|
|
Post by Pacifico on Nov 5, 2023 17:28:20 GMT
I think McDonalds problem is that once it was highlighted what the phrase meant he didn't withdraw it but doubled down. he wasn't looking for agreement or consensus. Why is it that we have to agree, like puppies, on the Israeli definition of the phrase "from the river to sea" even when it refers to Israel being free and living in peace? Just like normal we are allowing ourselves to be browbeaten into submission, is this what Brexit really meant? LOL - not a single person chanting that thinks it means Israel being free and living in peace.  Next you will be telling us that the calls for Intifada and Jihad are just a suggestion of going on a pub crawl. |
|
|
|
Post by sandypine on Nov 5, 2023 17:38:31 GMT
What is 'justice' in this context? Peaceful liberty has been is short measure for decades and there are always those who will not live in that way irrespective of what is agreed. I didn't say in and can only, like you assume. That does not explain what 'justice' is in this context nor that peaceful liberty will survive the non peaceful. |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Nov 6, 2023 5:00:20 GMT
Why is it that we have to agree, like puppies, on the Israeli definition of the phrase "from the river to sea" even when it refers to Israel being free and living in peace? Just like normal we are allowing ourselves to be browbeaten into submission, is this what Brexit really meant? LOL - not a single person chanting that thinks it means Israel being free and living in peace. Next you will be telling us that the calls for Intifada and Jihad are just a suggestion of going on a pub crawl. I would like to know how you can possibly know that "not a single person chanting that thinks it means Israel being free and living in peace", just one person thinking it makes you look stupid, guess what I think it. Why are you and people like you so against people living in peace? |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Nov 6, 2023 5:02:01 GMT
I didn't say in and can only, like you assume. That does not explain what 'justice' is in this context nor that peaceful liberty will survive the non peaceful. How can I explain something I did not say? What do you 'think' it means? |
|
