|
|
Post by The Squeezed Middle on Feb 22, 2024 14:34:43 GMT
They dont have anything on Starmer, absolutely nothing Starmer listened to the concerns of Labour MPs who had been on the recieving end of bullying and threats from Labour voters... FIFY. And it's a totally invalid response for an aspiring PM to back down to threats of violence from his own supporters. |
|
|
|
Post by Bentley on Feb 22, 2024 14:44:55 GMT
You and other lefties then …you’ve answered your own OP. Dose that mean they weren't crying babies Not if you can read and write . |
|
|
|
Post by jonksy on Feb 22, 2024 15:01:42 GMT
You go girl.....!!!! 'Not fit to lead Britain!' Penny Mordaunt rips into Keir Starmer in furious Commons attack...... Penny Mordaunt insisted Sir Keir Starmer is "not fit" to lead Britain in an impassioned Commons attack after a dramatic day over a Gaza ceasefire vote. The Commons Leader blamed "party politics on behalf of the Labour Party" for the chaotic scenes. Speaking in the Commons, said of the Labour leader: "He puts the interests of the Labour Party before the interests of the British people.....
|
|
|
|
Post by Fairsociety on Feb 22, 2024 15:05:12 GMT
You go girl.....!!!! 'Not fit to lead Britain!' Penny Mordaunt rips into Keir Starmer in furious Commons attack...... Penny Mordaunt insisted Sir Keir Starmer is "not fit" to lead Britain in an impassioned Commons attack after a dramatic day over a Gaza ceasefire vote. The Commons Leader blamed "party politics on behalf of the Labour Party" for the chaotic scenes. Speaking in the Commons, said of the Labour leader: "He puts the interests of the Labour Party before the interests of the British people.....
I wanted her as Tory leader, she doesn't suffer fools gladly. |
|
|
|
Post by jonksy on Feb 22, 2024 15:08:13 GMT
You go girl.....!!!! 'Not fit to lead Britain!' Penny Mordaunt rips into Keir Starmer in furious Commons attack...... Penny Mordaunt insisted Sir Keir Starmer is "not fit" to lead Britain in an impassioned Commons attack after a dramatic day over a Gaza ceasefire vote. The Commons Leader blamed "party politics on behalf of the Labour Party" for the chaotic scenes. Speaking in the Commons, said of the Labour leader: "He puts the interests of the Labour Party before the interests of the British people.....
I wanted her as Tory leader, she doesn't suffer fools gladly. Droopy draws rayner is still smarting mate.....LOL |
|
|
|
Post by Fairsociety on Feb 22, 2024 15:13:32 GMT
I wanted her as Tory leader, she doesn't suffer fools gladly. Droopy draws rayner is still smarting mate.....LOL LOL.... |
|
|
|
Post by see2 on Feb 22, 2024 15:46:52 GMT
You go girl.....!!!! 'Not fit to lead Britain!' Penny Mordaunt rips into Keir Starmer in furious Commons attack...... Penny Mordaunt insisted Sir Keir Starmer is "not fit" to lead Britain in an impassioned Commons attack after a dramatic day over a Gaza ceasefire vote. The Commons Leader blamed "party politics on behalf of the Labour Party" for the chaotic scenes. Speaking in the Commons, said of the Labour leader: "He puts the interests of the Labour Party before the interests of the British people.....
It was the SNP who acted like a bunch of kids just because the Speaker decided that the issue was too important to ignore the comments from the second largest political party in the country. I know the Scots have many individuals who are more resilient than the bunch of immature wannabes they sent to parliament. |
|
|
|
Post by Bentley on Feb 22, 2024 16:13:42 GMT
You go girl.....!!!! 'Not fit to lead Britain!' Penny Mordaunt rips into Keir Starmer in furious Commons attack...... Penny Mordaunt insisted Sir Keir Starmer is "not fit" to lead Britain in an impassioned Commons attack after a dramatic day over a Gaza ceasefire vote. The Commons Leader blamed "party politics on behalf of the Labour Party" for the chaotic scenes. Speaking in the Commons, said of the Labour leader: "He puts the interests of the Labour Party before the interests of the British people.....
It was the SNP who acted like a bunch of kids just because the Speaker decided that the issue was too important to ignore the comments from the second largest political party in the country. I know the Scots have many individuals who are more resilient than the bunch of immature wannabes they sent to parliament. He wouldn’t have ignored the comments if he had not acquiesced to Starmers ‘ urging ‘. Not being persuaded doesn’t equate to ignoring. They both left themselves open to very serious criticism. |
|
|
|
Post by Fairsociety on Feb 22, 2024 16:18:54 GMT
Starmer is a intimidating bully, he's going to cheat his way to being PM, and he'll trample over anyone who stands in his way, he's ruined the reputation of Durham police force with the cover up of beergate, he's ruined the reputation of Sue Gray (if she had one in the first place) by stitching up Boris Johnson, and now he's ruined the reputation of Hoyle, he's a user and abuser, and to think this low life, lying, corrupt, parasite could soon be running our country.
|
|
|
|
Post by witchfinder on Feb 22, 2024 16:22:33 GMT
There is no evidence what so ever that Starmer bullied anyone, its all in your mind
The Speaker has made it clear his reasons for choosing the Labour motion, and they are legitimate and valid reasons, so no more conspiracy theories unless there is proof / evidence.
|
|
|
|
Post by thomas on Feb 22, 2024 16:23:42 GMT
Starmer is a intimidating bully, he's going to cheat his way to being PM, and he'll trample over anyone who stands in his way, he's ruined the reputation of Durham police force with the cover up of beergate, he's ruined the reputation of Sue Gray (if she had one in the first place) by stitching up Boris Johnson, and now he's ruined the reputation of Hoyle, he's a user and abuser, and to think this low life, lying, corrupt, parasite could soon be running our country. guido reporting the number who have signed the motion of no confidence in Hoyle up to 64 . On and on it runs.  |
|
|
|
Post by jonksy on Feb 22, 2024 16:26:24 GMT
There is no evidence what so ever that Starmer bullied anyone, its all in your mindThe Speaker has made it clear his reasons for choosing the Labour motion, and they are legitimate and valid reasons, so no more conspiracy theories unless there is proof / evidence. There is a plethoria of evidence fiddles.... |
|
|
|
Post by thomas on Feb 22, 2024 16:27:21 GMT
There is no evidence what so ever that Starmer bullied anyone, its all in your mind The Speaker has made it clear his reasons for choosing the Labour motion, and they are legitimate and valid reasons, so no more conspiracy theories unless there is proof / evidence. the reasons about `safety ` dont really stack up though do they witch finder.? All labour had to do was either back the snp motion , or abstain. Surely the only risk from islamic extremism if that's whats being hinted at would have been if they had backed the governments motion of being against a ceasefire? |
|
|
|
Post by witchfinder on Feb 22, 2024 16:43:40 GMT
There is no evidence what so ever that Starmer bullied anyone, its all in your mind The Speaker has made it clear his reasons for choosing the Labour motion, and they are legitimate and valid reasons, so no more conspiracy theories unless there is proof / evidence. the reasons about `safety ` dont really stack up though do they witch finder.? All labour had to do was either back the snp motion , or abstain. Surely the only risk from islamic extremism if that's whats being hinted at would have been if they had backed the governments motion of being against a ceasefire? No, Labour could not back the SNP motion, and you know fine well why The SNP motion was too hard line against Israel, and in a climate where Labour are WRONGLY but constantly accused of been "antisemitic", it would have attracted much criticism. The Labour motion was more balanced, it criticised Hamas, called for a ceasefire, and stated that all sides should work towards a peaceful solution. Most Conservatives would never have backed the SNP motion, many Labour MPs would not have backed it, so again I ask the question, what was the point of the SNP motion. ( I allready know the answer ) |
|
|
|
Post by jonksy on Feb 22, 2024 16:48:43 GMT
the reasons about `safety ` dont really stack up though do they witch finder.? All labour had to do was either back the snp motion , or abstain. Surely the only risk from islamic extremism if that's whats being hinted at would have been if they had backed the governments motion of being against a ceasefire? No, Labour could not back the SNP motion, and you know fine well why The SNP motion was too hard line against Israel, and in a climate where Labour are WRONGLY but constantly accused of been "antisemitic", it would have attracted much criticism. The Labour motion was more balanced, it criticised Hamas, called for a ceasefire, and stated that all sides should work towards a peaceful solution. Most Conservatives would never have backed the SNP motion, many Labour MPs would not have backed it, so again I ask the question, what was the point of the SNP motion. ( I allready know the answer ) Thats another fucking keyboard you owe me fiddles.. |
|
