Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on May 13, 2023 14:43:53 GMT
It's only you who is hyping up foreign business projects and foreign tax havens, whilst relying on their figures.
|
|
|
|
Post by thomas on May 13, 2023 14:54:13 GMT
It's only you who is hyping up foreign business projects and foreign tax havens, whilst relying on their figures. so everyone is wrong except you , and you are of course correct , but cant prove it so we just have to rely on your postings on these forums and take your word for things. 
I hang on your every word as ever b4.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on May 13, 2023 15:03:44 GMT
The sky is blue today.
|
|
|
|
Post by thomas on May 13, 2023 15:05:53 GMT
see my replies on this and other threads. Do you have anything worthwhile to post and debate instead of making puerile empty head claims about things you blatantly dont understand? |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on May 13, 2023 15:06:56 GMT
The irony.
|
|
|
|
Post by thomas on May 13, 2023 15:30:19 GMT
Not true, up to 70% of electrical supply in Scotland comes from nuclear energy. The windmills that blight your country side and coastline are inefficient, costly and very expensive to dispose of when broken beyond repair. Nuclear is the way forward, but the green lot must have shares in the windmill factories, no other reason to push for their development. om mate are you there? Im not sure where you got your figures from , but if its from the torygraph i would chuck it in the bin mate.
|
|
|
|
Post by thomas on May 13, 2023 15:31:06 GMT
Anyway some good news back on tuition .
|
|
|
|
Post by om15 on May 13, 2023 16:01:11 GMT
I did post my link on here somewhere, it was the COP in Glasgow that triggered the debate, the electrical authority in Scotland rather dryly stated that during COP the nuclear industry supplied 70% of the power for that day, it is on here somewhere.
One hundred million pounds is not a great deal in these sort of circumstances, would barely buy a few mobile homes, the reason that people stopped building windmills two hundred years ago is that they are expensive, kill birds, make a noise, look unsightly and don't work if the wind isn't blowing, they are also eyewatering expensive to scrap when they become life expired.
|
|
|
|
Post by thomas on May 13, 2023 16:33:45 GMT
I did post my link on here somewhere, it was the COP in Glasgow that triggered the debate, the electrical authority in Scotland rather dryly stated that during COP the nuclear industry supplied 70% of the power for that day, it is on here somewhere. One hundred million pounds is not a great deal in these sort of circumstances, would barely buy a few mobile homes, the reason that people stopped building windmills two hundred years ago is that they are expensive, kill birds, make a noise, look unsightly and don't work if the wind isn't blowing, they are also eyewatering expensive to scrap when they become life expired. hate to call you out here om , but honestly ive never heard that in my life that nuclear supplies 70% of scottish electricity.
its not , but you have to remember energy is not a devolved matter , and the majority of the money generated from scotlands energy resources flows down to your country. Holyrood has control of planning permission for example of where wind farms can be built , but the uk treasurey takes all taxation from energy. Only local taxation such as council tax and business rates are devolved to local scottish councils hence the small amount of money that comes from non domestic rates on windfarms , and why we need independence to take the lot .
Now there’s also onshore renewable energy, but also especially offshore. Recent answers from the UK Government disclose the abundance of energy that Scotland produces and that’s only going to grow exponentially in scale and in value. That an energy-rich Scotland sees so many Scots in fuel poverty is not only perverse but the price of the Union.
Scotland’s domestic electricity supply is largely provided by renewables, often amounting to 100 per cent in the north and, in 2020, Scotland produced the equivalent of 97 per cent of its electricity consumption from renewables. That’s even before the huge capacity of offshore really begins to grow and come ashore.
The cables being created between Peterhead and Torness to northern England will transmit four TWh in their first year. Berwick Bank in the Firth of Forth will alone produce 4.1 gigawatts (4,100,000 kW) with 40 per cent cabled directly south to Northumberland.
A recent answer from the UK Energy Department disclosed that 35 TWh was expected to have been sent south in 2021 and that is anticipated to increase to 124 TWh in 2030. That 35 TWh is enough to supply electricity to all of Scotland’s 2.5 million homes three and a half times over, yet our folk have been huddling for warmth, unable to heat their homes. And 124 TWh (or 124 billion kilowatt-hours) would do it more than 12 times over.
It’s not just that so many Scots are going without when in a land of such plenty, there’s the value that might well come to dwarf the income from our oil and gas. It’s huge, worth billions and that will only increase as renewables take over from fossil fuels, but we’re missing out. We’re a playground to enjoy and a resource to exploit. Our energy resource provides 124 billion reasons for independence
|
|
|
|
Post by colbops on May 13, 2023 22:28:21 GMT
I did post my link on here somewhere, it was the COP in Glasgow that triggered the debate, the electrical authority in Scotland rather dryly stated that during COP the nuclear industry supplied 70% of the power for that day, it is on here somewhere. One hundred million pounds is not a great deal in these sort of circumstances, would barely buy a few mobile homes, the reason that people stopped building windmills two hundred years ago is that they are expensive, kill birds, make a noise, look unsightly and don't work if the wind isn't blowing, they are also eyewatering expensive to scrap when they become life expired. hate to call you out here om , but honestly ive never heard that in my life that nuclear supplies 70% of scottish electricity.
its not , but you have to remember energy is not a devolved matter , and the majority of the money generated from scotlands energy resources flows down to your country. Holyrood has control of planning permission for example of where wind farms can be built , but the uk treasurey takes all taxation from energy. Only local taxation such as council tax and business rates are devolved to local scottish councils hence the small amount of money that comes from non domestic rates on windfarms , and why we need independence to take the lot .
Now there’s also onshore renewable energy, but also especially offshore. Recent answers from the UK Government disclose the abundance of energy that Scotland produces and that’s only going to grow exponentially in scale and in value. That an energy-rich Scotland sees so many Scots in fuel poverty is not only perverse but the price of the Union.
Scotland’s domestic electricity supply is largely provided by renewables, often amounting to 100 per cent in the north and, in 2020, Scotland produced the equivalent of 97 per cent of its electricity consumption from renewables. That’s even before the huge capacity of offshore really begins to grow and come ashore.
The cables being created between Peterhead and Torness to northern England will transmit four TWh in their first year. Berwick Bank in the Firth of Forth will alone produce 4.1 gigawatts (4,100,000 kW) with 40 per cent cabled directly south to Northumberland.
A recent answer from the UK Energy Department disclosed that 35 TWh was expected to have been sent south in 2021 and that is anticipated to increase to 124 TWh in 2030. That 35 TWh is enough to supply electricity to all of Scotland’s 2.5 million homes three and a half times over, yet our folk have been huddling for warmth, unable to heat their homes. And 124 TWh (or 124 billion kilowatt-hours) would do it more than 12 times over.
It’s not just that so many Scots are going without when in a land of such plenty, there’s the value that might well come to dwarf the income from our oil and gas. It’s huge, worth billions and that will only increase as renewables take over from fossil fuels, but we’re missing out. We’re a playground to enjoy and a resource to exploit. Our energy resource provides 124 billion reasons for independence
OK, so who is paying for all this infrastructure, say for example, Berwick Bank? |
|
|
|
Post by thomas on May 14, 2023 9:46:23 GMT
hate to call you out here om , but honestly ive never heard that in my life that nuclear supplies 70% of scottish electricity.
its not , but you have to remember energy is not a devolved matter , and the majority of the money generated from scotlands energy resources flows down to your country. Holyrood has control of planning permission for example of where wind farms can be built , but the uk treasurey takes all taxation from energy. Only local taxation such as council tax and business rates are devolved to local scottish councils hence the small amount of money that comes from non domestic rates on windfarms , and why we need independence to take the lot .
Now there’s also onshore renewable energy, but also especially offshore. Recent answers from the UK Government disclose the abundance of energy that Scotland produces and that’s only going to grow exponentially in scale and in value. That an energy-rich Scotland sees so many Scots in fuel poverty is not only perverse but the price of the Union.
Scotland’s domestic electricity supply is largely provided by renewables, often amounting to 100 per cent in the north and, in 2020, Scotland produced the equivalent of 97 per cent of its electricity consumption from renewables. That’s even before the huge capacity of offshore really begins to grow and come ashore.
The cables being created between Peterhead and Torness to northern England will transmit four TWh in their first year. Berwick Bank in the Firth of Forth will alone produce 4.1 gigawatts (4,100,000 kW) with 40 per cent cabled directly south to Northumberland.
A recent answer from the UK Energy Department disclosed that 35 TWh was expected to have been sent south in 2021 and that is anticipated to increase to 124 TWh in 2030. That 35 TWh is enough to supply electricity to all of Scotland’s 2.5 million homes three and a half times over, yet our folk have been huddling for warmth, unable to heat their homes. And 124 TWh (or 124 billion kilowatt-hours) would do it more than 12 times over.
It’s not just that so many Scots are going without when in a land of such plenty, there’s the value that might well come to dwarf the income from our oil and gas. It’s huge, worth billions and that will only increase as renewables take over from fossil fuels, but we’re missing out. We’re a playground to enjoy and a resource to exploit. Our energy resource provides 124 billion reasons for independence
OK, so who is paying for all this infrastructure, say for example, Berwick Bank? Mostly our own scottish money pays for all the infrastucture colly , but our friends in europe have also helped.
We even contribute to much of the infrastructure in your country.....like london crossrail , hs2 , london sewage system , westmisnter debt , windsor castle repair.
|
|
|
|
Post by thomas on May 14, 2023 9:49:37 GMT
www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-scotland-65543954Sir Peter Mathieson, principal and vice-chancellor of the University of Edinburgh, says government funding is "inadequate". Introduce means testing and fees for the well off. And get rid of the SNP. hey vinny. i see on twitter the english papers are complaining about how the poorest pay the most under englands unfair tuition fee system. Now while it goes without saying those earning the least will pay the loans back the longest and pay the most , i think you should get your own house in order before criticising other countries.
The whole system is one fucking mess in your country.
|
|
|
|
Post by sheepy on May 14, 2023 10:14:18 GMT
The Scots don't know it yet, but they are being lined up to end free University fees, which they think by expanding them will be a poke in the eye. It will just make them an even worse burden.
|
|
|
|
Post by thomas on May 14, 2023 10:29:46 GMT
The Scots don't know it yet, but they are being lined up to end free University fees, which they think by expanding them will be a poke in the eye. It will just make them an even worse burden. i agree sheepwash. Vinny waffles on about the poor and means testing , but in effect doesnt give a shit about the poor , only that there is no division in policy in his beloved union.
If starmer wins in scotland , i have already said much to the denial of certain labour supporters like see 2 that he will force tuition fees on scotland. Somtimes , certain folk need the pain of a labour government to come to their senses.
|
|
|
|
Post by sheepy on May 14, 2023 10:35:22 GMT
The Scots don't know it yet, but they are being lined up to end free University fees, which they think by expanding them will be a poke in the eye. It will just make them an even worse burden. i agree sheepwash. Vinny waffles on about the poor and means testing , but in effect doesnt give a shit about the poor , only that there is no division in policy in his beloved union.
If starmer wins in scotland , i have already said much to the denial of certain labour supporters like see 2 that he will force tuition fees on scotland. Somtimes , certain folk need the pain of a labour government to come to their senses.
I was just listening and watching his new labour followers of fashion digging that hole deeper and deeper. If nobody sets about breaking the spell, it will just carry on. |
|
