|
Post by piglet on Oct 10, 2023 13:54:16 GMT
Just caught up with this, wow, someone asking for people to put the boot in, and they have. To simplify things, nature dictates its simplicity and balance, that for every good thing there will be a bad thing. Positive, negative, ying and yang, matter, anti matter.....etc.
Socialism is the anti matter, the destroyer, the negative, the badness.
Thats just about it really.
Good evening.
|
|
|
Post by ratcliff on Oct 10, 2023 22:28:27 GMT
they do not have the legal qualifications to look after themselvesSo according to you only those with legal qualifications are capable of looking after themselves? There must be tens of millions without legal qualifications -so you believe they all need a carer Considering all the absolute claptrap you generally post on here this gem really takes the biscuit Your post is an excellent example of claptrap. No, most trade workers and labourers do not have Legal qualifications, so they cannot defend themselves in legal situations. No they don't need a carer they do need legally qualified people to defend them in legal situations. Perhaps you can now see just what an excellent example of claptrap your post is. Maybe you really do not understand the utter claptrap you insist on posting? To remind you (and anyone who has the misfortune to believe your rubbish) You posted quite categorically : It is an obvious fact that not all working people have the ability to ensure they are treated fairly and to quote the important bit that you missed, they do not have the legal qualifications to look after themselves.
Therefore you clearly posted that the majority of those who work are incapable of self care because they are not legally qualified. This lack of ability to self care must involve many tens of millions of people neglecting themselves yet you try to pretend that you did not post those words. Do you have a legal qualification? If not, according to your own post you too are incapable of looking after yourself . I suppose this is a standard lefty opinion (though I've never previously seen anyone on a internet forum state, as you did, that tens of millions without a legal qualification cannot look after themselves )- why else would lefties want to constantly expand the nanny state?
|
|
|
Post by andrewbrown on Oct 11, 2023 4:47:48 GMT
Your post is an excellent example of claptrap. No, most trade workers and labourers do not have Legal qualifications, so they cannot defend themselves in legal situations. No they don't need a carer they do need legally qualified people to defend them in legal situations. Perhaps you can now see just what an excellent example of claptrap your post is. Maybe you really do not understand the utter claptrap you insist on posting? To remind you (and anyone who has the misfortune to believe your rubbish) You posted quite categorically : It is an obvious fact that not all working people have the ability to ensure they are treated fairly and to quote the important bit that you missed, they do not have the legal qualifications to look after themselves.
Therefore you clearly posted that the majority of those who work are incapable of self care because they are not legally qualified. This lack of ability to self care must involve many tens of millions of people neglecting themselves yet you try to pretend that you did not post those words. Do you have a legal qualification? If not, according to your own post you too are incapable of looking after yourself . I suppose this is a standard lefty opinion (though I've never previously seen anyone on a internet forum state, as you did, that tens of millions without a legal qualification cannot look after themselves )- why else would lefties want to constantly expand the nanny state?
That doesn't really make any sense as you seem to be implying that someone who is not legally qualified can look after their interests as much as someone who is. Patently not true, or we'd have no need for lawyers.
|
|
|
Post by ratcliff on Oct 11, 2023 12:16:20 GMT
Maybe you really do not understand the utter claptrap you insist on posting? To remind you (and anyone who has the misfortune to believe your rubbish) You posted quite categorically : It is an obvious fact that not all working people have the ability to ensure they are treated fairly and to quote the important bit that you missed, they do not have the legal qualifications to look after themselves.
Therefore you clearly posted that the majority of those who work are incapable of self care because they are not legally qualified. This lack of ability to self care must involve many tens of millions of people neglecting themselves yet you try to pretend that you did not post those words. Do you have a legal qualification? If not, according to your own post you too are incapable of looking after yourself . I suppose this is a standard lefty opinion (though I've never previously seen anyone on a internet forum state, as you did, that tens of millions without a legal qualification cannot look after themselves )- why else would lefties want to constantly expand the nanny state?
That doesn't really make any sense as you seem to be implying that someone who is not legally qualified can look after their interests as much as someone who is. Patently not true, or we'd have no need for lawyers. I didn't post that view- CToo posted that stupidity not me ( but is trying unsuccessfully to backtrack and claim that they didn't ) He/She/It posted that a legal qualification is necessary to be able to look after yourself It's the standard b***ocks from that poster
|
|
|
Post by see2 on Oct 11, 2023 20:00:17 GMT
And this is the problem with lefties . When you use their own debate techniques on them , it triggers them into projection . Nope it confirms the lack of intelligence and lack of original thought by uneducated righties like yourself. Who are just too dense to understand what they are doing.
|
|
|
Post by Bentley on Oct 11, 2023 20:02:39 GMT
And this is the problem with lefties . When you use their own debate techniques on them , it triggers them into projection . Nope it confirms the lack of intelligence and lack of original thought by uneducated righties like yourself. Who are just too dense to understand what they are doing. You have just proved my point . Thanks 👍
|
|
|
Post by see2 on Oct 11, 2023 20:07:46 GMT
That doesn't really make any sense as you seem to be implying that someone who is not legally qualified can look after their interests as much as someone who is. Patently not true, or we'd have no need for lawyers. I didn't post that view- CToo posted that stupidity not me ( but is trying unsuccessfully to backtrack and claim that they didn't ) He/She/It posted that a legal qualification is necessary to be able to look after yourself It's the standard b***ocks from that poster No I didn't, what I posted was that people who are not legally trained need people who are legally trained to look after them in legal situations. When you cannot prove otherwise, just remember that forum readers can see you as an uneducated moron who appears to think she is actually very clever.
|
|
|
Post by see2 on Oct 11, 2023 20:20:27 GMT
Nope it confirms the lack of intelligence and lack of original thought by uneducated righties like yourself. Who are just too dense to understand what they are doing. You have just proved my point . Thanks 👍 There is no debate / argument against Idiots like yourself. Fact.
|
|
|
Post by Bentley on Oct 11, 2023 20:36:19 GMT
You have just proved my point . Thanks 👍 There is no debate / argument against Idiots like yourself. Fact. And even more projection from you to support my point . You are the git that keeps on giving ❤️
|
|
|
Post by see2 on Oct 11, 2023 20:53:09 GMT
There is no debate / argument against Idiots like yourself. Fact. And even more projection from you to support my point . You are the git that keeps on giving ❤️ I must admit that without the chuckles I get from your schoolyard level replies my life would be just a tad duller. I do recall that I stopped reacting like you do when I was about 9 or 10 years old, perhaps even a bit younger
|
|
|
Post by Bentley on Oct 11, 2023 20:57:00 GMT
And even more projection from you to support my point . You are the git that keeps on giving ❤️ I must admit that without the chuckles I get from your schoolyard level replies my life would be just a tad duller. I do recall that I stopped reacting like you do when I was about 9 or 10 years old, perhaps even a bit younger Consider it therapy See2 . It’s the least I can do considering you supported my point about you and the other lefties .
|
|
|
Post by see2 on Oct 11, 2023 21:00:23 GMT
I must admit that without the chuckles I get from your schoolyard level replies my life would be just a tad duller. I do recall that I stopped reacting like you do when I was about 9 or 10 years old, perhaps even a bit younger Consider it therapy See2 . It’s the least I can do considering you supported my point about you and the other lefties . Now that is projection ^^, ha ha, Thanks.
|
|
|
Post by Bentley on Oct 11, 2023 21:05:06 GMT
Consider it therapy See2 . It’s the least I can do considering you supported my point about you and the other lefties . Now that is projection ^^, ha ha, Thanks. If you say so . I understand your neediness . I had a granny once .❤️
|
|
|
Post by Vinny on Oct 11, 2023 21:06:43 GMT
This summed it up in 2019.
|
|
|
Post by Tinculin on Oct 12, 2023 9:05:06 GMT
I know I am opening a can of worms here and will get no sensible comments but I am going to give it a go. I hear the left is this and the left is that but never any sensible reasons for disliking them. Typical. The left spends other peoples money - and so do all political parties. The left are champagne socialists - the left has no problem with some amongst them being well off. The left are woke - we are all woke to one degree or another, so what? The left want to defund the police - they don't. The left are in the pockets of the unions - the unions are made up of working people. The left support BLM - they do they believe all lives matter. The left call out things like food bank use - they do but why doesn't everyone? Just a few. When you reduce politics to left vs right, you're putting people into one of two pots and honestly, while this is appropriate for US politics who've built their entire political system upon it, it's not really a true reflection of politics across almost any other nation. Even in the US, it's questionable because a not so small number of Americans are aligned to middle values and don't agree with the far left/right of their party. People on the 'Left' often have contrasting and different views with some of their more vocal causes & the same is true for the right. As an example, not everyone on the right is a climate denier and not everyone on the left is a huge advocate for BLM. Unfortunately, group think and group mentality have a huge roll to play in this, but the tldr is (in my opinion), reducing politics to a binary value is never going to work because politics is a very complicated and nuanced topic. A better question therefore might have been, "Why do people dislike BLM", or Why do people dislike "Woke" or "Champagne socialists" etc.
|
|