|
|
Post by Vinny on May 22, 2023 9:47:28 GMT
Just found out there's a media super injunction about Philip Schofield, anyone know anyone in the USA or elsewhere who can find out what he's trying to cover up?
|
|
|
|
Post by wapentake on May 22, 2023 9:57:45 GMT
Just found out there's a media super injunction about Philip Schofield, anyone know anyone in the USA or elsewhere who can find out what he's trying to cover up? I have seen that someone is making allegations on the internet,it’s all a bit sad really if they’ve got evidence they should take it somewhere if not they should shut up. Since there’s a super injunction you can’t really say anymore. |
|
|
|
Post by Vinny on May 22, 2023 10:01:06 GMT
Well, it can't last forever.
|
|
|
|
Post by Hutchyns on May 22, 2023 11:16:08 GMT
wapentake
Didn't the likes of Holmes & Langsford try to take it somewhere, but then found that it was they themselves who were shut up. A warning shot across the bows of anyone else thinking of trying to blow the whistle.
|
|
|
|
Post by wapentake on May 22, 2023 11:24:51 GMT
wapentake Didn't the likes of Holmes & Langsford try to take it somewhere, but then found that it was they themselves who were shut up. A warning shot across the bows of anyone else thinking of trying to blow the whistle. Yeah not a fan of trial by rumour,if there is suspected wrongdoing it should be taken to law and investigated there and if appropriate before a judge and jury. |
|
|
|
Post by Bentley on May 22, 2023 11:28:02 GMT
wapentake Didn't the likes of Holmes & Langsford try to take it somewhere, but then found that it was they themselves who were shut up. A warning shot across the bows of anyone else thinking of trying to blow the whistle. Yeah not a fan of trial by rumour,if there is suspected wrongdoing it should be taken to law and investigated there and if appropriate before a judge and jury. You could say the same thing about Saville . It was only persistent rumours that lead to the investigation and that was too late . |
|
|
|
Post by wapentake on May 22, 2023 11:36:04 GMT
Yeah not a fan of trial by rumour,if there is suspected wrongdoing it should be taken to law and investigated there and if appropriate before a judge and jury. You could say the same thing about Saville . It was only persistent rumours that lead to the investigation and that was too late . Times have changed,perhaps super injunctions are past their sell by date but there are also entirely innocent people had their lives ruined or at least attempts to do so by malicious falsehoods. Ive no idea in this case what’s true or false and neither does anyone else,if there’s any substance it should be looked by the law not by rumour. |
|
|
|
Post by Bentley on May 22, 2023 11:44:49 GMT
You could say the same thing about Saville . It was only persistent rumours that lead to the investigation and that was too late . Times have changed,perhaps super injunctions are past their sell by date but there are also entirely innocent people had their lives ruined or at least attempts to do so by malicious falsehoods. Ive no idea in this case what’s true or false and neither does anyone else,if there’s any substance it should be looked by the law not by rumour. Celebrities shouldn’t have it both ways. They shouldn’t be able to manipulate the press to enhance their reputation and then complain when something that might not be to their advantage comes into light . You haven’t the resources to manipulate the press or ( probably) the resources for a super injunction. Your sympathy is wasted l |
|
|
|
Post by wapentake on May 22, 2023 11:53:34 GMT
Times have changed,perhaps super injunctions are past their sell by date but there are also entirely innocent people had their lives ruined or at least attempts to do so by malicious falsehoods. Ive no idea in this case what’s true or false and neither does anyone else,if there’s any substance it should be looked by the law not by rumour. Celebrities shouldn’t have it both ways. They shouldn’t be able to manipulate the press to enhance their reputation and then complain when something that might not be to their advantage comes into light . You haven’t the resources to manipulate the press or ( probably) the resources for a super injunction. Your sympathy is wasted l Sympathies,? Tbh I can’t stand the bloke or Willoughby and Holmes’s and partner too. I look at what should happen and is fair whether you’re rich or poor,let’s face it there’s a thread on Braverman alluding to much less serious alleged behaviour but potentially no less damaging to her future. I appreciate what you’re saying about super injunctions but we’re someone to post on the net allegations about you would you still have the same view? |
|
|
|
Post by Bentley on May 22, 2023 12:00:13 GMT
Celebrities shouldn’t have it both ways. They shouldn’t be able to manipulate the press to enhance their reputation and then complain when something that might not be to their advantage comes into light . You haven’t the resources to manipulate the press or ( probably) the resources for a super injunction. Your sympathy is wasted l Sympathies,? Tbh I can’t stand the bloke or Willoughby and Holmes’s and partner too. I look at what should happen and is fair whether you’re rich or poor,let’s face it there’s a thread on Braverman alluding to much less serious alleged behaviour but potentially no less damaging to her future. I appreciate what you’re saying about super injunctions but we’re someone to post on the net allegations about you would you still have the same view? I would be looking from a subjective stand point . I have every sympathy for Mrs ordinary who gets caught up in a media rumour mill. I have zero sympathy from a wealthy celebrity who has manipulated the media for years and suddenly finds out that they were riding a tiger . |
|
|
|
Post by The Squeezed Middle on May 22, 2023 12:31:50 GMT
I have even less sympathy for those who spend their career reporting the peccadillos of others* while protecting their own with a super injunction.
Hypocrites of the highest order. (Andrew Marr anyone?)
(*I'm not saying that's what Schofield's doing btw).
|
|
|
|
Post by johnofgwent on May 22, 2023 12:46:05 GMT
Just found out there's a media super injunction about Philip Schofield, anyone know anyone in the USA or elsewhere who can find out what he's trying to cover up? is this a new one, or the one the twatterverse is saying needs to be renewed from when it was first taken out. Plenty of scurrilous twats rabbitting on about what he is supposed to have done, all baseless lies i’m sure… |
|
|
|
Post by johnofgwent on May 22, 2023 12:51:10 GMT
Celebrities shouldn’t have it both ways. They shouldn’t be able to manipulate the press to enhance their reputation and then complain when something that might not be to their advantage comes into light . You haven’t the resources to manipulate the press or ( probably) the resources for a super injunction. Your sympathy is wasted l Sympathies,? Tbh I can’t stand the bloke or Willoughby and Holmes’s and partner too. I look at what should happen and is fair whether you’re rich or poor,let’s face it there’s a thread on Braverman alluding to much less serious alleged behaviour but potentially no less damaging to her future. I appreciate what you’re saying about super injunctions but we’re someone to post on the net allegations about you would you still have the same view? i have one opening question, and one followup Can Arsebook be sued for libel, and if not, why not. |
|
|
|
Post by Vinny on May 22, 2023 12:57:13 GMT
One of my friends in the pub was saying about it, I looked up on google, and there is a super injunction, I don't know why either.
There's a lot of rumours flying around about Phil and a boy named Matthew McGreevy now aged 19.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on May 22, 2023 13:11:35 GMT
He should have remained in the closet. Hs career was doing well before then.
|
|
