|
|
Post by happyhornet on Mar 4, 2024 12:29:26 GMT
Well if you bothered to ask, I'd have said that the most likely explanation for me is that the CV rejection is indicative of societal prejudice. Just another way of claiming that there is tacit conspiracy in HR department to deny people with certain names employment without actually saying it . No it isn't, societal prejudice would negate the need for a conspiracy which by the way only you are talking about. |
|
|
|
Post by Bentley on Mar 4, 2024 12:35:01 GMT
Just another way of claiming that there is tacit conspiracy in HR department to deny people with certain names employment without actually saying it . No it isn't, societal prejudice would negate the need for a conspiracy which by the way only you are talking about. No it wouldn’t. There must be a tacit agreement in the HR dept to discriminate for discrimination to occur . societal prejudice Is just a meaningless leftie buzzword like White privilege and unconscious bias. For discrimination to occur in HR departments it must be endorsed within that department . |
|
|
|
Post by happyhornet on Mar 4, 2024 12:39:53 GMT
No it isn't, societal prejudice would negate the need for a conspiracy which by the way only you are talking about. No it wouldn’t. There must be a tacit agreement in the HR dept to discriminate for discrimination to occur . societal prejudice Is just a meaningless leftie buzzword like White privilege and unconscious bias. For discrimination to occur in HR departments it must be endorsed within that department . Lots of people in society holding certain views does not require a conspiracy, neither does people acting on said views. |
|
|
|
Post by Bentley on Mar 4, 2024 12:46:23 GMT
No it wouldn’t. There must be a tacit agreement in the HR dept to discriminate for discrimination to occur . societal prejudice Is just a meaningless leftie buzzword like White privilege and unconscious bias. For discrimination to occur in HR departments it must be endorsed within that department . Lots of people in society holding certain views does not require a conspiracy, neither does people acting on said views. It needs a conspiracy to act on it in an HR department . Your trouble is that all you have is bias speculation and buzzwords . Ive given a rational explanation..statistical risk. Ive supplied a pretty much exact example with Pontins. A hypothetical extreme example with Fred Bloggs trying for an interview was a lap dance and there is every insurance application that has ever been filled in. Your delusion of dark thoughts in HR departments is unhelpful as well as quite ridiculous. |
|
|
|
Post by happyhornet on Mar 4, 2024 12:50:33 GMT
Lots of people in society holding certain views does not require a conspiracy, neither does people acting on said views. It needs a conspiracy to act on it in an HR department . Your trouble is that all you have is bias speculation and buzzwords . Ive given a rational explanation..statistical risk. Ive supplied a pretty much exact example with Pontins. A hypothetical extreme example with Fred Bloggs trying for an interview was a lap dance and there is every insurance application that has ever been filled in. Your delusion of dark thoughts in HR departments is unhelpful as well as quite ridiculous. I've provided hard statistical data, if you don't like what it says that is your problem not mine, facts don't care about your feelings. |
|
|
|
Post by Bentley on Mar 4, 2024 12:58:23 GMT
It needs a conspiracy to act on it in an HR department . Your trouble is that all you have is bias speculation and buzzwords . Ive given a rational explanation..statistical risk. Ive supplied a pretty much exact example with Pontins. A hypothetical extreme example with Fred Bloggs trying for an interview was a lap dance and there is every insurance application that has ever been filled in. Your delusion of dark thoughts in HR departments is unhelpful as well as quite ridiculous. I've provided hard statistical data, if you don't like what it says that is your problem not mine, facts don't care about your feelings. You’ve supplied figures not any kind of explanation . The facts you provided do not support your meaningless buzzwords or bias speculation. |
|
|
|
Post by happyhornet on Mar 4, 2024 13:04:41 GMT
I've provided hard statistical data, if you don't like what it says that is your problem not mine, facts don't care about your feelings. You’ve supplied figures not any kind of explanation . The facts you provided do not support your meaningless buzzwords or bias speculation. I've provided figures that show that ethnic minorties face a disadvantage in the job market. There's room to speculate about the reasons for it but not the fact itself. It's also backed up by ONS unemployment figures. |
|
|
|
Post by Bentley on Mar 4, 2024 13:10:51 GMT
You’ve supplied figures not any kind of explanation . The facts you provided do not support your meaningless buzzwords or bias speculation. I've provided figures that show that ethnic minorties face a disadvantage in the job market. There's room to speculate about the reasons for it but not the fact itself. It's also backed up by ONS unemployment figures. There must be an explanation. The most rational one is that people with those names are statistically more likely to be a poorer candidate than those with different names . They are no less disadvantaged than the 65 year old applicant for a lap dance job. |
|
|
|
Post by happyhornet on Mar 4, 2024 13:12:01 GMT
I've provided figures that show that ethnic minorties face a disadvantage in the job market. There's room to speculate about the reasons for it but not the fact itself. It's also backed up by ONS unemployment figures. There must be an explanation. The most rational one is that people with those names are statistically more likely to be a poorer candidate than those with different names . I don't think that is the most rational explanation and I've seen no evidence to back it up. |
|
|
|
Post by Bentley on Mar 4, 2024 13:14:34 GMT
There must be an explanation. The most rational one is that people with those names are statistically more likely to be a poorer candidate than those with different names . I don't think that is the most rational explanation and I've seen no evidence to back it up. Any other explanation would involve a broad conspiracy across HR departments to deny people with those names an interview … Ive supplied an example of my explanation. |
|
|
|
Post by happyhornet on Mar 4, 2024 13:16:11 GMT
I don't think that is the most rational explanation and I've seen no evidence to back it up. Any other explanation would involve a broad conspiracy across HR departments to deny people with those names an interview … It wouldn't require a conspiracy as I've already explained, it would in fact negate the need for a conspiracy. |
|
