|
|
Post by sheepy on May 13, 2023 8:43:50 GMT
While traditional notions of sex and gender suggest a simple binary – if you are born with a penis, you are male and identify as a man and if you are born with a vagina, you are female and identify as a woman – the reality, gender experts say, is more complex. "There isn't one single 'biological' answer to the definition of a woman. There's not even a singular biological answer to the question of 'what is a female,'" Jordan-Young said. There are at least six different biological markers of “sex” in the body: genitals, chromosomes, gonads, internal reproductive structures, hormone ratios and secondary sex characteristics. None of the six is strictly dichotomous, Jordan-Young said, and the different markers don’t always align. Sarah Richardson, a Harvard scholar, historian and philosopher of biology who focuses on the sciences of sex and gender and their policy dimensions, said Jackson's answer accurately reflects legal practice. While U.S. law remains an unsettled arena for the conceptualization and definition of sex, it frequently grounds sex categorization in biological evidence and reasoning. But like Jordan-Young, Richardson emphasized that biology does not offer a simple or singular answer to the question of what defines a woman. Do you have a hat? Now you're sounding like a boffin RR. 😉 I'm sure there's some guy on You tube who can give you the proper answers. Well there you are you see, one cannot question the unquestionable right of the boffin. Although he obviously isn't anything like a boffin. |
|
|
|
Post by jonksy on May 13, 2023 9:20:50 GMT
Wasn't it dead nag that stated some so called experts could not define a woman when he was defending the loser starmer? Funny how he could not name one of his mythical experts tho. While traditional notions of sex and gender suggest a simple binary – if you are born with a penis, you are male and identify as a man and if you are born with a vagina, you are female and identify as a woman – the reality, gender experts say, is more complex. "There isn't one single 'biological' answer to the definition of a woman. There's not even a singular biological answer to the question of 'what is a female,'" Jordan-Young said. There are at least six different biological markers of “sex” in the body: genitals, chromosomes, gonads, internal reproductive structures, hormone ratios and secondary sex characteristics. None of the six is strictly dichotomous, Jordan-Young said, and the different markers don’t always align. Sarah Richardson, a Harvard scholar, historian and philosopher of biology who focuses on the sciences of sex and gender and their policy dimensions, said Jackson's answer accurately reflects legal practice. While U.S. law remains an unsettled arena for the conceptualization and definition of sex, it frequently grounds sex categorization in biological evidence and reasoning. But like Jordan-Young, Richardson emphasized that biology does not offer a simple or singular answer to the question of what defines a woman. Do you have a hat? So in other words your so called experts are talking total bollocks then dead nag. It don't take no experts to define a biological fact. |
|
|
|
Post by zanygame on May 13, 2023 9:54:11 GMT
While traditional notions of sex and gender suggest a simple binary – if you are born with a penis, you are male and identify as a man and if you are born with a vagina, you are female and identify as a woman – the reality, gender experts say, is more complex. "There isn't one single 'biological' answer to the definition of a woman. There's not even a singular biological answer to the question of 'what is a female,'" Jordan-Young said. There are at least six different biological markers of “sex” in the body: genitals, chromosomes, gonads, internal reproductive structures, hormone ratios and secondary sex characteristics. None of the six is strictly dichotomous, Jordan-Young said, and the different markers don’t always align. Sarah Richardson, a Harvard scholar, historian and philosopher of biology who focuses on the sciences of sex and gender and their policy dimensions, said Jackson's answer accurately reflects legal practice. While U.S. law remains an unsettled arena for the conceptualization and definition of sex, it frequently grounds sex categorization in biological evidence and reasoning. But like Jordan-Young, Richardson emphasized that biology does not offer a simple or singular answer to the question of what defines a woman. Do you have a hat? So in other words your so called experts are talking total bollocks then dead nag. It don't take no experts to define a biological fact. "It don't take no experts" 🤣 Which means. "It does take some experts" It don't take no experts That should be you signature. |
|
|
|
Post by Pacifico on May 13, 2023 10:44:16 GMT
Wasn't it dead nag that stated some so called experts could not define a woman when he was defending the loser starmer? Funny how he could not name one of his mythical experts tho. While traditional notions of sex and gender suggest a simple binary – if you are born with a penis, you are male and identify as a man and if you are born with a vagina, you are female and identify as a woman – the reality, gender experts say, is more complex. "There isn't one single 'biological' answer to the definition of a woman. There's not even a singular biological answer to the question of 'what is a female,'" Jordan-Young said. There are at least six different biological markers of “sex” in the body: genitals, chromosomes, gonads, internal reproductive structures, hormone ratios and secondary sex characteristics. None of the six is strictly dichotomous, Jordan-Young said, and the different markers don’t always align. Sarah Richardson, a Harvard scholar, historian and philosopher of biology who focuses on the sciences of sex and gender and their policy dimensions, said Jackson's answer accurately reflects legal practice. While U.S. law remains an unsettled arena for the conceptualization and definition of sex, it frequently grounds sex categorization in biological evidence and reasoning. But like Jordan-Young, Richardson emphasized that biology does not offer a simple or singular answer to the question of what defines a woman. Do you have a hat? If you are going to cut & paste something out fo USA Today its polite to give a link. And as for the 'experts' named in that piece - Rebecca Jordan-Young got her degree from Barnard College where she majored in Political Science. Barnard is a girls Liberal Arts College which happens to be where my cousins kid went - and lets just say that MIT it is not..  |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on May 13, 2023 11:03:18 GMT
While traditional notions of sex and gender suggest a simple binary – if you are born with a penis, you are male and identify as a man and if you are born with a vagina, you are female and identify as a woman – the reality, gender experts say, is more complex. "There isn't one single 'biological' answer to the definition of a woman. There's not even a singular biological answer to the question of 'what is a female,'" Jordan-Young said. There are at least six different biological markers of “sex” in the body: genitals, chromosomes, gonads, internal reproductive structures, hormone ratios and secondary sex characteristics. None of the six is strictly dichotomous, Jordan-Young said, and the different markers don’t always align. Sarah Richardson, a Harvard scholar, historian and philosopher of biology who focuses on the sciences of sex and gender and their policy dimensions, said Jackson's answer accurately reflects legal practice. While U.S. law remains an unsettled arena for the conceptualization and definition of sex, it frequently grounds sex categorization in biological evidence and reasoning. But like Jordan-Young, Richardson emphasized that biology does not offer a simple or singular answer to the question of what defines a woman. Do you have a hat? So in other words your so called experts are talking total bollocks then dead nag. It don't take no experts to define a biological fact. Knee and earth al. |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on May 13, 2023 11:04:53 GMT
While traditional notions of sex and gender suggest a simple binary – if you are born with a penis, you are male and identify as a man and if you are born with a vagina, you are female and identify as a woman – the reality, gender experts say, is more complex. "There isn't one single 'biological' answer to the definition of a woman. There's not even a singular biological answer to the question of 'what is a female,'" Jordan-Young said. There are at least six different biological markers of “sex” in the body: genitals, chromosomes, gonads, internal reproductive structures, hormone ratios and secondary sex characteristics. None of the six is strictly dichotomous, Jordan-Young said, and the different markers don’t always align. Sarah Richardson, a Harvard scholar, historian and philosopher of biology who focuses on the sciences of sex and gender and their policy dimensions, said Jackson's answer accurately reflects legal practice. While U.S. law remains an unsettled arena for the conceptualization and definition of sex, it frequently grounds sex categorization in biological evidence and reasoning. But like Jordan-Young, Richardson emphasized that biology does not offer a simple or singular answer to the question of what defines a woman. Do you have a hat? If you are going to cut & paste something out fo USA Today its polite to give a link. And as for the 'experts' named in that piece - Rebecca Jordan-Young got her degree from Barnard College where she majored in Political Science. Barnard is a girls Liberal Arts College which happens to be where my cousins kid went - and lets just say that MIT it is not.. I seem to have difficulty linking for some reason it never seems to work, so sorry all the same. It does not matter who says it if the scientific facts are correct. |
|
|
|
Post by jonksy on May 13, 2023 11:17:28 GMT
So in other words your so called experts are talking total bollocks then dead nag. It don't take no experts to define a biological fact. "It don't take no experts" 🤣 Which means. "It does take some experts" It don't take no experts That should be you signature. There are no experts. Just the usual woke brigade who couldn't find their own arsehole if they had a map. |
|
|
|
Post by jonksy on May 13, 2023 11:18:41 GMT
So in other words your so called experts are talking total bollocks then dead nag. It don't take no experts to define a biological fact. Knee and earth al. Quote and bollocks you mean dead nag. |
|
|
|
Post by andrewbrown on May 13, 2023 11:24:45 GMT
Wasn't it dead nag that stated some so called experts could not define a woman when he was defending the loser starmer? Funny how he could not name one of his mythical experts tho. While traditional notions of sex and gender suggest a simple binary – if you are born with a penis, you are male and identify as a man and if you are born with a vagina, you are female and identify as a woman – the reality, gender experts say, is more complex. "There isn't one single 'biological' answer to the definition of a woman. There's not even a singular biological answer to the question of 'what is a female,'" Jordan-Young said. There are at least six different biological markers of “sex” in the body: genitals, chromosomes, gonads, internal reproductive structures, hormone ratios and secondary sex characteristics. None of the six is strictly dichotomous, Jordan-Young said, and the different markers don’t always align. Sarah Richardson, a Harvard scholar, historian and philosopher of biology who focuses on the sciences of sex and gender and their policy dimensions, said Jackson's answer accurately reflects legal practice. While U.S. law remains an unsettled arena for the conceptualization and definition of sex, it frequently grounds sex categorization in biological evidence and reasoning. But like Jordan-Young, Richardson emphasized that biology does not offer a simple or singular answer to the question of what defines a woman. Do you have a hat? I'm afraid there's a lot of people on this forum who can't do anything other than binary. And if something doesn’t fit that model then they rant against it. Hence words like "leftie", "woke" and "Remnant" are littered throughout pretty much every thread on here. They are still not coming to terms with the fact that leave / remain was not a left / right issue and pushed UK politics in to 3d. The idea that the difference between genders has nuances is alien to their thinking ability so will just generate the above words without much thought. Awaiting in 3, 2, 1... |
|
|
|
Post by zanygame on May 13, 2023 12:07:36 GMT
"It don't take no experts" 🤣 Which means. "It does take some experts" It don't take no experts That should be you signature. There are no experts. Just the usual woke brigade who couldn't find their own arsehole if they had a map. Arseholes are not marked on maps to protect your anonymity. |
|
|
|
Post by Orac on May 13, 2023 12:16:57 GMT
Wasn't it dead nag that stated some so called experts could not define a woman when he was defending the loser starmer? Funny how he could not name one of his mythical experts tho. While traditional notions of sex and gender suggest a simple binary – Biology suggests a binary. The biological system known as 'sex' employs two variants (male and female). Tradition in many cases tracks some reality or other. |
|
|
|
Post by zanygame on May 13, 2023 12:25:31 GMT
While traditional notions of sex and gender suggest a simple binary – Biology suggests a binary. The biological system known as 'sex' employs two variants (male and female). Tradition in many cases tracks some reality or other. But sometimes the biology does not match the brain or the hormones. |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on May 13, 2023 12:28:53 GMT
"It don't take no experts" 🤣 Which means. "It does take some experts" It don't take no experts That should be you signature. There are no experts. Just the usual woke brigade who couldn't find their own arsehole if they had a map. Is it only 'people' that disagree with your narrow outlook that are 'woke'. In general the question is simple in reality it is much more complicated.😒 |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on May 13, 2023 12:32:14 GMT
While traditional notions of sex and gender suggest a simple binary – Biology suggests a binary. The biological system known as 'sex' employs two variants (male and female). Tradition in many cases tracks some reality or other. Are you saying definitively that no female has been born with some male 'parts'? Are you saying definitively that no male has been born with some female 'parts'? |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on May 13, 2023 12:33:25 GMT
So in other words your so called experts are talking total bollocks then dead nag. It don't take no experts to define a biological fact. Are you saying definitively that no female has been born with some male 'parts'? Are you saying definitively that no male has been born with some female 'parts'? |
|
