|
Post by see2 on May 17, 2023 21:22:58 GMT
Ha ha ha, Typical right-wing denigration you guys have nothing without it. Oh the irony ā¤ļø There you go, no answers.
|
|
|
Post by Bentley on May 17, 2023 21:39:36 GMT
There you go, no answers. Lol. Oh the irony no 2 š
|
|
|
Post by Pacifico on May 17, 2023 21:58:18 GMT
They are not paying Ā£1400 for the right to vote - they are paying Ā£1400 for a British Passport. If you permanently migrate to another country why wouldn't you want to become a citizen of that country? You would be better asking them rather than insinuating you know something others don't know. If you live somewhere for 30 years and yet still dont wish to become a citizen of the country why would you expect to take part in their political process?
|
|
|
Post by see2 on May 17, 2023 21:59:32 GMT
There you go, no answers. Lol. Oh the irony no 2 š OK, so you are back in the schoolyard, Bye
|
|
|
Post by see2 on May 17, 2023 22:00:37 GMT
You would be better asking them rather than insinuating you know something others don't know. If you live somewhere for 30 years and yet still dont wish to become a citizen of the country why would you expect to take part in their political process? Why are you asking me?
|
|
|
Post by Bentley on May 17, 2023 22:04:47 GMT
Lol. Oh the irony no 2 š OK, so you are back in the schoolyard, Bye Only because you took us there š
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on May 18, 2023 6:37:10 GMT
Bollocks. Shelling out large sums of money is not a reasonable determinant of commitment. After all it represents very little genuine commitment to a rich man. Actually living here and working here and raising a family here shows far more commitment to the UK. And is not something that mere money can demonstrate. But do carry on talking shit. It gives me something to laugh at. Hahaha Bollocks. Shelling out large sums of money can be a reasonable measure of commitment . If you are too stupid to realise that a large some of money represents a totally different level of commitment to different income levels then thats your problem. If voted have to be bought then obviously thats a lot easier for richer people for whom it it represents very little commitment at all. Residency here is the commitment that should matter.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on May 18, 2023 6:42:53 GMT
Absolute nonsense. It is far more likely that they are not prepared to pay Ā£1400 for the right to vote. And why would they? How many of the rest of us would pay that for the right to vote? Vanishingly few I suspect. The right to vote should be determined by residency not money nor citizenship if acquiring the latter costs a lot of money They are not paying Ā£1400 for the right to vote - they are paying Ā£1400 for a British Passport. If you permanently migrate to another country why wouldn't you want to become a citizen of that country? It is the cost involved which is a lot of money to some people. If I emigrated to Australia but was not living on a massive income there I would be reluctant to shell out a large sum to become an Australian citizen. And the fact is if you cannot vote here without citizenship, you ARE de facto having to pay Ā£1400 for the right to vote. Which is neither fair nor democratic because buying the right to vote is easier for some than for others. But that's the way you like it for largely partisan reasons isn't it? After all the wealthier someone is the more likely they are to vote conservative. So in essence the more likely they are to vote conservative the easier it is for them to buy the right to vote. Which leaves you nowhere near the moral high ground when it comes to opposing the extension of the vote to all nationals living here, not just those who can afford to easily buy citizenship out of their pocket money
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on May 18, 2023 6:45:57 GMT
Lol. Oh the irony no 2 š OK, so you are back in the schoolyard, Bye He thinks repeating such idiotic inanities like a 6 year old when his intellect does not extend to any more intelligent response, serves some kind of clever purpose. When in fact it shows him up to be just a bit thick and childish.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on May 18, 2023 9:02:47 GMT
Pensioners have more impact on the economy than 16-17 year olds as they spend more due to having both private and state pensions. 16-17 year olds though having jobs normally live at home with less disposable income. In other words a large part of pensioners' incomes is funded by working people's taxes, including those of working 16 and 17 year olds. And 16 and 17 year olds are far more likely to be working than most pensioners and have an obviously much larger personal stake in the future than pensioners. So a silly point that was already pointless before you made it because no one here has said pensioners should not have the vote. But 16 and 17 year olds contribute more than pensioners, cost the NHS far less, and take far less than pensioners in handouts simply because they dont get taxpayer funded pensions and do often still live at home. So they ought to have the right to vote too.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on May 18, 2023 9:31:49 GMT
One thing this thread has proven. All you old farts whether motivated by fear or condescension are really triggered by this one. You are swarming into this thread as a pack. Any time I can spare usually results in me being trolled and insulted and occasionally even intelligently debated with by four or five of you at once. Keeps me occupied though whilst I can be bothered. Yet most of you cannot put a decent argument together nor in some cases even understand opposing views. Same for foreign residents having the vote. You all seem to be stating the opinion that none of them should have the vote - unless they can afford Ā£1400 in the case of foreigners - without coming up with any good reasons why that should be so, and without any apparent ability to counter opposing arguments other than by trolling or throwing insults.
And quite obviously most of it is motivated by a fear that foreign residents might be too pro EU and 16 and 17 year olds might be too left wing. You are afraid of them having the vote because of fear they might not vote the way you want them to. In essence your motivation is one of voter suppression by denial of the franchise to groups you think might not vote the way you want them to. And you do it my emoting rather than thinking in most cases it seems.
Beyond saying this, there is little point in engaging with you further. Everything that can be said already has been and there is no point in saying it all over again. Those of you who are too thick to understand opposing arguments will remain too thick to understand opposing arguments. Those who have no better arguments than trolling or throwing insults will continue doing so because it is all you have left. All of you, almost invariably elderly right wingers, will always hate the idea even if you have no good arguments against it. And of course many of you will assume you speak for the nation at large. You always do because of the echo chambers you inhabit. I doubt whether any of you have ever canvassed the views of the public on the doorstep outside your own bubbles.
Trying to change the minds of a negatively emoting and fearful bunch of stick in the mud right wing pensioners is a bigger waste of time than shoving my head up Bentleys arse in search of his brain. I only bother because it is fun and some of you are unintentionally funny in your stupidity. But the point is arriving where I am growing more bored than amused or otherwise entertained by this topic.
So you can all start emoting in agreement with each other, spouting ill-thought out nonsense and saying "indeed" to whatever the last lot of bollocks spouted was. Because I am frankly bored now. Though I may look in from time to time when I fancy a laugh and perhaps occasionally to take the piss, lol
|
|
|
Post by Vinny on May 18, 2023 9:39:25 GMT
If you're going to call someone stupid, at least spell it right.
|
|
|
Post by Bentley on May 18, 2023 9:40:00 GMT
Bollocks. Shelling out large sums of money can be a reasonable measure of commitment . If you are too spupid to realise that a large some of money represents a totally different level of commitment to different income levels then thats your problem. If voted have to be bought then obviously thats a lot easier for richer people for whom it it represents very little commitment at all. Residency here is the commitment that should matter. No but you are stupid enough to insist that there should be no financial commitment to become a UK citizen on the grounds that rich people exist. Turn off the shoulder chip and you might stop embarrassing yourself .
|
|
|
Post by Bentley on May 18, 2023 9:41:15 GMT
OK, so you are back in the schoolyard, Bye He thinks repeating such idiotic inanities like a 6 year old when his intellect does not extend to any more intelligent response, serves some kind of clever purpose. When in fact it shows him up to be just a bit thick and childish. You and see2 must have been separated at birth lš
|
|
|
Post by Vinny on May 18, 2023 9:43:12 GMT
Citizenship is not just the right to vote. It's the right to consular protection. It's the right to never have to pay for another visa, in other words, permanent right of residency. Visas cost hundreds of pounds. Some visas cost over Ā£1400.
This is a one off payment offering permanent rights.
|
|