|
|
Starmer
Feb 22, 2024 8:05:17 GMT
via mobile
Post by Totheleft on Feb 22, 2024 8:05:17 GMT
What did he do wrong
They say he was a Coward giving in to the defectors in his party all he did was to try and stop a split
In his party .
What any other party leader will do
He acted in the best interest of his party .
Remember what Camrom did to stop defectors from his party he called a
A referemmden and look at the mess that caused the Country were in Recession now .
All Starmer did was actually out is parliamentary democratic right
By putting forward another amendment.
|
|
|
|
Post by Pacifico on Feb 22, 2024 8:14:20 GMT
|
|
|
|
Starmer
Feb 22, 2024 9:54:04 GMT
via mobile
Post by Totheleft on Feb 22, 2024 9:54:04 GMT
No try and put forward a argument if you can. |
|
|
|
Post by Bentley on Feb 22, 2024 9:57:13 GMT
Read the thread titled Should Hoyle resign? Doofus .
|
|
|
|
Post by thomas on Feb 22, 2024 10:15:22 GMT
Read the thread titled Should Hoyle resign? Doofus . Thats all we are going to get for the next wee while is labour supporters running around forums trying to deflect from labours hoylegate. It certainly looks at the minute though starmer may have overplayed his hand. There seems to be quite a backlash. |
|
|
|
Post by Fairsociety on Feb 22, 2024 10:21:13 GMT
Starmer/Labour can do and say everything Sunak/Tories can't, imagine if this was the other way round, we'd never hear the end of Starmer/Rayner demanding resignations, inquiries, remembering the pair of them over partgate they were like two wild rabid dogs foaming at the mouth, I hope this brings down Hoyle and Starmer, good riddance to the corrupt pair.
|
|
|
|
Post by witchfinder on Feb 22, 2024 11:43:29 GMT
They dont have anything on Starmer, absolutely nothing
Starmer listened to the concerns of MPs who had been on the recieving end of bullying and threats from the public and constituents, and he lobbied The Speaker based upon those concerns.
These were totaly valid reasons for asking The Speaker to consider the TONED DOWN motion as put together by the Labour Party.
Unless anyone can prove anything otherwise, this is the version we have to accept, and its as simple as that, no conspiracy theories, no crystal balls, no suppositions.
|
|
|
|
Post by jonksy on Feb 22, 2024 11:45:22 GMT
They dont have anything on Starmer, absolutely nothingStarmer listened to the concerns of MPs who had been on the recieving end of bullying and threats from the public and constituents, and he lobbied The Speaker based upon those concerns. These were totaly valid reasons for asking The Speaker to consider the TONED DOWN motion as put together by the Labour Party. Unless anyone can prove anything otherwise, this is the version we have to accept, and its as simple as that, no conspiracy theories, no crystal balls, no suppositions. Fucking hell fiddles what rock have you been hiding under the last few days? |
|
|
|
Post by jonksy on Feb 22, 2024 11:49:30 GMT
So Sir Kneel-a-lot will cost Sir Biased-a-lot his job and still remains silent. Utterly spineless......
|
|
|
|
Post by Fairsociety on Feb 22, 2024 11:55:44 GMT
So Sir Kneel-a-lot will cost Sir Biased-a-lot his job and still remains silent. Utterly spineless...... Starmer will be looking for a way to boot Sue Gray out, he promises these dimwits good positions, then when he gets what he wants he kicks them to the kerb, Hoyle will be sitting at home kicking himself saying .... What have I done. |
|
|
|
Post by Bentley on Feb 22, 2024 12:27:26 GMT
They dont have anything on Starmer, absolutely nothing Starmer listened to the concerns of MPs who had been on the recieving end of bullying and threats from the public and constituents, and he lobbied The Speaker based upon those concerns. These were totaly valid reasons for asking The Speaker to consider the TONED DOWN motion as put together by the Labour Party. Unless anyone can prove anything otherwise, this is the version we have to accept, and it’s as simple as that, no conspiracy theories, no crystal balls, no suppositions. We don’t have to accept anything . |
|
|
|
Starmer
Feb 22, 2024 14:12:27 GMT
via mobile
Post by Totheleft on Feb 22, 2024 14:12:27 GMT
Read the thread titled Should Hoyle resign? Doofus . The only thing Hoyle did was upset loads of crying babies. |
|
|
|
Post by Bentley on Feb 22, 2024 14:20:08 GMT
Read the thread titled Should Hoyle resign? Doofus . The only thing Hoyle did was upset loads of crying babies. You and other lefties then …you’ve answered your own OP. |
|
|
|
Starmer
Feb 22, 2024 14:30:35 GMT
via mobile
Post by Totheleft on Feb 22, 2024 14:30:35 GMT
Starmer/Labour can do and say everything Sunak/Tories can't, imagine if this was the other way round, we'd never hear the end of Starmer/Rayner demanding resignations, inquiries, remembering the pair of them over partgate they were like two wild rabid dogs foaming at the mouth, I hope this brings down Hoyle and Starmer, good riddance to the corrupt pair. What do you think going on know we the cry babies doing now calling for the Speaker to resign beca us he upset them. |
|
|
|
Starmer
Feb 22, 2024 14:34:25 GMT
via mobile
Post by Totheleft on Feb 22, 2024 14:34:25 GMT
The only thing Hoyle did was upset loads of crying babies. You and other lefties then …you’ve answered your own OP. Dose that mean they weren't crying babies |
|
