|
|
Post by Orac on Sept 21, 2023 21:59:07 GMT
a breeze is inhumane
|
|
|
|
Post by Bentley on Sept 21, 2023 22:22:14 GMT
Any island that doesn't make security work is not really trying.. I'm sure you could protect our 19,000 miles of coast. Dads army Would we need to ? How far can those dinghy’s travel? Just how practical is it to land trafficked people on the West coast , Scotland etc? |
|
|
|
Post by Bentley on Sept 21, 2023 22:22:27 GMT
Any island that doesn't make security work is not really trying.. I'm sure you could protect our 19,000 miles of coast. Dads army Would we need to ? How far can those dinghies travel? Just how practical is it to land trafficked people on the West coast , Scotland etc? |
|
|
|
Post by zanygame on Sept 21, 2023 22:22:34 GMT
If it comes out your arse. |
|
|
|
Post by Orac on Sept 21, 2023 22:30:25 GMT
That gives me an idea.
|
|
|
|
Post by jonksy on Sept 21, 2023 23:54:49 GMT
Any island that doesn't make security work is not really trying.. I'm sure you could protect our 19,000 miles of coast. Dads army With what the UK has shelled out on this illegal invasion would have built a 20 foot high fence all around the UK using razor wire comeplete with landmines. |
|
|
|
Post by Dan Dare on Sept 22, 2023 5:15:09 GMT
Kindly explain how creating UNHCR-style camps for asylum seekers is 'inhuman'. And ditto why treating claims as other European countries do is likewise. One aspect of that is of course is abolishing legal aid for asylum cases. But that only means that the myriad charities and NGOs that concern themselves with 'migrants rights' will need to take up the slack. That leaves the field open for sympathisers like your goodself to do your bit. I think the clue is here, "fund the Border Agency to erect temporary camps in remote wild and windy places" No different to wartime measures to accommodate the several million men called up to military service, and retained during the national service era.
I spent most of my childhood in such places, RAF Bridgnorth being one in particular that comes to mind. There are dozens if not hundreds of such places where the basic infrastructure is still largely intact and where the land is still available for Bridgnorth-style wooden huts. Nearly two million servicemen and women passed through Bridgnorth between 1939 and 1965. If it was good enough for our fathers and grandfathers why is it not good enough for asylum seekers?
|
|
|
|
Post by Pacifico on Sept 22, 2023 6:37:38 GMT
Any island that doesn't make security work is not really trying.. I'm sure you could protect our 19,000 miles of coast. Dads army Australia did it quite successfully - as I said, you just don't wan't to try.. |
|
|
|
Post by zanygame on Sept 22, 2023 6:42:14 GMT
I'm sure you could protect our 19,000 miles of coast. Dads army With what the UK has shelled out on this illegal invasion would have built a 20 foot high fence all around the UK using razor wire complete with landmines. Didn't Trump think of something like that? 😅 😂 Stalag UK. |
|
|
|
Post by zanygame on Sept 22, 2023 6:44:04 GMT
I'm sure you could protect our 19,000 miles of coast. Dads army Australia did it quite successfully - as I said, you just don't wan't to try.. Britain is not Australia. Different coast line, different populated areas, different distances to other countries. |
|
|
|
Post by jonksy on Sept 22, 2023 6:45:33 GMT
With what the UK has shelled out on this illegal invasion would have built a 20 foot high fence all around the UK using razor wire complete with landmines. Didn't Trump think of something like that? 😅 😂 Stalag UK. But it worked. It would be even better here because we are an Island. |
|
|
|
Post by zanygame on Sept 22, 2023 6:45:52 GMT
I think the clue is here, "fund the Border Agency to erect temporary camps in remote wild and windy places" No different to wartime measures to accommodate the several million men called up to military service, and retained during the national service era.
I spent most of my childhood in such places, RAF Bridgnorth being one in particular that comes to mind. There are dozens if not hundreds of such places where the basic infrastructure is still largely intact and where the land is still available for Bridgnorth-style wooden huts. Nearly two million servicemen and women passed through Bridgnorth between 1939 and 1965. If it was good enough for our fathers and grandfathers why is it not good enough for asylum seekers?
BIG differences. 1, You could leave anytime to another safe place. 2, It was not a life sentence. |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 22, 2023 6:46:26 GMT
I'm sure you could protect our 19,000 miles of coast. Dads army Australia did it quite successfully - as I said, you just don't wan't to try.. Some people will support anything and everything to hurt this country, where any hint for a solution will be attacked. |
|
|
|
Post by zanygame on Sept 22, 2023 6:47:28 GMT
Didn't Trump think of something like that? 😅 😂 Stalag UK. But it worked. It would be even better here because we are an Island. Worked OMG It wasn't even built and it certainly didn't stop illegal migrants. The whole Island thing was spoilt when they invented the boat. |
|
|
|
Post by Pacifico on Sept 22, 2023 6:47:30 GMT
Australia did it quite successfully - as I said, you just don't wan't to try.. Britain is not Australia. Different coast line, different populated areas, different distances to other countries. It's an island in the middle of the ocean - people turning up on these shores don't just materialise. In fact currently the government are providing a taxi service from foreign territorial waters - they, like you, simply do not want to try. |
|
