|
Post by see2 on May 22, 2023 21:08:34 GMT
As you indulge in personal denigration ^^^ I made an objective observation about your own behaviour. ^^^ And used your OPINION to insult me.
|
|
|
Post by The Squeezed Middle on May 22, 2023 21:15:08 GMT
Life's a mirror, Shrieky.
|
|
|
Post by buccaneer on May 22, 2023 21:19:41 GMT
I made an objective observation about your own behaviour. ^^^ And used your OPINION to insult me. I'm sure my opinion about you isn't unique.
|
|
|
Post by Red Rackham on May 23, 2023 9:23:36 GMT
Quite right Jonksy, and I have a theory on that, it's a theory that for some reason annoys srb7677. It goes something like this... In my opinion left wing remainiacs tend to be young and inexperienced and the younger they are the more inexperienced they tend to be, who's surprised? Which is why Labour are so keen on allowing children to vote. Half of your age group dont even understand the internet, though for that very reason they are not represented here. Society is changing all the time and many of you get left behind, your much vaunted experience of past working practices no longer relevant. When it comes to modern technology and life as it is lived today the average 17 year old is often more clued up and experienced than many of you lot, who are often living in the past, much of your past experience no longer relevant today. Many more of them have experienced or are experiencing university, for example. The sense of you lot being out of touch and left behind is particularly true of the more intellectually challenged and life long brainwashed amongst you. You in particular seem to acknowledge no difference between a 17 year old and a 7 year old. What on earth has the internet got to do with anything? I'll let you into a secret, the only people who say life experience is irrelevant are those who lack it, namely people like you, outraged lefties and kids. The fact that you think a 17 year old is more 'clued up and experienced' than someone who is much older is not only hilarious, but says much about you. You may be interested to know that in humans the brain is not fully developed until mid to late 20's which is why, in my opinion, the voting age should not be 18. It should be at least 21, preferably 25. You mention university, it's true I never went to university, I wasn't clever enough in fact I failed the 11+ which means I missed out on grammar school and university. Has it held me back in life? Not at all. In those days you had to be clever to go to university, whereas these days going to 'Uni' to study burger technology for two years followed by unemployment or a job in a warehouse is seen as a trendy right of passage. I know a couple of kids who went to university, they're both in their early 20's now. Neither of them finished the courses they chose, one said he didn't like university, the other said she missed home. The former is now a brickie's labourer, the latter works in a shop. They are both enjoying life, and neither of them are even vaguely interested in politics.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on May 23, 2023 12:39:22 GMT
Half of your age group dont even understand the internet, though for that very reason they are not represented here. Society is changing all the time and many of you get left behind, your much vaunted experience of past working practices no longer relevant. When it comes to modern technology and life as it is lived today the average 17 year old is often more clued up and experienced than many of you lot, who are often living in the past, much of your past experience no longer relevant today. Many more of them have experienced or are experiencing university, for example. The sense of you lot being out of touch and left behind is particularly true of the more intellectually challenged and life long brainwashed amongst you. You in particular seem to acknowledge no difference between a 17 year old and a 7 year old. What on earth has the internet got to do with anything? I'll let you into a secret, the only people who say life experience is irrelevant are those who lack it, namely people like you, outraged lefties and kids. The fact that you think a 17 year old is more 'clued up and experienced' than someone who is much older is not only hilarious, but says much about you. You may be interested to know that in humans the brain is not fully developed until mid to late 20's which is why, in my opinion, the voting age should not be 18. It should be at least 21, preferably 25. You mention university, it's true I never went to university, I wasn't clever enough in fact I failed the 11+ which means I missed out on grammar school and university. Has it held me back in life? Not at all. In those days you had to be clever to go to university, whereas these days going to 'Uni' to study burger technology for two years followed by unemployment or a job in a warehouse is seen as a trendy right of passage. I know a couple of kids who went to university, they're both in their early 20's now. Neither of them finished the courses they chose, one said he didn't like university, the other said she missed home. The former is now a brickie's labourer, the latter works in a shop. They are both enjoying life, and neither of them are even vaguely interested in politics. You cite two young people you happen to know who have no interest in politics as if that is universal. By the time I was 17 I was deeply interested in politics and in my time campaigning locally in recent years - both inside and outside the Labour party - I have encountered plenty of young people who are passionate about politics. Like other age groups, some are interested in politics, some not. And if you think I have reached the age of 57 without gaining a lot of experience of life along the way, you must think I have lived my life in a monastery, lol. Nevertheless, at 17 I still knew enough and could think sensibly enough to vote had I had the vote. And generally it is the ones interested and knowledgeable about politics who are more likely to vote. The uninterested ones are much less likely to bother. Which goes for all age groups.. As for my own life experience, this includes a childhood in which domestic violence was a regular thing, schools that still empowered cane-wielding sadists, teenage youth training programs, working for a living in a variety of jobs, including in a garage, for the local council, as a landscape gardener, as a construction worker, and most recently in retail. I had periods of unemployment in the 80s and 90s, was on long term sick for a few years with depression and anxiety which I overcame so have experienced poor mental health in the past. And having found my dad dead in bed when I was 18 in what was a very hot summer, my early adulthood was scarred and, though it took years to realise, this damaged me. No one should see their dad like that when a few hours earlier he was alive and well aged only 39. I reacted badly and went off the rails for four or five years, dabbling heavily in drink and drugs. I sought help in the end and took action to sort myself out. These days I use such early experiences to talk to people I see making similar mistakes with words of wisdom and also help those who are struggling with past traumas. What I have missed out on is never having had kids because I never felt the desire, but most of those around me did and I was a frequent babysitter in earlier years. For a time I was a volunteer for the Red Cross and have twice been a member of the Labour party, the first time in the 80s when I was still young. I joined the party when still aged only 17. My first serious girlfriend was German and I taught myself to speak the language, which is why I ended up travelling alone to Germany aged 17 to spend time with her and her family. I have also travelled to Egypt and seen the pyramids, Athens and the acropolis, Izmir in Turkey, Venice, and also Cyprus. I grew up in an owner occupied house, latterly in affluent suburbia, but my mum had to sell up when my dad died. I spent a decade or so living in insecure private rented accommodation including brief periods of crashing on friends' sofas so officially homeless. One night I had to sleep rough. But have spent most of the last quarter century living in a one bedroom social housing flat. My experience as a tenant - both private and social - has a big impact upon my views re housing. I could go on. Suffice it to say there are many things I have experienced and many things I have not. Same could be said of most people with a few decades behind them. But what the average 17 year old has is an almost natural ease when it comes to navigating the internet, having grown up with it and not had to learn it later in life. They are also coming of age in a society where their every error of judgement will be plastered all over the internet and remain there for all time. We never had to worry about that in our day. We never had to experience the consequences of that. Young people also have very recent experience of the education system as it is today which is rather more relevant than our experience of it many decades ago because so much has changed since then. Clearly, the average 17 year olds experience of the education system is far more relevant than ours. Because things change so much with the passage of time, there will always be areas where the experience of young people is more relevant than ours, because ours is outdated. We should listen to them and give them a say. Besides which, so what about experience. This forum itself produces clear evidence that experience does not always equate to intelligent thinking and sensible decision making. What matters to me is the cognitive ability to think things through rationally, and any intelligent 16 or 17 year old is capable of doing that. We all were when I and my peers were that age and I see zero reason to assume today's teenagers are any less intelligent.
|
|
|
Post by Red Rackham on May 23, 2023 12:55:18 GMT
srb7677, I appreciate the response, but I'll have to get back to you. For whatever reason I have my hands full at the mo, I have to keep getting up.
|
|
|
Post by Red Rackham on May 23, 2023 15:07:07 GMT
You cite two young people you happen to know who have no interest in politics as if that is universal. By the time I was 17 I was deeply interested in politics and in my time campaigning locally in recent years - both inside and outside the Labour party - I have encountered plenty of young people who are passionate about politics. Like other age groups, some are interested in politics, some not. And if you think I have reached the age of 57 without gaining a lot of experience of life along the way, you must think I have lived my life in a monastery, lol. Nevertheless, at 17 I still knew enough and could think sensibly enough to vote had I had the vote. And generally it is the ones interested and knowledgeable about politics who are more likely to vote. The uninterested ones are much less likely to bother. Which goes for all age groups.. As for my own life experience, this includes a childhood in which domestic violence was a regular thing, schools that still empowered cane-wielding sadists, teenage youth training programs, working for a living in a variety of jobs, including in a garage, for the local council, as a landscape gardener, as a construction worker, and most recently in retail. I had periods of unemployment in the 80s and 90s, was on long term sick for a few years with depression and anxiety which I overcame so have experienced poor mental health in the past. And having found my dad dead in bed when I was 18 in what was a very hot summer, my early adulthood was scarred and, though it took years to realise, this damaged me. No one should see their dad like that when a few hours earlier he was alive and well aged only 39. I reacted badly and went off the rails for four or five years, dabbling heavily in drink and drugs. I sought help in the end and took action to sort myself out. These days I use such early experiences to talk to people I see making similar mistakes with words of wisdom and also help those who are struggling with past traumas. What I have missed out on is never having had kids because I never felt the desire, but most of those around me did and I was a frequent babysitter in earlier years. For a time I was a volunteer for the Red Cross and have twice been a member of the Labour party, the first time in the 80s when I was still young. I joined the party when still aged only 17. My first serious girlfriend was German and I taught myself to speak the language, which is why I ended up travelling alone to Germany aged 17 to spend time with her and her family. I have also travelled to Egypt and seen the pyramids, Athens and the acropolis, Izmir in Turkey, Venice, and also Cyprus. I grew up in an owner occupied house, latterly in affluent suburbia, but my mum had to sell up when my dad died. I spent a decade or so living in insecure private rented accommodation including brief periods of crashing on friends' sofas so officially homeless. One night I had to sleep rough. But have spent most of the last quarter century living in a one bedroom social housing flat. My experience as a tenant - both private and social - has a big impact upon my views re housing. I could go on. Suffice it to say there are many things I have experienced and many things I have not. Same could be said of most people with a few decades behind them. But what the average 17 year old has is an almost natural ease when it comes to navigating the internet, having grown up with it and not had to learn it later in life. They are also coming of age in a society where their every error of judgement will be plastered all over the internet and remain there for all time. We never had to worry about that in our day. We never had to experience the consequences of that. Young people also have very recent experience of the education system as it is today which is rather more relevant than our experience of it many decades ago because so much has changed since then. Clearly, the average 17 year olds experience of the education system is far more relevant than ours. Because things change so much with the passage of time, there will always be areas where the experience of young people is more relevant than ours, because ours is outdated. We should listen to them and give them a say. Besides which, so what about experience. This forum itself produces clear evidence that experience does not always equate to intelligent thinking and sensible decision making. What matters to me is the cognitive ability to think things through rationally, and any intelligent 16 or 17 year old is capable of doing that. We all were when I and my peers were that age and I see zero reason to assume today's teenagers are any less intelligent. I didn't suggest that 'all' young people are uninterested in politics, however I have to say that in my experience young people are in the main, uninterested in politics. The young lady I mentioned previously claims to be pro EU, but you only have to chat with her for a couple of minutes to realise she doesn't know the first thing about the EU. The reason she claims to be pro EU is because she is influenced by her parents who I know well and are very pro EU. I'm sure no one will be surprised to hear that a young inexperienced person can be easily influenced, which is why in my opinion schoolchildren should not be given a vote. Fortunately for me I know nothing of domestic violence, although I did on occasion receive corporal punishment at school and I will be the first to say I deserved it. Teachers or at least headmasters should have the ability to administer corporal punishment to disruptive little gits who refuse to behave, in my experience, it works. When I was at school, senior school, no one ever got expelled or excluded as it's called today. If you committed an offence that was considered to be that serious you were caned and sent back to class. These days c3000 kids are permanently excluded from school every year. Progress? I think not. I wont go into my own childhood in any detail, not that there's anything to hide. Other than dad dying when we were young it was fairly unremarkable. Some people thought having no dad made us an easy target, they got that wrong. From an early age mum taught my brother and I to fight back and we did. We soon learned that bullies weren't interested in people who faught back. I also saw a bit of the world, I joined the army aged 17, that was the best decision of my life. At that time I never thought I'd stay in for 22 years and oddly enough I joined the Labour party during the early 80's. That raised a few eyebrows I can tell you lol. The army isn't (Or wasn't) the sort of environment that was particularly sympathetic towards the Labour party. Just goes to show how politically clueless I was, and I was. Some years ago, about 20 years ago actually, my wife and I did a CLAIT course at night school. (Computer Literacy and Information Technology) Every Tuesday & Thursday evening for six months. It was very informative, too informative. It taught us all sorts we didn't really need to know, suffice to say within a few months I'd forgotten most of it. Like language (I also used to speak passable German) use it or lose it. I'm no IT genius because I don't need to be, I know what I need to know. You claim there will always be areas where the experience of young people is more relevant than ours. That may be your experience, it's certainly not mine. I cant think of any circumstance in which a young persons experience is considered to be more relevant than the experience of someone older, someone with more experience. Kids should of course be listened to, they should be nurtured and encouraged cajoled even, but not mollycoddled or wrapped in cotton wool. They should be taught to be respectful polite and confident, and not to be frightened of failure. Failing is OK, giving up is not. In my opinion.
|
|
|
Post by andrewbrown on May 23, 2023 15:18:49 GMT
What did you make of the youth participation in the Scottish Referendum in 2014? I must admit, I'd never been in favour of lowering the voting age, but I changed my mind then. It was a breath of fresh air to have the youth in the discussion.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on May 23, 2023 21:10:49 GMT
You cite two young people you happen to know who have no interest in politics as if that is universal. By the time I was 17 I was deeply interested in politics and in my time campaigning locally in recent years - both inside and outside the Labour party - I have encountered plenty of young people who are passionate about politics. Like other age groups, some are interested in politics, some not. And if you think I have reached the age of 57 without gaining a lot of experience of life along the way, you must think I have lived my life in a monastery, lol. Nevertheless, at 17 I still knew enough and could think sensibly enough to vote had I had the vote. And generally it is the ones interested and knowledgeable about politics who are more likely to vote. The uninterested ones are much less likely to bother. Which goes for all age groups.. As for my own life experience, this includes a childhood in which domestic violence was a regular thing, schools that still empowered cane-wielding sadists, teenage youth training programs, working for a living in a variety of jobs, including in a garage, for the local council, as a landscape gardener, as a construction worker, and most recently in retail. I had periods of unemployment in the 80s and 90s, was on long term sick for a few years with depression and anxiety which I overcame so have experienced poor mental health in the past. And having found my dad dead in bed when I was 18 in what was a very hot summer, my early adulthood was scarred and, though it took years to realise, this damaged me. No one should see their dad like that when a few hours earlier he was alive and well aged only 39. I reacted badly and went off the rails for four or five years, dabbling heavily in drink and drugs. I sought help in the end and took action to sort myself out. These days I use such early experiences to talk to people I see making similar mistakes with words of wisdom and also help those who are struggling with past traumas. What I have missed out on is never having had kids because I never felt the desire, but most of those around me did and I was a frequent babysitter in earlier years. For a time I was a volunteer for the Red Cross and have twice been a member of the Labour party, the first time in the 80s when I was still young. I joined the party when still aged only 17. My first serious girlfriend was German and I taught myself to speak the language, which is why I ended up travelling alone to Germany aged 17 to spend time with her and her family. I have also travelled to Egypt and seen the pyramids, Athens and the acropolis, Izmir in Turkey, Venice, and also Cyprus. I grew up in an owner occupied house, latterly in affluent suburbia, but my mum had to sell up when my dad died. I spent a decade or so living in insecure private rented accommodation including brief periods of crashing on friends' sofas so officially homeless. One night I had to sleep rough. But have spent most of the last quarter century living in a one bedroom social housing flat. My experience as a tenant - both private and social - has a big impact upon my views re housing. I could go on. Suffice it to say there are many things I have experienced and many things I have not. Same could be said of most people with a few decades behind them. But what the average 17 year old has is an almost natural ease when it comes to navigating the internet, having grown up with it and not had to learn it later in life. They are also coming of age in a society where their every error of judgement will be plastered all over the internet and remain there for all time. We never had to worry about that in our day. We never had to experience the consequences of that. Young people also have very recent experience of the education system as it is today which is rather more relevant than our experience of it many decades ago because so much has changed since then. Clearly, the average 17 year olds experience of the education system is far more relevant than ours. Because things change so much with the passage of time, there will always be areas where the experience of young people is more relevant than ours, because ours is outdated. We should listen to them and give them a say. Besides which, so what about experience. This forum itself produces clear evidence that experience does not always equate to intelligent thinking and sensible decision making. What matters to me is the cognitive ability to think things through rationally, and any intelligent 16 or 17 year old is capable of doing that. We all were when I and my peers were that age and I see zero reason to assume today's teenagers are any less intelligent. I didn't suggest that 'all' young people are uninterested in politics, however I have to say that in my experience young people are in the main, uninterested in politics. The young lady I mentioned previously claims to be pro EU, but you only have to chat with her for a couple of minutes to realise she doesn't know the first thing about the EU. The reason she claims to be pro EU is because she is influenced by her parents who I know well and are very pro EU. I'm sure no one will be surprised to hear that a young inexperienced person can be easily influenced, which is why in my opinion schoolchildren should not be given a vote. Fortunately for me I know nothing of domestic violence, although I did on occasion receive corporal punishment at school and I will be the first to say I deserved it. Teachers or at least headmasters should have the ability to administer corporal punishment to disruptive little gits who refuse to behave, in my experience, it works. When I was at school, senior school, no one ever got expelled or excluded as it's called today. If you committed an offence that was considered to be that serious you were caned and sent back to class. These days c3000 kids are permanently excluded from school every year. Progress? I think not. I wont go into my own childhood in any detail, not that there's anything to hide. Other than dad dying when we were young it was fairly unremarkable. Some people thought having no dad made us an easy target, they got that wrong. From an early age mum taught my brother and I to fight back and we did. We soon learned that bullies weren't interested in people who faught back. I also saw a bit of the world, I joined the army aged 17, that was the best decision of my life. At that time I never thought I'd stay in for 22 years and oddly enough I joined the Labour party during the early 80's. That raised a few eyebrows I can tell you lol. The army isn't (Or wasn't) the sort of environment that was particularly sympathetic towards the Labour party. Just goes to show how politically clueless I was, and I was. Some years ago, about 20 years ago actually, my wife and I did a CLAIT course at night school. (Computer Literacy and Information Technology) Every Tuesday & Thursday evening for six months. It was very informative, too informative. It taught us all sorts we didn't really need to know, suffice to say within a few months I'd forgotten most of it. Like language (I also used to speak passable German) use it or lose it. I'm no IT genius because I don't need to be, I know what I need to know. You claim there will always be areas where the experience of young people is more relevant than ours. That may be your experience, it's certainly not mine. I cant think of any circumstance in which a young persons experience is considered to be more relevant than the experience of someone older, someone with more experience. Kids should of course be listened to, they should be nurtured and encouraged cajoled even, but not mollycoddled or wrapped in cotton wool. They should be taught to be respectful polite and confident, and not to be frightened of failure. Failing is OK, giving up is not. In my opinion. Thanks for your detailed and reasoned response. I feel that for once we are engaging with each other's thoughts and experiences rather than each other's politically motivate soundbites. But I have to be back in work in less than 11 hours during which I must find time to sleep, so lack the time for the response your post deserves. So a better response will have to wait until after work tomorrow.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on May 25, 2023 9:18:27 GMT
You cite two young people you happen to know who have no interest in politics as if that is universal. By the time I was 17 I was deeply interested in politics and in my time campaigning locally in recent years - both inside and outside the Labour party - I have encountered plenty of young people who are passionate about politics. Like other age groups, some are interested in politics, some not. And if you think I have reached the age of 57 without gaining a lot of experience of life along the way, you must think I have lived my life in a monastery, lol. Nevertheless, at 17 I still knew enough and could think sensibly enough to vote had I had the vote. And generally it is the ones interested and knowledgeable about politics who are more likely to vote. The uninterested ones are much less likely to bother. Which goes for all age groups.. As for my own life experience, this includes a childhood in which domestic violence was a regular thing, schools that still empowered cane-wielding sadists, teenage youth training programs, working for a living in a variety of jobs, including in a garage, for the local council, as a landscape gardener, as a construction worker, and most recently in retail. I had periods of unemployment in the 80s and 90s, was on long term sick for a few years with depression and anxiety which I overcame so have experienced poor mental health in the past. And having found my dad dead in bed when I was 18 in what was a very hot summer, my early adulthood was scarred and, though it took years to realise, this damaged me. No one should see their dad like that when a few hours earlier he was alive and well aged only 39. I reacted badly and went off the rails for four or five years, dabbling heavily in drink and drugs. I sought help in the end and took action to sort myself out. These days I use such early experiences to talk to people I see making similar mistakes with words of wisdom and also help those who are struggling with past traumas. What I have missed out on is never having had kids because I never felt the desire, but most of those around me did and I was a frequent babysitter in earlier years. For a time I was a volunteer for the Red Cross and have twice been a member of the Labour party, the first time in the 80s when I was still young. I joined the party when still aged only 17. My first serious girlfriend was German and I taught myself to speak the language, which is why I ended up travelling alone to Germany aged 17 to spend time with her and her family. I have also travelled to Egypt and seen the pyramids, Athens and the acropolis, Izmir in Turkey, Venice, and also Cyprus. I grew up in an owner occupied house, latterly in affluent suburbia, but my mum had to sell up when my dad died. I spent a decade or so living in insecure private rented accommodation including brief periods of crashing on friends' sofas so officially homeless. One night I had to sleep rough. But have spent most of the last quarter century living in a one bedroom social housing flat. My experience as a tenant - both private and social - has a big impact upon my views re housing. I could go on. Suffice it to say there are many things I have experienced and many things I have not. Same could be said of most people with a few decades behind them. But what the average 17 year old has is an almost natural ease when it comes to navigating the internet, having grown up with it and not had to learn it later in life. They are also coming of age in a society where their every error of judgement will be plastered all over the internet and remain there for all time. We never had to worry about that in our day. We never had to experience the consequences of that. Young people also have very recent experience of the education system as it is today which is rather more relevant than our experience of it many decades ago because so much has changed since then. Clearly, the average 17 year olds experience of the education system is far more relevant than ours. Because things change so much with the passage of time, there will always be areas where the experience of young people is more relevant than ours, because ours is outdated. We should listen to them and give them a say. Besides which, so what about experience. This forum itself produces clear evidence that experience does not always equate to intelligent thinking and sensible decision making. What matters to me is the cognitive ability to think things through rationally, and any intelligent 16 or 17 year old is capable of doing that. We all were when I and my peers were that age and I see zero reason to assume today's teenagers are any less intelligent. I didn't suggest that 'all' young people are uninterested in politics, however I have to say that in my experience young people are in the main, uninterested in politics. The young lady I mentioned previously claims to be pro EU, but you only have to chat with her for a couple of minutes to realise she doesn't know the first thing about the EU. The reason she claims to be pro EU is because she is influenced by her parents who I know well and are very pro EU. I'm sure no one will be surprised to hear that a young inexperienced person can be easily influenced, which is why in my opinion schoolchildren should not be given a vote. Fortunately for me I know nothing of domestic violence, although I did on occasion receive corporal punishment at school and I will be the first to say I deserved it. Teachers or at least headmasters should have the ability to administer corporal punishment to disruptive little gits who refuse to behave, in my experience, it works. When I was at school, senior school, no one ever got expelled or excluded as it's called today. If you committed an offence that was considered to be that serious you were caned and sent back to class. These days c3000 kids are permanently excluded from school every year. Progress? I think not. I wont go into my own childhood in any detail, not that there's anything to hide. Other than dad dying when we were young it was fairly unremarkable. Some people thought having no dad made us an easy target, they got that wrong. From an early age mum taught my brother and I to fight back and we did. We soon learned that bullies weren't interested in people who faught back. I also saw a bit of the world, I joined the army aged 17, that was the best decision of my life. At that time I never thought I'd stay in for 22 years and oddly enough I joined the Labour party during the early 80's. That raised a few eyebrows I can tell you lol. The army isn't (Or wasn't) the sort of environment that was particularly sympathetic towards the Labour party. Just goes to show how politically clueless I was, and I was. Some years ago, about 20 years ago actually, my wife and I did a CLAIT course at night school. (Computer Literacy and Information Technology) Every Tuesday & Thursday evening for six months. It was very informative, too informative. It taught us all sorts we didn't really need to know, suffice to say within a few months I'd forgotten most of it. Like language (I also used to speak passable German) use it or lose it. I'm no IT genius because I don't need to be, I know what I need to know. You claim there will always be areas where the experience of young people is more relevant than ours. That may be your experience, it's certainly not mine. I cant think of any circumstance in which a young persons experience is considered to be more relevant than the experience of someone older, someone with more experience. Kids should of course be listened to, they should be nurtured and encouraged cajoled even, but not mollycoddled or wrapped in cotton wool. They should be taught to be respectful polite and confident, and not to be frightened of failure. Failing is OK, giving up is not. In my opinion. I will try and respond to all this respectfully. It has always been the case that many young people are influenced by the opinions of their parents. And as they go through life these are modified in response to their own experiences and thought processes. But it is not always the case that young people blindly follow their parents. My dad for example was a typical working class Tory who read the Daily Mail and always voted conservative. He was also sadly a racist bigot. In all this his views were very similar to those of his parents so he might have been one of the ones influenced heavily by his parents, but if so it was lifelong in his case. In the last year or two of his life we had frequent disagreements about politics because my left leaning views formed very quickly, reinforced by what I was seeing all around me. This was the period from about 1981 to 1983. By the time I was 17 I was reading books by people like Tony Benn and joined the Labour party. My dad much took the piss when the 83 election was called for a date two weeks before my 18th birthday so I could not vote in it (incidentally a personal experience that has fuelled my belief in the desirability of lowering the voting age). And yet my dad upon returning from the polling station said that for the first time ever in his life he voted Labour because he decided to cast a vote for me rather than himself. I respected him for that. The Tory candidate still won though, lol. A month later my dad was dead. Unlike you I have no experience of serving in the armed forces, though a nephew of mine is in the army. This latter fact does mean that I do still have some emotional investment in the wellbeing of servicemen and the desire not to risk their lives for bad causes. And yes the army is still not somewhere where left wing views are widespread. My nephew who very much leans left tends not to talk about politics much with his comrades in arms. It is interesting to note that you yourself joined the Labour party in the 80s just like me. But whereas my politics and values remain broadly the same, having been reinforced by my life long experiences, yours have moved in a very different direction, so much so that you utterly reject what you might have thought back then. And herein lies a key experience-based reason for our differences of opinion re the enfranchisement of 16 and 17 year olds. Naturally we tend to think that whatever we think now is sensible. If we didn't we wouldn't think it. But because your life experiences have tended to move you to a very different place politically, you are inclined to view your younger self as a political idiot, naïve, not having a clue, etc. But because my life experiences have tended to confirm and reinforce what I thought back then, I tend to see my younger self as a politically rather sensible young chap. In short, because I see my youthful self as politically sensible, I am more temperamentally inclined to want to give the vote to other young people today. Because you see your youthful self as a political idiot you are temperamentally inclined not to want to trust other young people today with the vote. Without trying to say who is right or wrong, with thoughts based upon what we have shared with each other, it is possible to discern how our own life experiences and political trajectories have led us to hold opposing views re the enfranchisement of 16 and 17 year olds.
|
|
|
Post by Pacifico on May 25, 2023 10:52:44 GMT
You just said you wanted to vote for Michael Foot - does not compute.
|
|
|
Post by Tinculin on May 26, 2023 9:23:26 GMT
While I am concerned about uncontrolled migration, it would seem that it's impossible to stop.
The Tories have demonstrated a complete inability to get control of the situation and Labour says they're not going to stop it, and in fact, encourage it.
Both parties net the same result, continued increased migration.
So therefore, until the Tories can actually demonstrate they can curb immigration on a meaningful scale (and by that, I mean control illegal immigration), I see this as a none story.
|
|
|
Post by Fairsociety on May 26, 2023 9:42:30 GMT
While I am concerned about uncontrolled migration, it would seem that it's impossible to stop. The Tories have demonstrated a complete inability to get control of the situation and Labour says they're not going to stop it, and in fact, encourage it. Both parties net the same result, continued increased migration. So therefore, until the Tories can actually demonstrate they can curb immigration on a meaningful scale (and by that, I mean control illegal immigration), I see this as a none story. The problem is France, our border control should be able to stop these migrants in the channel as they approach UK waters and hand them back to the French, it's a farce that the illegal migrants are dictating the terms by refusing to be rescued by French border patrols, they shouldn't have a say in the matter.
|
|
|
Post by Bentley on May 26, 2023 9:49:21 GMT
If international laws and agreements are loading against the interests of the UK then why should we be obliged to submit to those laws and agreements ? We should be able to identify uncontrolled immigration as an existential threat to the UK and take the appropriate action to solve the problem .
|
|
|
Post by Tinculin on May 26, 2023 10:08:36 GMT
While I am concerned about uncontrolled migration, it would seem that it's impossible to stop. The Tories have demonstrated a complete inability to get control of the situation and Labour says they're not going to stop it, and in fact, encourage it. Both parties net the same result, continued increased migration. So therefore, until the Tories can actually demonstrate they can curb immigration on a meaningful scale (and by that, I mean control illegal immigration), I see this as a none story. The problem is France, our border control should be able to stop these migrants in the channel as they approach UK waters and hand them back to the French, it's a farce that the illegal migrants are dictating the terms by refusing to be rescued by French border patrols, they shouldn't have a say in the matter. I disagree, The problem is that we can't control our own borders, that isn't France's problem. That is ours. In fact, that we're incapable of making decisions to do so, actually helps France. If you want to do anything serious about immigration then we need to empower the authorities to do it and toughen up and do what needs to be done. Otherwise it's stupid arguments like today's headlines whinging about universities bringing in students rather than actually tackling the elephant in the room.
|
|