Rayner shining example of her double standard hypocrisy

Sorry, but we are just going around and around in circles here - AT THE TIME THAT BORIS & Co HAD THEIR PARTY / SOCIAL GATHERING, BOOZE & BUFFET AND CAKES, SUCH GATHERINGS WERE ILLEGAL.

So how does that make it a "Stitch Up", they broke the rules, these were people who made the rules and expected us, the mere peasants to stick to the rules. It was not a stitch up, they were caught out and the rest is history, but more than anything else and above all other facts surrounding this sleazy episode ... They were guilty.

It was the Met that issued the 126 fixed penalty notices for breaching the lockdown rules, not Sue Gray…

Where did anyone allege that alcohol or cake was illegal? The only person saying this is... YOU!

 What goes around , comes around .

Ok so this is shifting the goalposts


This article is the first I have seen that suggests representing your main address to be other than where it actually is, and thereby evading capital gains tax is not actually a criminal offence. That's the first time I've heard that it isn't I wish I'd known tax evasion wasn't a criminal act when I could have enjoyed the rewards it brings ....

But the main thrust in here is now that she claimed on her nomination papers for the election that she was living somewhere she wasn't

This is a breach of Section 65 of the Representation of The People Act

This is a big deal or certainly has the potential to be. Anyone who has stood for parliament will know, because it is stated in big print on the form you sign and send with your £500 that in order to be a valid nominee either you OR YOUR Election AGENT ***MUST*** be resident IN the constituency in which you wish to stand OR one immediately adjacent to it,

This is to ensure voters are voting to 'send one from among their number to Westminster to govern or loyally oppose blah blah' as per our unwritten constitution from the days of Charles the Second

The actual address matters because were it proven she was not where she was AND where she really was fell too far from the constituency AND her agent was not local either then her election would be void and boy would she be in shit

But for decades now constituency parties have ensured a party member meeting that residency qualification declares themself an agent to whom the authorities may refer in all matters pertinent to the candidate, and from whom the financial returns shall be obtained in good time.

So we fall back on the simple offence of not declaring your true address.

Popcorn anyone ?

When I started looking at this I assumed the tax evasion was the issue. Rachael Reeves had pinned her hopes of increasing spending on a number of measures Fishy and (nope, can't call him that) his replacement at number 11 were ideologically never going to do, but in fact have, so now Reeves is in a spot, and has had to declare he first job will be to piss half the billion and a half Wankford and Guessing have pissed up the wall in Cardiff, buying more tax men to chase tax evasion.

It's a bit difficult to do that when the woman you can't sack because the party voted for her is done for it.

I don't understand the motive for making a false declaration of your address on the nomination form. Everyone knows that the days of a high profile candidate having anything to do with the constituency are long gone. Labour and Tory alike parachute candidates in from far off...

It's not as if you have to make it public (which you have to for the Welsh assembly) you can for Westminster opt not to have it published on the notice of election, and most publish the postcode of their office because your election agent can legally declare THAT.

To be done for this would be sheer humiliation pure and simple.

No matter what the outcome is, posters will certainly be fed your 'BIG GOB' rendering on here.