|
|
Post by andrewbrown on Apr 13, 2024 15:10:20 GMT
Yes of course its trivial It was trivial to have a fucking glass of wine on a certain birthday but of course the usual dumfuck lefty knuckle draggers didn't think so at the time. Did they fiddles? Having a glass of wine and a slice of cake was of course, not illegal. No one other than yourself said it was. But you somehow keep repeating it, but of course you fail to realise that constantly repeating a fallacy doesn't make it the truth. |
|
|
|
Post by Pacifico on Apr 13, 2024 15:30:29 GMT
The tax evasion is really neither here nor there - it is a trivial amount, although it is rather hilarious to see Labour politicians evading tax and starving the NHS of funding. What is more important is the absolute hypocrisy of the Labour Party - every time there are the slightest allegations against any other politicians there is a raft of demands to publish tax returns, legal advice etc etc. But when the boot is on the other foot and it is a Labour politician in the frame it's 'look over there a Unicorn'..  Dont forget, as of this precise time Angela Raynor has not been found guilty of tax evasion, anf IF indeed it is eventually found that she is not guilty of tax evasion, that would then only leave the trivial offence of been registered on the electoral roll at an address she did not live at. I personally have sold property which I did not live in, and made a profit, and I paid no CGT, and I broke no rules, just letting you know of what the outcome might be. Did you miss the bit about 'slightest allegations'? This might help clear up your confusion. Raynor posted this before Johnson was found guilty of anything:  |
|
|
|
Post by jonksy on Apr 13, 2024 15:30:33 GMT
Yep.....We all know it was no more than a fucking lefty witch hunt.....And from the same source.......'Political mood changed today' says Sir Keir Starmer after Labour pass motion for investigation into Boris Johnson
Out-of-power Starmer and Labour Party can pass as many motions as they like, but unless further evidence is produced, they'll be flushed away.
As it was 126 fixed penalty fines were issued — were any contested...?
Of course they can and he knew he would be backed my the other traitors in the tory party who like you have it in for Boris because he did what he propised and ot BREXIT DONE..Like I said Pat you must keep the industry that produces turd polish working overtime... |
|
|
|
Post by Pacifico on Apr 13, 2024 15:33:11 GMT
It was trivial to have a fucking glass of wine on a certain birthday but of course the usual dumfuck lefty knuckle draggers didn't think so at the time. Did they fiddles? Totally different matter It was not simply a glass of wine, it was a party, with a gathering of people to celebrate a birthday, and it involved booze, a buffet and birthday cake. At the same time most of us were obeying the rules, and some were denied access and visits to their loved ones, it was a case of "The Rules Dont Apply To Us", typical Tory arrogance.says the poster trying to whitewash breaking of the rules by Labour politicians... |
|
|
|
Post by jonksy on Apr 13, 2024 15:33:48 GMT
It was trivial to have a fucking glass of wine on a certain birthday but of course the usual dumfuck lefty knuckle draggers didn't think so at the time. Did they fiddles? Having a glass of wine and a slice of cake was of course, not illegal. No one other than yourself said it was. But you somehow keep repeating it, but of course you fail to realise that constantly repeating a fallacy doesn't make it the truth. The truth is Andy is the lefty knuckle dragging dumfucks made out it was illegal whilst holding pissups of their own..And you keep repeating that boris was a criminal and starmer is a saint FFS... |
|
|
|
Post by see2 on Apr 13, 2024 15:50:27 GMT
Dont forget, as of this precise time Angela Raynor has not been found guilty of tax evasion, anf IF indeed it is eventually found that she is not guilty of tax evasion, that would then only leave the trivial offence of been registered on the electoral roll at an address she did not live at. I personally have sold property which I did not live in, and made a profit, and I paid no CGT, and I broke no rules, just letting you know of what the outcome might be. Did you miss the bit about 'slightest allegations'? This might help clear up your confusion. Raynor posted this before Johnson was found guilty of anything: Looks Like Rayner had more than just insinuation to go on. |
|
|
|
Post by see2 on Apr 13, 2024 15:51:37 GMT
Having a glass of wine and a slice of cake was of course, not illegal. No one other than yourself said it was. But you somehow keep repeating it, but of course you fail to realise that constantly repeating a fallacy doesn't make it the truth. The truth is Andy is the lefty knuckle dragging dumfucks made out it was illegal whilst holding pissups of their own..And you keep repeating that boris was a criminal and starmer is a saint FFS... And you keep distorting the reality. |
|
|
|
Post by Bentley on Apr 13, 2024 15:59:34 GMT
Did you miss the bit about 'slightest allegations'? This might help clear up your confusion. Raynor posted this before Johnson was found guilty of anything: Looks Like Rayner had more than just insinuation to go on. Looks like you are showing your bias. |
|
|
|
Post by Red Rackham on Apr 13, 2024 16:13:06 GMT
The truth is Andy is the lefty knuckle dragging dumfucks made out it was illegal whilst holding pissups of their own..And you keep repeating that boris was a criminal and starmer is a saint FFS... And you keep distorting the reality. The thing is see2, Rayner has made a career out of vociferously often aggressively demanding that people, Tories, who 'broke the rules' should resign. But she also said politicians (Tories) who are under police investigation should have the whip removed until the investigation has found them not guilty of any wrongdoing. And I couldn't help noticing in a recent interview that Starmer refused to say no fewar than three times whether he had confidence in Rayner. I wonder who the deputy prime minister will be after the election? It sure as hell wont be 'back bench' Rayner. Or will she even be an MP? |
|
|
|
Post by witchfinder on Apr 13, 2024 16:52:59 GMT
And you keep distorting the reality. The thing is see2, Rayner has made a career out of vociferously often aggressively demanding that people, Tories, who 'broke the rules' should resign. But she also said politicians (Tories) who are under police investigation should have the whip removed until the investigation has found them not guilty of any wrongdoing. And I couldn't help noticing in a recent interview that Starmer refused to say no fewar than three times whether he had confidence in Rayner. I wonder who the deputy prime minister will be after the election? It sure as hell wont be 'back bench' Rayner. Or will she even be an MP? And Angela Rayner has stated that SHE WILL step down as deputy Labour leader - IF - she is found to have broken the law. |
|
|
|
Post by Fairsociety on Apr 13, 2024 16:56:53 GMT
The thing is see2, Rayner has made a career out of vociferously often aggressively demanding that people, Tories, who 'broke the rules' should resign. But she also said politicians (Tories) who are under police investigation should have the whip removed until the investigation has found them not guilty of any wrongdoing. And I couldn't help noticing in a recent interview that Starmer refused to say no fewar than three times whether he had confidence in Rayner. I wonder who the deputy prime minister will be after the election? It sure as hell wont be 'back bench' Rayner. Or will she even be an MP? And Angela Rayner has stated that SHE WILL step down as deputy Labour leader - IF - she is found to have broken the law. Starmer said the same thing if he was found guilty over beergate ........ which he knew he wouldn't, he'd sorted it.
He's sorted if for Rayner hence the reason it's taken this long before the police did their job, plenty of time for the cover-ups...... that's dishonest Labour for you.
|
|
|
|
Post by Pacifico on Apr 13, 2024 17:01:57 GMT
The thing is see2, Rayner has made a career out of vociferously often aggressively demanding that people, Tories, who 'broke the rules' should resign. But she also said politicians (Tories) who are under police investigation should have the whip removed until the investigation has found them not guilty of any wrongdoing. And I couldn't help noticing in a recent interview that Starmer refused to say no fewar than three times whether he had confidence in Rayner. I wonder who the deputy prime minister will be after the election? It sure as hell wont be 'back bench' Rayner. Or will she even be an MP? And Angela Rayner has stated that SHE WILL step down as deputy Labour leader - IF - she is found to have broken the law. So double standards for Labour Politicians it is then.. how predictable.. |
|
|
|
Post by Red Rackham on Apr 13, 2024 17:02:40 GMT
The thing is see2, Rayner has made a career out of vociferously often aggressively demanding that people, Tories, who 'broke the rules' should resign. But she also said politicians (Tories) who are under police investigation should have the whip removed until the investigation has found them not guilty of any wrongdoing. And I couldn't help noticing in a recent interview that Starmer refused to say no fewar than three times whether he had confidence in Rayner. I wonder who the deputy prime minister will be after the election? It sure as hell wont be 'back bench' Rayner. Or will she even be an MP? And Angela Rayner has stated that SHE WILL step down as deputy Labour leader - IF - she is found to have broken the law. Big of her. |
|
|
|
Post by witchfinder on Apr 13, 2024 17:08:34 GMT
Pathetic ... INTELLIGENT people can see the vast difference between having a bottle of beer at a working meeting, and having a party.
The dumb right wing Tory supporters then resort to claiming "its a cover-up" or its a "witch hunt", or that Keir Starmer was colluding with the police. (Conspiracy theories)
If only you knew how utterly stupid this makes you look, you have not got the intelligence to be posting on adult political boards.
|
|
|
|
Post by Fairsociety on Apr 13, 2024 17:16:37 GMT
Pathetic ... INTELLIGENT people can see the vast difference between having a bottle of beer at a working meeting, and having a party. The dumb right wing Tory supporters then resort to claiming "its a cover-up" or its a "witch hunt", or that Keir Starmer was colluding with the police. (Conspiracy theories) If only you knew how utterly stupid this makes you look, you have not got the intelligence to be posting on adult political boards. Anyone with a iota of intelligence would know Johnson was stitched up like a kipper, when the person heading the investigation into him Sue Gray was then offered a top job within the Opposition party that helped stitch him up ....... do you honest and truly believe Johnson wasn't stitched up, you'd have to be a fuckin numbnut if you thought Sue Gray acted with honesty, integrity and fairness. |
|
