|
|
Post by sheepy on Jul 1, 2023 8:46:54 GMT
No that's because I would not like to see people driven to their own destruction by cultish behaviour. So we having a degree of common sense offer you alternatives which you get decide if you have a future not completely ruled by psychology and political totalitarians. You confuse science with politics. If scientists spot an asteroid on its way to hit earth, the decision to switch all efforts to stop it is not political or psychological. If a blogger claims the scientists might have got some minor aspect of the size of the asteroid wrong and we can't know how much destruction it may cause, my attitude is not to give that blogger equal credence to the scientists who warn of disaster. Nor do I think to pause our efforts until we know for sure and its possibly too late or requires far more effort to save the planet. Basically I trust the scientists of the world, especially when so many of them agree. No I don't you do, I have listened to mindless droning on for pages and pages, science needs politics as it did for Covid but as with covid it is based more on psychology and asking for exactly the same thing, political totalitarians. |
|
|
|
Post by jonksy on Jul 1, 2023 8:48:05 GMT
[br People are hard up thanks to the ECO BS. Sorry, I forgot you don't believe global warming is happening at all, so your view is bound to be different. Because it isn't happening that's why... |
|
|
|
Post by zanygame on Jul 1, 2023 8:50:35 GMT
That's because you are one of those who thinks a blogger is equal to a scientific institute. Isn't this like condemning Galileo for not having the same level of authority as the religious institute? The polar opposite. Galileo was a scientist reporting scientific observations. the religious institutes were those denying science because it didn't fit their narrative. |
|
|
|
Post by jonksy on Jul 1, 2023 8:52:03 GMT
You confuse science with politics. If scientists spot an asteroid on its way to hit earth, the decision to switch all efforts to stop it is not political or psychological. If a blogger claims the scientists might have got some minor aspect of the size of the asteroid wrong and we can't know how much destruction it may cause, my attitude is not to give that blogger equal credence to the scientists who warn of disaster. Nor do I think to pause our efforts until we know for sure and its possibly too late or requires far more effort to save the planet. Basically I trust the scientists of the world, especially when so many of them agree. No I don't you do, I have listened to mindless droning on for pages and pages, science needs politics as it did for Covid but as with covid it is based more on psychology and asking for exactly the same thing, political totalitarians. Here is another little snippet that Zany can take to the bank the USBC are quietly not using heat pumps any longer in their new builds as they are the source of all complaints on new builds..This ECO BS is dying on its feet but the usual bumburgher deciples cannot see that fact. |
|
|
|
Post by zanygame on Jul 1, 2023 8:53:59 GMT
You confuse science with politics. If scientists spot an asteroid on its way to hit earth, the decision to switch all efforts to stop it is not political or psychological. If a blogger claims the scientists might have got some minor aspect of the size of the asteroid wrong and we can't know how much destruction it may cause, my attitude is not to give that blogger equal credence to the scientists who warn of disaster. Nor do I think to pause our efforts until we know for sure and its possibly too late or requires far more effort to save the planet. Basically I trust the scientists of the world, especially when so many of them agree. No I don't you do, I have listened to mindless droning on for pages and pages, science needs politics as it did for Covid but as with covid it is based more on psychology and asking for exactly the same thing, political totalitarians. "Mindless droning" I have a policy of not answering posts with insults as it just encourages more. |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 1, 2023 8:54:02 GMT
Isn't this like condemning Galileo for not having the same level of authority as the religious institute? The polar opposite. Galileo was a scientist reporting scientific observations. the religious institutes were those denying science because it didn't fit their narrative. Actually, it isn't. After all, your recent posts appear to maintaining your authority over science whilst dismissing others as somehow inferior dogma, purely by source and not data. |
|
|
|
Post by sheepy on Jul 1, 2023 8:56:13 GMT
The polar opposite. Galileo was a scientist reporting scientific observations. the religious institutes were those denying science because it didn't fit their narrative. Actually, it isn't. After all, your recent posts appear to maintaining your authority over science whilst dismissing others as somehow inferior dogma, purely by source and not data. He doesn't have a clue, but he will not be enlightened as I have seen it all before thousands of times, he cannot even work out that mindless droning comes out of all sides over it. |
|
|
|
Post by zanygame on Jul 1, 2023 8:59:02 GMT
No I don't you do, I have listened to mindless droning on for pages and pages, science needs politics as it did for Covid but as with covid it is based more on psychology and asking for exactly the same thing, political totalitarians. Here is another little snippet that Zany can take to the bank the USBC are quietly not using heat pumps any longer in their new builds as they are the source of all complaints on new builds..This ECO BS is dying on its feet but the usual bumburgher deciples cannot see that fact. USBC ? |
|
|
|
Post by jonksy on Jul 1, 2023 9:04:14 GMT
Here is another little snippet that Zany can take to the bank the USBC are quietly not using heat pumps any longer in their new builds as they are the source of all complaints on new builds..This ECO BS is dying on its feet but the usual bumburgher deciples cannot see that fact. USBC ? Look it up yourself Zany...You soon would if it were pro ECO BS. |
|
|
|
Post by zanygame on Jul 1, 2023 9:07:06 GMT
The polar opposite. Galileo was a scientist reporting scientific observations. the religious institutes were those denying science because it didn't fit their narrative. Actually, it isn't. After all, your recent posts appear to maintaining your authority over science whilst dismissing others as somehow inferior dogma, purely by source and not data. What?? The vast majority of scientists claim AGW is a real and present danger. Its you who say they are all wrong. |
|
|
|
Post by zanygame on Jul 1, 2023 9:07:36 GMT
Look it up yourself Zany...You soon would if it were pro ECO BS. I did and found nothing relevant. usbcuk.com/ |
|
|
|
Post by jonksy on Jul 1, 2023 9:10:50 GMT
Look it up yourself Zany...You soon would if it were pro ECO BS. I did and found nothing relevant. usbcuk.com/And did you suffer your usual blindness? |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 1, 2023 9:12:20 GMT
Actually, it isn't. After all, your recent posts appear to maintaining your authority over science whilst dismissing others as somehow inferior dogma, purely by source and not data. What?? The vast majority of scientists claim AGW is a real and present danger. Its you who say they are all wrong. These are yet more unsubstantiated claims, and I haven't agreed or disagreed with what has been posted. I have merely suggested that you try and address this scientifically, but you seem fixed on making it about some institution. You are aware that these institutions and 'scientists' rely on money, right? |
|
|
|
Post by zanygame on Jul 1, 2023 9:22:32 GMT
And did you suffer your usual blindness? I'll ask once more and ignore your usual uncooperative rudeness. Who do you mean by USBC. I assume by addressing it to me personally you wanted my response, if not then fine I'll ignore. |
|
|
|
Post by zanygame on Jul 1, 2023 9:33:38 GMT
What?? The vast majority of scientists claim AGW is a real and present danger. Its you who say they are all wrong. These are yet more unsubstantiated claims, and I haven't agreed or disagreed with what has been posted. I have merely suggested that you try and address this scientifically, but you seem fixed on making it about some institution. You are aware that these institutions and 'scientists' rely on money, right? You wish me to address the claims made by WUWT etc, which I have done very many times from the first time they were raised. Each time I disprove one the pseudo scientists simply jump to the next, round and round. I never get any answers in the other direction. No response to my asking how many is 89 weather stations in comparison to all the U.S weather stations. Or why is there no conflict between satellite measurements and land ones. As soon as I raise these points you return to the safety of calling me a zealot. I have also addressed the claims that the worlds scientists are all prepared to perjure themselves to get next years funding. It seems impossibly unlikely that Scientists from every nation across the world including China all got together to waste their governments money. That institutes like the NOAA who are funded without any research grants would also go along with the scam. I find the claim implausible. |
|
