|
|
Post by see2 on Jan 5, 2024 20:34:05 GMT
But what of the future Keir Starmers who would benefit just as much as he did through experience of the Grammar School and Private School systems? - are they just tossed aside? How will the kids in years to come from working class backgrounds who wish to done very well for themselves achieve that once you have taken that ladder enjoyed by Starmer away? Don't forget Starmer's special personal exra tax perks pension arrangements (just for him alone ) the likes of which he wants to deny to anyone else 3. The 1971 Act shall have effect in relation to any pension payable under the Pension Scheme for Keir Starmer QC (being a scheme made under section 1 of the Superannuation Act 1972(1)), as if it were a pension specified in Part 1 of Schedule 2 to the 1971 Act. www.legislation.gov.uk/uksi/2013/2588/contents/madeNot sure what your whinge is about. In 1971/72 we had a Conservative government. In 2013 when it included Starmer we had a Conservative majority government. Starmer was not / is not in control so how can he do anything about it? I think an explanation is due. |
|
|
|
Post by see2 on Jan 5, 2024 20:39:26 GMT
I love the way that you quote a link proving you are wrong. Andy. To political idiots that is. |
|
|
|
Post by see2 on Jan 5, 2024 20:47:07 GMT
Don't you read what I written conservatives have been in power during recessions more times the labour since 1920. Do you and the other right wing posters on here think I'm making it up? That's because the Tories always have to pick up the pieces left behind from Labour, picking up the pieces from Labour always results in recessions you fool. You insist on revealing just how little you know about Labour. |
|
|
|
Post by see2 on Jan 5, 2024 20:53:09 GMT
Telling lies, about me this time, is so typical of Righties, they are definitely less than a full shilling, otherwise they wouldn't be out on the wing of politics. Lying and denigration is in their DNA, that's what I call sad. You do not have to prove your immaturity to me, but I do enjoy a nice chuckle when you do it  Ah I see so when you post that about another its from a person of great intellect the height of integrity but if you are described similarly it’s all lies from a thicko. I suspect it’s a lack of self awareness on your part along with the delusion of your own worth that few others would share. No, I was replying to lies told about me, I do not tell lies about others so I am never in their position. |
|
|
|
Post by Fairsociety on Jan 5, 2024 21:04:52 GMT
That's because the Tories always have to pick up the pieces left behind from Labour, picking up the pieces from Labour always results in recessions you fool. You insist on revealing just how little you know about Labour. Daft old fool, I know enough about them not to vote for them, bloody daft old buggers like you going to leave a legacy of debt for your childrens, childrens childrens children they will be burdened with Labours ..... 'Live today, pay tomorrow' ... mentality. |
|
|
|
Post by jonksy on Jan 5, 2024 21:05:47 GMT
Your link proves fuck all Andy. To political idiots that is. Well it fooled Andy. But then that isn't hard to fool a leftie as you would well know. |
|
|
|
Post by jonksy on Jan 5, 2024 21:07:24 GMT
Don't forget Starmer's special personal exra tax perks pension arrangements (just for him alone ) the likes of which he wants to deny to anyone else 3. The 1971 Act shall have effect in relation to any pension payable under the Pension Scheme for Keir Starmer QC (being a scheme made under section 1 of the Superannuation Act 1972(1)), as if it were a pension specified in Part 1 of Schedule 2 to the 1971 Act. www.legislation.gov.uk/uksi/2013/2588/contents/madeNot sure what your whinge is about. In 1971/72 we had a Conservative government. In 2013 when it included Starmer we had a Conservative majority government. Starmer was not / is not in control so how can he do anything about it? I think an explanation is due.Try looking up ESTABLISHMENT c2. |
|
|
|
Post by see2 on Jan 5, 2024 21:16:08 GMT
What on earth are you on about? Obviously you Think that's it's OK for private Schools to be A Tax burden on the County. I've just looked at parents can afford to Send there Kids . To School nearly 30% receive sponsorship or Beauchury and a lot get the kids Grandparents to pay for the School fees . Out of there inheritance money then they Claim a tax Refund on that. It's all a big con. And don't forget how Private Schools Claim there tax relief they claim it has a Chaitry. And there a lot of Immigrant/Foreign students in Private schools. Aren't you the one who said to me the other day that Imigrants don't pay a penny towards tax . There not needed? Keir Starmer benefited massively from going to a Private School - Labour are now being hypocritical by trying to prevent other kids having the same advantages that Starmer had. Of course we have been here before with Labour. Anthony Crosland was the architect of scrapping the Grammar School System in 1965. Crosland having (like Starmer) been educated privately. It seems that quality education should not be allowed to the children of the Working Class - a bog standard Comp is good enough for them. Are you claiming that no kids from a working class comprehensive school background ever get to university? |
|
|
|
Post by see2 on Jan 5, 2024 21:20:42 GMT
You insist on revealing just how little you know about Labour. Daft old fool, I know enough about them not to vote for them, bloody daft old buggers like you going to leave a legacy of debt for your childrens, childrens childrens children they will be burdened with Labours ..... 'Live today, pay tomorrow' ... mentality. The Conservative party's history of over dominating Parliament ever since 1951, makes it absolutely clear that your mind is controlled by Tory propaganda. In short you haven't got a clue. |
|
|
|
Post by see2 on Jan 5, 2024 21:22:13 GMT
Not sure what your whinge is about. In 1971/72 we had a Conservative government. In 2013 when it included Starmer we had a Conservative majority government. Starmer was not / is not in control so how can he do anything about it? I think an explanation is due.Try looking up ESTABLISHMENT c2. That is not an explanation. Try explaining. |
|
|
|
Post by jonksy on Jan 5, 2024 21:57:48 GMT
Try looking up ESTABLISHMENT c2. That is not an explanation. Try explaining. Well it seems every else understands c2 so what is youf excuse? |
|
|
|
Post by Pacifico on Jan 5, 2024 22:08:27 GMT
Keir Starmer benefited massively from going to a Private School - Labour are now being hypocritical by trying to prevent other kids having the same advantages that Starmer had. Of course we have been here before with Labour. Anthony Crosland was the architect of scrapping the Grammar School System in 1965. Crosland having (like Starmer) been educated privately. It seems that quality education should not be allowed to the children of the Working Class - a bog standard Comp is good enough for them. Are you claiming that no kids from a working class comprehensive school background ever get to university? Well Starmer was never in danger of of going to a working class comprehensive.. only the best was good enough for him. Soi ideal Labour leader material.. |
|
|
|
Post by Totheleft on Jan 6, 2024 0:23:07 GMT
Are you claiming that no kids from a working class comprehensive school background ever get to university? Well Starmer was never in danger of of going to a working class comprehensive.. only the best was good enough for him. Soi ideal Labour leader material.. I'm A working class guy from a working class background lived in Social housing all my life . Went to a working Class Catholic infant and junior school. Several pupils passed there 11 plus and went to Bury Grammar School Sir kier obviously went the same Route. Why do you keep going on about sir Keir Education back ground. Are you Jealous and envious of him or something? Because he probably has a more successful career then you . |
|
|
|
Post by Pacifico on Jan 6, 2024 7:42:09 GMT
Well Starmer was never in danger of of going to a working class comprehensive.. only the best was good enough for him. Soi ideal Labour leader material.. I'm A working class guy from a working class background lived in Social housing all my life . Went to a working Class Catholic infant and junior school. Several pupils passed there 11 plus and went to Bury Grammar School Sir kier obviously went the same Route.
Why do you keep going on about sir Keir
Education back ground.
Are you Jealous and envious of him or something? Because he probably has a more successful career then you . I'm pointing out the hypocrisy of someone who enjoyed the best private education money can buy trying to stop other kids from benefiting from those same advantages. Now that Starmer has made it to the top he is pulling up the ladder that he used to get there. He is a hypocritical twat. |
|
|
|
Post by see2 on Jan 6, 2024 10:16:36 GMT
That is not an explanation. Try explaining. Well it seems every else understands c2 so what is youf excuse? Its your lack of comprehension that allows you to post the above ^^^ |
|
