|
|
Post by Totheleft on May 29, 2024 6:14:55 GMT
Hoy women hater who asked the GMP TO look into Angie baby housing matters . A Bloody tory mp Doofus. Wipe the egg of your chin . You haven't got an original thought in your head have you doofus?...You just use others thoughs and sayings... Of course I have Mr woman hater have you wiped that egg of your Chin . What's this sentence mean young man. You just use others thoughs and sayings...? |
|
|
|
Post by andrewbrown on May 29, 2024 6:30:46 GMT
The Manchester police PCC is labour and no matter what anyone says the inference is facts vs the optics is not a good look or does anything to I still public confidence or trust. An outside force should have carried out the investigation alongside the HMRC who prosecute on the balance of probability rather than the police’s beyond a reasonable doubt. The HMRC have stayed out of all this. Why? .....Why aren't these being investigated and held to account by our "free" press? The facts in front of the public are plain to see, another allegedly corrupt MP getting away with it. Whether or not it costs who, whatever amount, it should be pursued as they are in public office?..... Legs open wide and willing Rayner's neighbours voice their anger and disbelief after police drop probe into 'Two Homes' MP...... www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-13469265/Angela-Rayners-neighbours-voice-anger-disbelief-police-drop-probe-Two-Homes-MP.htmlIf you mean that PCCs should not be political positions, I 100% agree, and that's why I always spoil my PCC ballot paper. |
|
|
|
Post by Bentley on May 29, 2024 10:09:45 GMT
from what I understand these two offences have now run out of time due to the statute or limitations (HMRC can only go back 4 years or something) So she got away with a bit of tax fiddling - it's not the end of the world So 'IF' she got away with a bit of tax fiddling - it's not the end of the world. Perhaps but it might be a major blow to her credibility. If she spouted about Tories fiddling the system or dishonesty again there might be a response that points out she is no better than them ..just less successful . |
|
|
|
Post by ratcliff on May 29, 2024 16:08:13 GMT
My understanding is that there are three investigations being conducted, one by the Manchester Police, one by Stockport Council and one by HMRC, now I recall earlier that there is a time limit on this alleged crime, so even if there was some evidence of wrong doing Ms Raynor is not likely to be charged by the Police. The Police have stated that they are taking no further action and have passed details of their investigation on to HMRC, so that now leaves two investigations being carried out, HMRC into possible CGT irregularities, and the Council into whether Ms Raynor misrepresented her circumstances over the purchase and sale of her discounted council house.So it is not over yet, due to the sensitivity around Ms Raynor I dare all parties concerned are ensuring that all investigations are being carried out scrupulously fairly. It is pleasing however that Ms Raynor appears to be keeping a low profile, long may that continue, the election is tedious enough without foul mouthed slatterns bellowing abuse all over the television screens. from what I understand these two offences have now run out of time due to the statute or limitations (HMRC can only go back 4 years or something) So she got away with a bit of tax fiddling - it's not the end of the world Don't know where you get 4 years from - that's not true The taxpayer is advised to keep their tax records for 7 years before considering shredding them but HMRC can (and do) go back 20 years if they want. |
|
|
|
Post by ratcliff on May 29, 2024 16:11:18 GMT
The Manchester police PCC is labour and no matter what anyone says the inference is facts vs the optics is not a good look or does anything to I still public confidence or trust. An outside force should have carried out the investigation alongside the HMRC who prosecute on the balance of probability rather than the police’s beyond a reasonable doubt. The HMRC have stayed out of all this. Why? .....Why aren't these being investigated and held to account by our "free" press? The facts in front of the public are plain to see, another allegedly corrupt MP getting away with it. Whether or not it costs who, whatever amount, it should be pursued as they are in public office?..... Legs open wide and willing Rayner's neighbours voice their anger and disbelief after police drop probe into 'Two Homes' MP...... www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-13469265/Angela-Rayners-neighbours-voice-anger-disbelief-police-drop-probe-Two-Homes-MP.htmlIf you mean that PCCs should not be political positions, I 100% agree, and that's why I always spoil my PCC ballot paper. I agree but think it's an unnecessary appointment , as are the multitude of political mayors imposed |
|
|
|
Post by dodgydave on May 30, 2024 11:55:03 GMT
It's not going well for Rayner, some mud will stick on the two houses situation, and then there was the video of her grovelling to Asian Elders... and now it has been revealed you can can pay to watch her son shag his wife on Onlyfans lol. order-order.com/2024/05/29/revealed-angela-rayners-porn-star-son/Looks like we will get 10 years of Starmer. |
|
|
|
Post by The Squeezed Middle on May 30, 2024 11:56:35 GMT
|
|
|
|
Post by Fairsociety on May 30, 2024 12:16:24 GMT
Labour are in charge of any inquiry or investigating in to any alleged Tory wrong doing, and Labour are in charge of any alleged Labour wrong doing.
Double standard hypocrisy at its finest.
|
|
|
|
Post by patman post on May 30, 2024 13:03:35 GMT
from what I understand these two offences have now run out of time due to the statute or limitations (HMRC can only go back 4 years or something) So she got away with a bit of tax fiddling - it's not the end of the world Don't know where you get 4 years from - that's not true The taxpayer is advised to keep their tax records for 7 years before considering shredding them but HMRC can (and do) go back 20 years if they want. I've been professionally advised that HMRC can go back 20 years checking personal financial history — but a general rule of thumb is: • 4 years for genuine mistakes • 6 years for carelessness • 12 years for offshore matters • 20 years for deliberate tax evasion
In Angela Rayner's case, it looks like just another attempt at Right Wing smearing, this time by Partygate excuser, James Daly, who scraped into parliament by 104 votes...
|
|
|
|
Post by jonksy on May 30, 2024 13:03:55 GMT
Labour are in charge of any inquiry or investigating in to any alleged Tory wrong doing, and Labour are in charge of any alleged Labour wrong doing.
Double standard hypocrisy at its finest.
Where are the usual dumfucks now this has come to light? A bloody good find by TSM.. |
|
|
|
Post by jonksy on May 30, 2024 13:05:51 GMT
Don't know where you get 4 years from - that's not true The taxpayer is advised to keep their tax records for 7 years before considering shredding them but HMRC can (and do) go back 20 years if they want. I've been professionally advised that HMRC can go back 20 years checking personal financial history — but a general rule of thumb is: • 4 years for genuine mistakes • 6 years for carelessness • 12 years for offshore matters • 20 years for deliberate tax evasion
In Angela Rayner's case, it looks like just another attempt at Right Wing smearing, this time by Partygate excuser, James Daly, who scraped into parliament by 104 votes...
Stop trying to divert the thread pat. Rayner caught yet again whith her knickers around her ankles.. |
|
|
|
Post by jonksy on May 30, 2024 13:09:28 GMT
It's not going well for Rayner, some mud will stick on the two houses situation, and then there was the video of her grovelling to Asian Elders... and now it has been revealed you can can pay to watch her son shag his wife on Onlyfans lol. order-order.com/2024/05/29/revealed-angela-rayners-porn-star-son/Looks like we will get 10 years of Starmer. Yep and I bet she doesn't even know the father's name.... Then you have abcus's son yet another fucking criminal.. |
|
|
|
Post by patman post on May 30, 2024 13:16:35 GMT
I've been professionally advised that HMRC can go back 20 years checking personal financial history — but a general rule of thumb is: • 4 years for genuine mistakes • 6 years for carelessness • 12 years for offshore matters • 20 years for deliberate tax evasion
In Angela Rayner's case, it looks like just another attempt at Right Wing smearing, this time by Partygate excuser, James Daly, who scraped into parliament by 104 votes...
Stop trying to divert the thread pat. Rayner caught yet again whith her knickers around her ankles.. The opening post was:
Angela Rayner slammed for ‘staggering hypocrisy’ over £48k profit on council house sale
The Deputy Labour leader, whose portfolio includes housing, now wants to reform the same right-to-buy policy, implemented by late Margaret Thatcher, that gave her a huge cash win
I'm not the one diving off into free-time karaoke or jealously fantasising about other people's supposed sexual experiences.
My post(s) record the facts that a Rayner has been cleared of accusations that were initially brought by a Tory who reckons that most struggling children in his constituency are the "products of crap parents"...
|
|
|
|
Post by ratcliff on May 30, 2024 13:21:27 GMT
Don't know where you get 4 years from - that's not true The taxpayer is advised to keep their tax records for 7 years before considering shredding them but HMRC can (and do) go back 20 years if they want. I've been professionally advised that HMRC can go back 20 years checking personal financial history — but a general rule of thumb is: • 4 years for genuine mistakes • 6 years for carelessness • 12 years for offshore matters • 20 years for deliberate tax evasion
In Angela Rayner's case, it looks like just another attempt at Right Wing smearing, this time by Partygate excuser, James Daly, who scraped into parliament by 104 votes...
IF the HMRC paperwork allegedly seen by the Guardian is true and the ginger growler was not liable for cgt as the house she sold was genuinely her tax free PPR and her husband owned a second house nearby as his tax free PPR then HMRC needs to publish guidance urgently to explain how this was achieved as it is contrary to tax legislation which states that a married couple (unless legally separated) can have only one PPR between them . If it is good for the ginger growler then all should be able to claim the same tax advantages - unless it's akin to Sir Kneeler's just for him and no-one else personal pension and a personal ginger growler only doesn't pay cgt scheme |
|
|
|
Post by jonksy on May 30, 2024 13:25:01 GMT
Stop trying to divert the thread pat. Rayner caught yet again whith her knickers around her ankles.. The opening post was:
Angela Rayner slammed for ‘staggering hypocrisy’ over £48k profit on council house sale
The Deputy Labour leader, whose portfolio includes housing, now wants to reform the same right-to-buy policy, implemented by late Margaret Thatcher, that gave her a huge cash win
I'm not the one diving off into free-time karaoke or jealously fantasising about other people's supposed sexual experiences.
My post(s) record the facts that a Rayner has been cleared of accusations that were initially brought by a Tory who reckons that most struggling children in his constituency are the "products of crap parents"...
She got caught red handed pat and no amount of lefty bullshit can hide the fact... |
|
