|
|
Post by buccaneer on Jan 13, 2024 10:53:27 GMT
So, when the Brexit deal was negotiated and the EU wanted the ECJ to oversee the TCA you think this foreign court based in Luxembourg would have ruled in Britain's favour upon ze Commissions vexatious complaints? LOL! Talk about vexatious complaints!!! You can't show a single instance of ECJ bias, yet you have vexatiously imputed bias to them. If you want us to believe that your allegations aren't vexatious, show us evidence of ECJ bias. You won't find any in the cases where the Commission brought the UK before the ECJ. See you failed to answer the question. Thanks for tacitly admitting the ECJ are EU stooges. |
|
|
|
Post by Einhorn on Jan 13, 2024 10:55:43 GMT
LOL! Talk about vexatious complaints!!! You can't show a single instance of ECJ bias, yet you have vexatiously imputed bias to them. If you want us to believe that your allegations aren't vexatious, show us evidence of ECJ bias. You won't find any in the cases where the Commission brought the UK before the ECJ. See you failed to answer the question. Thanks for tacitly admitting the ECJ are EU stooges. I did answer the question. I pointed out that there isn't a jot of evidence to show ECJ bias. If you have evidence, present it. Cite cases. Otherwise, it's just more right-wing conspiracy theory. |
|
|
|
Post by buccaneer on Jan 13, 2024 11:04:37 GMT
See you failed to answer the question. Thanks for tacitly admitting the ECJ are EU stooges. I did answer the question. I pointed out that there isn't a jot of evidence to show ECJ bias. If you have evidence, present it. Cite cases. Otherwise, it's just more right-wing conspiracy theory. You did not answer the question because you couldn't bring yourself to admit that the ECJ would rule in the EU's favour under their proposed TCA. Thank you. |
|
|
|
Post by Vinny on Jan 13, 2024 11:09:54 GMT
No point bothering with Brusselsbots.
|
|
|
|
Post by Einhorn on Jan 13, 2024 11:10:18 GMT
I did answer the question. I pointed out that there isn't a jot of evidence to show ECJ bias. If you have evidence, present it. Cite cases. Otherwise, it's just more right-wing conspiracy theory. You did not answer the question because you couldn't bring yourself to admit that the ECJ would rule in the EU's favour under their proposed TCA. Thank you. Okay, I'll put it in plainer terms. There is absolutely nothing in the history of the ECJ's relationship with the UK that shows it is biased against the UK. Absolutely nothing. In fact, the reverse is true. The ECJ demonstrated time and again it was completely impartial. This is illustrated by its more frequently finding in favour of the UK than in favour of the Commission over a period in excess of thirty years. So, yes, I believe the ECJ would have been impartial. It would be unreasonable to believe otherwise, given its long record of impartiality in its dealings with the UK. |
|
|
|
Post by Einhorn on Jan 13, 2024 11:11:41 GMT
No point bothering with Brusselsbots. Or misinformed people like you, B-4, Buccaneer, and Jonksy. |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 13, 2024 11:18:56 GMT
No point bothering with Brusselsbots. Agreed. They're posting wild insulting personal claims about several members and just to get a reaction. The only winning move is not to play. |
|
|
|
Post by Einhorn on Jan 13, 2024 11:22:20 GMT
No point bothering with Brusselsbots. Agreed. They're posting wild insulting personal claims about several members and just to get a reaction. The only winning move is not to play. Wild? Explain how my claim was 'wild'. You're not a democrat. You're a Johnson supporter. You support the man who tried to shut down democracy. It's perfectly legitimate to assume that you're just projecting your anti-democratic bias onto others. You actually support the former Polish government's efforts to do what Johnson failed to do because the UK has an independent judiciary. |
|
|
|
Post by buccaneer on Jan 13, 2024 11:31:28 GMT
Agreed. They're posting wild insulting personal claims about several members and just to get a reaction. The only winning move is not to play. Wild? Explain how my claim was 'wild'. You're not a democrat. You're a Johnson supporter. You support the man who tried to shut down democracy. It's perfectly legitimate to assume that you're just projecting your anti-democratic bias onto others. You actually support the former Polish government's efforts to do what Johnson failed to do because the UK has an independent judiciary. Parliament was full of anti-democratic remainers who were hellbent on keeping the UK in, or under the EU's stooge ECJ, and who couldn't accept the result of the 2016 referendum because they were anti-democratic. That was the effect of an anti-democratic cause what Johnson attempted. |
|
|
|
Post by Einhorn on Jan 13, 2024 11:34:21 GMT
Wild? Explain how my claim was 'wild'. You're not a democrat. You're a Johnson supporter. You support the man who tried to shut down democracy. It's perfectly legitimate to assume that you're just projecting your anti-democratic bias onto others. You actually support the former Polish government's efforts to do what Johnson failed to do because the UK has an independent judiciary. Parliament was full of anti-democratic remainers who were hellbent on keeping the UK in, or under the EU's stooge ECJ, and who couldn't accept the result of the 2016 referendum because they were anti-democratic. That was the effect of anti-democratic cause what Johnson attempted. LOL! Johnson tried to shut down democracy and the independent judiciary stopped him. And it was lies that won the referendum. If it were otherwise, a majority of people wouldn't regret the decision to leave. |
|
|
|
Post by buccaneer on Jan 13, 2024 11:37:52 GMT
Parliament was full of anti-democratic remainers who were hellbent on keeping the UK in, or under the EU's stooge ECJ, and who couldn't accept the result of the 2016 referendum because they were anti-democratic. That was the effect of anti-democratic cause what Johnson attempted. LOL! Johnson tried to shut down democracy and the independent judiciary stopped him. And it was lies that won the referendum. If it were otherwise, a majority of people wouldn't regret the decision to leave. I've alread explained (as you know full well) why Johnson did that, against a backdrop of anti-democratic wishes. The rest is EU-phile conspiracy theory. |
|
|
|
Post by Einhorn on Jan 13, 2024 11:44:45 GMT
LOL! Johnson tried to shut down democracy and the independent judiciary stopped him. And it was lies that won the referendum. If it were otherwise, a majority of people wouldn't regret the decision to leave. I've alread explained (as you know full well) why Johnson did that, against a backdrop of anti-democratic wishes. The rest is EU-phile conspiracy theory. The people didn't vote for a hard Brexit. It wasn't in the least bit undemocratic to refuse to allow something the people didn't vote for. The people voted in in an advisory referendum. For you to insist on an outcome that contradicted the very basis upon which the referendum was held is itself undemocratic. Add that to the fact that Johnson falsely pitched the referendum as 'The EU or the NHS'. Finally, consider that the result would have been overturned if it had been a mandatory referendum, in the same way that a Swiss referendum was recently overturned on the basis of misinformation put out in the lead-up to a referendum in that country. |
|
|
|
Post by Einhorn on Jan 13, 2024 11:45:30 GMT
Not that any of the above matters now, of course. Farage himself has predicted 10 years of Labour rule. That's a lot of Brino. Fair enough, given the public's change of attitude in respect of Brexit.
|
|
|
|
Post by Pacifico on Jan 13, 2024 11:50:36 GMT
I've alread explained (as you know full well) why Johnson did that, against a backdrop of anti-democratic wishes. The rest is EU-phile conspiracy theory. The people didn't vote for a hard Brexit. It wasn't in the least bit undemocratic to refuse to allow something the people didn't vote for. The people didn't vote for a soft Brexit either, they just voted to leave the EU - Parliament decides how and they made their decision. Best you learn to live with it. |
|
|
|
Post by The Squeezed Middle on Jan 13, 2024 11:50:53 GMT
No point bothering with Brusselsbots. Agreed. They're posting wild insulting personal claims about several members and just to get a reaction. The only winning move is not to play. Stick them on your ignore list and deprive them of the attention that they crave.  |
|
