|
Post by see2 on Jun 6, 2024 7:24:52 GMT
Your lying bigoted and biased garbage is exposed in the way you ignored the gist of my post you replied to, with your usual dollop of trash. LOL You need to learn how to play chess. WHAT IS MY BIAS?Your exaggerated eagerness to dump your garbage on Labour.
|
|
|
Post by ratcliff on Jun 6, 2024 10:58:19 GMT
|
|
|
Post by dodgydave on Jun 7, 2024 1:35:37 GMT
Your exaggerated eagerness to dump your garbage on Labour. So when I expose your bias, that is my bias?? lol. You won't accept any scrutiny of the left, THAT IS BIAS. You are one of those morons that blindly defends Labour because you see any critism of Labour as support for the Tories. THAT IS BIAS... and very childish. I scrutinise all sides, because I am not a mindless idiot. If I was biased I would only call out the bad things Labour and Biden do... but I don't... I call them all sides out.
|
|
|
Post by see2 on Jun 8, 2024 9:14:06 GMT
Your exaggerated eagerness to dump your garbage on Labour. So says the elderly delusional poster who worships the ground the incompetent Gordon Brown walks on and continues to blame Mrs Thatcher for everything under the sun from the weather , today's ills to burning the toast More lies and denigration from a clearly not very bright Righty ^^^ Just so typical
|
|
|
Post by see2 on Jun 8, 2024 9:22:57 GMT
Your exaggerated eagerness to dump your garbage on Labour. So when I expose your bias, that is my bias?? lol. You won't accept any scrutiny of the left, THAT IS BIAS. You are one of those morons that blindly defends Labour because you see any critism of Labour as support for the Tories. THAT IS BIAS... and very childish. I scrutinise all sides, because I am not a mindless idiot. If I was biased I would only call out the bad things Labour and Biden do... but I don't... I call them all sides out. I posted against Corbyn and I voted Conservative in that election. So don't use lies in an attempt to defend yourself, it just reduces your credibility even more. I recognise your repeated and excessive attacks, mostly on Labour, as an example of your bias. The stupidity of your post really should be recognizable even to yourself.
|
|
|
Post by ratcliff on Jun 8, 2024 16:28:54 GMT
More lies and denigration from a clearly not very bright Righty ^^^ Just so typical What lies in my post? You have posted that you are elderly You are delusional You worship at the altar of Gordon Brown and New Labour You continue to blame Mrs T for just about everything I can't see any lies there
|
|
|
Post by om15 on Jun 8, 2024 16:50:51 GMT
Angela Raynor has demonstrated her ill bred and common upbringing on many occasions, a grandmother at 31 she left school with more children than o levels, her drunken and foul mouthed abuse of the Tories was captured on film and was seen by all the electorate, the illiterate comments where she confused "abstract" for "abject" in her recent shouting speech further reinforces our distaste for her. This appalling frightful creature will be on the front benches after the election and is tipped to be Prime Minister within months, what on earth is happening to our Country, talk about managed decline, I would rather see screaming Lord Sutch as PM, at least he could understand the English language.
|
|
|
Post by dodgydave on Jun 8, 2024 17:59:43 GMT
So when I expose your bias, that is my bias?? lol. You won't accept any scrutiny of the left, THAT IS BIAS. You are one of those morons that blindly defends Labour because you see any critism of Labour as support for the Tories. THAT IS BIAS... and very childish. I scrutinise all sides, because I am not a mindless idiot. If I was biased I would only call out the bad things Labour and Biden do... but I don't... I call them all sides out. I posted against Corbyn and I voted Conservative in that election. So don't use lies in an attempt to defend yourself, it just reduces your credibility even more. I recognise your repeated and excessive attacks, mostly on Labour, as an example of your bias. The stupidity of your post really should be recognizable even to yourself. What utter nonsense. Your problem is that you are a selective reader. When I posted about Rayner's two home problem, you thought it was because I didn't like... because you only half-read then just copy & paste some tripe about "lies / insinuation / smears". I post on this topic because I am discussing the facts of the matter and how it will effect (1) Labour (2) her obvious ambitions to be PM. I've said many times that I would prefer Rayner or Starmer, because Starmer is a snake oil salesman. At least Rayner has some convictions. The fact I can play the "devil's advocate" shows that I am not biased. You on the other hand...
|
|