|
|
Post by zanygame on Feb 15, 2024 7:59:59 GMT
Oh goody another conspiracy theory. Try leaving your ivory tower and look at what's actually going on. NO! THey can't get me up here.  |
|
|
|
Post by Steve on Feb 15, 2024 10:26:12 GMT
Oh goody another conspiracy theory. Try leaving your ivory tower and look at what's actually going on. Which is that you posted an idiot conspiracy theory. |
|
|
|
Post by Bentley on Feb 15, 2024 10:37:00 GMT
Why is an obvious government policy a conspiracy’ theory’?
It the go-to phrase for lefties and net zero zealots .
|
|
|
|
Post by Steve on Feb 15, 2024 10:40:36 GMT
Why is an obvious government policy a conspiracy’ theory’? It the go-to phrase for lefties and net zero zealots . Go on show us that it is a government policy to ABOLISH all personal transport. Because it isn't, it's just going to be impossible for those on low incomes to have one |
|
|
|
Post by Bentley on Feb 15, 2024 10:49:05 GMT
Why is an obvious government policy a conspiracy’ theory’? It the go-to phrase for lefties and net zero zealots . Go on show us that it is a government policy to ABOLISH all personal transport. Because it isn't, it's just going to be impossible for those on low incomes to have one Banning ICE vehicles (and making them harder to repair ) for an inferior and more expensive alternative plus not prioritising the infrastructure to charge them is a bit of a clue . I notice another ‘ let them eat cake ‘ net zero zealot glibly dismisses the people’ on low incomes’ while putting on his pedant hat . |
|
|
|
Post by Steve on Feb 15, 2024 11:05:08 GMT
Go on show us that it is a government policy to ABOLISH all personal transport. Because it isn't, it's just going to be impossible for those on low incomes to have one Banning ICE vehicles (and making them harder to repair ) for an inferior and more expensive alternative plus not prioritising the infrastructure to charge them is a bit of a clue . I notice another ‘ let them eat cake ‘ net zero zealot glibly dismisses the people’ on low incomes’ while putting on his pedant hat . yes it is a bit of a clue, that personal transport is not being abolished. Maybe you haven't heard of electric vehicles. You see them everywhere now |
|
|
|
Post by Bentley on Feb 15, 2024 11:16:53 GMT
Banning ICE vehicles (and making them harder to repair ) for an inferior and more expensive alternative plus not prioritising the infrastructure to charge them is a bit of a clue . I notice another ‘ let them eat cake ‘ net zero zealot glibly dismisses the people’ on low incomes’ while putting on his pedant hat . yes it is a bit of a clue, that personal transport is not being abolished. Maybe you haven't heard of electric vehicles. You see them everywhere now Indeed. I even alluded to them in the post you replied to. As a mod in a failed forum far far away used to say ‘ specsavers are open today’. |
|
|
|
Post by Steve on Feb 15, 2024 11:22:33 GMT
So why did you post countering my post saying they are not being abolished?
Just to cause trouble perchance?
|
|
|
|
Post by Bentley on Feb 15, 2024 11:30:38 GMT
So why did you post countering my post saying they are not being abolished? Just to cause trouble perchance? They are being abolished . You admitted it . You admitted that they are being abolished for people in low incomes and the fact that there is no great effort to create an infrastructure to facilitate them tells us that it will not just be low incomes . Did your pedant hat fall over your eyes ? |
|
|
|
Post by The Squeezed Middle on Feb 15, 2024 12:19:17 GMT
Go on show us that it is a government policy to ABOLISH all personal transport. Well, let's see: ULEZ - soon to become pay-per-mile for all vehicles. Low Traffic Neigbourhoods 20 mph speed limits Tolls on tunnels and bridges Traffic lights phased to slow traffic Coordinated roadworks to make travel a nightmare Ban on repairing older cars Car Free Zones Less road space and more cycle lanes
Increasing road tax Etc etc
...it's just going to be impossible for those on low incomes to have one. Well, that's a partial admission then: So you accept that people on low incomes will be priced off the road. Now it's just a question of how low is low? |
|
|
|
Post by Dan Dare on Feb 15, 2024 12:34:19 GMT
If unrestricted personal mobility as a universal entitlement is the political objective it sounds like what is needed is a real 'People's Car'  |
|
|
|
Post by Steve on Feb 15, 2024 13:25:06 GMT
So why did you post countering my post saying they are not being abolished? Just to cause trouble perchance? They are being abolished . You admitted it . You admitted that they are being abolished for people in low incomes and the fact that there is no great effort to create an infrastructure to facilitate them tells us that it will not just be low incomes . Did your pedant hat fall over your eyes ? Sems your illiterate hat is firmly on your head. He said 'The real story is that personal transport is being abolished. Full stop.'No 'just for plebs' qualification that I can spot. Maybe you can invent one. |
|
|
|
Post by Bentley on Feb 15, 2024 13:52:59 GMT
They are being abolished . You admitted it . You admitted that they are being abolished for people in low incomes and the fact that there is no great effort to create an infrastructure to facilitate them tells us that it will not just be low incomes . Did your pedant hat fall over your eyes ? Sems your illiterate hat is firmly on your head. He said 'The real story is that personal transport is being abolished. Full stop.'No 'just for plebs' qualification that I can spot. Maybe you can invent one. |
|
|
|
Post by Steve on Feb 15, 2024 13:54:32 GMT
Your non point being?
|
|
|
|
Post by Bentley on Feb 15, 2024 13:55:45 GMT
The point was in the post you failed to read twice . |
|
