|
|
Post by Handyman on Mar 28, 2024 8:22:53 GMT
If she's done wrong she needs to ne held accountable. If the Police conclude she has not done wrong I am sure the usual suspects on the retarded right will go all EUSSR and demand the police look again, and again, and again until they do find something wrong. Funny how they used to complain when the EU did it, but when they do it they find it acceptable. I'd call them hypocrites, but most are too think to know what the word means. All The Best How many times did the rabid left wankers want Boris investigated over a poxy slice of cake and a glass of wine? And has your spell checker gone south as you are only to pleased to point out my spelling errors? I would have thought many adults would by now know that Police will only investigate a suspected Criminal Offence if they consider there are reasonable grounds to do so, they cannot and will not keep investigating her over and over again, that is sheer ill informed nonsense they can't do it won't do it Some claim that the Police did not investigate the allegation against Raynor properly , what we do not know is if new evidence has now come to light against Raynor if that is the case then rightly so the Police should investigate It will either clear Raynor of any wrong doing it may not, time will tell. Yes Boris was hounded by those who do not like him for one reason or another, initially the Police decided not to take any action if I recall correctly , but his Political opponents kept demanding he be investigated, he was sent a questionnaire under Police Caution due to Covid, He completed it and the outcome was he was issued with a Fixed Penalty Notice , like thousands of others for breaching Covid Regulation, Raynor was on TV this morning and stated she did nothing wrong everything was above board, if the outcome of this latest investigation supports that fine over and done with |
|
|
|
Post by ProVeritas on Mar 28, 2024 8:42:31 GMT
If she's done wrong she needs to ne held accountable. If the Police conclude she has not done wrong I am sure the usual suspects on the retarded right will go all EUSSR and demand the police look again, and again, and again until they do find something wrong. Funny how they used to complain when the EU did it, but when they do it they find it acceptable. I'd call them hypocrites, but most are too think to know what the word means. All The Best How many times did the rabid left wankers want Boris investigated over a poxy slice of cake and a glass of wine? And has your spell checker gone south as you are only to pleased to point out my spelling errors? Except almost every time there was a call for a new investigation it came on the heels of new evidence of another rules breach. Rayner has only done one, maybe two, things wrong. Johnson barely went a week during the pandemic without fucking up in some spectacular way. Just in case you didn't know "think" is the correct spelling of a word, just as thick is. Spell-checker wouldn't have picked it up. If you want I can point you to a 101 Guide for what a Spellchecker actually is. All The Best |
|
Nemo
Full Member
Posts: 102
|
Post by Nemo on Mar 28, 2024 10:17:09 GMT
Hi ProVentas, you posted:
Rayner has only done one, maybe two, things wrong.
What exactly has she done? I just see loads of innuendos.
|
|
|
|
Post by Fairsociety on Mar 28, 2024 10:20:42 GMT
Hi ProVentas, you posted: Rayner has only done one, maybe two, things wrong. What exactly has she done? I just see loads of innuendos. I doubt the police would be interviewing someone 'twice' over innuendos. |
|
|
|
Post by Fairsociety on Mar 28, 2024 10:24:48 GMT
If she's done wrong she needs to ne held accountable. If the Police conclude she has not done wrong I am sure the usual suspects on the retarded right will go all EUSSR and demand the police look again, and again, and again until they do find something wrong. Funny how they used to complain when the EU did it, but when they do it they find it acceptable. I'd call them hypocrites, but most are too think to know what the word means. All The Best How many times did the rabid left wankers want Boris investigated over a poxy slice of cake and a glass of wine? And has your spell checker gone south as you are only to pleased to point out my spelling errors? Exactly, she made a point of wanting Boris to resign just because the police had to speak to him, and here she is the 'second' time the police have had to speak to her.
Every time she's interviewed and asked any questions about it her face goes all twisted distorted and refuses to answer, not the actions of a innocent person, remember she accused Boris of being guilty because he wouldn't answer questions, Rayner is one of the biggest double standard lefty hypocrites in politics today.
|
|
Nemo
Full Member
Posts: 102
|
Post by Nemo on Mar 28, 2024 10:54:09 GMT
Hi ProVentas, you posted: Rayner has only done one, maybe two, things wrong. What exactly has she done? I just see loads of innuendos. I doubt the police would be interviewing someone 'twice' over innuendos.
But what has she supposed to have done? I've read everything from using tax loopholes to election fraud without any evidence being provided.
|
|
|
|
Post by Fairsociety on Mar 28, 2024 11:13:40 GMT
I doubt the police would be interviewing someone 'twice' over innuendos.
But what has she supposed to have done? I've read everything from using tax loopholes to election fraud without any evidence being provided.
Then there must be something else, I assume it has something to do with the ridiculous notion that her husband lived with her brother for five years, while they lived apart, sounds like stuff of fantasy to most people, pull the other one. |
|
|
|
Post by Pacifico on Mar 28, 2024 11:21:02 GMT
I doubt the police would be interviewing someone 'twice' over innuendos.
But what has she supposed to have done? I've read everything from using tax loopholes to election fraud without any evidence being provided.
She has either committed Tax Evasion through failing to pay CGT on a second home or committed an offence under the Representation of the People Act by failing to register at her primary residence. |
|
|
|
Post by Handyman on Mar 28, 2024 11:25:12 GMT
I doubt the police would be interviewing someone 'twice' over innuendos.
But what has she supposed to have done? I've read everything from using tax loopholes to election fraud without any evidence being provided.
The object of the Police Investigation into Raynor is to ascertain if the allegations made against her are accurate and if there is any evidence to prove what is alleged. If this second investigation proves she did not commit any offence that is the end of the matter, if they do find evidence that supports the two allegations that she and possibly her husband did Evade Capital Tax it is a Criminal Offence which HMRC will probably deal with. If she has made a false declaration to the Electoral Registration Office by providing an address she was not living at , that to is an Offence and as I understand it and she could be fined up to £1,000. You beat me to it Pacifico  |
|
|
|
Post by Fairsociety on Mar 28, 2024 11:26:54 GMT
Well I'm sure any useful nosy neighbour would be better informed on her living arrangements at the time, these nosy neighbours can be a damn pest at times. |
|
|
|
Post by jonksy on Mar 28, 2024 11:32:30 GMT
How many times did the rabid left wankers want Boris investigated over a poxy slice of cake and a glass of wine? And has your spell checker gone south as you are only to pleased to point out my spelling errors? Except almost every time there was a call for a new investigation it came on the heels of new evidence of another rules breach. Rayner has only done one, maybe two, things wrong. Johnson barely went a week during the pandemic without fucking up in some spectacular way. Just in case you didn't know "think" is the correct spelling of a word, just as thick is. Spell-checker wouldn't have picked it up. If you want I can point you to a 101 Guide for what a Spellchecker actually is. All The Best Boris was cleared by the police but starmer and his tart pushed the MET to invetigate a non crime. Of course starmer was doing the same with his illegal pissups and had friends in high places. Starmer rayner and gray sould be held accountable for their crimes...And you ramp on about hypocrisy FFS...
And I know "think" was spelt correctly but you used it out of context when you should have used THING......And as for your use of the spellchecker maybe you should invest in a Grammer checker... You relish picking-up on others errors but throw a fuckling wobbly when your own errrors are pointed out.....
|
|
|
|
Post by Fairsociety on Mar 28, 2024 11:50:01 GMT
Except almost every time there was a call for a new investigation it came on the heels of new evidence of another rules breach. Rayner has only done one, maybe two, things wrong. Johnson barely went a week during the pandemic without fucking up in some spectacular way. Just in case you didn't know "think" is the correct spelling of a word, just as thick is. Spell-checker wouldn't have picked it up. If you want I can point you to a 101 Guide for what a Spellchecker actually is. All The Best Boris was cleared by the police but starmer and his tart pushed the MET to invetigate a non crime. Of course starmer was doing the same with his illegal pissups and had friends in high places. Starmer rayner and gray sould be held accountable for their crimes...And you ramp on about hypocrisy FFS...
And I know "think" was spelt correctly but you used it out of context when you should have used THING......And as for your use of the spellchecker maybe you should invest in a Grammer checker... You relish picking-up on others errors but throw a fuckling wobbly when your own errrors are pointed out.....
Absolutely, we need to see those clips of that rabid dog moralising us on what we should do with Boris, DEMANDING he resigns because police had to speak to him, Labour pulling strings again, imagine if this was a moralising Tory, we'd be played back their past comments over and over again, as usual the leftie media giving Labour a easy ride. |
|
|
|
Post by Red Rackham on Mar 28, 2024 13:22:05 GMT
Persistent rumours of tax avoidance wont go away, the police are investigating her again and she refuses to reveal to Starmer tax advice she received when she sold her ex council house.
If Labour win the election, which seems likely, this will still be hanging over Labour. Can Starmer afford to have his deputy prime minister mired in controversy?
How much longer has Raynor got?
|
|
|
|
Post by dodgydave on Mar 28, 2024 13:52:15 GMT
How many times did the rabid left wankers want Boris investigated over a poxy slice of cake and a glass of wine? And has your spell checker gone south as you are only to pleased to point out my spelling errors? I would have thought many adults would by now know that Police will only investigate a suspected Criminal Offence if they consider there are reasonable grounds to do so, they cannot and will not keep investigating her over and over again, that is sheer ill informed nonsense they can't do it won't do it Some claim that the Police did not investigate the allegation against Raynor properly , what we do not know is if new evidence has now come to light against Raynor if that is the case then rightly so the Police should investigate It will either clear Raynor of any wrong doing it may not, time will tell. Yes Boris was hounded by those who do not like him for one reason or another, initially the Police decided not to take any action if I recall correctly , but his Political opponents kept demanding he be investigated, he was sent a questionnaire under Police Caution due to Covid, He completed it and the outcome was he was issued with a Fixed Penalty Notice , like thousands of others for breaching Covid Regulation, Raynor was on TV this morning and stated she did nothing wrong everything was above board, if the outcome of this latest investigation supports that fine over and done with I think it obvious to all that they didn't investigate it properly. They didn't interview the neighbours (key witnesses) to establish where she was actually living lol. My guess is that it was such a low priority that they didn't do anything (like when your house is burgled), but have now been forced to get off their ass because the spotlight hasn't gone away. |
|
|
|
Post by dodgydave on Mar 28, 2024 13:59:08 GMT
Persistent rumours of tax avoidance wont go away, the police are investigating her again and she refuses to reveal to Starmer tax advice she received when she sold her ex council house. If Labour win the election, which seems likely, this will still be hanging over Labour. Can Starmer afford to have his deputy prime minister mired in controversy? How much longer has Raynor got? You have this the wrong way around. Starmer IS LOVING THIS. He has distanced himself by refusing to look at the "expert advice" and taking her "on her word". Rayner is Starmer's biggest threat, not the Tories. Labour are 100% going to win, but Starmer won't be radical enough for (a) the left of the party (b) the unions (c) Momentum etc. It was obvious they would try to replace Starmer with Rayner asap, but with her discredited there really isn't anybody of worth to challenge Starmer for probably two to three elections. Even if she survives this she is already damaged by it because it looks as dodgy as hell, add it to the Growlergate farce and she is looking pretty unelectable as Labour MPs will be worried about further skeletons in her closest. With politics being what it is, I wouldn't be surprised if Starmer's team leaked this shit to Lord Ashcroft lol. |
|
