|
|
Post by piglet on May 12, 2023 12:48:04 GMT
Counting white faces is ok, as long as we can count black. The Tories are outrageously black. Strangely Labour are not, that makes them racist according to the way black people measure racism.
|
|
|
|
Post by steppenwolf on May 12, 2023 13:03:09 GMT
Badoch is a black anti woke MP married to a white man. I like her. The bottom line is that she announced a policy (that broke a promise that Sunak made) in the Press rather than Parliament - which pissed off the Speaker. She was then incredibly dismissive in her apology to the Speaker when she was called to the house for an urgent question to explain herself. She has basically failed to get the Blob to do what the PM promised and she can't be arsed to put any pressure on them. She then managed to insult the Opposition, which is fair enough, but also most of the Tory party in various ways. That's quite an achievement. I've been reading various stories about Badenoch. She does seem to be one of these arrogant and entitled Blacks who think they're untouchable. She doesn't turn up to meetings on time, doesn't do her homework and is condescending an rude to people. She's not going to get anywhere with this attitude. |
|
|
|
Post by Bentley on May 12, 2023 13:06:10 GMT
Badoch is a black anti woke MP married to a white man. I like her. The bottom line is that she announced a policy (that broke a promise that Sunak made) in the Press rather than Parliament - which pissed off the Speaker. She was then incredibly dismissive in her apology to the Speaker when she was called to the house for an urgent question to explain herself. She has basically failed to get the Blob to do what the PM promised and she can't be arsed to put any pressure on them. She then managed to insult the Opposition, which is fair enough, but also most of the Tory party in various ways. That's quite an achievement. I've been reading various stories about Badenoch. She does seem to be one of these arrogant and entitled Blacks who think they're untouchable. She doesn't turn up to meetings on time, doesn't do her homework and is condescending an rude to people. She's not going to get anywhere with this attitude. Arrogant and entitled blacks , arrogant and entitled Asians , arrogant and entitled whites. There seems to be a pattern here . |
|
|
|
Post by bancroft on May 12, 2023 13:31:10 GMT
|
|
|
|
Post by patman post on May 12, 2023 13:34:52 GMT
Some folks do make me laugh Firstly, we have a society where black or Asian people cannot get decent jobs, or promotions, or decent housing. Then we progress into the 1960s and in order to address the prejudice which was widespread, we introduce The Race Relations Act. Things improve, but not enough, theres still widespread discrimination, virtually no black police officers, and we still only associate black people with hospital cleaners ( the female ones can be nurses ), bus drivers or tube workers. No one associates black people with been a judge, an MP, lawyer or a TV presenter. The 1970s arrive, the National Front, send them home, Britain is a "white country", but never the less things do improve with another Race Relations Bill. The 1980s, horrific and widespread discrimination by our police forces, particularly The Met, who still have very few black or Asian officers. discrimination in areas of employment, Thatchers policies, poor housing, poverty and police harassment erupts into riots. Several inquiries make it plain ... society has to change, and the Metropolitan Police are "Institutionally Racist". And people wonder why Positive Discrimination was ever introduced ? It was introduced to put many wrongs .. right, and once society has changed enough, and balance resembles society, then positive discrimination can be abandoned. I don't agree that affirmative action/positive discrimination is the answer.
What's required are ways of ensuring fair and equal treatment for everyone. And fair and equal treatment is what Kemi Badenoch got yesterday. She displayed what's become the typical arrogance of the government that she's a part of by ignoring Parliament and announcing policy changes in the Telegraph, and was justly reprimanded...
|
|
|
|
Post by Fairsociety on May 12, 2023 13:40:16 GMT
I watch eggheads on tv, I've often noticed when the team is black and they are in the question box, when lefty Vine asks 'do you want to go first or second?' they never say please, it's either first or second no please, I think they feel it's a form of subservient saying please or thank you to White people, when really it's just good manners, nothing more nothing less.
|
|
|
|
Post by bancroft on May 12, 2023 14:18:30 GMT
Some folks do make me laugh Firstly, we have a society where black or Asian people cannot get decent jobs, or promotions, or decent housing. Then we progress into the 1960s and in order to address the prejudice which was widespread, we introduce The Race Relations Act. Things improve, but not enough, theres still widespread discrimination, virtually no black police officers, and we still only associate black people with hospital cleaners ( the female ones can be nurses ), bus drivers or tube workers. No one associates black people with been a judge, an MP, lawyer or a TV presenter. The 1970s arrive, the National Front, send them home, Britain is a "white country", but never the less things do improve with another Race Relations Bill. The 1980s, horrific and widespread discrimination by our police forces, particularly The Met, who still have very few black or Asian officers. discrimination in areas of employment, Thatchers policies, poor housing, poverty and police harassment erupts into riots. Several inquiries make it plain ... society has to change, and the Metropolitan Police are "Institutionally Racist". And people wonder why Positive Discrimination was ever introduced ? It was introduced to put many wrongs .. right, and once society has changed enough, and balance resembles society, then positive discrimination can be abandoned. I had three elderly relatives in the '90s that were either bullied or had crimes committed against them by people afro-caribbean background or black as we might say. They were all vulnerable and attacked. I saw a woman mugged in a banking hall in the '80s by another black person, I was too slow to get from the locked doors to a make a difference. My brother in the '90s rugby tackled an old white lady that had her bag snatched in the London market. A large builder sat on him until the police arrived. On a train in South London in the '00s heard a wailing looked up and saw tow large black males beating a small white boy for his phone, I intervened and they came for me though bottled it as we pulled into station as everyone got up. I had an uncle in the police who was in the police in the '80s dealing with London riots, he got named publicly for being in charge of a group that had killed a black person and was named in parliament by Labour. He went to court and won significant damages as it was not his van where the kid had died. This was police corruption to stop a rising star who might rumble the corrupt ones so they fed his name into politics. He felt his career ascent stopped after that. Now I also know a foreign chaffeur who used to work as a translator for CID before going into driving. He said it was good until one day his translation had been changed and he questioned it and was invited into the senior officers room who then threatened him with a baseball. He walked and never returned. The English working class struggle to get good jobs and so do the Blacks as most are seen as working class too. Muslims also can have the same problem. Indians and Asians generally get on better. With the latter groups they seem to have less of an attitude and just want to get on. Now in the police there is always a level of corruption as some go in to make money or some get corrupted on the job. They are not necessarily racists though will kill or arrange to have killed either blacks or whites, whoever gets in their way. Normally it involves the drugs business. I recall as a teen in the '80s about to go on a first European holiday and Mum asks shall we advise the police? Dad who grew up in Inner London says, 'Don't be stupid ours will be the first house to be burgled.' One bit of further advice my Dad said to me, 'was never give the police any lip most do a nasty and dirty job and the last thing they want to deal with is a smart Alec.' A work friend who later joined the police echoed this and said, 'if someone is mouthy I then look to see what else I can do him for like defective lights or low tread tyres.' |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on May 12, 2023 14:28:32 GMT
I see all the usual suspects out in force on this one, just itching to express their anti-black racism whilst pretending, probably even to themselves in some cases, that they are not racists.
Show this thread to any free- minded intelligent people, and the racist ones amongst you are all immediately apparent.
Whatever disrespect Badenoch showed, it is actually typical of many a senior Tory today regardless of colour, and not typical of her blackness, as some of you racist clowns are trying to purport.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on May 12, 2023 14:34:44 GMT
Some folks do make me laugh Firstly, we have a society where black or Asian people cannot get decent jobs, or promotions, or decent housing. Then we progress into the 1960s and in order to address the prejudice which was widespread, we introduce The Race Relations Act. Things improve, but not enough, theres still widespread discrimination, virtually no black police officers, and we still only associate black people with hospital cleaners ( the female ones can be nurses ), bus drivers or tube workers. No one associates black people with been a judge, an MP, lawyer or a TV presenter. The 1970s arrive, the National Front, send them home, Britain is a "white country", but never the less things do improve with another Race Relations Bill. The 1980s, horrific and widespread discrimination by our police forces, particularly The Met, who still have very few black or Asian officers. discrimination in areas of employment, Thatchers policies, poor housing, poverty and police harassment erupts into riots. Several inquiries make it plain ... society has to change, and the Metropolitan Police are "Institutionally Racist". And people wonder why Positive Discrimination was ever introduced ? It was introduced to put many wrongs .. right, and once society has changed enough, and balance resembles society, then positive discrimination can be abandoned.
What a load of old bollocks.
That is not the most intelligent or convincing refutation of a well argued post that I have ever seen. Not by a long way. But it is the typical response of someone who does not like the facts being presented but cannot take them apart with reason. Hence the utterly pointless response above which challenges no individual point being made whatsoever. Your response to this will probably involve simple name calling. |
|
|
|
Post by Fairsociety on May 12, 2023 14:35:36 GMT
I see all the usual suspects out in force on this one, just itching to express their anti-black racism whilst pretending, probably even to themselves in some cases, that they are not racists. Show this thread to any free- minded intelligent people, and the racist ones amongst you are all immediately apparent. Whatever disrespect Badenoch showed, it is actually typical of many a senior Tory today regardless of colour, and not typical of her blackness, as some of you racist clowns are trying to purport. Oh hush-up you white honky ... LOL  |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on May 12, 2023 14:40:01 GMT
I see all the usual suspects out in force on this one, just itching to express their anti-black racism whilst pretending, probably even to themselves in some cases, that they are not racists. Show this thread to any free- minded intelligent people, and the racist ones amongst you are all immediately apparent. Whatever disrespect Badenoch showed, it is actually typical of many a senior Tory today regardless of colour, and not typical of her blackness, as some of you racist clowns are trying to purport. Oh hush-up you white honky ... LOL Deploying racist labels against me does not make you look any less of a twat, by the way. lol |
|
|
|
Post by The Squeezed Middle on May 12, 2023 15:04:44 GMT
What a load of old bollocks.
That is not the most intelligent or convincing refutation of a well argued post that I have ever seen. Not by a long way. But it is the typical response of someone who does not like the facts being presented but cannot take them apart with reason. Hence the utterly pointless response above which challenges no individual point being made whatsoever. Your response to this will probably involve simple name calling. Nope. Sometimes the most intelligent refutation of a load of old bollocks is to simply call it out as such.
And that dreary repetition of leftist tropes trotted out by Sidfiddler was more than deserving of such.
|
|
|
|
Post by The Squeezed Middle on May 12, 2023 15:06:26 GMT
Anyway, I rather like Kemi Badenoch.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on May 12, 2023 15:14:30 GMT
That is not the most intelligent or convincing refutation of a well argued post that I have ever seen. Not by a long way. But it is the typical response of someone who does not like the facts being presented but cannot take them apart with reason. Hence the utterly pointless response above which challenges no individual point being made whatsoever. Your response to this will probably involve simple name calling. Nope. Sometimes the most intelligent refutation of a load of old bollocks is to simply call it out as such.
And that dreary repetition of leftist tropes trotted out by Sidfiddler was more than deserving of such.
Nah, the intelligent thing to do with a load of bollocks is to take it apart with reasoned argument, which should be extremely easy to do if it is indeed a load of bollocks. The fact that you seem disinclined even to try suggests that you cannot. Which in turn suggests one of two things. Either A, you are so intellectually challenged that you are incapable of ripping apart a load of bollocks with reason and logic. Or B, that you cannot take it apart because it is not actually a load of bollocks at all, merely facts you don't like. Since I do not believe that you lack intelligence, option B seems most likely to me. |
|
|
|
Post by om15 on May 12, 2023 15:14:49 GMT
It must be said that the ladies of the right in the Conservative Party do exclude more allure than the unkempt dowdy overweight foul mouthed drabs in the Labour Party.
That could be worth a vote alone.
|
|
