Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on May 30, 2024 20:37:46 GMT
When did I suggest you had? Genuine question. When you said it was ironic. He says everything is ironic, lol, usually in default of a better argument |
|
|
|
Post by Pacifico on May 30, 2024 21:32:59 GMT
I was referring to you, as a lefty, referring to the alleged fauxtrage of others.
Like lefties are never guilty of fauxtrage. 
That was ironic. , but I'll let that slide. Glad you agree that I've not invented a conspiracy theory on here. Appreciate that. compared to who? |
|
|
|
Post by andrewbrown on May 30, 2024 22:11:25 GMT
Well, I'm not really a lefty, but I'll let that slide. Glad you agree that I've not invented a conspiracy theory on here. Appreciate that. compared to who? I believe I've answered that before. Unfortunately there's too many people who just want this forum to be "righties" v "lefties", which just leads to yelling between two groups. It's not conducive to a good political conversation, but not many seem to be too interested in that. |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on May 30, 2024 22:34:29 GMT
I believe I've answered that before. Unfortunately there's too many people who just want this forum to be "righties" v "lefties", which just leads to yelling between two groups. It's not conducive to a good political conversation, but not many seem to be too interested in that. We have a choice between left and left establishment parties. What sort of political conversation are you after? |
|
|
|
Post by andrewbrown on May 30, 2024 22:58:45 GMT
I believe I've answered that before. Unfortunately there's too many people who just want this forum to be "righties" v "lefties", which just leads to yelling between two groups. It's not conducive to a good political conversation, but not many seem to be too interested in that. We have a choice between left and left establishment parties. What sort of political conversation are you after? Well according to Pacifico, they are both left wing. |
|
|
|
Post by see2 on May 31, 2024 4:18:56 GMT
I believe I've answered that before. Unfortunately there's too many people who just want this forum to be "righties" v "lefties", which just leads to yelling between two groups. It's not conducive to a good political conversation, but not many seem to be too interested in that. We have a choice between left and left establishment parties. What sort of political conversation are you after? The lie that the two parties are the same, is Tory propaganda. i.e. If there's no difference then why change one for the other. The Tories will do what they have always done that is to lie, insinuate and deceive in any way they can in their efforts to undermine Labour. And apparently 70% of the time the electorate swallow their deceitful approach and allow them to continue to mismanage and damage the country. |
|
|
|
Post by see2 on May 31, 2024 4:21:02 GMT
Labour are in charge of any inquiry or investigating in to any alleged Tory wrong doing, and Labour are in charge of any alleged Labour wrong doing. Double standard hypocrisy at its finest. I'm starting to suspect that the downfall of any Labour administration will be corruption. I wonder if they'll even last 5 years before all sorts of stuff starts coming out of the woodwork. They already look rotten to the core and they haven't even started. Spouted like a real Righty extremist ^^^ |
|
|
|
Post by see2 on May 31, 2024 4:27:16 GMT
Andy Burnham did not investigate her, Manchester Police did Sorry but no one will believe for one single moment that the Mayor of Manchester is not 'well connected', including the Police. Insinuation, deceit and denigration, they are the only powerful weapons the Tories have, controlled by their propaganda machine and their flunkies that spread it. |
|
|
|
Post by see2 on May 31, 2024 4:32:10 GMT
So 'IF' she got away with a bit of tax fiddling - it's not the end of the world. Perhaps but it might be a major blow to her credibility. If she spouted about Tories fiddling the system or dishonesty again there might be a response that points out she is no better than them ..just less successful . The point of my post was IF she is guilty, the rest of the comment belongs to Pacifico. |
|
|
|
Post by see2 on May 31, 2024 4:36:13 GMT
Neither can starmer define a woman... Look up 'Male, 46,XY and maybe you will begin to understand the complexities of human reproduction. Look up 'Female, 46,XY while you are at it. |
|
|
|
Post by Pacifico on May 31, 2024 6:36:57 GMT
We have a choice between left and left establishment parties. What sort of political conversation are you after? Well according to Pacifico, they are both left wing. Name a right-wing policy enacted in the last 14 years. |
|
|
|
Post by The Squeezed Middle on May 31, 2024 6:47:26 GMT
When you said it was ironic. He says everything is ironic, lol, usually in default of a better argument Says the man that shrieks "Racist" at everyone who disagrees with him. |
|
|
|
Post by Bentley on May 31, 2024 9:09:28 GMT
Perhaps but it might be a major blow to her credibility. If she spouted about Tories fiddling the system or dishonesty again there might be a response that points out she is no better than them ..just less successful . The point of my post was IF she is guilty, the rest of the comment belongs to Pacifico. I know..Thars why I posted ‘ PERHAPS’ and ‘ MIGHT’. The rest of my comment was quite fair and logical , the rest of your comment was meaningless. |
|
|
|
Post by see2 on May 31, 2024 9:14:30 GMT
The point of my post was IF she is guilty, the rest of the comment belongs to Pacifico. I know..Thars why I posted ‘ PERHAPS’ and ‘ MIGHT’. The rest of my comment was quite fair and logical , the rest of your comment was meaningless. You should have aimed your comments at Pacifico, it had nothing to do with me. You don't know logic and fair, you are far too far to the right for that. |
|
|
|
Post by Bentley on May 31, 2024 9:21:02 GMT
I know..Thars why I posted ‘ PERHAPS’ and ‘ MIGHT’. The rest of my comment was quite fair and logical , the rest of your comment was meaningless. You should have aimed your comments at Pacifico, it had nothing to do with me. You don't know logic and fair, you are far too far to the right for that. I answered your post because you posted it ffs. The rest of your post merely reflects your delusion of ‘ if I think it, then it must be right ‘. |
|
