|
|
Post by Bentley on Mar 25, 2024 17:21:44 GMT
Rayner has openly judged others .
She now understands the meaning of ‘ people who live in glass houses’.
|
|
|
|
Post by Fairsociety on Mar 25, 2024 17:24:38 GMT
Rayner wouldn't know the truth if it came up and slapped her across the face, Starmer was asked 7 times had he ever used drugs in his younger days, it was a simple Yes or No answer, 7 times he spluttered and would not say Yes or No, both Rayner/Starmer/Labour have a problem answering direct questions they can not say a positive Yes or No, BTW no one cares if Starmer took drugs or not, in fact it would probably boost his popularity because he comes across as wooden. How many children has Boris got? Who gives a flying fuck unless the UK tax payers are picking up his 'children's' bill. |
|
|
|
Post by jonksy on Mar 25, 2024 17:45:44 GMT
Rayner wouldn't know the truth if it came up and slapped her across the face, Starmer was asked 7 times had he ever used drugs in his younger days, it was a simple Yes or No answer, 7 times he spluttered and would not say Yes or No, both Rayner/Starmer/Labour have a problem answering direct questions they can not say a positive Yes or No, BTW no one cares if Starmer took drugs or not, in fact it would probably boost his popularity because he comes across as wooden. How many children has Boris got? Does it matter? At least they werent conceived behind the schools bike shed.... |
|
|
|
Post by jonksy on Mar 25, 2024 17:47:32 GMT
How many children has Boris got? Who gives a flying fuck unless the UK tax payers are picking up his 'children's' bill. Exactly mate..I wonder how mucht rayner gets in state hand outs each month for her brood of bastards? |
|
|
|
Post by Pacifico on Mar 25, 2024 17:56:57 GMT
Rayner wouldn't know the truth if it came up and slapped her across the face, Starmer was asked 7 times had he ever used drugs in his younger days, it was a simple Yes or No answer, 7 times he spluttered and would not say Yes or No, both Rayner/Starmer/Labour have a problem answering direct questions they can not say a positive Yes or No, BTW no one cares if Starmer took drugs or not, in fact it would probably boost his popularity because he comes across as wooden. How many children has Boris got? OOH! - look over there... a unicorn..  |
|
|
|
Post by andrewbrown on Mar 25, 2024 18:34:41 GMT
How many children has Boris got? OOH! - look over there... a unicorn.. Nope, not at all. I'm merely amused that those who constantly scream hypocrisy are hypocritical. |
|
|
|
Post by jonksy on Mar 25, 2024 18:39:22 GMT
OOH! - look over there... a unicorn.. Nope, not at all. I'm merely amused that those who constantly scream hypocrisy are hypocritical. Just the usual lefty whataboutery to try and divert the thread...Thats fucking hypocrisy in my book Andy.. |
|
|
|
Post by Pacifico on Mar 25, 2024 22:15:36 GMT
OOH! - look over there... a unicorn.. Nope, not at all. I'm merely amused that those who constantly scream hypocrisy are hypocritical. Leave it out - in a thread about the alleged tax evasion of the Ginger Growler the only comment you have is about Johnson. It's so predictable. |
|
|
|
Post by dodgydave on Mar 26, 2024 3:26:50 GMT
OOH! - look over there... a unicorn.. Nope, not at all. I'm merely amused that those who constantly scream hypocrisy are hypocritical. How many children Boris has is irrelevant, unless he gets back into power (very unlikely) and seeks to introduce a cap on how many children a couple can have (also very unlikely). Rayner wants a big state, so she is going to have to make a case for higher taxation to pay for it... which is why it looks very bad if she has ducked taxes in the past. This is what, the 3rd time she has attempted to bat off scrutiny by claiming it is smears. It doesn't exactly build trust with the public. |
|
|
|
Post by andrewbrown on Mar 26, 2024 4:35:12 GMT
Nope, not at all. I'm merely amused that those who constantly scream hypocrisy are hypocritical. Leave it out - in a thread about the alleged tax evasion of the Ginger Growler the only comment you have is about Johnson. It's so predictable. It was a comparison to highlight how different politicians were being held to different standards, and I'm sure that you were astute enough to understand the point that I was making. |
|
|
|
Post by andrewbrown on Mar 26, 2024 4:42:15 GMT
Nope, not at all. I'm merely amused that those who constantly scream hypocrisy are hypocritical. How many children Boris has is irrelevant, unless he gets back into power (very unlikely) and seeks to introduce a cap on how many children a couple can have (also very unlikely). Rayner wants a big state, so she is going to have to make a case for higher taxation to pay for it... which is why it looks very bad if she has ducked taxes in the past. This is what, the 3rd time she has attempted to bat off scrutiny by claiming it is smears. It doesn't exactly build trust with the public. My point wasn't really about Boris though, he was just an example. Of course he can have as many children as he likes, but the point that I was making was that another politician was unable to tell the public something in their private life that was making them look untrustworthy. Said posters were holding them to a different standard of account. With your second paragraph I'd agree, and if she is shown to have done wrong then I agree it undermines her. |
|
|
|
Post by Pacifico on Mar 26, 2024 9:03:18 GMT
Leave it out - in a thread about the alleged tax evasion of the Ginger Growler the only comment you have is about Johnson. It's so predictable. It was a comparison to highlight how different politicians were being held to different standards, and I'm sure that you were astute enough to understand the point that I was making. Ok I will play along - what is hypocritical about Johnson having loads of kids, has he campaigned against people having kids? |
|
|
|
Post by Fairsociety on Mar 26, 2024 10:02:54 GMT
Leave it out - in a thread about the alleged tax evasion of the Ginger Growler the only comment you have is about Johnson. It's so predictable. It was a comparison to highlight how different politicians were being held to different standards, and I'm sure that you were astute enough to understand the point that I was making. Rayner is in a very strong financial position thanks to a Tory policy 'Right to Buy' that not only put her on the property ladder, but she was able to buy it a huge discount, and when she sold it made a even bigger profit.
The point we are making andrea, this same Labour lout is trying to STOP people doing what she did, 'buying their council house', her argument 'it reduces social housing stock, well she never thought about that when she bought hers.
Labour hate anyone owning their own homes, getting financial stability, having assets, because Rayner knows most people who have those things vote TORY, who would want to risk losing all that under a Labour government.
|
|
|
|
Post by andrewbrown on Mar 26, 2024 13:43:15 GMT
Labour have no plans to end right to buy.
I agree though, that the money earned through right to buy should have been invested in new housing stock.
|
|
|
|
Post by Totheleft on Mar 26, 2024 14:07:09 GMT
It was a comparison to highlight how different politicians were being held to different standards, and I'm sure that you were astute enough to understand the point that I was making. Rayner is in a very strong financial position thanks to a Tory policy 'Right to Buy' that not only put her on the property ladder, but she was able to buy it a huge discount, and when she sold it made a even bigger profit.
The point we are making andrea, this same Labour lout is trying to STOP people doing what she did, 'buying their council house', her argument 'it reduces social housing stock, well she never thought about that when she bought hers.
Labour hate anyone owning their own homes, getting financial stability, having assets, because Rayner knows most people who have those things vote TORY, who would want to risk losing all that under a Labour government.
Don't you think she's in a strong financial postion because of her working life ? You should try it instead of being Envious. |
|
