|
Post by sandypine on Oct 12, 2023 18:12:04 GMT
Don't be silly Pacifico. The cost of a MGW of offshore wind generated electricity is currently around £50 and the cost of a MGW of gas generated electricity is currently around £100 (actually a bit more). If you could just let me have the dates of both the EU referendums in Greenland that would be much appreciated. I am not clear here on offshore wind are we including anything from the 4.3billion subsidy the British taxpayer has paid.
|
|
|
Post by zanygame on Oct 12, 2023 20:51:20 GMT
I think you fully understand what's being said. If wind power costs £40 to produce no one is going to sell it for £48 when they can get £80. I'm guessing you've never been in business. But the costs that you (and dappy) keep quoting as the the comparative cost of wind power compared with gas to prove that wind is cheaper, are based on the assumption that you can get it for £44. As you are now saying - if you have to pay £80 for windpower then obviously it is not cheaper than gas. At least I now know you understand. It costs far less than gas to produce, but business wise they are getting the best price they can while staying just below the competition. As more wind generation develops competition will grow and the gap between production cost and sale price will shrink. Something that can't happen with gas.
|
|
|
Post by zanygame on Oct 12, 2023 20:52:15 GMT
Don't be silly Pacifico. The cost of a MGW of offshore wind generated electricity is currently around £50 and the cost of a MGW of gas generated electricity is currently around £100 (actually a bit more). If you could just let me have the dates of both the EU referendums in Greenland that would be much appreciated. I am not clear here on offshore wind are we including anything from the 4.3billion subsidy the British taxpayer has paid. No it doesn't, they were development costs.
|
|
|
Post by Pacifico on Oct 12, 2023 21:20:19 GMT
But the costs that you (and dappy) keep quoting as the the comparative cost of wind power compared with gas to prove that wind is cheaper, are based on the assumption that you can get it for £44. As you are now saying - if you have to pay £80 for windpower then obviously it is not cheaper than gas. At least I now know you understand. It costs far less than gas to produce, but business wise they are getting the best price they can while staying just below the competition. As more wind generation develops competition will grow and the gap between production cost and sale price will shrink. Something that can't happen with gas. But that is the point - you have no idea how much Wind power costs to produce. You have latched onto these fantasy figures from the government that bear no reality to the real world. CfD's were introduced precisely because Wind Power was uneconomic - and nobody is suggesting getting rid of them and allowing wind power to rise or fall according to the market. Face facts - you were conned.
|
|
|
Post by Pacifico on Oct 12, 2023 21:20:58 GMT
I am not clear here on offshore wind are we including anything from the 4.3billion subsidy the British taxpayer has paid. No it doesn't, they were development costs. who paid for them?
|
|
|
Post by zanygame on Oct 12, 2023 21:24:34 GMT
At least I now know you understand. It costs far less than gas to produce, but business wise they are getting the best price they can while staying just below the competition. As more wind generation develops competition will grow and the gap between production cost and sale price will shrink. Something that can't happen with gas. But that is the point - you have no idea how much Wind power costs to produce. You have latched onto these fantasy figures from the government that bear no reality to the real world. CfD's were introduced precisely because Wind Power was uneconomic - and nobody is suggesting getting rid of them and allowing wind power to rise or fall according to the market. Face facts - you were conned. I have every idea. I have seen the figures from a dozen different sites. Try offering them £70 a MWh. Still cheaper than gas.
|
|
|
Post by Pacifico on Oct 12, 2023 21:31:49 GMT
But that is the point - you have no idea how much Wind power costs to produce. You have latched onto these fantasy figures from the government that bear no reality to the real world. CfD's were introduced precisely because Wind Power was uneconomic - and nobody is suggesting getting rid of them and allowing wind power to rise or fall according to the market. Face facts - you were conned. I have every idea. I have seen the figures from a dozen different sites. Try offering them £70 a MWh. Still cheaper than gas. So what happened to the claim that wind power only cost £44 MWh - we have seen inflation of 75% in one day...
|
|
|
Post by dappy on Oct 12, 2023 23:02:26 GMT
This is one of those weird threads that seem to crop up every now and then on this forum. Pacifico has got his figures wrong. We all make mistakes occasionally so while mildly embarrassing no biggie if he just says “oops you’re right, I got it wrong this time”. Instead he has thrashed around trying to obscure, misrepresent ever more desperate to cover his tracks but only succeeding in making a mild embarrassment into a complete destruction of his credibility. We are not quite up to the Infamous Greenland referendums meltdown but starting to approximate.
Let’s just remind you all one more time of the basic facts that have remained unchanged for many many pages.
At current prices, electricity generated from gas costs just over £100 per MGW.
The cost of offshore wind power is substantially less. The current cost is around £50.
Offshore wind generation costs have reduced substantially over recent years reaching £37 in summer 2022 but with construction raw materials (eg steel) costs increasing and interest rates increasing, they have increased over the last year or so to their current figure.
Wind investment needs price certainty as it’s costs are front loaded - it’s “fuel” is free, much of its cost comes in initial construction. So the government organises this through the Contract for Difference scheme.
A new project bids for a strike point against other projects and if successful the project will be built and power generated will be sold via this scheme.
Power generated is sold to the grid at the same price as power generated from gas. Let’s say for illustration that price is £110 per MWH. The grid pays the wind power generation company £110 for each MWH it feeds to the grid - exactly the same price as they would pay gas power generators.
Then the CFD mechanism kicks in. If they have won a bid at a CFD price of £50 per MWH, then the wind generator will have received £110 from the grid but pays £60 back to government leaving him with a net £50.
If on the other hand the Grid power price had only been £30 per MWH, the wing generating company would receive £30 from grid plus a further £20 from government - again leaving him with a net receipt of £50.
There is a bidding round for CFD on a regular basis. The government sets a maximum bid price beyond which operators cannot bid. In 2022 the maximum bid was £48 and as costs at the time were low, bids drove the strike price down to under £38. The Government screwed up the 2023 bid process by setting the maximum bid at £44. As costs have increased to around £50, the fixed sales price off £44 was below cost price of £50 and therefore obviously no one bid at a loss.
Anyone with primary school maths can work out that if gas generated electricity costs £100 and wind £50, wind is cheaper.
Pacifico will no doubt try to obscure and deflect but those are the current facts. Wind generated electricity is currently half the cost of gas generated electricity.
|
|
|
Post by zanygame on Oct 13, 2023 6:29:23 GMT
I have every idea. I have seen the figures from a dozen different sites. Try offering them £70 a MWh. Still cheaper than gas. So what happened to the claim that wind power only cost £44 MWh - we have seen inflation of 75% in one day... 44MWh to produce. They sell it for what they can get, just like every business. But you know this.
|
|
|
Post by zanygame on Oct 13, 2023 6:34:52 GMT
This is one of those weird threads that seem to crop up every now and then on this forum. Pacifico has got his figures wrong. We all make mistakes occasionally so while mildly embarrassing no biggie if he just says “oops you’re right, I got it wrong this time”. Instead he has thrashed around trying to obscure, misrepresent ever more desperate to cover his tracks but only succeeding in making a mild embarrassment into a complete destruction of his credibility. We are not quite up to the Infamous Greenland referendums meltdown but starting to approximate. Let’s just remind you all one more time of the basic facts that have remained unchanged for many many pages. At current prices, electricity generated from gas costs just over £100 per MGW. The cost of offshore wind power is substantially less. The current cost is around £50. Offshore wind generation costs have reduced substantially over recent years reaching £37 in summer 2022 but with construction raw materials (eg steel) costs increasing and interest rates increasing, they have increased over the last year or so to their current figure. Wind investment needs price certainty as it’s costs are front loaded - it’s “fuel” is free, much of its cost comes in initial construction. So the government organises this through the Contract for Difference scheme. A new project bids for a strike point against other projects and if successful the project will be built and power generated will be sold via this scheme. Power generated is sold to the grid at the same price as power generated from gas. Let’s say for illustration that price is £110 per MWH. The grid pays the wind power generation company £110 for each MWH it feeds to the grid - exactly the same price as they would pay gas power generators. Then the CFD mechanism kicks in. If they have won a bid at a CFD price of £50 per MWH, then the wind generator will have received £110 from the grid but pays £60 back to government leaving him with a net £50. If on the other hand the Grid power price had only been £30 per MWH, the wing generating company would receive £30 from grid plus a further £20 from government - again leaving him with a net receipt of £50. There is a bidding round for CFD on a regular basis. The government sets a maximum bid price beyond which operators cannot bid. In 2022 the maximum bid was £48 and as costs at the time were low, bids drove the strike price down to under £38. The Government screwed up the 2023 bid process by setting the maximum bid at £44. As costs have increased to around £50, the fixed sales price off £44 was below cost price of £50 and therefore obviously no one bid at a loss. Anyone with primary school maths can work out that if gas generated electricity costs £100 and wind £50, wind is cheaper. Pacifico will no doubt try to obscure and deflect but those are the current facts. Wind generated electricity is currently half the cost of gas generated electricity. Yep, that's a good summary. Its annoying when you have to spend time going back through the thread gathering the info just because someone is playing dodge ball. You are right this is very Grass Hopper style
|
|
|
Post by Pacifico on Oct 13, 2023 6:37:24 GMT
So what happened to the claim that wind power only cost £44 MWh - we have seen inflation of 75% in one day... 44MWh to produce. They sell it for what they can get, just like every business. But you know this. But this 44 MWh is a figure that has been invented - it has no basis in reality. But you know this
|
|
|
Post by zanygame on Oct 13, 2023 6:47:15 GMT
44MWh to produce. They sell it for what they can get, just like every business. But you know this. But this 44 MWh is a figure that has been invented - it has no basis in reality. But you know this No one would have offered them £48 per MWh if it cost more than that to produce. You been given the evidence several times, you just look stupid now.
|
|
|
Post by Pacifico on Oct 13, 2023 6:57:09 GMT
But this 44 MWh is a figure that has been invented - it has no basis in reality. But you know this No one would have offered them £48 per MWh if it cost more than that to produce. You been given the evidence several times, you just look stupid now. You can offer them whatever you want but if it is not at an economic rate then it will not get produced - as we see from the contracts awarded at £48 MWh. The market decides the rate not some guy sitting in a office with a picture of Saint Greta on the wall.
|
|
|
Post by zanygame on Oct 13, 2023 9:50:47 GMT
No one would have offered them £48 per MWh if it cost more than that to produce. You been given the evidence several times, you just look stupid now. You can offer them whatever you want but if it is not at an economic rate then it will not get produced - as we see from the contracts awarded at £48 MWh. The market decides the rate not some guy sitting in a office with a picture of Saint Greta on the wall. Yes we've already said £48.00 par MWh is less than it costs to produce currently. That does not mean its more expensive than gas generation. To clarify for you. Wind/solar £50 per MWh Gas £100 per MWh. Gas twice as much as wind/ solar. Is that simple enough for you? You can buy wind/solar for £70 per MWh but you can't buy Gas for £70 per MWh. Therefore wind/solar cheaper than gas. I thought you'd understood this very simple maths and were prevaricating. Now I'm not so sure.
|
|
|
Post by Pacifico on Oct 13, 2023 10:19:15 GMT
You can offer them whatever you want but if it is not at an economic rate then it will not get produced - as we see from the contracts awarded at £48 MWh. The market decides the rate not some guy sitting in a office with a picture of Saint Greta on the wall. Yes we've already said £48.00 par MWh is less than it costs to produce currently. That does not mean its more expensive than gas generation. To clarify for you. Wind/solar £50 per MWh Gas £100 per MWh. Gas twice as much as wind/ solar. Is that simple enough for you? You can buy wind/solar for £70 per MWh but you can't buy Gas for £70 per MWh. Therefore wind/solar cheaper than gas. I thought you'd understood this very simple maths and were prevaricating. Now I'm not so sure. where are you getting these figures from - who is saying that wind is profitable at £50 MWh? With regards to gas - Domestic prices for gas in the US (where they dont have all the renewables subsidies tacked on) are £55 MWh. So the wholesale production price is much lower.
|
|