Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 29, 2023 14:40:26 GMT
When you supported the anti-Semites in Labour. Sure, you, like they, will deny it, but since you were outed by your own petard I thought I'd remind you of it whilst you're smearing another member of racism. Evidence that I have supported anyone that has committed anti-Semite acts or abuse, please. If I stumble on those old posts where you were defending your far-left rabble in Labour when they were being outed for anti-semitism then I 'll share it. I'm certaintly not going to go out of my way for a liar, though. I will of course raise the issue again when you're smearing other members.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 29, 2023 15:26:42 GMT
Evidence that I have supported anyone that has committed anti-Semite acts or abuse, please. If I stumble on those old posts where you were defending your far-left rabble in Labour when they were being outed for anti-semitism then I 'll share it. I'm certaintly not going to go out of my way for a liar, though. I will of course raise the issue again when you're smearing other members.
I don't deny I support Labour, are you saying that supporting Labour makes one an anti Semite?
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 29, 2023 15:29:09 GMT
Afaik 30 mph limits will be replaced by 20mph . Does that make it a 'blanket' speed limit for Wales?
|
|
|
Post by Bentley on Sept 29, 2023 15:30:01 GMT
Afaik 30 mph limits will be replaced by 20mph . Does that make it a 'blanket' speed limit for Wales? Dud you read the post you responded to?
|
|
|
Post by jonksy on Sept 29, 2023 15:31:56 GMT
Does that make it a 'blanket' speed limit for Wales? Dud you read the post you responded to? It's Friday mate and carers are off...
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 29, 2023 15:33:42 GMT
If I stumble on those old posts where you were defending your far-left rabble in Labour when they were being outed for anti-semitism then I 'll share it. I'm certaintly not going to go out of my way for a liar, though. I will of course raise the issue again when you're smearing other members.
I don't deny I support Labour, are you saying that supporting Labour makes one an anti Semite? I'm not here to offer you English lessons or play along with your inability to understand my post. Just because you jumped ship from the Corbynites back to the Blairites doesn't mean you lose all of the baggage. What it does highlight is the fact that Labour still has the same problem, but then again this is a party that is dependent on votes from people with a reputation for disliking the Jews.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 30, 2023 7:18:55 GMT
I don't deny I support Labour, are you saying that supporting Labour makes one an anti Semite? I'm not here to offer you English lessons or play along with your inability to understand my post. Just because you jumped ship from the Corbynites back to the Blairites doesn't mean you lose all of the baggage. What it does highlight is the fact that Labour still has the same problem, but then again this is a party that is dependent on votes from people with a reputation for disliking the Jews.
What are you talking about??? I have on this board openly criticised Starmer and some of his policies but I still believe he will be a better PM that anyone we have had from the Tories. I have always criticised Blair and his illegal war in Iraq and have stated before that he should be put on trial for war crimes. Yes, I supported Corbyn and still do, what the Tories, media and Israel did to him was appalling and a direct attack on our democracy. Get your facts straight before blathering on and making false accusations like other posters on this board.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 30, 2023 9:52:56 GMT
I'm not here to offer you English lessons or play along with your inability to understand my post. Just because you jumped ship from the Corbynites back to the Blairites doesn't mean you lose all of the baggage. What it does highlight is the fact that Labour still has the same problem, but then again this is a party that is dependent on votes from people with a reputation for disliking the Jews.
What are you talking about??? I have on this board openly criticised Starmer and some of his policies but I still believe he will be a better PM that anyone we have had from the Tories. I have always criticised Blair and his illegal war in Iraq and have stated before that he should be put on trial for war crimes. Yes, I supported Corbyn and still do, what the Tories, media and Israel did to him was appalling and a direct attack on our democracy. Get your facts straight before blathering on and making false accusations like other posters on this board. And Corbyn was expelled from the party over Anti-Semitism, therefore you support Corbyn who is an anti-Semitism enabler. As B-4 correctly said. www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-65102128
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 30, 2023 12:00:54 GMT
I don't deny I support Labour, are you saying that supporting Labour makes one an anti Semite? I'm not here to offer you English lessons or play along with your inability to understand my post. Just because you jumped ship from the Corbynites back to the Blairites doesn't mean you lose all of the baggage. What it does highlight is the fact that Labour still has the same problem, but then again this is a party that is dependent on votes from people with a reputation for disliking the Jews.
"If I stumble on those old posts where you were defending your far-left rabble in Labour when they were being outed for anti-semitism then I 'll share it. I'm certaintly not going to go out of my way for a liar, though. I will of course raise the issue again when you're smearing other members". Did you find any? Are you still following your masters lead and attempting to smear Labour as anti-Semite?
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 30, 2023 12:02:37 GMT
What are you talking about??? I have on this board openly criticised Starmer and some of his policies but I still believe he will be a better PM that anyone we have had from the Tories. I have always criticised Blair and his illegal war in Iraq and have stated before that he should be put on trial for war crimes. Yes, I supported Corbyn and still do, what the Tories, media and Israel did to him was appalling and a direct attack on our democracy. Get your facts straight before blathering on and making false accusations like other posters on this board. And Corbyn was expelled from the party over Anti-Semitism, therefore you support Corbyn who is an anti-Semitism enabler. As B-4 correctly said. www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-65102128I do not believe, as many sane people do not, believe Corbyn was/is an anti-Semite. Because the Tories, the right wing media and the Israeli lobby say he is does not make it true. When people feel 'cornered' they always bring up the old rehashed lies.
|
|
|
Post by jonksy on Sept 30, 2023 14:23:47 GMT
I do not believe, as many sane people do not, believe Corbyn was/is an anti-Semite. Because the Tories, the right wing media and the Israeli lobby say he is does not make it true. When people feel 'cornered' they always bring up the old rehashed lies. Even YOUR OWN LEFTY WOKE MEDIA has given reports on comrade corbys racism rr. I have increased the font size and made it bold as WE all know you are deaf and blind to FACTS.
Investigation
In October 2020, a report by the UK's human rights watchdog found Labour to be responsible for "unlawful" acts of harassment and discrimination during Jeremy Corbyn's four-and a-half years as party leader.
The Equality and Human Rights Commission (EHRC) investigation identified serious failings in leadership and an inadequate process of handling anti-Semitism complaints.
Its report said the party was responsible for three breaches of the Equality Act: political interference in anti-Semitism complaints, failure to provide adequate training to those handling anti-Semitism complaints and harassment.
In a statement, it said: "The equality body's analysis points to a culture within the party which, at best, did not do enough to prevent anti-Semitism and, at worst, could be seen to accept it."
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 30, 2023 15:45:32 GMT
I do not believe, as many sane people do not, believe Corbyn was/is an anti-Semite. Because the Tories, the right wing media and the Israeli lobby say he is does not make it true. When people feel 'cornered' they always bring up the old rehashed lies. Even YOUR OWN LEFTY WOKE MEDIA has given reports on comrade corbys racism rr. I have increased the font size and made it bold as WE all know you are deaf and blind to FACTS.
Investigation
In October 2020, a report by the UK's human rights watchdog found Labour to be responsible for "unlawful" acts of harassment and discrimination during Jeremy Corbyn's four-and a-half years as party leader.
The Equality and Human Rights Commission (EHRC) investigation identified serious failings in leadership and an inadequate process of handling anti-Semitism complaints.
Its report said the party was responsible for three breaches of the Equality Act: political interference in anti-Semitism complaints, failure to provide adequate training to those handling anti-Semitism complaints and harassment.
In a statement, it said: "The equality body's analysis points to a culture within the party which, at best, did not do enough to prevent anti-Semitism and, at worst, could be seen to accept it."
The Equality and Human Rights Commission (EHRC) has decided to drop it’s investigation into Tory Islamophobia because the Tories have told them they’re doing their own “independent” investigation. In an attempt to understand the thought process behind such a decision, given that the EHRC didn’t consider dropping their investigation into alleged anti-Semitism in the Labour Party, despite the fact that the Labour Party undertook their own extensive investigation, Spotlight have taken a look into the EHRC and the background of some of the people involved in the decision making process. PROFILE: Equality and Human Rights Commission, David Isaac & Rebecca Hilsenrath: Although the EHRC is a non-departmental public body (NDPB), it is government funded. In April 2016, the Guardian reported that the then Tory Minister for Women & Equalities, Nicky Morgan, was under fire for appointing David Isaac, a wealthy city lawyer whose firm works for the government, as chair of the Equality and Human Rights Commission. Harriet Harman, chair of parliament’s joint committee on human rights said at the time that this was a serious conflict of interest because “the EHRC often took cases against the government” and Isaac’s firm often represented the government, This even including work for the DWP. Concerns were ignored and Isaac was appointed chair. Hardly independent and with such close links to the Tory party what else was to be expected. We do not have a democracy in this country.
|
|
|
Post by jonksy on Sept 30, 2023 19:30:23 GMT
Even YOUR OWN LEFTY WOKE MEDIA has given reports on comrade corbys racism rr. I have increased the font size and made it bold as WE all know you are deaf and blind to FACTS.
Investigation
In October 2020, a report by the UK's human rights watchdog found Labour to be responsible for "unlawful" acts of harassment and discrimination during Jeremy Corbyn's four-and a-half years as party leader.
The Equality and Human Rights Commission (EHRC) investigation identified serious failings in leadership and an inadequate process of handling anti-Semitism complaints.
Its report said the party was responsible for three breaches of the Equality Act: political interference in anti-Semitism complaints, failure to provide adequate training to those handling anti-Semitism complaints and harassment.
In a statement, it said: "The equality body's analysis points to a culture within the party which, at best, did not do enough to prevent anti-Semitism and, at worst, could be seen to accept it."
The Equality and Human Rights Commission (EHRC) has decided to drop it’s investigation into Tory Islamophobia because the Tories have told them they’re doing their own “independent” investigation. In an attempt to understand the thought process behind such a decision, given that the EHRC didn’t consider dropping their investigation into alleged anti-Semitism in the Labour Party, despite the fact that the Labour Party undertook their own extensive investigation, Spotlight have taken a look into the EHRC and the background of some of the people involved in the decision making process. PROFILE: Equality and Human Rights Commission, David Isaac & Rebecca Hilsenrath: Although the EHRC is a non-departmental public body (NDPB), it is government funded. In April 2016, the Guardian reported that the then Tory Minister for Women & Equalities, Nicky Morgan, was under fire for appointing David Isaac, a wealthy city lawyer whose firm works for the government, as chair of the Equality and Human Rights Commission. Harriet Harman, chair of parliament’s joint committee on human rights said at the time that this was a serious conflict of interest because “the EHRC often took cases against the government” and Isaac’s firm often represented the government, This even including work for the DWP. Concerns were ignored and Isaac was appointed chair. Hardly independent and with such close links to the Tory party what else was to be expected. We do not have a democracy in this country. You whole post is total bollocks. What the fuck would woke lefty remnants know about democracy?
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 1, 2023 5:37:01 GMT
I do not believe, as many sane people do not, believe Corbyn was/is an anti-Semite. Because the Tories, the right wing media and the Israeli lobby say he is does not make it true. When people feel 'cornered' they always bring up the old rehashed lies. Even YOUR OWN LEFTY WOKE MEDIA has given reports on comrade corbys racism rr. I have increased the font size and made it bold as WE all know you are deaf and blind to FACTS.
Investigation
In October 2020, a report by the UK's human rights watchdog found Labour to be responsible for "unlawful" acts of harassment and discrimination during Jeremy Corbyn's four-and a-half years as party leader.
The Equality and Human Rights Commission (EHRC) investigation identified serious failings in leadership and an inadequate process of handling anti-Semitism complaints.
Its report said the party was responsible for three breaches of the Equality Act: political interference in anti-Semitism complaints, failure to provide adequate training to those handling anti-Semitism complaints and harassment.
In a statement, it said: "The equality body's analysis points to a culture within the party which, at best, did not do enough to prevent anti-Semitism and, at worst, could be seen to accept it."
EHRC = Tory.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 1, 2023 5:38:33 GMT
The Equality and Human Rights Commission (EHRC) has decided to drop it’s investigation into Tory Islamophobia because the Tories have told them they’re doing their own “independent” investigation. In an attempt to understand the thought process behind such a decision, given that the EHRC didn’t consider dropping their investigation into alleged anti-Semitism in the Labour Party, despite the fact that the Labour Party undertook their own extensive investigation, Spotlight have taken a look into the EHRC and the background of some of the people involved in the decision making process. PROFILE: Equality and Human Rights Commission, David Isaac & Rebecca Hilsenrath: Although the EHRC is a non-departmental public body (NDPB), it is government funded. In April 2016, the Guardian reported that the then Tory Minister for Women & Equalities, Nicky Morgan, was under fire for appointing David Isaac, a wealthy city lawyer whose firm works for the government, as chair of the Equality and Human Rights Commission. Harriet Harman, chair of parliament’s joint committee on human rights said at the time that this was a serious conflict of interest because “the EHRC often took cases against the government” and Isaac’s firm often represented the government, This even including work for the DWP. Concerns were ignored and Isaac was appointed chair. Hardly independent and with such close links to the Tory party what else was to be expected. We do not have a democracy in this country. You whole post is total bollocks. What the fuck would woke lefty remnants know about democracy? What part is bollocks?
|
|