The Fundamental Interest of the English People

What was that we heard during the Blairite years about importing diversity in order 'to rub the Right's nose in it'?

It is not difficult to engage in debate at all, what seems difficult is asking cogent questions without using language that ridicules and belittles the points made. It is a style that may be effective at times but it is noticeable as a style. Conspiracy theories do not require evidence; suspicions of conspiracies occurring are based on the evidence that exists and for which there seems little rational explanation other than some degree of planning.

Sandy, the proposition is just ridiculous. It's impossible not to ridicule it. I mean, really? A group of people got together and decided to wipe out the 'ethnic English'?!!!

Why is it absurd? It happened with the  Jews where the actual final solution was discussed round a table by a group of people. It happened with the Armenians where Turkey sat round and discussed a policy, it happened with the Cultural revolution where a group sat round and discussed what to do, it happened in Vietnam where war was engaged on frequent false premises by the US government Stalin was pretty adept at removing ethnic groups wholesale.  All these things are historical fact. Remember no one has said that the English were specifically targeted for demographic enswampment  (is that a word) it was just a happy outcome but large scale immigration into the West was seen as a boon to economies and to dilute populations to make wars less likely and populations easier to control in some way. So demographic change was certainly in my view a plan as we can see from all the diversity and inclusion pressures and laws. As I said there may have been sound moral reasons in teh eyes of some  for why such actions were taken but realistically the only consideration that should have carried any weight was the actual democratic wishes of the electorate, and that just got in the way. I am afraid the EU was a manifestation of those overriding desires to control in ostensibly paternal ways.

It is not the opposite it is exactly that that people sat in a room and discussed eradicating whole populations You accept that that is what happened in all the above examples yet somehow some group sitting around saying let us swamp the English with mass migration and see if we can breed them out is in your view an absurd notion. The point is history shows us that people conspiring in such a way  is not absurd it is quite commonplace.

Now where did I say 'the cabinet'. The whole point is that any group who consider this is a group with some form of power and influence and can use all sorts of pressure, coercion and manipulation to achieve their ends. Quite often it is the incontestable moral position of the argument that swings things their way. Fairness, compassion, sympathy, helping others, lucky birth are all the watchwords of how to have their way. Pressure groups are formed to help refugees and extend compassion to those less fortunate and all works well for those whose motives may not be as morally sound as they would have us believe. They co-opt many well meaning people to their causes whose moral positions are sound yet they are being used.
What is clear the English are being overwhelmed quite quickly in their own homeland despite stating quite clearly democratically that is not what they want. Is there another explanation?

Becasue there is irrefutable evidence that the disappearance of the English people from their historic homeland as a majority  is a fact not too far distant from being realised. This may be down to all sorts of other factors but it is still obvious that immigration levels are significantly against their wishes and the notion is fairly widespread from ethnic minorities is 'how does it feel'?  I could add whitey there if you like. Also the laws are made that mandates diversity and inclusion as diversity is being systematically increased. Another law that bases its existence on 'fairness' and 'equality' whilst doing exactly the opposite.