|
|
Post by jonksy on Dec 27, 2023 21:36:08 GMT
UK economy to become fastest growing in the EUSSR beating Germany, France and Spain.
|
|
|
|
Post by morayloon on Dec 27, 2023 23:40:33 GMT
UK economy to become fastest growing in the EUSSR beating Germany, France and Spain.
2038? A 15 year projection? ... A hae ma doots min!!! |
|
|
|
Post by Einhorn on Dec 28, 2023 0:42:53 GMT
UK economy to become fastest growing in the EUSSR beating Germany, France and Spain.
It's great that you always hide the paper you're linking. It's fun guessing whether the link will lead to The Express or the The Daily Mail.  |
|
|
|
Post by jonksy on Dec 28, 2023 3:48:55 GMT
UK economy to become fastest growing in the EUSSR beating Germany, France and Spain.
It's great that you always hide the paper you're linking. It's fun guessing whether the link will lead to The Express or the The Daily Mail. The reason I use a LINK is because it is on MSN and the link would be longer than the post.
See what I mean?
|
|
|
|
Post by jonksy on Dec 28, 2023 3:51:05 GMT
UK economy to become fastest growing in the EUSSR beating Germany, France and Spain.
2038? A 15 year projection? ... A hae ma doots min!!! "2038".....Yep that is a few years after we have stripped devolution from Scotland fellow Brit. |
|
|
|
Post by Pacifico on Dec 28, 2023 8:06:02 GMT
UK economy to become fastest growing in the EUSSR beating Germany, France and Spain.
It's great that you always hide the paper you're linking. It's fun guessing whether the link will lead to The Express or the The Daily Mail. well you could always read the report in the Times.. |
|
|
|
Post by Fairsociety on Dec 28, 2023 9:16:19 GMT
We've got big problems if Starmer wins the next GE.
He can't put a case forward why we should rejoin the EU if all the signs indicate we are doing better without them.
We have to watch he doesn't start to sabotage any future progress, he'll have the entire lefty remoaner civil service at his disposal, and they can do a lot of damage, he'll have his trade minister wrecking future lucrative trade deals with other countries. Once he sabotages Brexit he can then put his case forward why we would do better rejoining the EU......... mark my words.
|
|
|
|
Post by andrewbrown on Dec 28, 2023 9:49:30 GMT
We've got big problems if Starmer wins the next GE. He can't put a case forward why we should rejoin the EU if all the signs indicate we are doing better without them. We have to watch he doesn't start to sabotage any future progress, he'll have the entire lefty remoaner civil service at his disposal, and they can do a lot of damage, he'll have his trade minister wrecking future lucrative trade deals with other countries. Once he sabotages Brexit he can then put his case forward why we would do better rejoining the EU......... mark my words. Which lucrative trade deals do you refer to? |
|
|
|
Post by Fairsociety on Dec 28, 2023 9:53:37 GMT
We've got big problems if Starmer wins the next GE. He can't put a case forward why we should rejoin the EU if all the signs indicate we are doing better without them. We have to watch he doesn't start to sabotage any future progress, he'll have the entire lefty remoaner civil service at his disposal, and they can do a lot of damage, he'll have his trade minister wrecking future lucrative trade deals with other countries. Once he sabotages Brexit he can then put his case forward why we would do better rejoining the EU......... mark my words. Which lucrative trade deals do you refer to? you are getting as bad as see2 for commenting on threads that you clearly haven't even studied, you do know it's very annoying.
Australia and New Zealand are the two landmark post-Brexit free trade agreements. They were signed on December 2021 and February 2022, respectively. These deals were negotiated from scratch, in theory allowing the UK to tailor them as per its objectives.
|
|
|
|
Post by andrewbrown on Dec 28, 2023 9:55:05 GMT
Which lucrative trade deals do you refer to? you are getting as bad as see2 for commenting on threads that you clearly haven't even studied, you do know it's very annoying.
Australia and New Zealand are the two landmark post-Brexit free trade agreements. They were signed on December 2021 and February 2022, respectively. These deals were negotiated from scratch, in theory allowing the UK to tailor them as per its objectives.
You believe that those two trade deals are lucrative? 🤔 |
|
|
|
Post by Fairsociety on Dec 28, 2023 9:57:09 GMT
you are getting as bad as see2 for commenting on threads that you clearly haven't even studied, you do know it's very annoying.
Australia and New Zealand are the two landmark post-Brexit free trade agreements. They were signed on December 2021 and February 2022, respectively. These deals were negotiated from scratch, in theory allowing the UK to tailor them as per its objectives.
You believe that those two trade deals are lucrative? 🤔 The clue is in 'landmark'  |
|
|
|
Post by jonksy on Dec 28, 2023 9:58:42 GMT
Which lucrative trade deals do you refer to? you are getting as bad as see2 for commenting on threads that you clearly haven't even studied, you do know it's very annoying.
Australia and New Zealand are the two landmark post-Brexit free trade agreements. They were signed on December 2021 and February 2022, respectively. These deals were negotiated from scratch, in theory allowing the UK to tailor them as per its objectives.
This is typical of the remainers mate as their project fear gets flushed even further down the shitter. |
|
|
|
Post by andrewbrown on Dec 28, 2023 9:59:57 GMT
Not really. They are landmark as they were the first we negotiated from scratch post Brexit (as you pointed out in your post).
Noone has ever claimed that they are lucrative, so I'm dying to know how you reached your conclusion...
|
|
|
|
Post by jonksy on Dec 28, 2023 10:00:48 GMT
you are getting as bad as see2 for commenting on threads that you clearly haven't even studied, you do know it's very annoying.
Australia and New Zealand are the two landmark post-Brexit free trade agreements. They were signed on December 2021 and February 2022, respectively. These deals were negotiated from scratch, in theory allowing the UK to tailor them as per its objectives.
You believe that those two trade deals are lucrative? 🤔 Yep and not an ounce of sovereignty lost and no hidden 90 billion quid do we have to pay. What's not to like Andy? |
|
|
|
Post by Fairsociety on Dec 28, 2023 10:05:26 GMT
Not really. They are landmark as they were the first we negotiated from scratch post Brexit (as you pointed out in your post). Noone has ever claimed that they are lucrative, so I'm dying to know how you reached your conclusion...
£12 trillion is not lucrative? .... LOL
|
|
