|
|
Post by Einhorn on Jan 13, 2024 9:44:23 GMT
Erm, the present Polish government has depoliticised the state media. You know ... the opposite of what you would expect in a dictatorship. Jesus Christ, Jonksy! At the very least, get the basics right. Have you been to Poland lately. There are no mentions in the media about the riots in the streets of poland, They only find out aboutit by using foreing media and arsebook. Sorry, Jonks. I'm simply not prepared to take your word for anything. Back that up with a reliable source. |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 13, 2024 9:47:54 GMT
They had puppet governments all over Europe during the German occupation of 1942. Many in Poland today refer to Tusk as the German embed. They aren't wrong. Yet Brexiters endlessly supply us with lists of countries arguing with each other. Not what you'd expect in puppet governments. Poland's PM is an EU agent and German puppet. Tusk is part German. It's why they waved the magic wand and made him PM again. It's why he was the President of the European Council. |
|
|
|
Post by see2 on Jan 13, 2024 9:49:19 GMT
They had puppet governments all over Europe during the German occupation of 1942. Many in Poland today refer to Tusk as the German embed. They aren't wrong. They are wrong if they are insinuating it has anything to do with Nazism. |
|
|
|
Post by buccaneer on Jan 13, 2024 9:57:49 GMT
They had puppet governments all over Europe during the German occupation of 1942. Many in Poland today refer to Tusk as the German embed. They aren't wrong. The irony!!! Supposing you haven't just made up the above, these people will be linked to the right-wing party that the current government replaced. You remember them, don't you? The extremely nationalistic and xenophobic party that replaced the highest members of the judiciary with their own stooges. You don't get more Nazi-like than that. Not that you would disapprove. It was the independent judiciary in the UK that stopped your man Johnson shutting down democracy when he attempted to unlawfully prorogue Parliament. If the old right-wing Polish government had tried that, they wouldn't have met any opposition from the judiciary because the judiciary were 'their people'. A bit like the ECJ are ze Commission's people. |
|
|
|
Post by buccaneer on Jan 13, 2024 10:06:17 GMT
Probably because you take great joy in pointing out the UK's problems (which it had when it was a member) and trying to attribute it to Brexit. Which of course is a load of rubbish, and which of course is why you will not read stats, facts and opinions that paint the UK in a positive light. Trust me I take NO joy in the UK's problems. I'm trying to run an SME. As for facts. Your latest link (The one you haven't read or checked) States that Trump was doing an FTA with the UK, but Biden stopped it. 1, That's not true Trump said a deal could not be done. 2, Biden was elected by the people of America as their representative. My point is that this was blamed on EU membership, yet we left and it got worse not better. I have read them thanks. Trump was more open to a trade deal than IRA supporting Biden. But you carry on pooh poohing Brexit Britain. You dishonestly whinge and whine about the UK's economy; the global economy is currently limping along and the UK isn't unique in this. That's why timely reminders looking at the German economy give you a more broader outlook on nations' economies during these times, because your myopic and partisan views vociferously only sing it's 'Brexit wot dun it' |
|
|
|
Post by Einhorn on Jan 13, 2024 10:10:09 GMT
The irony!!! Supposing you haven't just made up the above, these people will be linked to the right-wing party that the current government replaced. You remember them, don't you? The extremely nationalistic and xenophobic party that replaced the highest members of the judiciary with their own stooges. You don't get more Nazi-like than that. Not that you would disapprove. It was the independent judiciary in the UK that stopped your man Johnson shutting down democracy when he attempted to unlawfully prorogue Parliament. If the old right-wing Polish government had tried that, they wouldn't have met any opposition from the judiciary because the judiciary were 'their people'. A bit like the ECJ are ze Commission's people. Back that up. The Commission is the policeman of the treaties. Its function is to enforce EU rules and to bring a member state before the ECJ for trial if it believes that member state has broken the rules. It is a fact that the ECJ ruled in Britain's favour more often than it ruled in favour of the Commission when the Commission brought the UK before it. That's strange behaviour for a court supposedly made up of Commission stooges. You, Jonksy, and B-4 are a constant source of misinformation. |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 13, 2024 10:14:20 GMT
The irony!!! Supposing you haven't just made up the above, these people will be linked to the right-wing party that the current government replaced. You remember them, don't you? The extremely nationalistic and xenophobic party that replaced the highest members of the judiciary with their own stooges. You don't get more Nazi-like than that. Not that you would disapprove. It was the independent judiciary in the UK that stopped your man Johnson shutting down democracy when he attempted to unlawfully prorogue Parliament. If the old right-wing Polish government had tried that, they wouldn't have met any opposition from the judiciary because the judiciary were 'their people'. A bit like the ECJ are ze Commission's people. It would be a waste of time responding to somebody dependent on the usual boring far-left propaganda. Suffice to say that the German occupation during WW2 had nothing to do with supporting the national interests of occupied nations. Germany formed an alliance with the USSR to divide Poland up. Tusk today bats for Moscow almost as much as he bends over to Berlin. |
|
|
|
Post by Einhorn on Jan 13, 2024 10:17:41 GMT
A bit like the ECJ are ze Commission's people. It would be a waste of time responding to somebody dependent on the usual boring far-left propaganda. Suffice to say that the German occupation during WW2 had nothing to do with supporting the national interests of occupied nations. Germany formed an alliance with the USSR to divide Poland up. Tusk today bats for Moscow almost as much as he bends over to Berlin. No. It was your man Johnson who tried to shut down Parliament and democracy in the UK. He would have got away with it if he had been in a position to pack the Supreme Court with government judges/stooges. That's exactly what the xenophobic, racist right-wing government in Poland did. It was a breach of the EU requirement that its members operate under democratic principles. |
|
|
|
Post by Einhorn on Jan 13, 2024 10:23:53 GMT
Yet Brexiters endlessly supply us with lists of countries arguing with each other. Not what you'd expect in puppet governments. Poland's PM is an EU agent and German puppet. Tusk is part German. It's why they waved the magic wand and made him PM again. It's why he was the President of the European Council. Right-wing conspiracy theory. |
|
|
|
Post by buccaneer on Jan 13, 2024 10:27:31 GMT
A bit like the ECJ are ze Commission's people. Back that up. The Commission is the policeman of the treaties. Its function is to enforce EU rules and to bring a member state before the ECJ for trial if it believes that member state has broken the rules. It is a fact that the ECJ ruled in Britain's favour more often than it ruled in favour of the Commission when the Commission brought the UK before it. That's strange behaviour for a court supposedly made up of Commission stooges. You, Jonksy, and B-4 are a constant source of misinformation. You're no reliable source of information yourself. The EU/Commission is notorious for bending and breaking its own "rules" when it suits. |
|
|
|
Post by Einhorn on Jan 13, 2024 10:30:22 GMT
Back that up. The Commission is the policeman of the treaties. Its function is to enforce EU rules and to bring a member state before the ECJ for trial if it believes that member state has broken the rules. It is a fact that the ECJ ruled in Britain's favour more often than it ruled in favour of the Commission when the Commission brought the UK before it. That's strange behaviour for a court supposedly made up of Commission stooges. You, Jonksy, and B-4 are a constant source of misinformation. You're no reliable source of information yourself. The EU/Commission is notorious for bending and breaking its own "rules" when it suits. It's a fact that the ECJ ruled in favour of the UK more often than the Commission when the Commission brought the UK before the ECJ for trial. That's odd behaviour for a court you claim is made up of Commission stooges. |
|
|
|
Post by buccaneer on Jan 13, 2024 10:45:15 GMT
You're no reliable source of information yourself. The EU/Commission is notorious for bending and breaking its own "rules" when it suits. It's a fact that the ECJ ruled in favour of the UK more often than the Commission when the Commission brought the UK before the ECJ for trial. That's odd behaviour for a court you claim is made up of Commission stooges. So, when the Brexit deal was negotiated and the EU wanted the ECJ to oversee the TCA you think this foreign court based in Luxembourg would have ruled in Britain's favour upon ze Commissions vexatious complaints? |
|
|
|
Post by Einhorn on Jan 13, 2024 10:48:25 GMT
It's a fact that the ECJ ruled in favour of the UK more often than the Commission when the Commission brought the UK before the ECJ for trial. That's odd behaviour for a court you claim is made up of Commission stooges. So, when the Brexit deal was negotiated and the EU wanted the ECJ to oversee the TCA you think this foreign court based in Luxembourg would have ruled in Britain's favour upon ze Commissions vexatious complaints? LOL! Talk about vexatious complaints!!! You can't show a single instance of ECJ bias, yet you have vexatiously imputed bias to them. If you want us to believe that your allegations aren't vexatious, show us evidence of ECJ bias. You won't find any in the cases where the Commission brought the UK before the ECJ. |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 13, 2024 10:50:18 GMT
Back that up. The Commission is the policeman of the treaties. Its function is to enforce EU rules and to bring a member state before the ECJ for trial if it believes that member state has broken the rules. It is a fact that the ECJ ruled in Britain's favour more often than it ruled in favour of the Commission when the Commission brought the UK before it. That's strange behaviour for a court supposedly made up of Commission stooges. You, Jonksy, and B-4 are a constant source of misinformation. You're no reliable source of information yourself. The EU/Commission is notorious for bending and breaking its own "rules" when it suits. The trolls on here who post personal abuse around the clock for the EU on all EU related threads are of no interest to me personally. If it wants to smear me then at least it shows how intolerant they really are. |
|
|
|
Post by Einhorn on Jan 13, 2024 10:52:19 GMT
You're no reliable source of information yourself. The EU/Commission is notorious for bending and breaking its own "rules" when it suits. The trolls on here who post personal abuse around the clock for the EU on all EU related threads are of no interest to me personally. If it wants to smear me then at least it shows how intolerant they really are. Your man Johnson tried to shut down democracy when he attempted to unlawfully prorogue Parliament. Of course, you're going to support a corrupt Polish government that was in the process of putting in place mechanisms that would allow it to do what the independent judiciary in the UK stopped Johnson doing. |
|
