|
Post by wapentake on Dec 26, 2023 12:52:13 GMT
Don't you ever give up? No matter how often you are told that people across the political spectrum have a similar opinion of Blair you just post it’s all lies and unfair on the great? man himself. Because I criticise some of what Israel is doing now you call me an anti semite,srb7677 was a long term Labour supporter but because he criticised Blair you called him a left wing extremist,I (sadly) helped vote in the Blair govt,as it happens I think Brown whatever his faults was more principled a man than Blair could ever be. I was just saying that whatever point you’re arguing always results in you calling people liars,you are entitled to your opinion but it’s a bit rich referencing the quality of the forum when you are far from raising it. The problem is that too many people post their OPINION of Blair as if it were the truth, when it should in fact be made clear that it is just their opinion. I only refer to anyone as a liar when they post a lie either to me or about me. If your post is anti-Semitic in any way, then I will refer to you as being anti-Semitic. As a politician to be admired I place Brown and Alistair Darling before Blair. I do think of srb as an extremist, so extreme that he attacks the moderate Left and refuses to vote for moderation. Even so, I modified my comment from 'extremist' to 'hard Left' which I then used in all my posts to him thereafter. If you want to comment I suggest you keep up with the facts. An extremist is a man who wants to play two gun tex with another without a plan for the aftermath,and how did it all turn out for the Middle East peace envoy or more importantly the dead UK service peoples families and the people of that region plus the safety of the UK itself, yep a lot worse . No matter I’ll set up a foundation so all the plebs will love me,other politicians will listen to my wise words and more importantly I’ll remain relevant. Starmer might be more accepted if he tried being himself rather than a Blair clone or to be more accurate clown. All posted without words in capitals which don’t reinforce the accuracy of a post.
|
|
|
Post by see2 on Dec 26, 2023 19:32:24 GMT
The problem is that too many people post their OPINION of Blair as if it were the truth, when it should in fact be made clear that it is just their opinion. I only refer to anyone as a liar when they post a lie either to me or about me. If your post is anti-Semitic in any way, then I will refer to you as being anti-Semitic. As a politician to be admired I place Brown and Alistair Darling before Blair. I do think of srb as an extremist, so extreme that he attacks the moderate Left and refuses to vote for moderation. Even so, I modified my comment from 'extremist' to 'hard Left' which I then used in all my posts to him thereafter. If you want to comment I suggest you keep up with the facts. An extremist is a man who wants to play two gun tex with another without a plan for the aftermath,and how did it all turn out for the Middle East peace envoy or more importantly the dead UK service peoples families and the people of that region plus the safety of the UK itself, yep a lot worse . No matter I’ll set up a foundation so all the plebs will love me,other politicians will listen to my wise words and more importantly I’ll remain relevant. Starmer might be more accepted if he tried being himself rather than a Blair clone or to be more accurate clown. All posted without words in capitals which don’t reinforce the accuracy of a post. There was a plan for the aftermath which included repairs to infrastructure like energy and water supplies, plus the setting up of democratic elections. Both of which were followed up on. The invasion was legal and necessary, the way it was carried out by US forces, is questionable. But downers like yourself will always make more of any downside, whether avoidable or not. Asinine comments should play no part in adult debate. New Labour did many good things, Starmer intends to learn from these. 'capitals' are used with the intention of helping struggling debaters to understand the important part of the point made. Clearly you either miss or ignore such points.
|
|
|
Post by wapentake on Dec 26, 2023 19:56:13 GMT
An extremist is a man who wants to play two gun tex with another without a plan for the aftermath,and how did it all turn out for the Middle East peace envoy or more importantly the dead UK service peoples families and the people of that region plus the safety of the UK itself, yep a lot worse . No matter I’ll set up a foundation so all the plebs will love me,other politicians will listen to my wise words and more importantly I’ll remain relevant. Starmer might be more accepted if he tried being himself rather than a Blair clone or to be more accurate clown. All posted without words in capitals which don’t reinforce the accuracy of a post. There was a plan for the aftermath which included repairs to infrastructure like energy and water supplies, plus the setting up of democratic elections. Both of which were followed up on. The invasion was legal and necessary, the way it was carried out by US forces, is questionable. But downers like yourself will always make more of any downside, whether avoidable or not. Asinine comments should play no part in adult debate. New Labour did many good things, Starmer intends to learn from these. 'capitals' are used with the intention of helping struggling debaters to understand the important part of the point made. Clearly you either miss or ignore such points. Can’t get your head round attack the post not the poster.
|
|
|
Post by see2 on Dec 27, 2023 10:55:39 GMT
There was a plan for the aftermath which included repairs to infrastructure like energy and water supplies, plus the setting up of democratic elections. Both of which were followed up on. The invasion was legal and necessary, the way it was carried out by US forces, is questionable. But downers like yourself will always make more of any downside, whether avoidable or not. Asinine comments should play no part in adult debate. New Labour did many good things, Starmer intends to learn from these. 'capitals' are used with the intention of helping struggling debaters to understand the important part of the point made. Clearly you either miss or ignore such points. Can’t get your head round attack the post not the poster. I answered the points in your post, including the asinine made up line you posted. I made some objective points that you have chosen to ignore. So your post ^^^ is is a nonsense deviation.
|
|
|
Post by sandypine on Dec 27, 2023 11:27:49 GMT
An extremist is a man who wants to play two gun tex with another without a plan for the aftermath,and how did it all turn out for the Middle East peace envoy or more importantly the dead UK service peoples families and the people of that region plus the safety of the UK itself, yep a lot worse . No matter I’ll set up a foundation so all the plebs will love me,other politicians will listen to my wise words and more importantly I’ll remain relevant. Starmer might be more accepted if he tried being himself rather than a Blair clone or to be more accurate clown. All posted without words in capitals which don’t reinforce the accuracy of a post. There was a plan for the aftermath which included repairs to infrastructure like energy and water supplies, plus the setting up of democratic elections. Both of which were followed up on. The invasion was legal and necessary, the way it was carried out by US forces, is questionable. But downers like yourself will always make more of any downside, whether avoidable or not. Asinine comments should play no part in adult debate. New Labour did many good things, Starmer intends to learn from these. 'capitals' are used with the intention of helping struggling debaters to understand the important part of the point made. Clearly you either miss or ignore such points. Looking at Arab/ME lands from a Westcentric position means that one is always going to do the wrong thing. The understanding of democracy in Arab lands is not at all like the Western concept. If one wins an election all that means is that one gets a chance to lord it over those who used to lord it over you and carry on the tribal and ways that are an accepted part of one who has power. Families and kin rule and corruption and ethnic conflict are part and parcel of the process. Honour plays an important part and also means that projects tend to be agrandisement projects as opposed to being specifically what is needed.
|
|
|
Post by piglet on Dec 27, 2023 11:29:19 GMT
Proof?, jumped up if say that any body needs to prove anything to the left who by definition are criminal. The left should be done to, not engaging in mindless discussion, going nowhere.
|
|
|
Post by see2 on Dec 27, 2023 13:37:11 GMT
Proof?, jumped up if say that any body needs to prove anything to the left who by definition are criminal. The left should be done to, not engaging in mindless discussion, going nowhere. Your post is a prime example of why Proof is a necessity in debate.
|
|
|
Post by piglet on Dec 28, 2023 10:32:35 GMT
Ok, the proof of the failure of socialism is that it has failed constantly throughout history, the most recent being that red local governments, Brum and Nottingham have gone bust. The reds have bankrupted governments throughout history, the most notable recently was that oil soaked central american country that went bust, and still is. Tory governments have been voted out leaving heaps of money, then Britain under Labour goes bust.
Labour and money dont mix, they dont understand it, even more damning is that Labour opposes business, its the thing that puts food on the table.
In the grand scheme of things for every force there is an equal and opposite force, Labour are the negative to the positive. The left are a force of nature, not logical and objective, but an irrational lunacy. The left fails at every turn, yet personages like yourself continue to bang its drum, why?
|
|
|
Post by Fairsociety on Dec 28, 2023 10:36:09 GMT
Proof?, jumped up if say that any body needs to prove anything to the left who by definition are criminal. The left should be done to, not engaging in mindless discussion, going nowhere. Your post is a prime example of why Proof is a necessity in debate. Proof?
LOL... this coming from a poster who never posts links about any of his claims, we'd even accept bias links, but you produce nothing except your own warped lefty distorted opinions, you and facts are complete strangers.
|
|
|
Post by ratcliff on Dec 28, 2023 12:20:47 GMT
You have moderate centre left opinions? Pull the other leg , it has bells on (or are you trying to be amusing? If so you've failed abysmally and should stick to the day job) You've not posted any moderate views on this forum that I've noticed . Your posted views are hard left - you post your opinions as immutable facts , you link the left wing Independent newspaper claiming its editorially unbiased , according to your ego , anyone who dares to disagrees or questions your posts needs re-education , is stupid , uneducated ,misguided , a fool etc etc . As you post that you believe you are ''fortunate'' in your opinion , maybe you should seek counselling or up the memory pills? Thanks for proving my point with your tirade of misguided abusive and dishonest OPINIONS. All posted without any proof. IMO only someone from the hard Right of politics could even begin to think of my political views as "hard Left", but your comment is good for a chuckle at your self exposure. You could certainly do with a big dose of commonsense. Your suggestion about seeking counselling looks like a classic case of projection. Are you actually on medication for mental problems? Maybe you should actually read a post (with the aid of a dictionary , if you (as appears) have comprehension problems As for the ''proof'' of your extremist bias you claim is never supplied by others - no need - all anyone sensible has to do to evidence your extremist bias is to read your opinionated , extremist posts denigrating all those who disagree with your extremist hard left opinions posted as fact.
|
|
|
Post by Vinny on Dec 28, 2023 13:23:51 GMT
The people who killed Brianna, are just like the scum who carried out the Columbine massacre, they wanted to kill anyone they could.
Fortunately they didn't have firearms or there'd have been a rampage massacre.
|
|
|
Post by see2 on Dec 28, 2023 14:00:26 GMT
Proof?, jumped up if say that any body needs to prove anything to the left who by definition are criminal. The left should be done to, not engaging in mindless discussion, going nowhere. I wonder why you bothered to post such nonsense ^^^
|
|
|
Post by see2 on Dec 28, 2023 14:14:30 GMT
Ok, the proof of the failure of socialism is that it has failed constantly throughout history, the most recent being that red local governments, Brum and Nottingham have gone bust. The reds have bankrupted governments throughout history, the most notable recently was that oil soaked central american country that went bust, and still is. Tory governments have been voted out leaving heaps of money, then Britain under Labour goes bust.Labour and money dont mix, they dont understand it, even more damning is that Labour opposes business, its the thing that puts food on the table. In the grand scheme of things for every force there is an equal and opposite force, Labour are the negative to the positive. The left are a force of nature, not logical and objective, but an irrational lunacy. The left fails at every turn, yet personages like yourself continue to bang its drum, why? So who is advocating Socialism?Britain went bust under New Labour (not socialism) because of the International Financial Meltdown, not because of New Labour. What a seriously dishonest comment.More of silly nonsense that exists between your ears. Intelligent individuals have a reasonable understanding of the difference between opinion and reality. You totally fail in this important step.It seems that your strongest ability is your ability to delude yourself'
|
|
|
Post by see2 on Dec 28, 2023 14:18:33 GMT
Your post is a prime example of why Proof is a necessity in debate. Proof?
LOL... this coming from a poster who never posts links about any of his claims, we'd even accept bias links, but you produce nothing except your own warped lefty distorted opinions, you and facts are complete strangers.
I have posted and reposted links so often that there are times when I post without the many links I have posted. BUT, when challenged I do come up with relative links or references, so either grow up or shut up.
|
|
|
Post by see2 on Dec 28, 2023 14:27:28 GMT
Thanks for proving my point with your tirade of misguided abusive and dishonest OPINIONS. All posted without any proof. IMO only someone from the hard Right of politics could even begin to think of my political views as "hard Left", but your comment is good for a chuckle at your self exposure. You could certainly do with a big dose of commonsense. Your suggestion about seeking counselling looks like a classic case of projection. Are you actually on medication for mental problems? Maybe you should actually read a post (with the aid of a dictionary , if you (as appears) have comprehension problems As for the ''proof'' of your extremist bias you claim is never supplied by others - no need - all anyone sensible has to do to evidence your extremist bias is to read your opinionated , extremist posts denigrating all those who disagree with your extremist hard left opinions posted as fact. I didn't need a dictionary to understand that slimy, over opinionated dishonest post you posted. But, considering that you appear to be serious about your self delusionary position, I am now convinced that you definitely need some professional help.
|
|