|
Post by Einhorn on Jul 28, 2023 9:21:48 GMT
No. This is the correct sequence: Farage told lies about the EU, acted as a Putin enabler, and generally acquired a reputation for himself as a 'xenophobe' and a 'disingenuous grifter'. Then, the bank decided to jettison him because they took the decision, correctly or incorrectly, that he was a reputational burden for them. As usual, you're left with irrelevant pivots. I'm only warming up, Bubbles.
|
|
|
Post by The Squeezed Middle on Jul 28, 2023 9:22:09 GMT
Monte. The foundations that society is built upon such as freedom of speech , and democracy , is far more important than personal dislike of an individual , or puerile excuses over alleged hypocrisy.
This is wrong. We all know it. You and others on this thread such as darling and Zany are on the wrong side of societys moral standards once more , as i said about remainers post 2016. Public opinion is against you.
Let it go mate , and dont continue to die on that hill.
Heres the scottish indy blogger , former lib dem , pro european and critic of transgender issues Stuart campbell telliing talk tv of his personal "banking cancellation" similar to Farage. If you cant hold your nose about Farage , and see why this is wrong and we must all close ranks in society and get behind the banks being punished and reigned in over this , then i would have thought better of you.
Thomas, I thought we were friends. That you would deny me the pleasure of a bit of Farage bashing hurts. However, back to the point. NatWest didn't debank Manfrog they downgraded him. He debanked himself when he turned down the standard non-millionaire's club account that all of us plebs are reduced to using. Do you think the Queen's bank would give you or I an account in their over privileged self entitled banking clique? Does that make us debanked and if so where do I claim my compensation? But even that is beside the point. Should a company be forced to allow a customer service when they think is causing them reputational damage? Should I be forced to allow an abusive customer, who is scaring away my other customers, into my fancy restaurant? ''But he's hungry and everyone needs to eat'' you say. ''Fine, he can eat at my other restaurant which is a fast food joint'' I respond. ''Oh wait, he's stormed off in a huff. Couldn't have been that hungry after all''. ''Must have just been making some kind of point so he could make himself look victimised and it wasn't about the right to be fed after all. Well fuck him then''. No, as before, his business accounts were shut down and he was offered a basic personal account instead. Not the same thing.
|
|
|
Post by buccaneer on Jul 28, 2023 9:23:58 GMT
Exactly, this millionaires thing was a lie, the internal 40 page bank memo was about him and his views. Not about the money he had and other banks refused accounts as well. The 40 page bank statement discussed the reputational risk he posed to the bank. Clearly, there was some substance to it, as the manfrog wasn't able to find another bank to take him on. The reputational risk became damage for Coutts, NatWest and their board after they de-banked him for political reasons. They've done themselves far more damage than Farage ever could to their name.
|
|
|
Post by buccaneer on Jul 28, 2023 9:25:35 GMT
As usual, you're left with irrelevant pivots. I'm only warming up, Bubbles. Yeah, but you're boring. You have nowhere to go on this. Only to embarrass yourself further.
|
|
|
Post by Einhorn on Jul 28, 2023 9:26:00 GMT
The 40 page bank statement discussed the reputational risk he posed to the bank. Clearly, there was some substance to it, as the manfrog wasn't able to find another bank to take him on. The reputational risk became damage for Coutts, NatWest and their board after they de-banked him for political reasons. They've done themselves far more damage than Farage ever could to their name. Excellent news! Now all we need is for the manfrog to embark on ruinously expensive litigation. Two for the price of one!!
|
|
|
Post by The Squeezed Middle on Jul 28, 2023 9:27:28 GMT
The 40 page bank statement discussed the reputational risk he posed to the bank. Clearly, there was some substance to it, as the manfrog wasn't able to find another bank to take him on. The reputational risk became damage for Coutts, NatWest and their board after they de-banked him for political reasons. They've done themselves far more damage than Farage ever could to their name. And now the board are toppling like dominoes while Monte and Co maintain they've done nothing wrong. 🤣
|
|
|
Post by Einhorn on Jul 28, 2023 9:30:34 GMT
I'm only warming up, Bubbles. Yeah, but you're boring. Meh! My posts are getting mixed reviews.
|
|
|
Post by Einhorn on Jul 28, 2023 9:31:59 GMT
The reputational risk became damage for Coutts, NatWest and their board after they de-banked him for political reasons. They've done themselves far more damage than Farage ever could to their name. And now the board are toppling like dominoes while Monte and Co maintain they've done nothing wrong. 🤣 Who is saying they did nothing wrong? They clearly breached the Data Protection Act.
|
|
|
Post by buccaneer on Jul 28, 2023 9:35:55 GMT
Meh! My posts are getting mixed reviews. Your posts are causing reputational damage to this forum.
|
|
|
Post by Montegriffo on Jul 28, 2023 9:38:37 GMT
Thomas, I thought we were friends. That you would deny me the pleasure of a bit of Farage bashing hurts. However, back to the point. NatWest didn't debank Manfrog they downgraded him. He debanked himself when he turned down the standard non-millionaire's club account that all of us plebs are reduced to using. Do you think the Queen's bank would give you or I an account in their over privileged self entitled banking clique? Does that make us debanked and if so where do I claim my compensation? But even that is beside the point. Should a company be forced to allow a customer service when they think is causing them reputational damage? Should I be forced to allow an abusive customer, who is scaring away my other customers, into my fancy restaurant? ''But he's hungry and everyone needs to eat'' you say. ''Fine, he can eat at my other restaurant which is a fast food joint'' I respond. ''Oh wait, he's stormed off in a huff. Couldn't have been that hungry after all''. ''Must have just been making some kind of point so he could make himself look victimised and it wasn't about the right to be fed after all. Well fuck him then''. No, as before, his business accounts were shut down and he was offered a basic personal account instead. Not the same thing. As a great man once said ''so he wasn't debanked then?''
|
|
|
Post by Einhorn on Jul 28, 2023 9:41:55 GMT
Meh! My posts are getting mixed reviews. Your posts are causing reputational damage to this forum. Have the visiting bots been complaining? Because nobody else knows this forum even exists.
|
|
|
Post by The Squeezed Middle on Jul 28, 2023 9:43:18 GMT
As a great man once said ''so he wasn't debanked then?'' No, as before, his business accounts were shut down and he was offered a basic personal account instead. Not the same thing.
|
|
|
Post by Vinny on Jul 28, 2023 9:45:57 GMT
NatWest didn't debank Manfrog they downgraded him. He debanked himself when he turned down the standard non-millionaire's club account that all of us plebs are reduced to using. Incorrect. 40 page document. It had nothing to do with the amount of money in his account. Other banks wouldn't give him a business account. Only after he complained, was he offered a personal account, not a business account. Your argument is based on out of date information. The release of new information which contradicts the original statement, has resulted in Alison Rose resigning.
|
|
|
Post by Montegriffo on Jul 28, 2023 9:49:12 GMT
As a great man once said ''so he wasn't debanked then?'' No, as before, his business accounts were shut down and he was offered a basic personal account instead. Not the same thing. Hey, I'm just trying to get my name added to your signature. Everyone has to have a dream.
|
|
|
Post by Einhorn on Jul 28, 2023 9:50:18 GMT
NatWest didn't debank Manfrog they downgraded him. He debanked himself when he turned down the standard non-millionaire's club account that all of us plebs are reduced to using. Incorrect. 40 page document. It had nothing to do with the amount of money in his account. Other banks wouldn't give him a business account. Only after he complained, was he offered a personal account, not a business account. Your argument is based on out of date information. The release of new information which contradicts the original statement, has resulted in Alison Rose resigning. It had everything to do with reputational damage, though. As has been pointed out previously, things can't get much worse when a former slave-trading bank is ashamed to be seen in public with you.
|
|