Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on May 16, 2023 10:10:04 GMT
I'm referring to the time you sneeringly posted pictures of a mass hanging of Jewish concentration camp prisoners. I don't have such pictures, and never have. What disgraceful and shameless lies this Darling posts. |
|
|
|
Post by Einhorn on May 16, 2023 10:10:55 GMT
I don't have such pictures, and never have. What a disgraceful and shameless lies this Darling posts. Let's hear Danny deny it first. The pictures were removed by a mod. That mod is active on this site. Danny said that there would be a 'Day of the Rope' when quislings like me would be hanged. He then posted pictures of mass hangings of 'k*kes' in a concentration camp. |
|
|
|
Post by Dan Dare on May 16, 2023 10:21:59 GMT
Can you provide a link to such a post? Or is it like your story about British operatives being instructed to mutilate German occupiers a figment of your febrile imagination and so just as ephemeral? No, I can't. Do you deny posting pictures of mass hangings of Jews. You referred to them as k*kes. Yes I deny it. The honourable thing to do now would be to retract your aspersions since you can't provide any evidence to support them. |
|
|
|
Post by Einhorn on May 16, 2023 10:23:29 GMT
No, I can't. Do you deny posting pictures of mass hangings of Jews. You referred to them as k*kes. Yes I deny it. The honourable thing to do now would be to retract your aspersions since you can't provide any evidence to support them. No, let's involve Carty and Lewis. One of them removed your pictures. They were so disgusting, it's likely they won't have forgotten them. |
|
|
|
Post by Dan Dare on May 16, 2023 10:30:12 GMT
Go ahead, suit yourself. The only picture of a mass hanging I have ever posted on any site is the one linked above, and that depicts a mass execution of partisans on the Eastern front, not Jews in a concentration camp. In fact I'm unaware of any instances of the latter and have certainly never seen any photographs of such.
It is a disturbing picture I agree, but it is a historical artifact from the German Bundesarchiv which appears still today on Wikipedia.
|
|
|
|
Post by Einhorn on May 16, 2023 10:33:00 GMT
Go ahead, suit yourself. The only picture of a mass hanging I have ever posted on any site is the one linked above, and that depicts a mass execution of partisans on the Eastern front, not Jews in a concentration camp. In fact I'm unaware of any instances of the latter and have certainly never seen any photographs of such. It is a disturbing picture I agree, but it is a historical artifact from the German Bundesarchiv which appears still today on Wikipedia. Wrong. You gloated about a 'Day of the Rope' when all quislings would be hanged, and accompanied your post with a large picture of murdered Jews (whom you referred to as k*kes earlier in the thread). |
|
|
|
Post by Einhorn on May 16, 2023 11:25:21 GMT
Notwithstanding the fact that much of what you say has legs but in the same period you refer to vast UK sewage and clean drinking water schemes were put in place, public health was placed high on the agenda with hospitals and sanitoriums being built, easy transport for the working man was enabled by parliament and prison reform was well under way. This is my point you are selectively choosing the bad with no mitigation as regards the good. Clean water and medical facilities were also provided to British POWs in Japanese prisoner of war camps. Like Britain's elite, the Japanese also understood that it is very difficult to exploit the labour of a corpse. Transport was primarily for the financial benefit of the merchant classes who were exploiting the labour of the working classes. |
|
|
|
Post by Pacifico on May 16, 2023 11:46:52 GMT
There are levels of civilisation - what the British brought was better than what they had before. Okay, let's agree that the Indians were gifted with a low-level shitty form of civilisation that neither benefitted them nor the ordinary British person (who was working in shitty conditions and then going home to his slum tenement to live in a single room with 9 other people). Was the average Indian better off after the British left than they were before the British arrived? - yes. So everyone benefited from the civilisation that the Empire brought.. |
|
|
|
Post by Einhorn on May 16, 2023 11:48:15 GMT
Okay, let's agree that the Indians were gifted with a low-level shitty form of civilisation that neither benefitted them nor the ordinary British person (who was working in shitty conditions and then going home to his slum tenement to live in a single room with 9 other people). Was the average Indian better off after the British left than they were before the British arrived? - yes. So everyone benefited from the civilisation that the Empire brought.. Yep, and Fred West was better than Harold Shipman. Whoppee do! |
|
|
|
Post by sandypine on May 16, 2023 11:58:16 GMT
Notwithstanding the fact that much of what you say has legs but in the same period you refer to vast UK sewage and clean drinking water schemes were put in place, public health was placed high on the agenda with hospitals and sanitoriums being built, easy transport for the working man was enabled by parliament and prison reform was well under way. This is my point you are selectively choosing the bad with no mitigation as regards the good. Clean water and medical facilities were also provided to British POWs in Japanese prisoner of war camps. Like Britain's elite, the Japanese also understood that it is very difficult to exploit the labour of a corpse. Transport was primarily for the financial benefit of the merchant classes who were exploiting the labour of the working classes. They had managed to exploit the Labour of many potential corpses up to the mid 19th century without any problems. Why the sudden dash for care and concern when the lack of it had worked wonders before. Primarily maybe, that does not remove the fact it was a benefit to others as the exodus from the cities at Bank Holidays and Fair weeks shows clearly. |
|
|
|
Post by Einhorn on May 16, 2023 12:01:18 GMT
Clean water and medical facilities were also provided to British POWs in Japanese prisoner of war camps. Like Britain's elite, the Japanese also understood that it is very difficult to exploit the labour of a corpse. Transport was primarily for the financial benefit of the merchant classes who were exploiting the labour of the working classes. They had managed to exploit the Labour of many potential corpses up to the mid 19th century without any problems. Why the sudden dash for care and concern when the lack of it had worked wonders before. Primarily maybe, that does not remove the fact it was a benefit to others as the exodus from the cities at Bank Holidays and Fair weeks shows clearly. You tell me. The government in the mid-19th century practiced a policy of laissez-faire. If the factories could have made their workers more productive before that time, they would have. It's simply naive to think otherwise. |
|
|
|
Post by sandypine on May 16, 2023 12:01:34 GMT
Was the average Indian better off after the British left than they were before the British arrived? - yes. So everyone benefited from the civilisation that the Empire brought.. Yep, and Fred West was better than Harold Shipman. Whoppee do! However you are comparing two bad things whereas all we are concerned with is a comparison of before and after. Was the Empire beneficial overall to the ordinary Indian and it seems to have been positive overall. Whereas Shipman and West were not beneficial to anyone. |
|
|
|
Post by Pacifico on May 16, 2023 12:01:36 GMT
Was the average Indian better off after the British left than they were before the British arrived? - yes. So everyone benefited from the civilisation that the Empire brought.. Yep, and Fred West was better than Harold Shipman. Whoppee do! Progress is all that matters - you cannot create a paradise overnight. |
|
|
|
Post by sandypine on May 16, 2023 12:04:07 GMT
They had managed to exploit the Labour of many potential corpses up to the mid 19th century without any problems. Why the sudden dash for care and concern when the lack of it had worked wonders before. Primarily maybe, that does not remove the fact it was a benefit to others as the exodus from the cities at Bank Holidays and Fair weeks shows clearly. You tell me. The government in the mid-19th century practiced a policy of laissez-faire. If the factories could have made their workers more productive before that time, they would have. It's simply naive to think otherwise. No it is naive to believe that the only reason good things happened was because it was an advantage to 'the elite' in some direct or indirect way. Life and the universe is far more complicated than your simple take on cause and effect. |
|
|
|
Post by Einhorn on May 16, 2023 12:06:42 GMT
You tell me. The government in the mid-19th century practiced a policy of laissez-faire. If the factories could have made their workers more productive before that time, they would have. It's simply naive to think otherwise. No it is naive to believe that the only reason good things happened was because it was an advantage to 'the elite' in some direct or indirect way. Life and the universe is far more complicated than your simple take on cause and effect. If helping the poor and needy was at the front of the government's mind, more than a million of its citizens wouldn't have died from starvation. |
|
