|
Post by Pacifico on Nov 15, 2023 8:49:35 GMT
LOL - the BBC shilling for Hamas again..
|
|
|
Post by Bentley on Nov 15, 2023 9:01:30 GMT
The UN are complicit in the rise of Hamas - there schools are a breeding ground for violent jihadis. Israel is complicit in the rise of Hamas. Israel doesn’t tolerate Hamas .
|
|
|
Post by sandypine on Nov 15, 2023 9:14:42 GMT
What do you think motivates those who want this backward cult to undo all western progress? Why should we not give considerations to others views, we are not all the same. Say some group believed that miscegenation was wrong and against God's will and should be forcibly stopped or that some believed that racial mixing was wrong. You give consideration to people who will not shake hands with women yet find unable to tolerate others. Hypocrisy.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Nov 15, 2023 9:19:15 GMT
Why should we not give considerations to others views, we are not all the same. Say some group believed that miscegenation was wrong and against God's will and should be forcibly stopped or that some believed that racial mixing was wrong. You give consideration to people who will not shake hands with women yet find unable to tolerate others. Hypocrisy. Now you are making assumptions, I have never said I liked the way other people run their countries nor do I agree with their religions. I believe all people should be considered for what they are.
|
|
|
Post by sandypine on Nov 15, 2023 9:24:14 GMT
Say some group believed that miscegenation was wrong and against God's will and should be forcibly stopped or that some believed that racial mixing was wrong. You give consideration to people who will not shake hands with women yet find unable to tolerate others. Hypocrisy. Now you are making assumptions, I have never said I liked the way other people run their countries nor do I agree with their religions. I believe all people should be considered for what they are. The point I am making is that consideration is only within one's own parameters of acceptability. So there is no requirement to give consideration to others one disagrees with.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Nov 15, 2023 9:55:17 GMT
I don't care what the useless UN say. Stop listening to the Hamas broadcasting company - they're a bunch of lying terrorists. Israel can wipe out Hamas without targeting all Palestinians, and are doing so. It's not genocide. Stop using very serious words flippantly. What would you call 11,000+ dead then? There's 30k Hamas fighters, so 19,000 to go.
|
|
|
Post by sheepy on Nov 15, 2023 10:07:57 GMT
What would you call 11,000+ dead then? There's 30k Hamas fighters, so 19,000 to go. See nobody actually cares about the Jews or Palestinians, they just want death and destruction.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Nov 15, 2023 11:14:05 GMT
Now you are making assumptions, I have never said I liked the way other people run their countries nor do I agree with their religions. I believe all people should be considered for what they are. The point I am making is that consideration is only within one's own parameters of acceptability. So there is no requirement to give consideration to others one disagrees with. Of course there is, there are plenty on here I disagree with but I am always mindful that they have a right to their opinion and a right to voice it. (except, of course, for one or two lunatics"
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Nov 15, 2023 11:16:16 GMT
What would you call 11,000+ dead then? There's 30k Hamas fighters, so 19,000 to go. They have probably killed a couple of hundred Hamas members. You are therefore advocating killing innocent men, women and children.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Nov 15, 2023 12:26:05 GMT
There's 30k Hamas fighters, so 19,000 to go. They have probably killed a couple of hundred Hamas members. You are therefore advocating killing innocent men, women and children. I am therefore doing no such thing. Jog on.
|
|
|
Post by Montegriffo on Nov 15, 2023 12:33:58 GMT
What would you call 11,000+ dead then? There's 30k Hamas fighters, so 19,000 to go. Don't you mean 2.3 million to go since you are unable to distinguish between Hamas and Palestinians?
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Nov 15, 2023 12:45:43 GMT
There's 30k Hamas fighters, so 19,000 to go. Don't you mean 2.3 million to go since you are unable to distinguish between Hamas and Palestinians? I don't mean anything of the sort, so don't ever try to put words in my mouth over such a serious issue.
|
|
|
Post by Montegriffo on Nov 15, 2023 12:56:33 GMT
Don't you mean 2.3 million to go since you are unable to distinguish between Hamas and Palestinians? I don't mean anything of the sort, so don't ever try to put words in my mouth over such a serious issue. How many of the 4600+ children killed were Hamas fighters do you think? You have indicated that all 11,000 killed by the IDF can be subtracted from the 30,000 estimated Hamas fighters in Gaza. These are your own words and I didn't need to put them in your frothing mouth. I can't work out if God is laughing or weeping over the division and hatred he has caused. Such hatred that you are rejoicing over the death of His children.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Nov 15, 2023 12:58:55 GMT
They have probably killed a couple of hundred Hamas members. You are therefore advocating killing innocent men, women and children. I am therefore doing no such thing. Jog on. You are saying that the 11,000 dead Palestinians are members of Hamas, there are nearly 5,000 children bombed out of existence not counting the ones that are buried under the rubble. You are advocating genocide.
|
|
|
Post by sandypine on Nov 15, 2023 14:32:33 GMT
The point I am making is that consideration is only within one's own parameters of acceptability. So there is no requirement to give consideration to others one disagrees with. Of course there is, there are plenty on here I disagree with but I am always mindful that they have a right to their opinion and a right to voice it. (except, of course, for one or two lunatics" I was intrigued more by your comment "Why should we not give considerations to others views, we are not all the same." Which to my mind implies that not just accepting others have views but accepting that those views are just as valid as one's own by being thoughtful and sensitive to those views. Unless you meant something else entirely which I cannot see.
|
|