|
|
Post by thomas on Sept 6, 2023 6:56:37 GMT
I'll reply to your post later, but right now Thomas, I'm going to say reading through this thread I'm very disappointed at the number of times you are lashing out at other posters. For someone who claims at least im trying to have a debate sheepwash, which is after all what a forum is all about ...conflicting views To then make posts like these, is not acceptable: - billy no mates trying to be relevant in yet anbother thread with his limp wristed attempts at a put down. The adults are talking steve . Run along now dear. - is this you projecting supposed tantrums onto forum members once again to make puerile points? - thank god we have you here steve to keep us all informed and on the straight and narrow. I dont think i have ever come across a more pointless forum member than you in my time posting on interwebby forums - I wouldn't bother, Steve is so out of his depth it is rather laughable, not the sharpest cookie in the jar. Read Rule 3 here: ukpoliticsdebate.boards.net/thread/30/forum-rules-readIf personal attacks are what you consider 'debate', I'd rather you not post here at all. Moving forward, make of that what you will. thats fine. I can accept my medicine if ive broken rules. Where is steves reprimand for balance?
In post thirteen of the first page , forum member steve jumped into the thread totally unprovoked by me and made a personal sneering demeaning attack on me , which ripley voiced his disagreement of. If my reaction is to be reprimanded , then surely the instigator of the personal spat must too?
|
|
|
|
Post by Steve on Sept 6, 2023 9:29:58 GMT
. . .In post thirteen of the first page , forum member steve jumped into the thread totally unprovoked by me and made a personal sneering demeaning attack on me , . . [/div] [/quote] No I didn't. I posted this Maybe Thomas thinks the USA has invaded Canada No personal attack just sarcastically showing that for you to argue that the USA has to be a pariah state on the lines of Russia you'd have to show that they'd made a similar invasion of an adjacent country to seize territory. If you need the words 'maybe' or 'sarcasm' explained go look in a dictionary. |
|
|
|
Post by Montegriffo on Sept 6, 2023 9:58:12 GMT
. . .In post thirteen of the first page , forum member steve jumped into the thread totally unprovoked by me and made a personal sneering demeaning attack on me , . . [/div] [/quote] No I didn't. I posted this Maybe Thomas thinks the USA has invaded Canada No personal attack just sarcastically showing that for you to argue that the USA has to be a pariah state on the lines of Russia you'd have to show that they'd made a similar invasion of an adjacent country to seize territory. If you need the words 'maybe' or 'sarcasm' explained go look in a dictionary. [/quote] None the less it was a provocation. If you go through the thread you will see that Thomas has responded politely and respectfully to everyone else. |
|
|
|
Post by Steve on Sept 6, 2023 21:53:32 GMT
. . None the less it was a provocation. If you go through the thread you will see that Thomas has responded politely and respectfully to everyone else. As provocative as his OP with its 'you and others' attack? Feel free to point out the rule here that bans sarcasm |
|
|
|
Post by Montegriffo on Sept 6, 2023 22:46:01 GMT
. . None the less it was a provocation. If you go through the thread you will see that Thomas has responded politely and respectfully to everyone else. As provocative as his OP with its 'you and others' attack? Feel free to point out the rule here that bans sarcasm What makes you think I want to ban sarcasm? I'm just pointing out that most people, including fierce tartan clad members of obscure internet forums, tend to respond in kind. |
|
