|
|
Post by see2 on Dec 31, 2023 10:18:39 GMT
You are posting nonsense Red, many people from all walks of life and from different political position are concerned about the Asylum/Economic migrants, the problem is how best to deal with it. Righties it would seem would say 'fuck the law' and would no doubt Jack Boot them out. Which might be a nice thought for some, but they would soon find that the Jack Boot will be used in ways they disagree with, but by that time it will be too late to do anything about it. You claim "I'm posting nonsense" LOL, how very dare you. I post common bloody sense which is why lefties don't understand it. I'm not getting into a semantic argument about immigration, it's all been said. Suffice to say immigration illegal or otherwise will ensure the success of Reform UK. People laughed at UKIP, and as Farage famously said, 'they aint laughing now'. I imagine a pro immigrant, pro EU, Labour government in a few months time will be a massive boost for Reform UK. There is no amount of posted reality that will be allowed to enter into your Righty position. Fixed opinions are held in place by shallow thinking. |
|
|
|
Post by see2 on Dec 31, 2023 10:25:04 GMT
There was I believe two actions taken by Blair that were not UN led, but were covered by Later changes that followed the intervention by Blair and others against the mas murder and rape by the Serbs. (I can come back to that if your wish.) As for the two non-UN actions taken in Iraq, while a state of war still existed were: 1. The No Fly zones imposed on the Iraqi Air Force in reply to. --- A] Iraqi bombing a long line of Kurdish refugees who were fleeing Iraqi persecution. --- B] The continued bombing of Kuwait despite having just had their invasion repulsed. 2. In the run up to the bombing in 1997/98 the UN had issued one of many Resolutions demanding access for inspectors and no more 'cat and mouse' games. The resolution. Demanding entrance to areas for the UN Inspectors. (Back soon with Un Res.) "1060 12 June 1996 Unanimous Demands Iraq allow access to sites, weapons, transport and equipment by United Nations Special Commission weapons inspectors." This was 5years after the Ceasefire agreement that required free access for Inspectors was signed by Saddam. The areas that were bombed were some of the areas where Saddam had blocked the inspectors. The HUGE lie in the link is that it was a first step step into an illegal invasion of Iraq. So very clearly not a reliably objective source of information.
As the link to Alistair Campbell led to nothing I'm not sure why you posted it. Ha as expected anything you don’t agree with is a lie and imagining posting in bigger letters than usual proves your case. This shows Blair for what he is and was. I know why you are posting lies ^^^^ its because you have no depth of knowledge of the subject. If you cannot be honest with me it seems that you are unlikely to be being honest with yourself. I can only imagine just how awful it must be to live a life of lies. |
|
|
|
Post by jonksy on Dec 31, 2023 10:27:15 GMT
Ha as expected anything you don’t agree with is a lie and imagining posting in bigger letters than usual proves your case. This shows Blair for what he is and was. I know why you are posting lies ^^^^ its because you have no depth of knowledge of the subject. If you cannot be honest with me it seems that you are unlikely to be being honest with yourself. I can only imagine just how awful it must be to live a life of lies. Blair should face the Hague cee2nile. |
|
|
|
Post by wapentake on Dec 31, 2023 10:36:55 GMT
Ha as expected anything you don’t agree with is a lie and imagining posting in bigger letters than usual proves your case. This shows Blair for what he is and was. I know why you are posting lies ^^^^ its because you have no depth of knowledge of the subject. If you cannot be honest with me it seems that you are unlikely to be being honest with yourself. I can only imagine just how awful it must be to live a life of lies. When your devotion to Blair manifests itself in every reply despite evidence to the contrary and you have the cheek to say this to Red Has it ever crossed your mind that is exactly your stance on Blair? |
|
|
|
Post by see2 on Dec 31, 2023 10:41:48 GMT
I know why you are posting lies ^^^^ its because you have no depth of knowledge of the subject. If you cannot be honest with me it seems that you are unlikely to be being honest with yourself. I can only imagine just how awful it must be to live a life of lies. Blair should face the Hague . If there was any truth in your comment he would be there by now, but your are welcome to your misguided opinion. |
|
|
|
Post by jonksy on Dec 31, 2023 10:46:39 GMT
Blair should face the Hague . If there was any truth in your comment he would be there by now, but your are welcome to your misguided opinion. Why would I need to face the Haigh cee2nile? If lying was a crime towards humanity you would be shipped to the Haigh post haste. |
|
|
|
Post by see2 on Dec 31, 2023 10:51:21 GMT
I know why you are posting lies ^^^^ its because you have no depth of knowledge of the subject. If you cannot be honest with me it seems that you are unlikely to be being honest with yourself. I can only imagine just how awful it must be to live a life of lies. When your devotion to Blair manifests itself in every reply despite evidence to the contrary and you have the cheek to say this to Red Has it ever crossed your mind that is exactly your stance on Blair? My 'devotion' if that is what it is, is to outing the lies and insinuations about Blair. It is a perfectly honest and open thing to do. So don't attack me, go and look for real information such as in 'Hansard' the recorded actual words of Blair and Brown, not some trashy obviously biased information outlet. Then again, knowing the truth would spoil your game of denigrating and false insinuations. |
|
|
|
Post by see2 on Dec 31, 2023 10:56:34 GMT
If there was any truth in your comment he would be there by now, but your are welcome to your misguided opinion. Why would I need to face the Haigh honey? If lying was a crime towards humanity you would be shipped to the Haigh post haste. Hmm, I never suggested you did. Next time you think I have told a lie, just provide the evidence and I will firstly say thankyou and then immediately retract the 'lie' with an apology. |
|
|
|
Post by thomas on Dec 31, 2023 11:11:29 GMT
When your devotion to Blair manifests itself in every reply despite evidence to the contrary and you have the cheek to say this to Red Has it ever crossed your mind that is exactly your stance on Blair? My 'devotion' if that is what it is, is to outing the lies and insinuations about Blair. It is a perfectly honest and open thing to do. So don't attack me, go and look for real information such as in 'Hansard' the recorded actual words of Blair and Brown, not some trashy obviously biased information outlet. Then again, knowing the truth would spoil your game of denigrating and false insinuations. What lies and insinuations are they then? As wapentake has inferred , your are like some delusional blairite cultist who becomes angry and shocked once you emerge from your blairites bubble into the real world and find very few like never mind admire Blair the way your worship him. The facts once again Blair lost the Labour Party 4 million voters , from his high of taking 13 half million in 1997 , to the low of taking 9 half million in 2005 in his last election victory. This was done before the financial crash .Kinnock , then Smith , did all the donkey work for labour that Blair inherited , and Blair still managed to leave labour over two million voters worse off then when he became leader. He built less housing than thatcher , took us into a war on lies , left the working population worse off in terms of the cost of living , flooded the uk with migrants despite most other European nations putting blocks on east europeans at the time , and of course indebted generations of Scots and English with his PFI debacles , not to mention privatising the nhs in England. These are facts. Something blairite cultists like you can't handle. |
|
|
|
Post by jonksy on Dec 31, 2023 11:22:35 GMT
Why would I need to face the Haigh honey? If lying was a crime towards humanity you would be shipped to the Haigh post haste. Hmm, I never suggested you did. Next time you think I have told a lie, just provide the evidence and I will firstly say thankyou and then immediately retract the 'lie' with an apology. States the boards biggest liar extract your head from Blair's rectum and take a glimpse of reality. |
|
