|
Post by The Squeezed Middle on Nov 8, 2022 7:48:52 GMT
Yep.
"Terrorism is defined in United Kingdom law as the use or threat of action, both in and outside of the United Kingdom, designed to influence any international government organisation or to intimidate the public and for the purpose of advancing a political, religious, racial or ideological cause."
Their actions certainly meet the definition.
1) They are not threatening anyone, they are peacefully sitting in the road and do not struggle when violently dragged away. 2) They are advancing a green ideological cause and it would not matter which government was in power. 3) They are from all religious denominations. 4) They are from all racial backgrounds. 5) They are, with Tory consent, being threatened by the public.
Their actions exactly meet the definition of terrorism: They are threatening to continue breaking the law unless the government accedes to their ideological demands.
As your points 1) and 2) have actually demonstrated (foot shot, much? )
And the police have failed to deal appropriately hence the public now stepping in to prevent these crimes. As is their right.
|
|
|
Post by The Squeezed Middle on Nov 8, 2022 7:52:14 GMT
Yes, the Nazis stopped any sort of protest by killing their opponents, is that seriously what you are advocating? The left have always believed that the means justify their ideological ends.
These terrorists are just the latest manifestation.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Nov 8, 2022 7:55:21 GMT
1) They are not threatening anyone, they are peacefully sitting in the road and do not struggle when violently dragged away. 2) They are advancing a green ideological cause and it would not matter which government was in power. 3) They are from all religious denominations. 4) They are from all racial backgrounds. 5) They are, with Tory consent, being threatened by the public.
Their actions exactly meet the definition of terrorism: They are threatening to continue breaking the law unless the government accedes to their ideological demands.
As your points 1) and 2) have actually demonstrated.
And the police have failed to act hence the public now stepping in to prevent these crimes.
It does not mean you are a terrorist if you break the law which is lucky for Johnson and Sunak. Why have the police failed to act until now if they are witnessing terrorist at work?
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Nov 8, 2022 7:58:06 GMT
Yes, the Nazis stopped any sort of protest by killing their opponents, is that seriously what you are advocating? The left have always believed that the means justify their ideological ends.
These terrorists are just the latest manifestation.
It would save the people and the country £bs if the government started a full insulation policy. How is it that terrorists allow themselves to be forcibly dragged from the road without retaliation?🤣
|
|
|
Post by The Squeezed Middle on Nov 8, 2022 8:09:37 GMT
...It does not mean you are a terrorist if you break the law... It does if you do it in an attempt to force a government to accede to your ideological demands (as you've already agreed that they are). ...Why have the police failed to act until now if they are witnessing terrorist at work? Because they're useless.
|
|
|
Post by The Squeezed Middle on Nov 8, 2022 8:10:20 GMT
It would save the people and the country £bs if the government started a full insulation policy. How is it that terrorists allow themselves to be forcibly dragged from the road without retaliation?🤣 Irrelevant.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Nov 8, 2022 8:11:26 GMT
...It does not mean you are a terrorist if you break the law... It does if you do it in an attempt to force a government to accede to your ideological demands (as you've already agreed that they are). ...Why have the police failed to act until now if they are witnessing terrorist at work? Because they're useless. It's because, so far at least, people's right to protest.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Nov 8, 2022 8:12:52 GMT
It would save the people and the country £bs if the government started a full insulation policy. How is it that terrorists allow themselves to be forcibly dragged from the road without retaliation?🤣 Irrelevant. Ahh, so terrorism by the general public against peaceful protesters is fine.
|
|
|
Post by The Squeezed Middle on Nov 8, 2022 8:20:05 GMT
Dead horse, I'm sure you believe that you have a point but all you're actually doing is proving mine.
Which you seem too dim to realise.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Nov 8, 2022 8:55:11 GMT
Dead horse, I'm sure you believe that you have a point but all you're actually doing is proving mine. Which you seem too dim to realise. T'was you that said saving people and the country billions was irrelevant. 😂
|
|
|
Post by Steve on Nov 8, 2022 12:14:35 GMT
Red Rum spotted earlier
|
|
|
Post by The Squeezed Middle on Nov 8, 2022 13:38:50 GMT
As I said on the other thread:
"Just Stop Oil announce temporary protest pause but vow escalation if demands not met. The group threatened to increase their protests if their demands are not met by Friday."
If their demands are not met? But they're not terrorists? My arse.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Nov 8, 2022 15:12:12 GMT
As I said on the other thread:
"Just Stop Oil announce temporary protest pause but vow escalation if demands not met. The group threatened to increase their protests if their demands are not met by Friday."
If their demands are not met? But they're not terrorists? My arse.
Who is terrified of them? "The group demands investment in renewable energy and asks for buildings to have a better thermal insulation (in order to avoid waste of energy). Just Stop Oil also seeks to make people aware and cut the use of oil-powered vehicles, such as planes and private cars". Nothing wrong with that.
|
|
|
Post by sandypine on Nov 8, 2022 15:56:41 GMT
The main reason that idiot doesn't have a future is because she will have a criminal record and no potential employer who reads her online crap will want anything to do with her. And in my book that means she's intentionally made herself unemployed so no benefits so the stupid 'look at me' fuckwit can starve for all I care. Is violence the real answer? Is that not what she is perpetrating against teh rest of us. If saying let her starve is violence then her saying let them sit in their cars and miss medical appointments and not meet a multitude of obligations for six or seven hours is also violence. I disagree with her in everything she says and I believe she has a future. I use my vote to put my point across.
|
|
|
Post by sandypine on Nov 8, 2022 15:59:18 GMT
The left have always believed that the means justify their ideological ends.
These terrorists are just the latest manifestation.
It would save the people and the country £bs if the government started a full insulation policy. How is it that terrorists allow themselves to be forcibly dragged from the road without retaliation?🤣 No point in insulation for when the next pandemic comes along we will have to have the windows open all through the wintertime.
|
|